Original HRC document

PDF

Document Type: Final Report

Date: 2014 Dec

Session: 28th Regular Session (2015 Mar)

Agenda Item: Item6: Universal Periodic Review

GE.14-23930 (E)



Human Rights Council Twenty-eighth session

Agenda item 6

Universal periodic review

Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review*

Slovenia

*

The annex to the present report is circulated as received.

Contents

Paragraphs Page

Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1–4 3

I. Summary of the proceedings of the review process ................................................ 5–114 3

A. Presentation by the State under review ........................................................... 5–17 3

B. Interactive dialogue and responses by the State under review ........................ 18–114 5

II. Conclusions and/or recommendations ..................................................................... 115–116 13

Annex

Composition of the delegation ......................................................................................................... 23

Introduction

1. The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, established in accordance

with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1 of 18 June 2007, held its twentieth session from

27 October to 7 November 2014. The review of Slovenia was held at the 13th meeting on 4

November 2014. The delegation of Slovenia was headed by Goran Klemenčič, Minister of

Justice. At its 17th meeting, held on 6 November 2014, the Working Group adopted the

report on Slovenia.

2. On 15 January 2014, the Human Rights Council selected the following group of

rapporteurs (troika) to facilitate the review of Slovenia: Botswana, Italy and Viet Nam.

3. In accordance with paragraph 15 of the annex to resolution 5/1 and paragraph 5 of

the annex to resolution 16/21, the following documents were issued for the review of

Slovenia:

(a) A national report submitted/written presentation made in accordance with

paragraph 15 (a) (A/HRC/WG.6/20/SVN/1);

(b) A compilation prepared by the Office of the United Nations High

Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in accordance with paragraph 15 (b)

(A/HRC/WG.6/20/SVN/2);

(c) A summary prepared by OHCHR in accordance with paragraph 15 (c)

(A/HRC/WG.6/20/SVN/3).

4. A list of questions prepared in advance by Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany,

Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and

Northern Ireland was transmitted to Slovenia through the troika. Those questions are

available on the extranet of the universal periodic review.

I. Summary of the proceedings of the review process

A. Presentation by the State under review

5. The delegation of Slovenia reiterated that human rights were among the key

principles upon which the Republic of Slovenia was built. It reported that since the

submission of its national report, the participation of women in the national assembly and in

the Government had increased. Since mid-October an important new draft of a law on

same-sex civil partnerships was under public discussion.

6. The delegation stated that the Government had substantially reduced the backlog in

reporting to the human rights treaty bodies and added that in July 2014, Slovenia had

submitted its third report under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

(ICCPR) and its initial report under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with

Disabilities (CRPD). It had also just submitted an updated common core document.

7. Some areas where Slovenia has achieved significant progress since 2010 were

highlighted. The delegation underscored the measures taken to resolve the status of persons

erased from the register of permanent residents. A law regulating their status was passed in

2010 and gave the erased the possibility to regulate their status and obtain permanent

residence permits from the erasure onwards. A special compensation scheme took effect in

June 2014, according to which a beneficiary can claim compensation.

8. Slovenia stated it had further reduced court backlogs to the point where they could

no longer be considered a systemic problem.

9. Touching upon austerity measures, the delegation assured they were carefully re-

examined with a view to minimizing the impact on the most vulnerable. Social transfers

played a very important role in poverty reduction in Slovenia.

10. The delegation addressed questions received in advance of the interactive dialogue,

first providing additional information regarding questions received from the Czech

Republic, Mexico, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and

Northern Ireland on the erased and presenting the concrete measures in the Compensation

Act.

11. On the questions received in advance from Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands,

Norway and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland about the Roma,

the delegation referred to the improvement in the housing conditions of the Roma, which is

a priority of the National Programme of Measures for Roma for the period 2010–2015 and

with progress reached in many Roma settlements during recent years.

12. On trafficking in human beings, in response to inquiries by the Czech Republic,

Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern

Ireland, the delegation reiterated the importance it attaches to the issue. The delegation

asserted that the National Coordinator reports annually to the Government and the National

Assembly on preventive measures and assistance to all victims of trafficking.

13. In answering Belgium on discrimination against the children of same-sex couples in

schools, based on their family’s sexual orientation, the delegation, in presenting relevant

awareness-raising activities, highlighted a book “My name is Damjan” on lesbian, gay,

bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) persons that all secondary school students were

receiving during the current school year. In responses to the question of Spain, it explained

that the Slovenian Ministry of Health and the blood transfusion service were currently

considering their existing practices, with a view to adapting it to both medical requirements

for ensuring a high level of protection for recipients of blood and the principle of non-

discrimination.

14. In addressing a question from Mexico, the delegation reiterated that in Slovenia,

gender equality is a right, a goal and a horizontal principle permeating all spheres of life of

both women and men during all periods of life. Slovenia further specified the position of

women in the labour market, whereby the wage gap is among the lowest in Europe, i.e.

approximately 2.5 per cent in 2012. He also presented an important awareness-raising

project in regard to combating violence against women: “VESNA — to live a life free of

violence.”

15. The delegation addressed questions by Norway about overcrowding in Slovene

prisons, explaining that overcrowding was only an issue in one prison during a short time

period and was being remedied by various measures. Regarding the ruling of the European

Court on Human Rights foreign currency deposits in Ljubljanska Banka, the Government

had appointed a working group for its implementation and was preparing an action plan,

which will be presented to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe by mid-

January 2015.

16. The delegation also emphasized that discussions on the strengthening of the Human

Rights Ombudsperson are currently ongoing, in order to qualify for Group A accreditation

status by the International Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the

Promotion and Protection of Human Rights.

17. The delegation addressed questions by Belgium, explaining that interministerial

coordination procedures were under way regarding ratification of the Optional Protocol to

the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Optional

Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) on a communications

procedure and that ratification of the International Convention for the Protection of All

Persons from Enforced Disappearance (ICPPED) was under discussion in Slovenia, as was

also the ratification of the amendment to article 8 of the International Convention on the

Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD).

B. Interactive dialogue and responses by the State under review

18. During the interactive dialogue, 72 delegations made statements. Recommendations

made during the dialogue are to be found in section II of the present report.

19. The Islamic Republic of Iran welcomed the signature and ratification of international

instruments and changes to health-care legislation, including the Health Services Act. It

reiterated concerns expressed by OHCHR regarding violence against women and children,

domestic violence and violence against Roma.

20. Iraq commended actions to implement the recommendations accepted during the

first cycle of the universal periodic review. It also welcomed measures regarding domestic

violence, trafficking in persons and the protection of children. It noted guarantees of equal

treatment for all and protection from discrimination.

21. Ireland welcomed the standing invitation to special procedures and progress

regarding “erased” persons, reiterating concerns on implementation in that regard. It noted

slow progress regarding A status accreditation for the Human Rights Ombudsman, despite

acceptance of the relevant recommendations.

22. Israel welcomed measures regarding social protection, children and youth and

trafficking in persons. It expressed concern regarding discrimination towards citizens and

migrants, noting the failure to implement recommendations regarding discrimination

against Roma accepted during the first cycle of the universal periodic review.

23. Italy welcomed measures to combat violence against women, asking for

implementation details and any best practices regarding the national programme on

prevention of family violence, and whether a new programme was being considered. It

noted efforts regarding Roma rights and minority languages.

24. Kuwait welcomed the efforts regarding women’s and children’s rights, education,

integrity and corruption, and the reduction in the court backlog. It called for more women in

high-level political positions and implementation of the Special Rapporteur’s

recommendations on water and sanitation, noting cooperation.

25. Malaysia appreciated the measures to implement the recommendations accepted

during the first cycle of the universal periodic review, particularly progress on facilitating

places of worship for minority groups, on which it urged further action. It called for policies

and programmes to reduce prejudice towards minority groups.

26. Montenegro noted the implementation of previously accepted recommendations,

welcoming amendments to the criminal code. It asked how the Employment Relationship

Act had affected women’s participation in public and private labour markets and requested

information on the national programme of measures for Roma, noting progress.

27. Morocco noted the information on the implementation of previously accepted

recommendations and measures to strengthen the institutional framework, notably through

the Human Rights Ombudsman. It welcomed amendments to the criminal code and

measures to incorporate human rights education into school programmes and training

modules.

28. The Netherlands welcomed progress regarding the efficiency of the legal system and

the backlog of cases. It commended the efforts on gender equality and violence against

women, stressing the importance of protecting women and girls and improving the

treatment of minorities.

29. New Zealand welcomed the opportunity to discuss human rights issues of shared

concern and recognized the challenges faced. It offered to share its own experiences in

dealing with the issue of domestic violence with Slovenia.

30. Nicaragua highlighted Slovenia’s progress in combating trafficking in persons, in

line with the recommendations made during the first cycle. It also welcomed the progress

made in terms of gender equality and the empowerment and increased participation of

women in decision-making.

31. Nigeria applauded the progress made regarding children’s rights and urged

incorporation of the views of children into relevant decision-making processes. It

acknowledged the compulsory health insurance scheme and encouraged the introduction of

better provisions for retired persons and ill persons.

32. Norway regretted the reduced inclusivity of the universal periodic review process,

noting interruptions in the work of the relevant interdepartmental committee. It noted the

previous recommendations regarding Roma that had been accepted, welcoming cooperation

in that regard. It welcomed measures regarding human trafficking and children’s rights.

33. Pakistan called for further efforts to address discrimination against religious and

ethnic minorities, particularly regarding health, education and the prevention of torture by

law enforcement agencies. It echoed concerns raised by the Committee on the Elimination

of Racial Discrimination over inadequate prosecution of racially motivated offences.

34. The Philippines welcomed Slovenia’s efforts to fight trafficking in persons and

protect the rights of migrants. It stressed that adequate resources are needed for the

implementation of programmes on family violence, children and youth, persons with

disabilities and against discrimination.

35. Poland welcomed efforts by Slovenia to comply with the recommendations accepted

during the first cycle of the universal periodic review. However, it expressed concern

regarding the juvenile justice system and the situation of children from minority groups.

36. Portugal welcomed efforts to enhance the role of women in society and the labour

market and the plan to implement Security Council resolution 1325 (2000), which

represented progress towards ending violence against women and girls. It commended the

efforts to combat discrimination.

37. The Republic of Moldova inquired about the effects of applying the upgraded police

restraining orders. It noted with appreciation the steps taken by Slovenia to prevent and

combat trafficking in persons.

38. The Russian Federation noted Slovenia’s efforts to protect human rights. It noted,

however, that the situation of Roma remained problematic and the special legal status and

rights granted to the Roma community had not been implemented in practice.

39. Saudi Arabia noted institutional changes and the adoption of laws and policies to

protect and promote human rights. It also noted the programmes that had been implemented

to address needs of persons in poverty and the rights of children.

40. Senegal noted with satisfaction the progress made in the area of social protection,

protection of children, the fight against discrimination and domestic violence, as well as

housing and health care for migrants and asylum seekers.

41. Serbia encouraged Slovenia to continue its efforts in implementing the

recommendations from the first review and to have an inclusive interpretation of the Act on

the Legal Status of Citizens of Former Yugoslavia Living in Slovenia.

42. Sierra Leone commended Slovenia for setting up robust legal and institutional

frameworks to address human rights, ensure social rights and reduce poverty, despite the

economic situation. It encouraged Slovenia to bring the Office of the Ombudsman into line

with the Paris Principles.

43. Slovakia commended Slovenia for ratifying several international human rights

instruments and for its efforts to improve the integration of Roma and combat

discrimination against Roma. It encouraged Slovenia to continue modernizing Roma

settlements and ensuring funding for Roma teaching assistants.

44. Spain welcomed Slovenia’s institutional structure to combat discrimination, but

stressed the need for enhanced coordination within it. It lauded Slovenia’s progress in the

protection of persons with disabilities, but expressed concerns regarding the rights of Roma

and homosexual couples.

45. Sri Lanka commended the efforts to enhance the legal and institutional framework

and to promote the rights of women, children and Roma. It encouraged Slovenia to

safeguard the rights of the most vulnerable groups through social assistance.

46. Sweden welcomed Slovenia’s commitment to combating violence and

discrimination on all grounds, including sexual orientation and gender identity. However, it

noted the concern expressed by the Committee on the Rights of the Child about

discrimination against the children of same-sex couples.

47. Thailand noted with appreciation the inclusive compulsory health insurance scheme.

However, it noted reports of an increasing number of persons without adequate health

insurance and asked for more information about existing gaps. It also noted the challenges

faced by minorities.

48. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia welcomed the ratification of

international human rights instruments and the progress made since the first cycle of the

universal periodic review regarding “erased” persons and the consultative body for the

situation of persons from former Yugoslav republics. It requested information on

monitoring and corrective measures concerning discrimination against Roma.

49. Tunisia noted the ratification of regional and international instruments, the amended

constitution and criminal code and the efforts made against human trafficking and racial

discrimination. It encouraged Slovenia to reform the Human Rights Ombudsman to comply

with the Paris Principles.

50. Turkey asked for more information on the resolution on the national social

assistance programme 2013–2020 and the national reform programmes. It observed

Slovenia’s determination to resolve the issue of “erased persons”.

51. Ukraine recognized Slovenia’s commitment to human rights and its efforts to

improve the institutional and legislative framework, including the ratification of

international instruments. It noted the steps taken to protect persons with a disability,and

encouraged Slovenia to continue related programmes and to allocate resources for their

implementation.

52. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland noted the steps taken to

resolve the status of “erased” persons. It encouraged Slovenia to make further efforts for the

restoration of their rights and to close legal gaps in that regard. It also encouraged measures

to eliminate discrimination against Roma.

53. Regarding the rights of the Roma population, the delegation of Slovenia recalled that

Roma had special protection under the constitution and through the 2007 Roma Community

Act. A national programme of measures for Roma for the period 2015–2020 was being

developed to follow up on the existing one and would focus on living conditions,

employment, social inclusion, health, culture and languages.

54. Recognizing the ongoing challenge of human rights and social inclusion, the

delegation noted a significant improvement, owing to government efforts and those of the

international community and non-governmental organizations. Dialogue between the

Government and communities had improved. Targeted programmes included community

policing and training for police officers, and the first female Roma police officer had

entered the police force.

55. School classes were not segregated; Roma children were part of the mainstream

education system. However, under the strategy for the education of Roma, Roma teaching

assistants were employed to improve achievements and attendance at school, and provided

a bridge between the school and national authorities and the Roma community.

56. The delegation asserted that few Roma settlements did not have access to water,

following the enforcement of legislation requiring every settlement with more than 50

permanent residents to have a public water supply. Remaining problems were being

resolved, following recommendations by the Special Rapporteur on the human right to safe

drinking water and sanitation. Slovenia was considering elevating the right to water to the

constitutional level.

57. Slovenia drew attention to the role of the Government Council for Issues concerning

the National Communities of Members of Nations of the Former SFRY in Slovenia as a

consultative body.

58. Recalling that 25,000 people had been “erased” from the register of permanent

residents, Slovenia noted that their change in status had not affected their citizenship, but

had had an impact on their enjoyment of the rights accorded only to residents. Thirteen

thousand persons had had their status restored, while others had returned to their own

nations. The Act Regulating the Legal Status of Citizens of Former Yugoslavia Living in

Slovenia covered all “erased” groups and their children, including those living abroad, and

the Act on Compensations for Persons Erased from the Register of Permanent Residents

applied to all persons, irrespective of the success of their residence claim. The delegation

recognized that the system still faced challenges, with large numbers of cases and the

legislation being challenged before the Constitutional Court. However, prejudice against

“erased” persons had reduced dramatically.

59. The delegation emphasized that in Slovenia, hate speech, promoting intolerance and

xenophobia were crimes and resulted in prosecution; however, Slovenia did not experience

a lot of hate speech against minorities or religious intolerance.

60. Returning to the promotion of gender equality, the delegation reiterated that the

situation had improved significantly in the media, politics and the public sector, where 70

per cent of judges were women, but noted ongoing challenges in the corporate sector,

where only 5 per cent of chief executives were women.

61. Legislation and programmes had been adopted, in conjunction with the police and

social services, to combat gender-based and domestic violence and to raise awareness of

that issue.

62. Italian and Hungarian minorities had special constitutional status; they were

allocated two seats in the parliament and at least four public prosecutors were required to

have good knowledge of either the Italian or Hungarian languages. Funding was also

allocated to minority languages within the education system and the media.

63. Children’s rights were enshrined in the constitution and various acts, and were

protected within the education system and a special department had also been established

under the Human Rights Ombudsman. In criminal proceedings, the law provided for free

and impartial legal assistance for children who were witnesses or victims of crime and

perpetrators of crime over the age of 16 were prosecuted under a juvenile justice system, in

line with international standards.

64. Regrettably, some children had experienced poverty as a result of the recent

economic crisis. Social transfers, school grants, free school lunches, subsidies, free access

to health care for children and adolescents were ways in which Slovenia had sought to

mitigate the impact of the crisis on children. The 2015 budget would take into account the

need for ongoing provision of social assistance.

65. Regarding the rights of the elderly, the delegation explained that a special office

would be established under the new coalition agreement and that it was recognized that

elderly persons were a vulnerable group. Despite the financial crisis, pensions had not

decreased and there was a highly developed network of public and private care homes.

66. Responding to queries on trafficking in persons, Slovenia confirmed that it

implemented a human rights-based approach and that all relevant conventions had been

ratified. Awareness and training programmes had been introduced, in cooperation with the

National Coordinator for the Fight against Trafficking in Persons, the Prosecutor’s Office

and non-governmental organizations, as well as safe houses. However, the National

Coordinator’s Office required strengthening and more funding.

67. Slovenia acknowledged a past violation of article 3 of the European Convention on

Human Rights. However, it asserted that it had made dramatic changes, notably in

establishing an independent department in the Prosecutor’s Office to examine alleged

human rights violations by the security forces. Police legislation and complaints procedures

had been updated and international monitoring bodies now considered the police to be

responsive regarding the protection of human rights.

68. A new draft law regarding same-sex civil partnerships was under public discussion.

Previous efforts in that regard had failed, but under the coalition Government agreement the

issue had been reviewed and the new law would hopefully be adopted in 2015.

69. The delegation stated that it would strive to make progress in ratifying outstanding

conventions.

70. The United States of America urged acceleration of the efforts to compensate

“erased” persons. It expressed concern regarding ongoing discrimination and harassment of

the Roma, limited access to justice and unclear sanctions for employers interfering with

trade unions.

71. Uruguay noted the strategy for the inclusion of Roma for the period 2015–2020 and

encouraged Slovenia to redouble its efforts regarding persons pertaining to minorities,

considering their particular vulnerability and difficulty in accessing basic rights.

72. Uzbekistan commended the strengthened regulatory and institutional human rights

mechanisms and improvements to the health and education systems. It referred to concerns

expressed regarding the marginalization of Roma, prison overcrowding, gender-based

violence and the trafficking of women and girls for sexual exploitation.

73. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela welcomed Slovenia’s efforts to combat

domestic violence and protect migrants. It expressed concerns regarding the corporal

punishment of children, trafficking in persons, ill-treatment during detention, the persistent

case backlog and discrimination against Roma and “erased” persons.

74. Viet Nam welcomed the implementation of recommendations accepted during the

first cycle of the universal periodic review and encouraged further efforts towards the full

enjoyment of human rights. It took note of measures to improve the normative and

institutional framework.

75. Afghanistan commended the efforts undertaken since the first cycle of the universal

periodic review, including the ratification of international instruments. It noted steps to

ensure gender equality and prevent gender-based discrimination, particularly in the labour

market, and the criminalization of trafficking in persons.

76. Algeria welcomed the strengthened legal framework to combat the sexual

exploitation of children and measures against hate speech and intolerance. Despite

economic difficulties, legislation had been amended to ensure financial support for minority

groups. It noted the ratification of regional instruments.

77. Angola welcomed the particular attention given to the promotion of the rights of

persons with disabilities. While recognizing positive reforms of the law on minorities,

Angola remained concerned by certain acts of intolerance against them.

78. Argentina welcomed advances regarding persons with disabilities, such as the Law

on Equal Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities and the action programme for persons

with disabilities 2014–2021.

79. Armenia commended legislative and administrative initiatives, including towards

gender equality, the right to health, combating discrimination and trafficking in persons. It

noted Slovenia’s commitment to human rights education, which was included in the

national school system and in training programmes.

80. Australia noted progress regarding the issue of “erased persons”, but remained

concerned that “erased” citizens and the Roma population continued to face discrimination

and violations of their rights. It welcomed the establishment of equality bodies.

81. Austria welcomed the national programme of measures for Roma people, aimed at

combating discrimination, and the study on the ethnic vitality of areas inhabited by small

minority ethnic groups and autochthonous peoples, aimed at identifying cultural needs,

including those of German-speaking communities.

82. Azerbaijan noted institutional and legal reforms and steps towards establishing a

national human rights institution. It expressed concern regarding reports of discrimination,

particularly against Roma, ongoing trafficking in persons and the sexual exploitation of

children.

83. Bahrain commended the progress made since the first cycle of the universal periodic

review. It noted measures to guarantee the rights of minorities, but remained concerned

about persistent discrimination against ethnic minorities. Bahrain urged measures to ensure

their social integration.

84. Belgium welcomed political measures on social protection, children, protection

against domestic violence, trafficking in persons and Roma. However, it noted that progress

could still be made in fighting against discrimination.

85. Benin welcomed the ratification of the the European Council Convention on the

Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse and the adoption of a

national programme of measures for Roma for the period 2010–2015.

86. Bosnia and Herzegovina commended the mid-term universal periodic review report,

the amended criminal code and the improved rights of migrant workers. It asked about

plans to implement European Court of Human Rights rulings regarding “erased” persons

and plans to expand the list of constitutionally-recognized minorities.

87. Brazil noted the progress in children’s rights and efforts to promote gender equality

and the empowerment of women. It welcomed the national programme of measures for

Roma. It expressed concern regarding the rights of “erased” persons, encouraging efforts to

provide compensation.

88. Bulgaria acknowledged the ratification of a number of international treaties since the

first review and asked for further information about the current state of the ratification

process. It also assessed as positive developments in addressing discrimination against

certain groups.

89. Chile highlighted the implementation of public policies and the evolution of the

normative and institutional frameworks reflected in the adoption of laws, such as the

modification of the penal code and the Law on Migration, as well as the ratification of

several international instruments.

90. China noted with satisfaction awareness-raising measures to combat discrimination,

hate speech and intolerance. Slovenia promoted gender equality, enacted laws to guarantee

the rights for persons with disabilities and took measures to improve the rights of the Roma

and other minorities.

91. Costa Rica encouraged the ratification of ICPPED and highlighted efforts to achieve

an increase in the percentage of women in posts involving political accountability, in order

to promote the empowerment of women.

92. Côte d’Ivoire noted with satisfaction the reforms in the education system to make it

inclusive, policies to protect the environment to ensure a healthy living environment and

measures to protect vulnerable people.

93. Croatia commended the implementation of recommendations from the first UPR,

especially those related to the strengthening of the legislative framework; and efforts

regarding the most vulnerable social groups. It asked about the intention to re-establish the

former Office for Equal Opportunities.

94. Cuba expressed concern about the effects of the economic crisis on the economic

and social rights of the population and stated that unemployment, the decrease in the

income of the population and the increase in the number of persons at risk of poverty must

be specially attended to.

95. The Czech Republic welcomed the measures taken regarding “erased persons” and

trafficking in human beings. However, it emphasized that, according to the report of the

Council of Europe expert group on human trafficking, additional improvements remain to

be made.

96. Ecuador welcomed the efforts to comply with recommendations from the 2009

universal periodic review and the ratification of International Labour Organization (ILO)

conventions Nos. 144, 151, 155, 171, 183 and 187.

97. Egypt commended the commitment to the human rights of women and children

since the last review; the amendment of the criminal code; the adoption of the National Plan

on Youth; and the strengthening of anti-corruption measures. It encouraged Slovenia to

address the issues reported by the United Nations human rights mechanisms.

98. Estonia noted the progress in almost all human rights areas and the implementation

of most of the recommendations. It commended the measures regarding: trafficking in

human beings; gender equality and discrimination against women; violence against women

and domestic violence; and the most vulnerable groups.

99. France welcomed the delegation of Slovenia and made two recommendations.

100. Greece noted several changes in the normative and institutional framework in the

protection and promotion of human rights. It asked Slovenia for an evaluation of the

performance of the new office responsible for the dialogue with civil society and for

coordination of citizens’ initiatives.

101. Guatemala welcomed projects for the promotion and protection of human rights,

such as the “Achieve equality within diversity” project, which included awareness-raising

of the campaign entitled “Equal in diversity – getting there”.

102. Hungary believed that the situation of the autochthonous Hungarian community

could be improved in the fields of political participation, education and the use of the

national language. It also noted that many children were still stateless because their parents

were part of the so-called “erased” group.

103. India welcomed the national programme of measures for Roma people and the Legal

Status Act 2010. However, it remained concerned at the discrimination faced by Roma and

the so-called “erased people”. India welcomed the amendments to the criminal code

expanding the definition of human trafficking.

104. Indonesia welcomed the steps taken to combat trafficking in persons. While

appreciating the initiatives carried out to fight discrimination, Indonesia encouraged

Slovenia to continue to step up its efforts in that regard.

105. Peru welcomed Slovenia’s measures to combat trafficking in persons, the approval

of a plan of action on persons with disabilities and the ratification of the European

conventions on violence against women and on the protection of children against sexual

exploitation.

106. Mexico welcomed the changes made to the penal code to criminalize the abduction

of children under 15 for sexual purposes and welcomed the Law Regulating the Legal

Status of Citizens of Former Yugoslavia Living in Slovenia.

107. Romania appreciated the ratification of international instruments relating to human

rights and the adoption of legislative and policy measures aimed at fighting trafficking in

persons. It also appreciated the fact that Slovenia had provided a mid-term report on

implementation of the recommendations from the first cycle.

108. The delegation of Slovenia noted significant improvements in court backlogs, thanks

to targeted improvement measures and despite a reduction in the number of judges, owing

to judicial reforms. While issues remained, the system was becoming more effective.

109. Trade unions enjoyed strong legal protection and were powerful interlocutors in the

public and private sectors.

110. Slovenia stressed that corporal punishment was not used in schools and institutions

and was generally considered unacceptable. The Family Violence Prevention Act

prohibited all violence against children. The family code, due for adoption in 2015, would

contain a full ban on corporal punishment.

111. The cultural rights of ethnic minority groups were upheld by the constitution and the

Ministry of Culture. The Ministry of Culture financed increasing numbers of programmes

in support of minority groups each year. For example, a bilateral agreement between

Slovenia and Austria on cooperation in culture, education and science served the German-

speaking population of Slovenia, and special attention had been paid to that group under the

national culture programme.

112. Slovenia noted that, despite a ban on child labour, some isolated cases had been

observed in 2013. The Government had responded by commissioning a study and raising

awareness among inspection bodies.

113. Regarding persons with disabilities, Slovenia believed that the current normative

system was adequate. However, barriers to participation still existed and Slovenia had

implemented various measures in response.

114. In conclusion, Slovenia reconfirmed its desire to progress in protecting human

rights, describing the universal periodic review process as an opportunity for constructive

dialogue. It stated that it would endeavour to tackle new challenges and recurring

recommendations and issues, following up immediately on the second cycle of the

universal periodic review through discussions with all stakeholders.

II. Conclusions and/or recommendations**

115. The recommendations listed below will be examined by Slovenia which will

provide responses in due time, but no later than the twenty-eighth session of the

Human Rights Council in March 2015:

115.1 Take further steps for the ratification of several international treaties

in the field of human rights that were signed by Slovenia since the first UPR

cycle (Croatia);

115.2 Expedite the process of ratification of the amendment to article 8 of

the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial

Discrimination (Belgium);

115.3 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the Rights of the Child on a

communications procedure (Portugal, Slovakia);

115.4 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the Covenant on Economic, Social

and Cultural Rights (Spain, Tunisia, Portugal);

115.5 Proceed with the ratification of the Convention for the Protection of

All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, which was the object of a

recommendation accepted by Slovenia during the first cycle (Spain);

115.6 Ratify the International Convention on the Rights of All Migrant

Workers and Members of Their Families (ICRMW) (Iran (Islamic Republic

of));

115.7 Consider taking initial steps towards the ratification of ICRMW

(Philippines);

115.8 Ratify ICRMW (Senegal, Sierra Leone, Venezuela (Bolivarian

Republic of), Peru, Uruguay);

115.9 Consider ratifying ICRMW (Sri Lanka);

115.10 Ratify ICRMW (Bosnia and Herzegovina);

115.11 Consider the possibility of ratifying the Convention on the Protection

of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families

(Ecuador);

115.12 Ratify the International Convention on the Rights of Migrant

Workers and Members of their Family, based on the facts that the national

report indicates in paragraph 98 that it is currently under examination

(Egypt);

**

Conclusions and recommendations have not been edited.

115.13 Continue its efforts to ratify ICRMW (Indonesia);

115.14 Ratify the International Convention on Protection of All Persons

from Enforced Disappearance (Iraq);

115.15 Ratify the Convention for the Protection of All Persons from

Enforced Disappearance (Uruguay);

115.16 Ratify the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons

from Enforced Disappearance (Belgium, France, Tunisia, Sierra Leone,

Argentina);

115.17 Accede to the 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness and

take all relevant measures in order to reduce the number of stateless persons

(Hungary);

115.18 Ratify the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and

Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence, also known as the

Istanbul Convention, which it signed on 8 September 2011 (Turkey);

115.19 Repeal provisions of the Marriage and Family Relations Act that are

not compliant with the Convention on the Rights of the Child (Israel);

115.20 Draft a comprehensive law on children to incorporate in Slovenian

domestic law all the provisions of the Convention on the Rights of the Child

(Viet Nam);

115.21 Ensure that Slovenia’s national legislation is fully harmonized with

international standards to comply with its commitments under international

treaties, especially with regard to the Convention on the Elimination of All

Forms of Discrimination against Women, CRC and ICERD (Bahrain);

115.22 Broaden the mandate and powers of the institutions tasked with

guaranteeing the principle of equality and non-discrimination (Israel);

115.23 Continue its efforts in the promotion and protection of women’s and

children’s rights (Kuwait);

115.24 Continue its efforts with a view to the effective implementation of the

United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Education and Training

(Morocco);

115.25 Place a particular focus on the education and employability of Roma

women in integration policies, since women and children are the most

vulnerable groups within the Roma community (Norway);

115.26 Consider the establishment of an office of the ombudsman for

children’s rights, devoted purely to the protection of the rights of children

(Poland);

115.27 Consider developing national human rights indicators as an

instrument that allows for a more precise and coherent evaluation of the

effective implementation of human rights (Portugal);

115.28 Enact a unified and comprehensive law on child rights (Saudi

Arabia);

115.29 Continue efforts towards the introduction of human rights training in

the educational system and training programmes (Senegal);

115.30 Continue the steps aimed at the promotion of human rights education

at the national and international levels (Armenia);

115.31 Broaden the mandate of its equality bodies and increase their human

and financial resources (Australia);

115.32 Take further steps towards strengthening the mandate of the Human

Rights Ombudsman in order to ensure full compliance with the Paris Principles

(Ireland);

115.33 Bring its Human Rights Ombudsman’s Office into compliance with

the Paris Principles, including by providing it with adequate financial and

human resources (Malaysia);

115.34 Strengthen the mandates of the Ombudsman for Human Rights and

the Defender of the Principle of Equality and avoid any overlap in the

execution of their respective mandates (Morocco);

115.35 Accelerate the process of reform of the Ombudsman for Human

Rights in order to comply with the Paris Principles (Tunisia);

115.36 Bring the national human rights institution into compliance with the

Paris Principles and broaden its mandate to carry out investigations into

allegations of torture and ill-treatment (Ukraine);

115.37 Create the conditions that allow the Human Rights Ombudsperson to

acquire A status according to the Paris Principles, by enlarging its mandate to

receive allegations of torture and abuse and by providing it with the necessary

resources to enable it to fulfil its functions (Chile);

115.38 Ensure the compliance of its National Ombudsman with the Paris

Principles (Egypt); continue with the efforts to guarantee compliance of the

Human Rights Ombudsperson with the Paris Principles (Peru); take more

effective measures in order to bring the Ombudsman’s Office into compliance

with the Paris Principles (Azerbaijan);

115.39 Take the necessary steps to include the Human Rights Ombudsman

under Group A of the Paris Principles relating to the status of national human

rights institutions (Greece);

115.40 Implement the 20062016 Programme for Children and Youth

(Israel);

115.41 Adopt amendments to the Marriage and Family Relations Act in line

with previous efforts and add a provision that prohibits other forms of

demeaning treatment of children, such as psychological violence (Norway);

115.42 Implement the child and youth programme of 20132016 (Saudi

Arabia);

115.43 Increase cooperation with relevant United Nations treaty bodies, in

particular by submitting its periodic report to the Human Rights Committee

overdue since 2010 (Uzbekistan);

115.44 Address discrimination by the public and private sectors as a matter

of priority (Israel);

115.45 Step up efforts to prevent or limit hatred, racist and xenophobic acts

and speeches, including on the Internet (Malaysia);

115.46 Take the necessary steps for the criminalization of all acts of

intolerance and hate speech (Pakistan);

115.47 Strengthen measures to combat discrimination and facilitate victims’

access to remedies (Senegal);

115.48 Establish a better coordination between the different institutional

bodies competent in matters of non-discrimination (Spain);

115.49 Intensify its efforts to fight discrimination and intolerance,

particularly against Muslims, immigrants and people of African descent, and

encourage senior State officials and politicians to take a clear stand against

racist or xenophobic political discourse (Tunisia);

115.50 Adopt policies to ensure equality of rights for all persons, without

discrimination of gender, religion, race or sexual orientation, in line with

international standards (Uruguay);

115.51 Take the necessary measures to effectively fight against

discrimination by public and private actors (Belgium);

115.52 Strengthen measures to ensure that there are effective remedies for

potential victims of discrimination (Benin);

115.53 Continue to formulate, implement and enhance public policies aimed

at raising awareness of discrimination-related issues in society and ensure

effective remedies to victims of discrimination and statelessness (Brazil);

115.54 Pursue and strengthen policies against discrimination and intolerance

(Côte d’Ivoire);

115.55 Ensure follow-up of legislative measures for the protection and

inclusion of foreigners (Côte d’Ivoire);

115.56 Take concrete measures to prevent racially motivated crimes and

investigate and prosecute all acts of political discourse against minorities

(Egypt);

115.57 Continue with the campaign to eliminate all forms of discrimination,

particularly from school age and through human rights education (Mexico);

115.58 Ensure thorough implementation of the anti-discrimination

legislation in order to prevent and combat the discrimination based on any

criteria, notably racial and ethnic (Romania);

115.59 Continue making efforts to achieve full social equality between men

and women (Nicaragua);

115.60 Adopt proactive measures to ensure access to equal opportunities and

promote equal gender representation in decision-making positions, and

implement non-discriminatory policies to ensure equal pay for women and men

(Bahrain);

115.61 Take appropriate measures to enable more women to hold elective

offices (Benin);

115.62 Increase its efforts to combat racial discrimination and racist attacks,

particularly against the Roma (Iran (Islamic Republic of));

115.63 Introduce measures that will prevent discrimination against Roma

and make further efforts to combat all forms of intolerance and racism

(Nigeria);

115.64 Continue its policy to establish a climate of trust, understanding and

mutual respect between the different religions in the country (Morocco);

115.65 Adopt non-discriminatory policies with regard to the realization of

civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights of all ethnic and religious

communities, without any discrimination (Pakistan);

115.66 Continue to combat intolerance based on ethnic origin and ensure the

full respect of the human rights of the so-called “erased” people (Portugal);

115.67 Ensure that Roma children have equal opportunities in access to

quality education at all levels (Slovakia);

115.68 Strengthen efforts to combat discrimination against children

belonging to national minorities, particularly Roma, and reduce the number of

children living in poverty (Poland);

115.69 Step up efforts to combat discrimination against national minorities,

including Roma, and provide the victims of discrimination with access to

effective legal protection (Russian Federation);

115.70 Criminalize all acts of discrimination directed against Roma persons

(Sierra Leone);

115.71 Take further measures to combat all forms of discrimination against

the Roma community and ensure equal opportunities for their enjoyment of

economic, social and cultural rights, including education, health, employment

and housing (Sri Lanka);

115.72 Further improve the living conditions of Roma, especially ensuring

access to running water, electricity and housing, as well as providing education,

employment and health care for all members of the Roma community (the

former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia);

115.73 Measurably improve access to the legal system for Roma individuals

and other individuals belonging to groups facing discrimination, and carry out

a campaign to increase awareness among these minorities of their rights and

means of redress when infringements occur (United Kingdom of Great Britain

and Northern Ireland);

115.74 Strengthen legislative and practical measures to prevent all forms of

discrimination against ethnic minorities and foreigners (Uzbekistan);

115.75 Guarantee the right of Roma people to adequate housing, water and

sanitation, work, education, and security of tenure of their settlements

(Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of));

115.76 Take the necessary measures to fight all forms of intolerance and

hate speech against persons belonging to minorities (Algeria);

115.77 Strengthen its policy aimed at combating prejudice against minorities

(Angola);

115.78 Take the additional measures necessary to eliminate discrimination

against the Roma community and other vulnerable groups in the country

(Argentina);

115.79 Strengthen its human rights framework, including access to human

rights training, in order to increase protections for Roma people against

violations of their rights (Australia);

115.80 Combat discrimination against Roma and implement special

measures in the education, housing, health and employment spheres, as well as

investigating and prosecuting all discriminatory acts directed at Roma children

(Azerbaijan);

115.81 Adopt immediate and positive measures to combat all forms of

discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance against the Roma

communities and other ethnic groups, with regard to access to housing, quality

education, employment and health care (Bahrain);

115.82 Take further measures to provide security of tenure and promote

access to water, sanitation, education, health and employment for all Roma

communities (Brazil);

115.83 Intensify its efforts to ensure that the Roma are not victims of

discrimination, especially in areas such as access to housing and the right to

drinking water and sanitation (Chile);

115.84 Continue to increase input into education for Roma and other

minorities (China);

115.85 Strengthen activities to raise awareness in society of the need to

eliminate discrimination, intolerance and hate speech against minorities and

other groups (Costa Rica);

115.86 Continue reinforcing measures to guarantee respect for the human

rights of national communities, Roma and other ethnic groups (Cuba);

115.87 Strengthen measures to combat discrimination, with special attention

to the situation of minorities, by adopting laws and policies for the effective

promotion and protection of their rights (Ecuador);

115.88 Take further measures to combat marginalization and discrimination

against Roma (Greece);

115.89 Accelerate approval of the reforms of the Roma Community Act and

strengthen coordination with all actors involved to address the strategies of the

national programme of measures for Roma (Mexico);

115.90 Continue to improve Roma conditions, access to housing, water,

sanitation, education and employment and make further efforts to combat all

forms of intolerance and racism against them (Thailand);

115.91 Strengthen efforts to reduce disparities in the enjoyment of rights

between children of minority groups, particularly Roma children and children

of the majority of the population (Austria);

115.92 Harmonize the rights of homosexual couples with those of

heterosexual couples (Spain);

115.93 Heed the call by the Committee on the Rights of the Child to

regularize the status of children of same-sex couples and ensure their

protection against discrimination (Sweden);

115.94 Bring forward legislation providing a clear legal process for the

restoration of rights for individuals affected by the erasure (United Kingdom of

Great Britain and Northern Ireland);

115.95 Enact comprehensive legislation addressing the situation of the

erased, ensuring them appropriate assistance and protection (Uruguay);

115.96 Immediately restitute permanent residence for the “erased” persons

and adequately compensate them (Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of));

115.97 Recognize fully the civil and political rights of erased citizens and

facilitate their complete social integration (Australia);

115.98 Adopt the same-sex partnership act in order to further improve the

rights of LGBTI persons (Croatia);

115.99 Adopt further measures to facilitate effective access of the so-called

“erased” to permanent residency and citizenship (Czech Republic);

115.100 Take all appropriate measures to enable and facilitate the acquisition

of Slovenian citizenship by the “erased persons”, paying particular attention to

the children of “erased persons” in 1992, who are still stateless. Ensure

compensation for all “erased persons and, in this regard, review their

compensation schemes, on the basis of the amounts and criteria established by

the European Court of Human Rights and ensure the implementation of

measures to reintegrate erased persons (France);

115.101 That the youth guarantee scheme is implemented without

discrimination and sufficient budget allocated for its effective implementation

(India);

115.102 Take comprehensive measures to protect the rights of all national

minorities, including the so-called erased people and promote their full

integration into society (India);

115.103 Take legal measures aimed at preventing ethnically motivated crimes

(Iran (Islamic Republic of));

115.104 Establish a clear and comprehensive definition of violence against

childre, and prosecute all forms of violence, including domestic violence (Sierra

Leone);

115.105 Take the necessary measures for setting up a comprehensive national

strategy to prevent and address all forms of violence against women and

children (Iran (Islamic Republic of));

115.106 Take further steps to implement the national programme of family

violence prevention (netherlands); ensure implementation of the national

programme of family violence prevention (20092014) and prevent all forms of

violence against women and children, including domestic violence (Bahrain);

115.107 Concentrate attention on domestic violence (New Zealand);

115.108 Adopt a national strategy on combating domestic violence (Russian

Federation);

115.109 Strengthen the measures undertaken to combat domestic violence in

general and violence against children in particular (Algeria);

115.110 Broaden the definition of violence in the Law on the Prevention of

Domestic Violence, according to international standards, with a view to

eliminating all forms of violence against women and girls (Mexico);

115.111 Establish an institutional mechanism to combat discrimination and

violence against women and children, particularly children from minority

peoples (Viet Nam);

115.112 Adopt a comprehensive national strategy to prevent and combat all

forms of violence against children (Iraq);

115.113 Continue to strengthen normative frameworks for the protection of

children from violence and abuse, and develop awareness-raising programmes

aimed at educating the public about the harmful effects of corporal punishment

and enhancing the capacities of educators and the media to promote good

practices and more positive methods of child-rearing (Philippines);

115.114 Ensure that legislation is drafted and enacted to prohibit all corporal

punishment of children, including in the home (Sweden);

115.115 Legally prohibit the abhorrent practice of corporal punishment of

children and adopt an integral law on children, which compiles the provisions

of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic

of));

115.116 Explicitly prohibit in national legislation corporal punishment in all

settings, including at home (Austria);

115.117 Take appropriate measures to prevent the forced labour of children

in the country (Azerbaijan);

115.118 Adopt a comprehensive legal framework on the rights of the children

aiming also at completely outlawing the violence against children (Romania);

115.119 Intensify its work to provide specialized training for investigators,

prosecutors and judges in applying the human trafficking statute (Norway);

115.120 Further provide protection to victims of trafficking in human beings,

on the basis of a human rights-based approach, and ensure that they are

systematically informed of the possibility of a recovery and reflection period

(Republic of Moldova);

115.121 Step up efforts to combat trafficking in human beings, including

broadening international cooperation on this matter (Russian Federation);

115.122 Combat trafficking, punish perpetrators and compensate and

rehabilitate victims (Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of));

115.123 Further strengthen the steps taken in regard to trafficking,

particularly in reference to women and children (Afghanistan);

115.124 Continue the efforts directed towards combating trafficking in

human beings (Armenia); continue its efforts to combat trafficking in persons,

especially women and children, by prosecuting the perpetrators (Costa Rica);

take effective measures to prevent trafficking in persons, including women and

children (Uzbekistan); combat trafficking in persons, especially in women and

children, as well as prosecuting and investigating all perpetrators of these

crimes (Azerbaijan);

115.125 Invest in the human and financial resources of the secretariat of the

Working Group and the national coordinator dealing with trafficking in

human beings so that they can effectively carry out the full range of tasks

within their mandate (Czech Republic);

115.126 Redouble its efforts regarding trafficking, with a special focus on

trafficking in children (India);

115.127 Take appropriate steps to ensure the effectiveness of its Inter-

Ministerial Working Group for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings and

of the national coordinator on human trafficking and continue to improve

public awareness of this issue (Indonesia);

115.128 Increase the efficiency of court case management, thereby ensuring

access to trial without undue delay (United States of America);

115.129 Adopt a professional code of conduct for judges and prosecutors

(Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of));

115.130 Address the lack of special provisions for children in the Slovenian

criminal code and bring its juvenile justice system fully into compliance with

international standards (Poland);

115.131 Provide protection to the family as the basic and fundamental unity

of the society (Egypt);

115.132 Bring its national legislation fully in line with international standards

on freedom of expression by decriminalizing defamation in domestic law

(Estonia);

115.133 Consider the ratification of ILO Convention 189 concerning decent

work for domestic workers (Nicaragua);

115.134 Enact and fully implement the necessary laws to ensure protection

against interference in the establishment, functioning, and administration of

worker organizations, consistent with the recommendations of ILO (United

States of America);

115.135 Improve the social protection and living conditions of the most

vulnerable groups of the population (Algeria);

115.136 Apply more effective actions to face the negative effects of the

economic crisis on the population (Cuba);

115.137 Continue its positive efforts in reducing the numbers of persons at

risk of poverty or social exclusion by 2020 (Malaysia);

115.138 Provide legal protection against forced evictions (Nigeria);

115.139 Implement recommendations by the Special Rapporteur on the rights

to water and sanitation regarding access to water for Roma (Israel);

115.140 Continue to take measures in order to guarantee universal access to

safe drinking water and sanitation (Portugal);

115.141 Accelerate its efforts to finalize the national mental health

programme, with the aim of reducing the suicide rate (Costa Rica);

115.142 Consider appropriate means to reach out to achieve universal access

to health services and consider expanding the coverage of health services under

the compulsory health insurance schemes to include appropriate secondary and

tertiary services (Thailand);

115.143 Ensure that Slovenia’s facilities regarding the compulsory health

insurance scheme are available at the secondary and tertiary levels (Nigeria);

115.144 Provide further resources for the preservation of the languages and

culture of national communities, including the German-speaking community,

which has for a very long time formed an important part of Slovene society

(Austria);

115.145 Allocate sufficient resources to promote the rights of persons with

disabilities (Viet Nam);

115.146 Continue to strengthen the protection of persons with disabilities

through increasing employment opportunities to fundamentally improve their

living conditions (China);

115.147 Review the current practice of participatory rights of persons with

disabilities in elections, with the aim of identifying the necessary changes in

consultation with relevant stakeholders, and implementing measures to ensure

the voting rights of persons with disabilities (Hungary);

115.148 Continue improving the accessibility to transport and infrastructure

for persons with disabilities (Spain);

115.149 Ensure the full enjoyment of the political, civil, economic and social

rights of “erased” people, including health, social security, education and

employment, by regulating the status of the remaining “erased” persons and

providing adequate reparation to those affected (Ireland);

115.150 Implement the recommendations accepted by Slovenia during its first

UPR on the subject of discrimination against Roma (Israel);

115.151 Continue to devote great attention to the effective implementation of

the existing legislative framework on the use of the minority languages (Italy);

115.152 Adopt the necessary measures in order to better comply with the

recommendations on the use of minority languages released by the Council of

Europe, with particular reference to the rights of the autochthonous Italian

minority (Italy);

115.153 Continue strengthening the institutional framework for the

promotion and protection of minority rights in the country (Montenegro);

115.154 Take all necessary measures to ensure equal, legal and fair treatment

of minorities, including Roma (Netherlands);

115.155 Continued efforts in addressing and protecting the rights of ethnic

minorities, including in particular the situation of Roma living in Slovenia (New

Zealand);

115.156 Reconsider the grounds for recognizing national minority status

(Serbia);

115.157 Consider including in future censuses a question on national

ethnicity, so as to determine the different ethnic groups living in Slovenia

(Serbia);

115.158 Continue increasing the allocation of additional resources to improve

the living conditions of the Roma population in the informal settlements, by

strengthening their security of tenancy and ensuring the human right to

drinking water and sanitation and access to electricity (Spain);

115.159 Involve Romani organizations and communities in the development

and implementation of the strategy for Roma inclusion (United States of

America);

115.160 Continue working to safeguard the human rights of the minorities in

the country (Guatemala);

115.161 Regularize the status of all erased persons of origin from other

former Yugoslavian republics (Sierra Leone);

115.162 Take additional measures to tackle the problem of assimilation and to

reduce the gap that exists between the legislative framework and its

implementation with regard to the use of minority languages in public services

(Hungary);

115.163 Establish conventions that will guarantee the non-violation of

migrants’ rights (Nigeria).

116. All conclusions and/or recommendations contained in the present report reflect

the position of the submitting State(s) and/or the State under review. They should not

be construed as endorsed by the Working Group as a whole.

Annex

[English only]

Composition of the delegation

The delegation of Slovenia was headed by H.E. Mr. Goran Klemenčič, Minister of

Justice and composed of the following members:

• H.E. Mr. Bogdan Benko, Ambassador, State Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Deputy Head of Delegation;

• Mr. Stanko Baluh, Acting Director, Office of the Government of the Republic of Slovenia for National Minorities;

• Ms. Ružica Boškič, Acting Director-General, Family Affairs Directorate, Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities;

• Ms. Nina Gregori, Acting Director-General, Internal Administrative Affairs, Migration and Naturalization Directorate, Ministry of the Interior;

• Mr. Sašo Gazdić, Secretary, Head of the Cultural Diversity and Human Rights Service, Ministry of Culture;

• Mr. Ivo Holc, Police Councillor, Ministry of the Interior;

• Ms. Eva Tomič, Minister Plenipotentiary, Head of Human Rights Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs;

• Ms. Nadja Čobal, Secretary, Ministry of Health;

• Mr. Sandi Čurin, Undersecretary, National Coordinator for Fight against Trafficking in Persons, Ministry of the Interior;

• Ms. Dragica Iskrenovič, Secretary, EU Coordination and International Affairs Service, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food;

• Ms. Jana Lovšin, Secretary, Social Affairs Directorate, Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities;

• Ms. Breda Bunič, Undersecretary, Ministry of Defence;

• Ms. Erika Rustja, Undersecretary, Ministry of Education, Science and Sport;

• Mr. Zoran Skubic, Undersecretary, Ministry of Justice;

• Ms. Karmen Šterbenc, Senior Adviser II, Labour market and Employment Directorate, Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities;

• Ms. Nina Ban Zlatev, Senior Adviser, Coordinator for International Cooperation, Ministry of Justice;

• Ms. Polona Mal Bitenc, Attaché, Human Rights Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs;

• H.E. Mr. Vojislav Šuc, Ambassador, Permanent Representative of the Republic of Slovenia to the United Nations Office and other international organizations at

Geneva;

• Ms. Špela Košir, First Secretary, Permanent Mission of the Republic of Slovenia to the United Nations Office and other international organizations at Geneva;

• Ms. Urška Čas Svetek, Second Secretary, Permanent Mission of the Republic of Slovenia to the United Nations Office and other international organizations at

Geneva.