28/76 Final research-based report of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee on best practices and main challenges in the promotion and protection of human rights in post-disaster and post-conflict situations
Document Type: Final Report
Date: 2015 Feb
Session: 28th Regular Session (2015 Mar)
Agenda Item:
GE.15-02194 (E)
Human Rights Council Twenty-eighth session
Agenda items 3 and 5
Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil,
political, economic, social and cultural rights,
including the right to development
Human rights bodies and mechanisms
Final research-based report of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee on best practices and main challenges in the promotion and protection of human rights in post-disaster and post-conflict situations
Contents
Paragraphs Page
I. Mandate and introduction ........................................................................................ 1 – 5 3
II. Scope ................................................................................................................ 6 – 9 3
III. Definitions ............................................................................................................... 10 – 26 4
A. Terms used in the context of post-conflict situations...................................... 12 – 21 4
B. Terms used in the context of humanitarian response ..................................... 22 – 26 7
IV. Affected populations ............................................................................................... 27 – 36 8
A. Women and girls ............................................................................................. 29 – 31 8
B. Children .......................................................................................................... 32 9
C. Older persons .................................................................................................. 33 9
D. Persons with disabilities.................................................................................. 34 10
E. Indigenous peoples and minorities.................................................................. 35 10
F. LGBTI persons ............................................................................................... 36 10
V. A human rights-based approach .............................................................................. 37 – 43 10
VI. International normative framework ......................................................................... 44 – 58 13
A. United Nations human rights framework and mechanisms ............................ 44 – 51 13
B. International humanitarian law and mechanisms ............................................ 52 – 53 15
C. Regional institutions and mechanisms for humanitarian
aid and assistance ............................................................................................ 54 – 58 15
VII. Good practices ......................................................................................................... 59 – 81 16
A. National legal frameworks and mechanisms .................................................. 59 – 66 16
B. Participation of the community and the persons affected ............................... 67 – 70 17
C. Gender focus ................................................................................................... 71 – 75 18
D. Respect for cultural values .............................................................................. 76 – 77 19
E. Multilevel approach ........................................................................................ 78 – 81 19
VIII. Challenges ............................................................................................................... 82 – 94 19
IX. Main conclusions .................................................................................................... 95 – 97 21
X. Recommendations ................................................................................................... 98 – 104 22
I. Mandate and introduction
1. In its resolution 22/16, the Human Rights Council requested the Advisory
Committee to prepare a research-based report on best practices and main challenges in the
promotion and protection of human rights in post-disaster and post-conflict situations.
2. At its eleventh session, in August 2013, the Committee established a drafting group
composed of the following experts: Chinsung Chung, Latif Hüseynov, Vladimir
Kartashkin, Katharina Pabel, M. Cecilia Rachel V. Quisumbing (Rapporteur), Anantonia
Reyes Prado (Chairperson) and Imeru Tamrat Yigezu. Subsequently, Karla Hananía de
Varela, Kaoru Obata and Ahmer Bilal Soofi also joined the drafting group.
3. At its twelfth session, in February 2014, the Committee decided to appoint Ms.
Reyes Prado as Rapporteur and Mr. Hüseynov as Chairperson of the drafting group. At its
thirteenth session, in August 2014, the Committee designated Mr. Soofi as Chairperson of
the drafting group to replace Mr. Hüseynov. The Committee also recommended that the
Human Rights Council extend the time for the submission of the progress report, a
recommendation that the Council endorsed in its decision 26/116. The Committee therefore
presented the progress report to the Council at its twenty-seventh session.1
4. Pursuant to Council resolution 22/16, the Committee sought the views and inputs of
Member States and various stakeholders. Questionnaires were prepared and disseminated in
September 2013 to all Member States and to representatives of civil society and other
stakeholders requesting information on experiences, best practices and main challenges
faced in the promotion and protection of human rights in post-disaster and post-conflict
situations. A total of 39 responses were received, including from countries that experienced
post-disaster and post-conflict situations (see paras. 48 – 70 below).
5. In February 2014, the Committee, pursuant to paragraph 2 of Council resolution
22/16, decided also to seek the views of United Nations agencies. No replies were,
however, received.
II. Scope
6. The title of the Committee’s mandate suggests commonalities between post-disaster
and post-conflict situations, which can be found in the fact that both can represent a critical
threat to the health, safety, security or well-being of a community or large group of people.
The Committee has therefore adopted a holistic human rights approach to post-disaster and
post-conflict situations, in terms of applicability of other branches of international law,
including international humanitarian law, refugee law and international criminal law, with a
view to strengthened protection.
7. A post-disaster or post-conflict situation starts immediately after a disaster has
occurred or after the end of a conflict. It ends once the right to life and the security,
physical integrity and dignity of the affected population is protected again and the
population has recovered its rights related to basic necessities of life, including economic,
social, cultural, civil and political rights. Some reflection is needed on the meaning of
recovery of civil life, namely whether the restoration of the status quo ante would suffice,
1 The members of the drafting group are grateful to Veronica Sagastume, Programme Coordinator of
Norwegian Church Aid in Guatemala, and leader in the ACT Alliance Forum in Guatemala, for her
important input during the drafting of the present report.
since disasters or conflicts severely affect those whose living conditions are already
precarious. Further thought is required on how to improve these living conditions. Special
attention should be paid to the early stage of post-disaster and post-conflict situations (not
excluding matters of transitional justice), because humanitarian activities are mainly
developed at that stage. A holistic human rights-based approach must be also considered in
the rehabilitation and reconstruction stages, as well as in resettlement processes. Protracted
crisis situations should also be considered.2
8. While humanitarian activities mostly foster the promotion and protection of human
rights, and many good practices are highlighted in the present report, experience also shows
that humanitarian activities may be sometimes seriously flawed in terms of human rights.
The main challenges faced in the promotion and protection of human rights in post-disaster
and post-conflict situations are therefore also highlighted below.
9. A perspective that respects the protective normative framework and takes into
account a human rights-based approach must already be considered prior to the disaster,
and Governments should be aware of their responsibilities in the protection of their
populations. That affected persons understand their rights is equally important.
III. Definitions
10. Over the past decades, the world has witnessed a significant increase in the number
of disasters reported: from fewer than 100 per year reported in 1975 to more than 400 in
2010. The number of people affected and the economic damage caused by disasters have
also increased.3 Conflicts and natural disasters have multi-dimensional effects on human
rights. They create crises that affect the rights to life, health and security. Crops and
infrastructure are destroyed, having a long-term effect on livelihood, access to food and
water, education, health care and even access to justice and other basic services. A natural
disaster or conflict becomes an emergency4 when local families and communities cannot
cope with or recover from it on their own.
11. It has been estimated that complex, multi-causal crisis will become more common.5
Bearing in mind such a multi-dimensional scope, many terms need to be considered in
order to attain a better understanding of the theoretical and operative complexity of these
situations.
A. Terms used in the context of post-conflict situations
International and non-international armed conflict
2 Protracted crisis situations are characterized by recurrent natural disasters and/or conflict, food crises,
breakdown of livelihoods and insufficient institutional capacity to react to the crises. Countries in
protracted crises thus need to be regarded as a special category with special requirements in terms of
interventions by the development community. See “Countries in protracted crisis: what are they
and why do they deserve special attention?” in The State of Food Insecurity in the World, Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2010.
3 International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, “Red Cross Red Crescent approach
to disaster and crisis management” (available from www.ifrc.org/en/who-we-are/vision-and-
mission/disaster-and-crisis-management/)..
4 Emergencies are traditionally categorized into rapid onset disasters, chronic conflicts, forgotten and
cyclical.
5 “Conflict remains an important source of vulnerability, but other hazards and risks are gaining
prominence. Increasingly we will see climate change, urbanization, migration, access to food, and
technological disasters all acting at once and further compounding risks and vulnerabilities”.
Feinstein International Centre, Three-Year Plan: January 2012 to December 2015.
12. International humanitarian law makes a distinction between an international armed
conflict, whenever there is resort to armed force between two or more States, and non-
international armed conflicts, which are protracted armed confrontations between
governmental armed forces and one or more non-State armed groups, or between such
groups only. The armed confrontation must reach a minimum level of intensity and the
parties involved must show a minimum degree of organization.6
Peacebuilding
13. The term emerged in the 1970s in the work of Johan Galtung, who called for the
creation of peacebuilding structures to promote sustainable peace by addressing the root
causes of violent conflict and supporting indigenous capacities for peace management and
conflict resolution. Since then, the term has covered a multidimensional exercise and tasks
ranging from disarming warring factions to rebuilding political, economic, judicial and civil
society institutions.7
Post-conflict dialogue
14. A methodical approach, focused on the importance of bringing an armed conflict to
an end and moving to a peacebuilding programme. The establishment of dialogue with the
other party to the conflict is a part of reconciliation and peacemaking processes.
Representatives of the most vulnerable groups and affected people should be involved in
such dialogue.
Post-conflict situation
15. A situation in which open warfare has come to an end. Such situations remain tense
for years or decades and can easily relapse into large-scale violence. They generate
enormous development challenges for the communities affected and for international
actors, in vital sectors as security, justice, economic policy, education, media, agriculture,
health, and environment.8 Rebuilding institutional infrastructure shattered during conflict is
as important as, if not more important than, physical infrastructure.9
Post-conflict reconstruction
16. A generic term referring to the rebuilding of society in the aftermath of a conflict.
Physical infrastructures have to be repaired or rebuilt, governmental institutions have to be
reformed, psychic traumas of civilians and combatants have to be treated, the economy has
to be restarted, refugees to be repatriated, reconciliation between belligerents has to be
initiated, justice to be delivered. Efforts of this type require sustained support from the
international community.
Post-conflict recovery
17. The long-term rebuilding of a society in the aftermath of violent conflict. It includes
political, socioeconomic and physical aspects, such as disarming and reintegrating
combatants, finding durable solutions for internally displaced persons, reforming
6 See the ReliefWeb Glossary of Humanitarian Terms (available from
http://reliefweb.int/report/world/reliefweb-glossary-humanitarian-terms) and International Committee
of the Red Cross, “How is the term “Armed Conflict” defined in international humanitarian law?”,
opinion paper, 17 March 2008 (available from
www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/article/other/armed-conflict-article-170308.htm).
7 See Peacebuilding and the United Nations (www.un.org/en/peacebuilding/pbso/pbun.shtml).
8 Gerd Junne and Willemijn Verkoren, eds., Postconflict Development: Meeting New Challenges
(Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2005).
9 Lakhdar Brahimi, “State building in crisis and post-conflict countries”, seventh Global Forum on
Reinventing Government. Building Trust in Government, June 2007, Vienna.
governmental institutions, promoting trauma work and reconciliation, delivering justice,
restarting the economy and rebuilding damaged infrastructure. Related terms include war-
to-peace transitions and post-conflict reconstruction. It should be noted that the term
“recovery” has a broader connotation than reconstruction, which implies an emphasis on
physical aspects.10
Post-conflict transition
18. The tenuous period immediately following the termination of conflict during which
humanitarian needs must still be met and programmes, such as those for disarmament,
demobilization, reintegration and rehabilitation and for rebuilding infrastructure, remain at
an early stage. This period may also involve the temporary transfer of government
functions to a United Nations transitional administration, such as in the case of Kosovo and
Timor-Leste.11
Transitional justice
19. A transitional justice system is often extremely important after a conflict or situation
of violence. The States concerned should develop a strategy on transitional justice that
satisfies the rights of victims by means of reconciliation and reparation mechanisms. A
transitional justice strategy comprises a set of rules, public policies and institutions the goal
of which is to redress the legacy of a violent past. It consists of both judicial and non-
judicial processes and mechanisms that include prosecution initiatives, facilitating
initiatives in respect of the right to truth, delivering reparations, institutional reform and
national consultations. In this regard, international assistance must focus on the
development of the national capacity to initiate and lead the process. Disarmament,
demobilization and reintegration initiatives should be coordinated with transitional justice
processes and mechanisms in a positively reinforcing manner.12
20. Post-disaster situations comprise both natural and man-made disasters. Natural
disasters or hazards13 are events brought about by natural hazards that seriously affect the
society, economy and/or infrastructure of a region, such as floods, earthquakes or
hurricanes that cause great damage or loss of life. Depending on population vulnerability
and local response capacity, natural disasters pose challenges and problems of a
humanitarian nature. By contrast, technological or man-made hazards, such as complex
emergencies or conflicts, famine, population displacement and industrial or transport
accidents14 are events caused by humans and occur in or close to human settlements. This
10 Glossary of Terms for Conflict Management and Peacebuilding, United States Institute of Peace.
11 www.unocha.org.
12 See S/2004/616.
13 In the report of the Secretary-General on relief to development (A/60/89 – E/2005/79), the expression
“natural disasters” was purposely not used, as it conveys the mistaken assumption that disasters
occurring as result of natural hazards are wholly “natural” and therefore inevitable and outside human
control. Instead, it is widely recognized that such disasters are the result of the way individuals and
societies relate to threats originating from natural hazards. The nature and scale of threats inherent in
hazards vary. The risks and potential for disasters associated with natural hazards are largely shaped
by prevailing levels of vulnerability and measures taken to prevent, mitigate and prepare for disasters.
Thus, disasters are, to a great extent, determined by human action, or lack thereof. The expression
“disasters associated with natural hazards” should therefore be used, in accordance with the Hyogo
Framework for Action 2005-2015, adopted in January 2005 at the World Conference on Disaster
Reduction in Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
14 International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Types of disasters: definition of
hazard (www.ifrc.org/en/what-we-do/disaster-management/about-disasters/definition-of-hazard/).
can include environmental degradation, pollution, accidents and the impact of climate
change.15
21. In the present report, the term “natural disaster” includes both sudden and slow-
onset natural disasters. It is important to understand, however, that the magnitude of the
consequences of sudden natural hazards is a direct result of the way individuals and
societies relate to threats originating from natural hazards. The magnitude of the
consequences is, thus, determined by human action or the lack thereof.16
B. Terms used in the context of humanitarian response
Humanitarian crisis
22. An event or a series of events representing a critical threat to the health, safety,
security and/or well-being of a community or other large group of people, usually over a
wide area. Armed conflicts, epidemics, famine, natural disasters and other major
emergencies may all involve or lead to a humanitarian crisis that extends beyond the
mandate or capacity of any single agency. An emergency is a large-scale crisis that destroys
the lives of individuals, wrecks communities and overwhelms their ability to cope.17
23. Humanitarian crises can be grouped under three categories: Natural disasters
(earthquakes, floods, storms and volcanic eruptions); man-made disasters (conflicts, plane
and train crashes, fires and industrial accidents); complex emergencies (when the effects of
a series of events or factors prevent a community from having access to their basic needs,
such as water, food, shelter, security or health care). According to the International
Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, such “complex emergencies” are
typically characterized by extensive violence and loss of life, the displacement of
populations, widespread damage to societies and economies, the need for large-scale, multi-
faceted humanitarian assistance, hindrance or prevention of humanitarian assistance by
political and military constraints, particularly in post-conflict situations, and significant
security risks for humanitarian relief workers in some areas.18
24. These three kinds of emergencies can have an impact on millions of people in a
number of countries. In addition, there are increasingly new concepts for categorizing
emergencies related to climate, technology and health pandemics.
Humanitarian action, humanitarian aid, humanitarian assistance
25. The terms “humanitarian action”, “humanitarian aid” and “humanitarian assistance”
are often used interchangeably in post-disaster or post-conflict situations where the
principles and rules of humanitarian response are applied. For instance, according to the
World Health Organization, humanitarian assistance can be divided into three categories:
direct assistance, which is the face-to-face distribution of goods and services; indirect
assistance, which is at least one step removed from the population and involves such
activities as transporting relief goods or relief personnel; and infrastructure support, which
involves providing general services, such as road repair, airspace management and power
generation that facilitate relief, but are not necessarily visible to or solely for the benefit of
15 A/66/285.
16 Protecting Persons Affected by Natural Disasters, Inter-Agency Standing Committee Operational
Guidelines on Human Rights and Natural Disasters, 2006.
17 See Covenant Social Service, Disaster Relief: What is an emergency? (www.cssind.org/disaster-
relief).
18 International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, “Complex/manmade hazards:
complex emergencies” (available from www.ifrc.org/en/what-we-do/disaster-management/about-
disasters/definition-of-hazard/complex-emergencies/).
the stricken population.19 The European Union for its part interprets the term “humanitarian
aid” as including traditional responses to humanitarian crisis, that is, material relief
assistance and services as shelters, water and medicines; emergency food aid at short-term
distribution and supplementary feeding programmes; relief coordination, protection and
support services like coordination, logistics and communications; reconstruction relief and
rehabilitation, which involves repairing pre-existing infrastructure as opposed to longer-
term activities designed to improve the level of infrastructure; and disaster prevention and
preparedness in terms of disaster risk reduction, early warning systems, contingency stocks
and planning.20
26. Irrespective of the terminology used, all humanitarian responses have the same
objective: to save lives, to alleviate suffering and to maintain and protect human dignity
during and in the aftermath of emergencies. They are guided by the principles of humanity,
impartiality, neutrality and independence. Furthermore, during emergencies, the timeliness
of humanitarian aid and the protection of vulnerable groups become vital, particularly at the
stage of rescue.
IV. Affected populations
27. Persons affected by and victims of conflicts and disasters include internally
displaced persons, who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places
of habitual residence, in particular as a result of or in order to avoid the effects of armed
conflict, situations of generalized violence, violations of human rights or natural or man-
made disasters, and who have not crossed an internationally recognized State border,
refugees, and stateless persons.
28. There are other groups of people who are particularly vulnerable in post-conflict and
post-emergency situations. “Vulnerable groups” refers to all those persons that can be at
risk and affected by the negative effects of disasters or conflicts. Their vulnerability will
depend on their social, economic, political, cultural and ethnic position. Humanitarian
action in all post-disaster or post-conflict settings should pay particular attention to women,
children, older persons, persons with disabilities, indigenous peoples, minorities and
LGBTI persons. It is also essential that affected populations are sensitized to the fact that
they are rights-holders, not mere beneficiaries of charitable action.
A. Women and girls
29. In emergency, post-disaster and post-conflict situations, gender-based discrimination
increases the vulnerability of women and girls, including those with disabilities. Protection
activities established in this framework by national and international stakeholders should to
adopt a holistic approach to address these issues from an institutional perspective with an
impact on national policies and regulations, thus avoiding having to limit interventions to
specific activities that will only respond partially to the problem.
30. Women and girls must be one of the prioritized groups for humanitarian aid, relief
and recovery. Special protection approaches should be considered during the planning
process of the response and humanitarian aid. Women’s participation in humanitarian aid
19 World Health Organization, Humanitarian Health Action, Definitions: emergencies (available from
www.who.int/hac/about/definitions/en/).
20 European Commission, Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection, “Humanitarian aid”, 15 April 2014
(see http://ec.europa.eu/echo/en/what/humanitarian-aid).
decision-making must also be promoted and guaranteed. Mechanisms to prevent gender-
based violence, sexual harassment and rape should be put in place, as should legal aid and
social assistance to victims of sexual and of gender-based violence. In situations of
international or non-international armed conflict, humanitarian aid and reconciliation
processes should take into account traditional practices of having women as spoils of war.
In addition, women from indigenous and minority communities face multiple forms of
discrimination and require specific protection measures against both gender-based
discrimination and racist attitudes.
31. In its resolution 1325 (2000) on women, peace and security, the Security Council set
out the international framework in this regard. In particular, it urged Member States to
ensure increased representation of women at all decision-making levels in national, regional
and international institutions and mechanisms for the prevention, management, and
resolution of conflict, and called upon all actors involved, when negotiating and
implementing relevant agreements, to adopt a gender perspective, including, inter alia, the
special needs of women and girls during repatriation and resettlement and for rehabilitation,
reintegration and post-conflict reconstructions. Effective legal frameworks must prohibit
and criminalize violence against women and girls, prevent violence and safeguard
survivors.
B. Children
32. The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) recognizes that when an emergency
strikes, whether a sudden onset natural disaster or an armed conflict, children require
special protection to ensure their safety and well-being.21 The core commitments for
children in humanitarian action constitute the UNICEF central policy on how to uphold the
rights of children affected by humanitarian crises. In her report on the impact of armed
conflict on children, the independent expert appointed by the Secretary-General in 1994,
Graça Machel, called for an end to the targeting of children in armed conflicts.22 In the
report, the independent expert highlighted the fact that millions of girls and boys were
victims of killing, maiming, torture, rape, sexual exploitation, abduction, forced labour and
other violations of the rights of the child in pre-conflict, conflict and post-conflict
situations. She recognized that girls were more vulnerable, that the recruitment and use of
children in armed conflict was a violation of international law, as were the attacks on and
the military use of protected places that usually have a significant presence of children,
such as schools, hospitals and homes. In addition, she emphasized that the fact that children
were still being shamefully abused was “clear indication that we have barely begun to fulfil
our obligation to protect them”.23 Girls and boys are right-holders and therefore need to be
also involved in the humanitarian assistance process.
C. Older persons
33. Older persons are among the most affected during disasters and conflicts.
Disabilities, displacement, disease, malnutrition, discrimination and insecurity worsen the
living conditions of the elderly during post-conflict and post-disaster situations. The needs
21 See UNICEF, Child protection from violence, exploitation and abuse, Child protection in
emergencies at www.unicef.org/protection/57929_62178.html.
22 A/51/306.
23 Ibid., para. 313.
of older persons should therefore be included in immediate and long-term humanitarian
relief and assistance, as well as in humanitarian polices and guidelines.
D. Persons with disabilities
34. Persons with disabilities24 are disproportionately affected in situations of disaster
and conflict because many of the resources for humanitarian aid, shelter and assistance
become inaccessible for them. In addition, there is a direct correlation between
discrimination against persons with disabilities and insufficient resources. Humanitarian
aid, rescue, relief and rehabilitation should therefore meet the needs of the whole
population and also include the participation of persons with disabilities in all stages of
emergency response. Disability in post-disaster and post-conflict situations also rises
because people are injured and need specialized assistance and resources.25
E. Indigenous peoples and minorities
35. Indigenous peoples26 and minorities27 have traditionally been excluded from
development. Their settlements are mainly in rural areas, which are prone to natural hazards
and high levels of poverty. This places them at risk in the event of disasters and conflicts. It
is important to recognize and better understand indigenous peoples and minorities, and to
boost their knowledge of mechanisms established for disaster risk reduction.28
F. LGBTI persons
36. Stigmatization and discrimination based on sexual orientation increase gender-based
violence in post-conflict and post-disaster situations, negatively affecting LGBTI persons
with regard to the provision of food assistance, shelter and humanitarian aid.
V. A human rights-based approach
37. Human rights are the universal legal guarantees that protect individuals and groups
against actions and omissions interfering with fundamental freedoms, entitlements and
human dignity.29According to UNICEF, human rights principles and values are not only the
24 See Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, art. 1.
25 See the report on the Panel Discussion on Disaster Resilience and Disability: Ensuring Equality and
Inclusion, United Nations Headquarters, 10 October 2013.
26 See E/CN.4/Sub.2/1986/7 and Add. 1-4. For the concept of “indigenous and tribal peoples”, see the
Convention concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries, art. 1. See also “The
concept of indigenous peoples”. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Secretariat of the
Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, Workshop on data collection and disaggregation for
indigenous peoples, New York, 19–21 January 2004.
27 It is not possible to conclusively define the concept of minority or even to identify existing minorities,
or build a conclusive list of minorities. See José Bengoa, “Minorías: existencia y reconocimiento”,
working paper (E/CN.4/Sub.2/AC.5/2000/WP.2). See also the Declaration on the Rights of Persons
Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities (General Assembly resolution
47/135, annex).
28 R. Shaw et al, “Indigenous Knowledge – Disaster Risk Reduction”, policy note, European Union,
UNISDR, Kyoto University, 2008.
29 OHCHR, Frequently asked questions on a human rights-based approach to development cooperation,
foundation for development, but also for the response in emergencies. Human rights
principles of universality and non-discrimination mean that the promotion of social
inclusion, equality and justice should be central concerns.30
38. The human rights-based approach is a conceptual framework for the process of
human development that is normally based on international human rights standards and
operationally aimed at the promotion and protection of human rights. It seeks to analyse the
inequalities that lie at the heart of development problems and those in emergency situations,
as well as to redress discriminatory practices and the unjust distribution of power, which
impede development.
39. A human rights-based approach identifies rights-holders and their entitlements, and
corresponding duty-bearers and their obligations, working towards strengthening the
capacities of rights-holders to make their claims and of duty-bearers to meet their
obligations. It is based on the premise that the empowerment of rights-holders and the
challenging of duty-bearers are in themselves important results. It recognizes every human
being both as a person and as a right-holder and envisages the guarantee of human rights
protection and accomplishment, mainly by the States and other actors in emergency
situations and humanitarian response.
40. A human rights-based approach requires that the following principles and standards
derived from human rights treaties guide all humanitarian response:
(a) Universality: human rights must be afforded to everyone, without exception;
(b) Indivisibility: human rights are indivisible and interdependent;
(c) Participation and consultation: people from all sectors have to participate in
the decisions to protect their rights and their opinions must be taken into account;
(d) Non-discrimination: human rights must be guaranteed without discrimination
of any kind, with due regard for the special needs of victims, particularly vulnerable
persons, especially in relation to policies and practices that may have a discriminatory
effect on, for instance, persons with disabilities owing to their lack of inclusiveness and
accessibility;
(e) Accountability: mechanisms of accountability should be created for the
enforcement of rights. A human rights-based approach in post-disaster and post-conflict
situations emphasizes measurable and enforceable obligations through mechanisms of
accountability, which helps to strengthen political commitment and justifications for
resource allocation, and improves incentives for the provision of social services without
discrimination.31 This approach therefore opens up international mechanisms of human
rights accountability and oversight in such contexts.32 Furthermore, accountability is a
process that helps to identify what works, so it can be repeated, and what does not, so it can
be revised. It is a way of checking that reasonable balances are fairly struck;33
New York and Geneva, 2006..
30 UNICEF, “A human rights-based approach to programming in humanitarian crises: is UNICEF up to
the challenge?”, 2003.
31 See “Towards freedom from fear and want: Human rights in the post-2015 agenda”, Thematic Think
Piece, OHCHR, May 2012, pp.6–7.
32 See Dug Cubie and Marlies Hesselman, “Accountability for the human rights implications of natural
disasters: a proposal for systemic international oversight”, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights
(forthcoming March 2015).
33 A/HRC/7/11, para. 99.
(f) Transparency: Governments and humanitarian partners, both national and
international, must be transparent about all information and decision-making processes
relating to rights. Decision-makers wanting to manage emergency situations, however,
sometimes do not disclose certain information relevant to disaster mitigation. Governments,
should, in principle, disseminate all relevant information to the general public. Information
should not be distorted to prevent social panic. It is indeed foreseeable that, in the process
of disseminating information, some simplification would be not only inevitable but even
necessary. It is important to highlight, however, that, in such circumstances, such
government initiatives and accountability require records to be kept of the decision-making
process;
(g) Do no harm or do less harm: although aid can become part of the dynamics
of a conflict and may even prolong it, humanitarian organizations must strive to “do no
harm” or to minimize the harm they may be inadvertently doing simply by being present
and providing assistance.34
41. In the programme for reform (1997),35 and its second phase, an agenda for further
change (2001),36 the Secretary-General called upon United Nations agencies to make
human rights a cross-cutting priority for the United Nations system. In 2003, a group of
United Nations agencies, including the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA),
committed to integrating human rights into their national development cooperation
programmes by adopting a common understanding on a rights-based approach.37 In
November 2013, the Secretary-General launched the “Human Rights Up Front” initiative,
which aims at improving the United Nations response to safeguard human rights in
complex crises and prevent horrendous human suffering. The need for early action, and the
crucial role of responding early to human rights violations, is at the heart of the initiative.
Though framed in terms of the protection of human rights, it also includes the task of
protection of civilians, with the importance of preventive efforts being consistently
emphasized. Another central aspect is better organizational preparedness by the United
Nations. The Secretariat and United Nations agencies, funds and programmes are to ensure
that the United Nations System, both on the ground and at Headquarters, is appropriately
prepared – early on – to deal with evolving crisis situations.
42. There seems to be a cyclic process between human rights violations, humanitarian
crises and humanitarian response. Although this cyclic dynamic is not necessarily a lineal
process, some stages have been identified, both for conflicts and natural disasters.
According to OHCHR, when human rights violations are a consequence of conflict
situations, the sequence of events is as follows:
(a) Human rights violations as causes of conflict;
(b) Humanitarian crisis;
(c) New violations: consequences of conflict and humanitarian crises;
(d) Pre-existing human rights issues are exacerbated;
(e) Human rights promotion and protection as objective of peace agreements.38
34 The “do no harm” principle, developed by Mary B. Anderson in the 1990’s, has developed into an
approach, inspiring a series of training workshops for humanitarian workers.
35 A/51/950.
36 A/57/387 and Corr.1.
37 UNFPA, “The Human Rights-Based Approach”, available at www.unfpa.org/rights/approaches.htm.
38 See OHCHR, International Legal Protection of Human Rights in Armed Conflict (New York and
Geneva, 2011).
43. Lastly, when human rights violations are a consequence of natural disasters,
OHCHR sees the sequence of events as follows:
(a) Natural disaster;
(b) Humanitarian crisis;
(c) Pre-existing human rights issues are exacerbated and new violations as
consequences of the disaster;
(d) Human rights inform planning and delivery of humanitarian response;
(e) Human rights integrated into emergency preparedness plans.
VI. International normative framework
A. United Nations human rights framework and mechanisms
44. To increase the effectiveness and scope of human rights protection in post-disaster
and post-conflict situations, there is a need for a holistic and complementary approach
among the different branches of international law: international human rights law,
international humanitarian law, refugee law and international criminal law. The
international human rights legal framework is composed of specific treaties and soft law
that aim to protect people affected by natural disasters and conflicts. As protection is not
limited to survival and security in an emergency situation, all relevant guarantees with
regard to civil and political rights, as well as economic, social and cultural ones, will
contribute to dignify the people affected.
45. Some of the key principles in relation with humanitarian assistance were formulated
by the General Assembly in its resolution 43/131 on humanitarian assistance for victims of
natural disasters and similar emergency situations, in which the Assembly reaffirmed the
sovereignty of affected States and their leadership in humanitarian assistance in their own
territories, stressed the important contribution made in providing humanitarian assistance
by governmental and non-governmental organizations, and urged States to participate
closely with affected countries in international efforts with a view to facilitating the transit
of humanitarian assistance.
46. States therefore have the primary responsibility for coordinating humanitarian
assistance, and are at least under the moral duty to accept bona fide offers of assistance by
States or other relevant organizations. This emphasis on the States’ role does not however,
go to the detriment of the role of local communities and the fact that planning for disaster
risk reduction should be rather de-centralized and concretized.
47. The Universal Human Rights Index documents a number of concrete
recommendations, made in the context of the universal periodic review in relation to
humanitarian action in situations of natural disasters, that relate primarily to strengthening
or improving measures for disaster reduction and to responding appropriately to
emergencies, given the vulnerability of certain countries. Other countries were asked to
continue their efforts to strengthen and to share their experience, lessons learned, methods
and best practices in prevention and humanitarian response applied and particularly
considering providing assistance in case of natural disasters and taking positive steps with
regard to climate change. Several recommendations relate to post-conflict situations and to
continuing implementation of the Security Council resolutions on women, peace and
security; ensuring the rights of children and women and women’s participation in
reconstruction and peacebuilding processes; improving access to education; intensifying
efforts to prevent, punish and eradicate all forms of violence against women; preventing
and combating widespread economic exploitation of children; and strengthening
institutional capacities in the protection and promotion of human rights in post-conflict
situations through the incorporation of a human rights-based approach into all policies and
practices.
48. In its resolution 1325 (2000) on women, peace and security, the Security Council
reaffirmed the important role of women in the prevention and resolution of conflicts, peace
negotiations, peacebuilding, peacekeeping, humanitarian response and in post-conflict
reconstruction, and stressed the importance of their equal participation and full involvement
in all efforts for maintenance and promotion of peace and security. It urged all actors to
increase participation of women and incorporate gender perspectives in all United Nations
peace and security efforts. It also called upon all parties to the conflict to take special
measures to protect women and girls from gender-based violence, particularly rape and
other forms of sexual abuse, in situations of armed conflict. It provided a number of
important operational mandates, with implications for Member States and United Nations
entities.
49. Similarly, article 11 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities not
only enshrines obligations to ensure protection and safety of persons with disabilities in
situations of armed conflict and humanitarian emergencies, but also requires an inclusive
approach for the design of disaster risk reduction policies accessible to persons with
disabilities.
50. In recent years, attention has been drawn in particular to humanitarian aid and
assistance owing to emergencies provoked by armed conflicts and disasters around the
world, leading to the development of a specialized framework and mechanisms, including:
(a) Humanitarian policies, agreements, guidelines, documents and tools of the
Inter-Agency Standing Committee39 for humanitarian assistance, such as the Humanitarian
Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, the Guidelines on Mental Health
and Psychosocial Support in Emergency Settings, the Gender Handbook in Humanitarian
Action, the Operational Guidelines on Human Rights and Natural Disasters and the
Guidelines on Gender-Based Violence Interventions;
(b) The Sphere Project, a voluntary initiative that brings together a wide range of
humanitarian agencies around the common aim of improving the quality of humanitarian
assistance and accountability of humanitarian actors to their constituents, donors and
affected populations. Established in 1997, it is today a vibrant community of humanitarian
response practitioners.
51. Other important humanitarian mechanisms include:
(a) The Humanitarian Accountability Partnership, which has established concrete
norms, training, code of conduct, protection of sexual exploitation and abuse40 guidance and
certification;
(b) The Hyogo Framework for Action 2005–2015: Building the Resilience of
Nations and Communities to Disasters;
(c) The Global Humanitarian Platform, established to bring together United
Nations and non-United Nations humanitarian organizations to explore ways of exploring
humanitarian partnerships;
39 Established pursuant General Assembly resolution 46/182.
40 See Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse by UN and Related Personnel
(www.un.org/en/pseataskforce).
(d) The Guidelines for the Domestic Facilitation and Regulation of International
Disaster Relief and Initial Recovery Assistance, adopted at the thirtieth International
Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 2007, and the Code of Conduct in the
event of disasters;
(e) The International Law and Standards Applicable in Natural Disaster
Situations of the International Development Law Organization;
(f) The World Vision Minimum Inter-Agency Standards for Protection
Mainstreaming;41
(g) The Food Assistance Convention.
B. International humanitarian law and mechanisms
52. The Geneva Conventions and the Additional Protocols thereto are at the core of
international humanitarian law, the body of international law that seeks to limit the effects
of armed conflict. They restrict the means and methods of warfare and protect people who
are not or no longer participating in hostilities (civilians, medical and other health
professionals, humanitarian personnel, the wounded, sick or shipwrecked, or prisoners of
war). The Conventions and the Protocols thereto call for measures to be taken to prevent or
to put an end to all violations of international humanitarian law. They contain stringent
rules to deal with “grave breaches”. Those responsible for grave breaches must be sought,
tried or extradited, whatever their nationality.
53. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is an impartial, neutral and
independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives
and dignity of victims of armed conflict and other situations of violence and to provide
them with assistance. ICRC also endeavours to prevent suffering by promoting and
strengthening humanitarian law and universal humanitarian principles. Its work is based on
the Geneva Conventions of 1949, the Additional Protocols thereto, its Statutes, the Statutes
of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and the resolutions of the
International Conferences of the Red Cross and Red Crescent. ICRC addresses the effects
of conflict by, for instance, focusing attention on refugees and displaced persons (in
complementarity with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
(UNHCR)), mine clearance, training armed forces in the use of legitimate force, doctrine
development and counselling. One of its main activities is also the search for missing
persons; in this area, it has formulated an international standard of ante- and post-mortem
using forensic DNA analysis. ICRC forms part of the International Red Cross and Red
Crescent Movement. Seven fundamental principles guarantee the continuity of the
Movement’s work: humanity, impartiality, neutrality, independence, voluntary service,
unity and universality.
C. Regional institutions and mechanisms for humanitarian aid and
assistance
54. Various regional, subregional and national multi-sectoral and multi-stakeholder
initiatives evaluate and implement humanitarian assistance and human rights law in post-
disaster and post-conflict situations.
41 Available from http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Full_Report_3752.pdf.
55. In Africa, the initiatives implemented include Africa Humanitarian Action; the
Programme of Action for the Implementation of the Africa Regional Strategy for Disaster
Risk Reduction; the African Union Commission, which facilitates and coordinates the
implementation of the Regional Strategy, the Programme of Action and the Hyogo
Framework for Action; the Africa Regional Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction; periodic
high-level meetings of the African Ministerial Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction and
the African Ministerial Conference on the Environment; regional economic communities;
and the Planning and Coordinating Agency of the New Partnership for Africa’s
Development (NEPAD).
56. Important initiatives in Asia include Asian Disaster Reduction and Response
Network and the Asian Disaster Preparedness Center.
57. In Latin America, several intergovernmental bodies have been established, including
the Organization of American States, with the working group of the Inter-American
Network for Disaster Mitigation; and the Community of Latin American and Caribbean
States, with the Risk, Emergency and Disaster Task Force Inter-Agency Work Group for
Latin America and the Caribbean. The following mechanisms and forums have also been
created: the Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency; the Ibero-American
General Secretariat; the Coordination Center for the Prevention of Natural Disasters in
Central America; and the Comprehensive Risk Management Policy for Central America.
58. In Europe, the Emergency Response Coordination Centre, operated within the
Directorate General for Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection, was established to ensure a
coordinated, more rapid response to disasters both inside and outside Europe, using the
resources of the 32 countries participating in the European Union Civil Protection
Mechanism.
VII. Good practices
A. National legal frameworks and mechanisms
59. Governments should not use humanitarian assistance for political purposes.
Similarly, political parties should not take advantage of an emergency to better position
themselves among the population. Political patronage should be avoided in post-disaster
and post-conflict situations; affected populations, like any other individual or community,
continue to have rights and to be voters. In this regard, the responses received from
Member States to the questionnaire concerning their legal frameworks and the mechanisms
for responding to emergencies resulting from disasters or conflicts from a rights-based
approach are described below.
60. Slovakia is working to ensure that the Act on State Security in times of War and
Hostilities, Martial Law and Emergency State allows for the distribution of vitally
important products and goods to citizens affected by a crisis.
61. In Colombia, Law No. 1523 stipulates that humanitarian assistance must be
provided on the basis of the principles of equality, timeliness, relevance and effectiveness.
Article 1 of the law stipulates that all individuals are to receive the same support and the
same treatment in situations of disaster and danger. A manual on the standardization of
humanitarian assistance details more principles.
62. In Chile, the national civil protection and emergency system is based on the
Constitution of the State. To enforce the guarantees enshrined in the system, particularly
with regard to disasters, a number of relevant laws and regulations have been formulated.
63. In Mexico, as part of the national strategy to respond to humanitarian crises, the
General Civil Protection Act has been adopted to provide for the establishment of a national
mechanism for disasters from the viewpoint of integrated risk management, known as the
national system of civil protection (Sistema Nacional de Protección Civil).
64. In Japan, various measures have been taken to improve: its guidelines on nuclear
emergency preparedness and emergency response; the scope and extent of basic and
detailed health management surveys; dose limits of radiation; access to accurate
information on radiation and its health effects; transparency and accountability of the
nuclear industry and regulatory authority; and the participation of affected communities in
decision-making processes.
65. In addition to the above good practices, it is equally important that national laws for
disaster risk reduction be enacted to make provisions for the concrete allocation of funds to
disaster risk reduction. Evidence abounds of the immediate and direct effects that natural
disasters and conflicts have on the economy of communities and countries, in addition to
their long-term impact. In most disasters, the bulk of immediate damage comes from
destroyed assets (stock), such as buildings, infrastructure, inventories and growing crops.
Disasters also generate short- and long-term losses in economic activity and income (flow)
in affected areas, as people and companies lose their means of production and access to
markets. Economic activity picks up gradually during the years of reconstruction, starting
with emergency response and humanitarian assistance. Capital assets can be regenerated
through reconstruction investment, which generates income as work progresses. Such
natural disasters as storms and droughts have, according to one study, a moderate but
negative, permanent impact on income growth.42
66. The above-mentioned examples would indicate that Africa and Latin America have
improved their multilevel and multisectoral work on emergency preparedness and
humanitarian response, the result of the effects they have had to face in the conflicts and
disasters experienced in recent decades.
B. Participation of the community and the persons affected
67. Humanitarian assistance is developed in a comprehensive framework where legal,
social, political, ethical and cultural relations need to be taken into account. In the legal
framework, the State is the duty-bearer while people and communities are rights-holders,
not just the recipients of aid. This issue is a central theme in education, formal and informal
processes linked to disaster prevention and reduction, rehabilitation and reconstruction.
Some initiatives could be put in place in this regard:
(a) Community participation programmes, which should be accessible to and
inclusive of rural, indigenous and displaced communities, women and girls and persons
with disabilities; actions in the field of risk microzonation should consider community
involvement and identify the specific characteristics of the affected community;
(b) Specific school safety plans should be developed and include other forms of
institutions, such as special schools;
42 Statistical Yearbook for Asia and the Pacific 2011, “Assessing economic impact of natural disasters:
A mix of stock-and-flow indicators” (see www.unescap.org/stat/data/syb2011/II-
Environment/Natural-disasters.asp).
(c) Cultural patterns that allow women and men to participate equally in
decision-making processes at home and in the community on health and other issues need
to be taken into account.
68. Measures to rebuild local communities following their destruction by disasters are
essential. Affected populations are, as a result, forced to live in a totally new environment,
such as in temporary housing units, shelters and camps. It is recognized fact that, although
affected populations are expected to build a new community themselves, not all of them can
adjust to a new environment.
69. Individuals, as rights-holders, have the right to participate in the design and
evaluation of policies relating to their resettlement. The participation of victims and
affected persons ensures the transparency of administration and contributes to the
sustainability of humanitarian aid, relief and recovery actions. Local authorities have the
obligation to consult and involve the persons concerned during the early stages to avoid a
further gap in communication with beneficiaries.
70. The private sector and civil society also play and important role. States, for instance,
can promote prior agreements with companies in order to avoid price speculation and
shortages, and can also buy from local producers in order to improve the local economy.
Rising food prices hinder access to food to millions of people, even when products are
available. In addition, the final increase in food prices does not correspond to prices of
producers, who continue to earn very little from selling their crops, and thus perpetuates
their poverty and worsens their situation in emergencies.
C. Gender focus
71. One best practice identified from the responses received concerned the consideration
of gender issues in disaster responses; for example, the provision of personal hygiene kits,
food and water supplies, differentiated between men and women.
72. A gender-based approach takes into account the specific needs of women; for
example, more toilets need to be built for women because they usually carry their children
with them. While the “code of conviviality” establishes that common kitchen brigades
should be mixed to favour gender equality, shelters should have separate restrooms for men
and women, and a private room for intimate cleaning for women. Protection mechanisms
for gender-based violence and rape are another example. Women and girls, and in particular
those with disabilities, often are victims of not only rape and sexual harassment but also
trafficking and negative coping strategies. For example, they may be at a high risk of sexual
assault when they collect water or go to the restroom; good lighting is therefore essential.
73. As women, girls, older persons and children are also at risk of domestic violence,
centres for psychological assistance and legal aid ought to be in place. Shelters for women
and children survivors of violence could be considered part of humanitarian aid.
74. There is a need to develop thematic guidelines on female empowerment, and on
children and persons with disabilities in post-disaster and post-conflict situations. With
regard to children, special attention should be paid to former child soldiers and victims of
any form of violence. Secure playing areas for children and parents need to be put in place
in order to encourage solidarity and to ensure the mental health of affected persons.
75. Women’s involvement in the delivery of humanitarian aid supplies and
arrangements is important in order to avoid preferential treatment towards men and for
women’s empowerment in the community. Women should not have to bear the burden of
caring alone for their families; they should not be sexually abused in return for food or
other kinds of assistance; they need to have the same access to services and assistance as
men; and it should not be forgotten that they often take care of their children and elderly
family members as well.
D. Respect for cultural values
76. Providing food and clothes requires taking into account traditional and cultural
practices. There is also a need to increase indigenous community awareness of support and
resilience, which are important for the recovery of livelihoods of the affected persons on
their own territory or on a new one. Information on universal design and accessibility
should also be considered and welcomed for persons with disabilities.
77. Humanitarian kits responding to cultural practices and the needs of the population in
terms of food, kitchen, home and cleaning are indispensable. Support programmes for
nutrition should be designed in accordance with cultural requirements relating to food and
the nutritional needs of women, girls, children, including those with disabilities, and
targeted populations.
E. Multilevel approach
78. Humanitarian aid is based on legal and operational frameworks at the international,
regional, national and local levels, which therefore also calls for a multilevel approach to
facilitate the decentralization of such an emergency response.
79. Since local governments and traditional authorities are normally the closest to the
affected populations, their experience and lessons learned should be considered for
emergency response planning and implementation. Municipal governments should make
reasonable efforts to ensure adequate and decent living conditions in shelters. To that end,
guidelines should be elaborated and published for managing shelters, and identify areas
where special attention is necessary in assisting vulnerable groups.
80. A regional approach is also necessary, given that regional organizations and
mechanisms have significant expertise and resources to offer when dealing with disaster
situations. Regional initiatives in humanitarian aid should also be taken into account.
81. Disaster prevention and disaster risk reduction include practices to prevent serious
human rights violations and to avoid the historical accumulation of violations of economic,
social and cultural rights, including the right to food.
VIII. Challenges
82. The main challenge is to develop humanitarian responses and actions by States and
specialized, global and national initiatives that fully take into consideration the protective
legal framework granted by international human rights law, international humanitarian law
and other relevant branches of international law. A human rights-based approach is
important because it insists on rights-holders and duty-bearers. By putting the needs of
victims at its centre, international humanitarian law is not less important. It further
strengthens the protection and assistance afforded to affected populations. They should
frame, with other relevant branches of international law, all humanitarian work related to
disasters and conflicts. Furthermore, both international humanitarian law and international
human rights law support the recognition and prosecution of grave human rights violations
or serious violations of international humanitarian law in the context of armed conflict. If
humanitarian assistance is not based on such a framework, there is a risk that this approach
will be too limited and not integrate all the basic needs of affected people in the wider
planning process, as well as the responsibility of the State to lead the recovery process.
There is also a risk that some important issues will be postponed to recovery and
reconstruction, and will thus not be included in the State’s development strategy. Another
key challenge is that reconstruction efforts, an essential part of recovery, are too often
neglected.
83. In the rush to provide humanitarian aid and save lives, less attention is paid to the
human rights protection that must be provided to people affected by disasters and conflicts.
In addition, not much attention is paid to the rights of vulnerable persons.
84. Access to water was identified as a significant challenge following disasters and was
described as fundamental to prevent rape. Women are most vulnerable when they are
required to walk long distances to reach water. In addition, there are difficulties in the
provision of water supply based on international standards for hygiene and clean water.
Women’s particular requirements should be assessed in the case of emergency response.
Lack of access to aid supplies, information, communication and services also needs to be
addressed if the inclusiveness of persons with disabilities in disaster risk reduction policies
is to be guaranteed.
85. States must step up their efforts in the prevention of domestic violence and gender-
based violence in post-conflict and post-disaster situations. Information and comprehensive
assistance are needed to support women and children survivors of violence both in and
outside the emergency areas, for example in host communities. It is important to offer
special attention, which integrates a cultural approach, to displaced persons, persons with
disabilities, LGBT persons, older persons and indigenous peoples. States, through the
implementation of the four pillars described in Security Council resolution 1325 (2000) –
participation, protection, prevention, and relief and recovery – should promote the pivotal
role that women play in conflict management, conflict resolution and sustainable peace,
because they are still excluded from participation in peace processes. Procedures and
mechanisms should be developed to involve women in protection, prevention and relief and
recovery stages. Pursuant to Council resolution 1820 (2008), States are also required to
establish the framework and mechanism to protect women, girls and children from
violence, including sexual violence in situations of armed conflict.
86. It is also important to avoid political favouritism so that relief is guaranteed for all
concerned, not just for political supporters. Governments should not use humanitarian
attention for political purposes, and political parties should not use emergency situation for
better positioning themselves among the population.
87. Other identified challenges include:
(a) Lack of awareness of the Operational Guidelines on the Protection of Persons
in Situations of Natural Disasters;
(b) Lack of adequate internalization of the duties and rights with regard to the
promotion and protection of human rights in situations of natural disasters, essential for
their proper implementation;
(c) Poor decentralization of policies applied to disaster prevention and disaster
risk reduction;
(d) Lack of inclusiveness of and accessibility to at-risk groups, including women,
children, older persons, persons with disabilities and indigenous peoples, as well as the lack
of involvement and partnership with private actors.
88. Laws should be in place for disaster prevention and mitigation, and States should be
obliged to allocate the resources required to improve the living conditions of persons
affected by disaster and conflict.
89. In some States, constitutional rights may be limited, for instance when a state of
emergency has been declared. Even in states of emergency resulting from disaster or
conflict, however, the State must respect the core of human rights and ensure that the
specific legislations respects its own Constitution, international human rights treaties and
the rules contained in international declarations on humanitarian assistance.
90. States invest financially in humanitarian disaster and conflict relief in a planned
way, avoiding budgetary risks that jeopardize public investment in normal times. The
establishment of national funds for recovery and reconstruction could be important
initiatives.
91. Local mechanisms for denouncing violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law in disaster and conflict situations should be put in place to ensure the
safety, security and freedom of the persons affected. Complaints and feedback systems can
be designed and implemented as participatory processes, as can democratic-based actions.
92. In recent times, the term “disaster prevention” has often been coupled with “disaster
mitigation” or “disaster risk reduction”. This may have been caused by the growing
awareness that “hazards are inevitable, and the elimination of all risks is impossible”.43 In
the case of disasters, too much emphasis on prevention in planning to address disasters
might lead to the dissemination of an unfounded belief in safety. To achieve the ultimate
and foremost goal of saving lives, more attention should be paid to preparedness, early
warning and risk reduction.
93. The first action for preparedness for a disaster would, therefore, be to search what
types of risks exist in a particular area of the country, and then to raise public awareness of
those risks. Unsound economic and urban development often leads to great loss of human
life by natural hazards, besides reducing the sustainability of development. The perspective
of risk reduction should therefore be incorporated into national development plans.
94. The main challenges in peacebuilding and transitional justice are the allocation of
inadequate funds and the awareness of the international community that the resilience of
livelihoods is fundamental for peacebuilding and understanding the interdependence of
civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights.
IX. Main conclusions
95. Although rescue, relief and rehabilitation action should be compliant with
human rights, this is not always the case. A human rights-based approach includes the
principles of direct and intentional linkage to human rights; transparency;
participation, inclusiveness and consultation of those affected and beneficiaries; non-
discrimination; special attention to the needs of at-risk and marginalized groups
within the larger set of beneficiaries; and accountability and timeliness.
96. Humanitarian intervention should take into account legal, social, political,
ethical and cultural relations. It is fundamental that the legal framework underline
that the State holds obligations and individuals and communities hold rights.
97. To increase the effectiveness and scope of human rights protection in post-
disaster and post-conflict situations, a holistic and complementary approach among
the different branches of international law is necessary.
43 See United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, “A Safer World in the 21st Century: disaster
and risk reduction”, available at www.unisdr.org/who-we-are/international-strategy-for-disaster-
reduction.
X. Recommendations
98. Member States should recall that the full respect of all human rights and other
relevant branches of international law can ensure adequate protection in
humanitarian action in post-conflict and post-disaster situations. Rights relating to the
basic necessities of life (in particular relating to food, drinking water, shelter, clothing,
adequate health services and sanitation), physical security and integrity (protection of
the right to life and the right to be free of assault, rape, arbitrary detention and
kidnapping, and threats to these rights), civil and political protection needs (rights to
religious freedom and freedom of speech, personal documentation, political
participation, access to courts, and freedom from discrimination ) and other economic,
social and cultural protection needs (such as access to education, to receive restitution
or compensation for lost property and to work ) should be protected and respected
through the design and implementation of concrete initiatives and mechanisms at all
levels.
99. Approaches that are participatory, gender-based, culturally sensitive,
accountable, anti-discriminatory and comprehensive, and that adhere to the
principles of universal design, accessibility and inclusiveness and “do no harm” must
be included in all humanitarian aid plans and mechanisms during the design, rescue,
relief and recovery phases. These programmatic and political issues allow for better
application of international human rights law and international humanitarian law
standards, and offer a comprehensive response to crises. Mechanisms for respect of
human rights of the most vulnerable groups should be defined in preparedness for
disasters.
100. States should also recognize the need of specific funding for emergency
response, relief and reconstruction. The allocation of funds for that purpose should be
a priority in the annual national budget. In addition, States should identify long-term
development budgets – and not only with costs of recovery and reconstruction – to
avoid the accumulation of damage.
101. Special attention should be paid to the protection of human rights of vulnerable
persons, in particular women, children, older persons, displaced persons and persons
with disabilities. The vulnerability of children, particularly girls, is a priority when
planning prevention and humanitarian assistance. Attacks on places usually
frequented by children, such as schools, hospitals, parks and their own homes, should
be strongly condemned and avoided at all costs. The protection of such sites should be
a priority for United Nations peacekeepers.
102. Since there are many cases of States occupying the territory of other States, it is
important to highlight that, in the event of armed conflict, the occupying force is
responsible for the respect of international humanitarian law and the protection of the
human rights of the population of the occupied State.
103. Ensuring a human rights-based approach implies a high standard of
accountability. States that do not effectively protect their population during and after
a conflict or a disaster should therefore be held accountable.
104. Taking into account that rescue, relief and recovery actions will depend on the
context on the ground, humanitarian action may sometimes be at risk of infringing or
violating the human rights of the affected people, thus contravening the “do no harm”
principle. For that reason, plans for emergency preparedness and humanitarian aid
should be based on the human rights framework in order to prevent the living
conditions of the affected population from worsening during the delivery of
humanitarian assistance.