30/13 Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Marshall Islands
Document Type: Final Report
Date: 2015 Jul
Session: 30th Regular Session (2015 Sep)
Agenda Item: Item6: Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Council Thirtieth session
Agenda item 6
Universal periodic review
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review*
Marshall Islands
* The annex to the present report is circulated as received.
2
Contents
Page
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3
I. Summary of the proceedings of the review process ......................................................................... 3
A. Presentation by the State under review .................................................................................... 3
B. Interactive dialogue and responses by the State under review ................................................. 6
II. Conclusions and recommendations .................................................................................................. 14
Annex
Composition of the delegation ......................................................................................................... 22
Introduction
1. The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, established in accordance
with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1, held its twenty-second session from 4 to
15 May 2015. The review of the Marshall Islands was held at the 12th meeting, on 11 May
2015. The delegation of the Marshall Islands was headed by the Minister for Foreign
Affairs, Tony A. deBrum. At its 17th meeting, held on 15 May 2015, the Working Group
adopted the report on the Marshall Islands.
2. On 13 January 2015, the Human Rights Council selected the following group of
rapporteurs (troika) to facilitate the review of the Marshall Islands: China, Congo and
Mexico.
3. In accordance with paragraph 15 of the annex to Human Rights Council
resolution 5/1 and paragraph 5 of the annex to Council resolution 16/21, the following
documents were issued for the review of the Marshall Islands:
(a) A national report (A/HRC/WG.6/22/MHL/1);
(b) A compilation prepared by the Office of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) (A/HRC/WG.6/22/MHL/2);
(c) A summary prepared by OHCHR (A/HRC/WG.6/22/MHL/3).
4. A list of questions prepared in advance by Belgium, Germany, Liechtenstein,
Mexico, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
was transmitted to the Marshall Islands through the troika. These questions are available on
the extranet of the Working Group
I. Summary of the proceedings of the review process
A. Presentation by the State under review
5. The delegation of the Marshall Islands thanked OHCHR, the Human Rights Council
and the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review for allowing the Marshall Islands
to present its second report on its human rights situation. The delegation also thanked the
Regional Rights Resource Team of the Secretariat of the Pacific Community, the Pacific
Islands Forum Secretariat and their bilateral partners for assistance in the preparations
leading up to the submission of the report of the Marshall Islands as well as their
participation before the Working Group.
6. The Marshall Islands stated that with a population of roughly over 60,000 people, it
consisted of low-lying coral atolls (29) and islands (5) in the central Pacific with a total
land area of approximately 181 km 2 scattered over an exclusive economic zone of 2 million
km 2 of ocean.
7. The Marshall Islands emphasized that after the Second World War it was
administered by the United States of America as a United Nations-mandated Trust Territory
of the Pacific Islands. During that period, the United States had detonated in the country,
namely the atolls of Bikini and Enewetak, 67 atmospheric, land and underwater atomic and
thermonuclear weapons from 1946 to 1958, or the equivalent of 1.6 Hiroshima bombs
every single day during the 12 years of the United States Nuclear Testing Program. Such
was the legacy of the United States, and to the present day outstanding issues arising from
the Program were yet to be resolved. The Marshall Islands adopted its Constitution in 1979
4
and on 21 October 1986 entered into the Compact of Free Association with the United
States. An amended version of the Compact was signed in 2003.
8. The Marshall Islands stated that it had made important strides since its first universal
periodic review in 2010. In addition to being party to the Convention on the Rights of the
Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against
Women, it was now party to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and
the United Nations Convention against Corruption. Prior to accession to the Convention on
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, consultations had taken place to develop the
National Policy on Disability Inclusive Development, which was approved by the “Nitijela”
(Parliament) in late 2014. The Policy was developed in line with the Convention, the
Pacific Regional Strategy on Disability and the Incheon Strategy to “Make the Right Real” for Persons with Disabilities in Asia and the Pacific. Subsequent to acceding to the
Convention, the Marshall Islands drafted a bill on the rights of persons with disabilities,
which was before the Nitijela. The country received technical assistance from the Economic
and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat and
the Pacific Disability Forum throughout the entire process.
9. With respect to the other core human rights treaties and existing optional protocols,
the Cabinet had approved the accession of the Marshall Islands to those treaties and
optional protocols subject to constitutional processes. Given its limited resources, the
country had to be careful not only to accede to those important treaties and protocols, but
also to apply them to domestic law in order to ensure proper implementation.
10. The Marshall Islands reported that the Nitijela had enacted a number of laws that
supported the Bill of Rights and criminalized any violations thereof, particularly the
Domestic Violence Prevention and Protection Act 2011, an updated Criminal Code 2011
and the Marshall Islands Public School System Act 2013. Also before the Nitijela, in
addition to the bill on the rights of persons with disabilities, were two bills, one on child
protection and the other on the human rights commission. The latter would codify the
Resource Development Committee and its monitoring and implementation responsibilities
with respect to human rights.
11. Furthermore, and in addition to the National Policy on Disability Inclusive
Development, the Marshall Islands stressed that it had developed the National Strategic
Plan, with technical assistance from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
The Plan covered the period from 2015 to 2017 and would continually be updated in three-
year increments so as to meet longer-term objectives which would be achieved in
five sectors: social development; the environment, climate change and resiliency;
infrastructure development; sustainable economic development; and good governance.
12. The Marshall Islands added that the Cabinet had recently adopted a number of
important gender-inclusive national policies, including the Gender Equality Policy, the
aforementioned National Strategic Plan, the National Climate Change Policy Framework
and the National Energy Policy. They all incorporated goals and outcomes for gender
equality and the advancement of women, and called for the development of gender-
sensitive strategies for climate change responses and the advancement of women in
decision-making and economic empowerment.
13. Regarding violence against women, the Marshall Islands indicated that the Nitijela
had passed the Domestic Violence Prevention and Protection Act 2011 after several years
of work by several non-governmental organizations (NGOs), including Women United
Together Marshall Islands. The Domestic Violence Prevention and Protection Task Force
was established in 2012, as an attachment to the Secretary of Internal Affairs, to ensure the
law was implemented, make recommendations, pool resources and lobby for the Nitijela to
provide financial support from the Ministry of Internal Affairs’ recurrent budget. To further
help the work of eliminating domestic violence, the Government submitted an application
to a United Nations trust fund and was awarded US$ 372,000 for the implementation of the
Act for three years according to the Act’s costing table developed by UNDP. Furthermore,
development of a family health study survey, with assistance from the United Nations
Population Fund (UNFPA), began in 2012; the survey was projected to be launched later in
2015. One of the recommendations arising from the exercise was to improve administrative
data collection and analysis with regard to health, justice, education and social services.
That would strengthen the referral system among essential services while allowing the
country to carry out its analysis of the services to ensure that they were responding to the
high prevalence rates of violence against women recorded in the survey, and make policy
and programme reform where administrative reporting was low. The Marshall Islands
stated that it urgently needed international assistance at the grass-roots and local levels to
better achieve visible elimination of domestic violence.
14. Other policies had been developed in the Marshall Islands, namely the National
Youth Policy (2009–2014), with assistance from NGOs and regional development partners;
the National Reproductive Health Policy/Strategy (2014–2016), with assistance from the
UNFPA Pacific Subregional Office; the Country Prevention of Adolescent Pregnancy: A
Three-Year Strategy (2014–2016), with assistance from UNFPA; and the Marshallese Joint
National Plan for Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Management (2014–2018),
with help from the Secretariat of the Pacific Community Applied Geoscience and
Technology Division, the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme and
UNDP. The delegation thanked those international and regional partners, and asked for
their continued support.
15. The Marshall Islands emphasized that those accomplishments had been made while
it continued to face the challenges of climate change and the lingering effects of the United
States Nuclear Testing Program. The country had been outspoken in seeking to address the
human rights dimension of climate change, including in early 2009, when it told the Human
Rights Council in a formal report that climate risks would seriously threaten nearly each
and every core human right sector, including the right to statehood for the entire nation. In
2013, the country led efforts for the Pacific Islands Forum leaders to adopt the Majuro
Declaration for Climate Leadership, which set forward national commitments to reduce
emissions. That principle — that every nation, large and small, rich and poor, commit to
action — had helped change multilateral politics. The country was also working very hard
to secure a strong and practical post-2020 climate agreement in Paris, but the Paris
agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change was very
likely to leave serious exposure to human rights risks.
16. The Marshall Islands also emphasized that impacts of climate change on local
communities continued to worsen; a recent drought had affected a quarter of the nation and
necessitated the serious involvement of the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian
Affairs of the United Nations. Unusually strong king tides and coastal flooding had
devastated local communities. That was also an issue shared in the wider Pacific region as
seen when the Federated States of Micronesia and Vanuatu suffered from the recent
hurricanes. While natural events had always occurred in small islands, it was irrefutable
that there were climate drivers and that the scale and intensity of their impact were
increasing.
17. The Marshall Islands highlighted the fact that the Special Rapporteur on the
implications for human rights of the environmentally sound management and disposal of
hazardous substances and wastes visited the Marshall Islands from 27 to 30 March 2012
and the United States from 24 to 27 April 2012 to assess the impact on human rights of the
Nuclear Testing Program conducted in the Marshall Islands by the United States from 1946
to 1958. One of the issues identified in his report was the limited access to information
6
relating to the Program. Many of the historical documents provided to the Marshall Islands
were incomplete and in “deleted version only” form and labelled as “extracted, redacted or
sanitized” with information of an unknown nature and the volume removed. Following the
Special Rapporteur’s report, the country had as recently as 27 April 2015 been trying to
gain access to that information but to no avail. The repeated failure or refusal of the United
States to provide full access to those records could only be taken as a blatant indignity
towards and lack of respect for the Marshallese people and represented an ongoing
violation of basic human rights.
18. Despite those challenges and other constraints, such as human and financial
resources, the delegation stated that the Marshall Islands continued to do its outmost to
address recommendations from the first universal periodic review to improve the country’s
capacity to address human rights issues. As it had in 2010, the Marshall Islands once again
requested the kind assistance of the international community for the following:
(a) Technical and financial assistance for capacity-building of public servants
and government-elected officials with respect to implementation of human rights in the
country;
(b) Technical and financial assistance in improving public awareness
programmes of both the Government and NGOs with respect to the human rights of the
Marshallese people;
(c) Technical and financial assistance to address climate change, educational and
health issues.
19. The Marshall Islands reiterated its commitment to fulfilling its human rights
obligations. Although it was a small island developing State, much progress had been made
in five years, and the country was confident that more progress was forthcoming. It
recognized that more work needed to be done, none of which would be relegated. The
country would continue to do its part in the promotion and protection of human rights for
the Marshallese people and the improvement thereof, but it would like to point out that that
was a collaborative, universal effort requiring the partnership and assistance of the
international community. To that end, the Marshall Islands looked forward to the
recommendations of the Working Group, which would be seriously considered given its
domestic process.
B. Interactive dialogue and responses by the State under review
20. During the interactive dialogue, 43 delegations made statements. Recommendations
made during the dialogue can be found in section II of the present report.
21. The Netherlands referred to the standing invitation extended to the special
procedures and welcomed steps taken to implement recommendations by the Special
Rapporteur on the implications for human rights of the environmentally sound management
and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes. It was concerned about the protection of
the rights of people living with HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and/or other sexually transmitted
diseases. It mentioned the steps taken in the field of women’s rights and that improvements
could be made regarding the political participation of women. The Netherlands made
recommendations.
22. New Zealand was conscious of the challenges faced by small island developing
States. It congratulated the Marshall Islands on ratifying the Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities and commended its development of domestic legislation. It
indicated that violence against women was an ongoing problem and offered to share its own
experiences in dealing with domestic violence. New Zealand made recommendations.
23. The Philippines appreciated the ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of
All Forms of Discrimination against Women and the Convention on the Rights of the
Child, recalling that during the first universal periodic review, the Marshall Islands had
received numerous recommendations regarding ratification of core international human
rights treaties. It inquired about actions taken towards the ratification of those treaties. It
pointed out that the Marshall Islands was late in submitting periodic reports in compliance
with its obligations under those human rights conventions. The Philippines made a
recommendation.
24. Portugal welcomed the steps taken to protect and promote human rights since the
first universal periodic review, including the adoption of the Public School System Act
2013, which established a public free-of-charge school system. It welcomed the
determination of the Marshall Islands to prevent adolescent pregnancy as reflected in the
development of its 2014–2016 strategy. Portugal made recommendations.
25. The Russian Federation noted with satisfaction the progress achieved, including the
new Criminal Code and the National Strategic Plan 2015–2017. It appreciated the policies
to promote gender equality, improve the quality of life of persons with disabilities, and for
the development of youth. It highlighted the need for the international community to
provide support relating to health care and the environment. The Russian Federation made
recommendations.
26. Rwanda noted with appreciation the legislative development, national measures and
policies aimed at promoting and protecting human rights. It commended the Domestic
Violence Prevention and Protection Act. It noted with appreciation the development of the
National Gender Policy, scheduled for review by the Cabinet in early 2015 and inquired
about its outcome. It commended the adoption of the Disability Inclusive Development
Policy. Rwanda made recommendations.
27. Sierra Leone commended efforts to address human rights issues in a holistic manner
by engaging various stakeholders at the regional and international levels and pointed out
that the Marshall Islands was well on its way to meeting Millennium Development Goal 4.
It commended climate change management initiatives and encouraged the Marshall Islands
to continue to seek technical assistance from the international community. Sierra Leone
made recommendations.
28. Singapore welcomed the accession of the Marshall Islands to the United Nations
Convention against Corruption and commended it for including good governance as one of
the five sectors of activity through which it sought to achieve the objectives of its National
Strategic Plan. It acknowledged the efforts of the Marshall Islands in protecting and
promoting the rights of women. Singapore made recommendations.
29. Slovenia commended the Marshall Islands for ratifying the Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities. It welcomed efforts in the field of gender equality and
the empowerment of women, including the adoption of the Domestic Violence Prevention
and Protection Act 2011 and work on a new National Gender Policy. It pointed out efforts
made to ensure the right to education but remained concerned about high-school dropout
rates. Slovenia made recommendations.
30. Spain recognized the efforts made by the Marshall Islands in the area of the rights of
persons with disabilities and congratulated it on the recent ratification of the Convention on
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Spain made recommendations.
31. Responding to questions, the Marshall Islands underlined the fact that, concerning
gender equality, even though there was only one female member of Parliament out of 33, a
number of the country’s positions in the public service were held by women such as the
8
Head of the Public Service Commission. The Marshall Islands strived to bring forward its
goals of gender equality in that small country.
32. In terms of public health, the Marshall Islands had some of the best records in both
follow-up and treatment of HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis.
33. The Marshall Islands appreciated comments regarding its continuous efforts to
secure justice for people who had been exposed to radiation during the nuclear testing
program and their descendants. It was working on solving issues regarding claims that had
been adjudicated but not paid and also on holding the United States responsible for the
monitoring of exposed areas and homelands that could not be resettled because of the high
level of radiation. That continued to be work in progress. The Marshall Islands had reached
some milestones but there were still many impediments to the final resolution of that issue
beginning with the freedom and access to information which it knew the United States
possessed but never shared, invoking security reasons.
34. Sweden referred to the Committee on the Rights of the Child’s recommendation to
the Marshall Islands that corporal punishment of children be prohibited in all settings and
that the Criminal Code authorized the use of force to correct children’s misconduct. It
pointed out that despite legal prohibition, violence against women was a widespread
problem. Sweden made recommendations.
35. Thailand welcomed legislative and political reforms, in particular the adoption of the
Domestic Violence Prevention and Protection Act 2011, the new Criminal Code and the
active cooperation with international organizations. It encouraged the Marshall Islands to
intensify its efforts to adopt and apply a global national policy on disabilities. It also
encouraged awareness-raising programmes to prevent sexually transmitted diseases and
early pregnancy. Thailand made recommendations.
36. Timor-Leste noted with appreciation the adoption of a new law on education in 2013
that ensured the right to education, as well as the adoption of the Domestic Violence
Prevention and Protection Act. It mentioned that the Marshall Islands was in the process of
reviewing its legislation concerning persons with disabilities. Timor-Leste made
recommendations.
37. The United Kingdom commended the efforts of the Marshall Islands to implement
recommendations, despite capacity and resource challenges. It welcomed measures to
combat gender-based violence and protect the rights of children. It was concerned that
levels of sexual and gender-based violence remained high and encouraged the Marshall
Islands to take further action in that area and ensure that perpetrators of domestic violence
were prosecuted. The United Kingdom made recommendations.
38. The United States indicated that the Government had approved the formation of a
National Task Force on Human Trafficking, but stated that it had not demonstrated efforts
to prosecute alleged traffickers, protect victims or prevent trafficking. It said that additional
government efforts were needed to raise awareness and enforce laws prohibiting
employment discrimination, particularly with regard to persons with disabilities. The
United States made recommendations.
39. Uruguay congratulated the Marshall Islands on the recent ratification of the
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and encouraged it to continue its
efforts aimed at harmonizing domestic legislation with international human rights
obligations. Uruguay made recommendations.
40. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela listed the legislative changes that had taken
place during the past years, such as the new Penal Code and the Domestic Violence
Prevention and Protection Act 2011. It highlighted the National Strategic Plan of 2014, the
National Gender Policy and the Public School System Act. The Bolivarian Republic of
Venezuela made a recommendation.
41. Algeria commended the efforts deployed by the Marshall Islands to promote and
protect human rights, in particular the adoption of the Domestic Violence Prevention and
Protection Act. It also congratulated the Marshall Islands on the measures adopted for the
protection of children. It mentioned that the review of its national report referred to major
challenges such as climate change and nuclear tests. Algeria made recommendations.
42. Argentina congratulated the Marshall Islands for the establishment of the National
Strategic Plan 2015–2017 and the National Policy on Disability Inclusive Development
2014–2018. Argentina made recommendations.
43. Armenia noted the steps taken for raising awareness about human rights including
through the mass media, the open invitation extended to all special procedures of the
Human Rights Council, and the initiatives to promote women’s rights. Armenia was
concerned, however, that the Marshall Islands had not yet ratified numerous core
international human rights instruments. It also encouraged the Marshall Islands to take
additional measures to promote human rights education. Armenia made recommendations.
44. Australia congratulated the Marshall Islands for the enactment of the Domestic
Violence Prevention and Protection Act 2011, while recognizing that efforts were still
required to address the challenges posed by domestic violence. It also commended the
country’s participation in the visit of the Special Rapporteur on the implications for human
rights of the environmentally sound management and disposal of hazardous substances and
wastes, and stated that Australia would be pleased to assist the Marshall Islands in
implementing the Special Rapporteur’s recommendation to improve water sanitation and
waste management. Australia made recommendations.
45. Belgium welcomed the efforts deployed by the Marshall Islands to follow up on the
results of the first universal periodic review. In particular it commended the adoption of the
Domestic Violence Prevention and Protection Act 2011, which represented a real stride
forward. Despite the globally positive records of the Marshall Islands in the human rights
sphere, Belgium suggested expanding the ratification of international human rights
instruments and approving the implementation of existing legislation. Belgium made
recommendations.
46. Responding to other questions, the Marshall Islands indicated that it was a
matriarchal society. Traditionally, women dealt with the most important aspect of island
life, the passage of land rights. The sense of belonging to the community in an extended
family or a clan situation was based on where you must work, own land and be a caretaker
for the future children of that land. That aspect, which was the most important of
Marshallese society, influenced the behaviour of adults in the community. Over the past
decades, with the urbanization of the island population, with the need to be displaced not
just by choice but for various reasons including drugs, famine, floods and other reasons, the
population had not lent itself to the traditional manner of dealing with extended family
issues. As a result, it had to rely on modern law and processes to which access was limited
and of which it had an even more limited understanding.
47. The Marshall Islands strived to make sure that Government measures for the
prevention of domestic and gender violence and the protection of children, including
guaranteeing their rights to health and education, were part of the country’s constitutional
responsibility. It still remained a task and a challenge for the Government to ensure that
domestic violence was avoided first of all and then when it did occur it was properly
prosecuted and prevented from future expansion. The Marshall Islands underlined that it
was doing its best to deal with the problem, with the assistance of regional organizations,
the United Nations as well as NGOs.
10
48. The Marshall Islands stated that the updated Criminal Code of 2011 was close to
international human rights standards such as provisions for human trafficking. A task force
on human trafficking had been established and the Government would be working closely
with the International Organization for Migration on the implementation of the United
States office grant to monitor and combat trafficking in persons. The Marshall Islands
asked for closer cooperation with the United States and requested more information on how
to track down, prevent and prosecute trafficking in persons.
49. Brazil commended the Marshall Islands for the review of the legal framework to
strengthen women’s rights. It also referred to the progress made with regard to rights
relating to disability. Brazil made recommendations.
50. Canada welcomed the enactment of the law addressing domestic violence. It
encouraged the Marshall Islands to finalize the remaining protocols and develop strategies
to implement the Domestic Violence Prevention and Protection Act 2011. Canada remained
concerned, however, about reports of child malnutrition and limited access to health care
and immunizations in rural communities. It encouraged the Marshall Islands to continue to
work towards the achievement of its Millennium Development Goals. Canada made
recommendations.
51. China welcomed the ratification by the Marshall Islands of the Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities and other important international human rights
instruments; its accession to the United Nations Convention against Corruption; the
enactment of the Domestic Violence Prevention and Protection Act which was an important
step in strengthening legal protection for women and children; its revision of the Criminal
Code to criminalize human trafficking; and the fact that it pursued a national strategic plan
and took measures to implement policies on gender equality, disability, inclusive
development and child protection. China noted that as a small island developing State, the
Marshall Islands was facing financial difficulties, lack of capacity and resources in the
protection and promotion of human rights and called upon the international community to
provide it with constructive help. China made recommendations.
52. The Congo noted with satisfaction that the Marshall Islands had marked an
important stage in its development through adopting an inclusive policy to improve the
country’s capacity to address human rights issues. In the context of the recommendations of
the first cycle of the universal periodic review, the Congo welcomed the ratification of the
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the progress achieved in the
empowerment of women. The Congo made recommendations.
53. Costa Rica highlighted the importance of being a party to the main human rights
instruments and encouraged strengthened cooperation with the human rights treaty bodies,
the Human Rights Council and its special procedures and OHCHR. Costa Rica welcomed
the standing invitation made to special procedures and mentioned the measures taken to
step up efforts to deal with the problem of domestic violence and encouraged the continued
waging of an effective war on that scourge. Costa Rica made recommendations.
54. Cuba pointed out the adverse effects of the nuclear tests carried out in some of the
Marshall Islands, which had been exacerbated by the negative consequences of climate
change. Cuba highlighted the progress made with the enactment of the new Criminal Code
in line with international human rights standards as well as the adoption of the Domestic
Violence Prevention and Protection Act 2011, the Marshall Islands Public School System
Act 2013 and the National Policy on Disability Inclusive Development. Cuba made
recommendations.
55. Denmark was pleased to note that the first cycle recommendations to ratify the
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment had been accepted. Denmark welcomed the fact that a draft paper had been
prepared seeking a decision from the Cabinet to direct the national reporting and
monitoring body to plan and consult with relevant stakeholders on the accession to human
rights treaties. Denmark made a recommendation.
56. Egypt pointed out that, despite the fact that it had accepted the recommendation
arising from the universal periodic review, the Marshall Islands had not ratified the
majority of the key human rights treaties, including the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
Egypt was also concerned that indigenous rights had been seriously affected by, inter alia,
environmental contamination and displacement. Egypt was further concerned that the
population experienced threats of increased drought, freshwater shortages, sanitation
problems, food insecurity and coastal erosion. Egypt made recommendations.
57. Estonia referred to steps to implement previous recommendations including on the
rights of persons with disabilities with the approval of the National Policy on Disability.
Estonia commended the enactment of a new Criminal Code closely in line with
international human rights standards and of the Domestic Violence Prevention and
Protection Act 2011, which criminalized domestic violence. Estonia encouraged continued
cooperation with the special procedures. Estonia made recommendations.
58. Fiji congratulated the Marshall Islands for the introduction of laws and policies to
proactively prevent and deal with gender-based violence against women and girls,
particularly the 2011 domestic violence law, the Child Protection Act and the recently
approved National Gender Policy. Fiji shared with the Marshall Islands the challenges
related to the loss of land and livelihood as a result of climate change, and concerning the
course set to empower communities to be able to enforce social and economic rights in
jeopardy as a result of climate change. Fiji made recommendations.
59. Responding to questions, the Marshall Islands thanked Fiji for its cooperation in the
context of its participation in the Working Group session. The Marshall Islands reaffirmed
that Parliament would certainly adopt those treaties and optional protocols before it in the
course of 2015. The Marshall Islands stressed that because it had adopted its Constitution in
1978/1979, after many neighbouring countries had adopted theirs, it had had the benefit of
learning from their laws and their judiciary’s history to draft and approve a bill of rights
that was quite extraordinary. The Marshall Islands had been trying during the past decades
to harmonize its domestic legislation with international treaties and protocols despite the
many obstacles and impediments to implementing those treaties.
60. The Marshall Islands stated that in some parts of the country, it was still distributing
drinking water. It indicated that when it had to decide whether to build a prison for women
or a maternity ward, it would choose the latter. It emphasized that it was not for lack of
political will, but a matter of managing limited resources and that the Marshall Islands
would abide by its commitments made in the context of the universal periodic review and
regional meetings to implement them as soon as possible.
61. France welcomed the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities by the Marshall Islands and its standing invitation to the special procedures.
France regretted that the Marshall Islands had still not ratified the two fundamental
international covenants in line with its commitments from the first universal periodic
review cycle. France made recommendations.
62. Germany acknowledged the challenges facing the Marshall Islands, especially its
resource constraints and the consequences of climate change. Germany welcomed steps
taken since the first universal periodic review such as the development of the National
Strategic Plan and policies on disability, youth and gender as well as revision of the
Criminal Code, criminalizing all forms of domestic violence. Germany indicated that some
12
gaps remained in the enjoyment of all human rights, especially for vulnerable groups.
Germany made recommendations.
63. Indonesia commended the implementation of the National Strategic Plan 2015–
2017, including on social development, climate change and resilience and good
governance. Indonesia commended the adoption of gender and disability policies and the
new Criminal Code in line with international human rights standards. Indonesia appreciated
the establishment of the Resource Development Committee to address human rights issues
and the universal periodic review reporting process. Indonesia made recommendations.
64. Ireland welcomed the introduction of legislation on domestic violence and the right
to education. Ireland hoped that steps would be taken as soon as possible to ratify the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Ireland recognized efforts, including through
compensation, made to address the detrimental legacy of nuclear weapons-testing
programmes. Ireland urged implementation of the recommendations of the Special
Rapporteur on the implications for human rights of the environmentally sound management
and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes to develop a health strategy and plan of
action. Ireland was concerned at the low level of women’s representation in politics and
mentioned the challenges of poor immunization coverage and child malnutrition. Ireland
made recommendations.
65. Israel recognized the significant efforts taken to address the constant threat of the
effects of climate change that demanded increased attention and growing budget
allocations. Israel highlighted measures taken such as accession to the Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities, development of gender, disability and youth policies
and the prevention of adolescent pregnancy strategy, creation of a Disability Coordination
Office, enactment of the Domestic Violence Prevention and Protection Act, and to ensure
free and public education. Israel made recommendations.
66. Japan appreciated that the Marshall Islands had recently become a party to the
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Japan welcomed the policies
formulated on gender equality, domestic violence and persons with disabilities notably in
the National Strategic Plan. Japan encouraged enhanced efforts to promote gender equality.
Japan expected the steady implementation of relevant policies including the Domestic
Violence Prevention and Protection Act concerning the reportedly high incidence of
violence against women, underage pregnancy and cases of child abuse. Japan made a
recommendation.
67. Maldives respected the progress achieved since the first review, given the immense
challenges of small island developing States struggling with the severe consequences of
climate change. Maldives commended the Domestic Violence Prevention and Protection
Act 2011 and encouraged its prompt and effective implementation. Maldives mentioned the
progress made in implementing a national programme aimed at eliminating violence against
children and encouraged the expeditious passing into law of the Child Protection Bill. It
welcomed the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
Maldives made recommendations.
68. Mexico congratulated the Marshall Islands on ratifying the Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities, on awareness-raising programmes in different local
media and on its mobile team expanding capacity-building and the delivery of information
on reproductive health, family planning and food security. Mexico welcomed the
commitment to combat the effects of climate change and indicated that lack of capacity and
insufficient resources were major obstacles to dealing fully with problems and
commitments on human rights. Mexico made recommendations.
69. Montenegro welcomed the adoption of the Domestic Violence Prevention and
Protection Act 2011 and asked about activities for its full implementation and whether there
was any intention to define 18 years as the legal age of marriage for girls. Montenegro also
asked the Marshall Islands for information on the expected finalization of its internal
accession procedure and on becoming a party to specific treaties. It inquired about the
measures taken to strengthen laws and policies on child protection and integrate them into
existing mechanisms. Montenegro made recommendations.
70. Morocco highlighted the commitment of the Marshall Islands to social and
economic development with the adoption of the National Strategic Plan (2015–2017). It
welcomed the visit of the Special Rapporteur on the implications for human rights of the
environmentally sound management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes.
Morocco welcomed the measures taken aimed at accession to the main international human
rights instruments, including the Convention against Torture, the International Convention
for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance and the Optional Protocol to
the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. It
highlighted the adoption of the new Penal Code and various policies and strategies on
disability, reproductive health, family planning and climate change. Morocco made
recommendations.
71. Namibia encouraged the Marshall Islands to continue its efforts to promote and
protect the rights of its people despite the challenges of climate change and environmental
disasters. It was pleased to note the enactment of the Domestic Violence Prevention and
Protection Act 2011 and inquired about the status of the national women’s policy. Namibia
made recommendations.
72. The Marshall Islands thanked those State representatives who had encouraged it and
commended the work that had been done since the last universal periodic review. It thanked
Israel for the installation of drinking water facilities in Eba, which would ensure that
children attended school and had access to clean drinking water. It also mentioned the good
cooperation with Japan along with the European Union in a programme of energy supply in
the country. The Marshall Islands would continue to work with neighbouring countries,
including Maldives, to deal with climate change issues.
73. The Marshall Islands considered that the most important human right was the right
to exist. Countries in the Pacific and particularly the Marshall Islands had been subjected to
forces beyond their control in terms of displacement of population as well as difficulty in
providing basic health and education to their populations. The Marshall Islands considered
that responsibility to be less important just because there were other priorities. It was a
matter of making choices on what to address first and what to address next. The Marshall
Islands viewed the right to exist as primarily important.
74. The Marshall Islands emphasized that there were places in the country that would be
forbidden for human habitation for the following years. Displaced persons from the Nuclear
Testing Program remained scattered not only throughout the Marshall Islands but also
throughout the United States and in other parts of the world. Their human rights should be
part of the discussion. The country also had issues with climate change over which it had
absolutely no control. The Marshall Islands had been vocal in world forums on that issue
because it was a right to exist issue. The Marshall Islands stressed the need to anticipate and
urgently find answers to the rising of the ocean and what to do with the population,
displaced people and how to secure their other human rights in the future. The Marshall
Islands reiterated its commitment to ensure that universal periodic review recommendations
were implemented.
14
II. Conclusions and recommendations
75. The following recommendations will be examined by the Marshall Islands
which will provide responses in due time, but no later than the thirtieth session of the
Human Rights Council, in September 2015:
75.1 Ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (New
Zealand);
75.2 Ratify the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights (New Zealand);
75.3 Ratify the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights and its Optional Protocol (Portugal);
75.4 Ratify or accede to the remaining core international human rights
treaties (Rwanda);
75.5 Ratify the seven core international human rights instruments
including the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment, the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms
of Racial Discrimination and the International Covenant on Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights and their Optional Protocols (Sierra Leone);
75.6 Continue working towards the ratification of existing human rights
treaties (Slovenia);
75.7 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Spain);
75.8 Ratify the Optional Protocols to the Convention on the Rights of the
Child, as previously recommended (Spain);
75.9 Ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
(Timor-Leste);
75.10 Ratify the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Timor-Leste);
75.11 Ratify the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment, the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights and the International Convention on the Elimination of All
Forms of Racial Discrimination (United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland);
75.12 Consider ratifying the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights and its Optional Protocols, the Optional Protocol to the International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Optional Protocol
to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment (Uruguay);
75.13 Consider becoming party to the International Convention for the
Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (Uruguay);
**
The conclusions and recommendations have not been edited.
75.14 Accelerate the process of acceding to the two international human
rights covenants and also to strengthen the rights of persons with disabilities
(Algeria);
75.15 Consider ratifying the International Convention for the Protection of
All Persons from Enforced Disappearance as well as the other international
human rights core instruments to which the country is not yet a party
(Argentina);
75.16 Accede to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the
Crime of Genocide (Armenia);
75.17 Accede to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
(Armenia);
75.18 Ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and
its two Optional Protocols (Belgium);
75.19 Ratify all the core international human rights treaties to which the
country is not yet a party, including the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights , the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
Discrimination, the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment as well as the International Convention
for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (Brazil);
75.20 Take immediate action to accede to the major human rights
instruments, leading with the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights (Canada);
75.21 Accede to international human rights instruments (Costa Rica);
75.22 Intensify efforts to ratify the Convention against Torture and Other
Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment with a view to having
ratified it when the Marshall Islands meets the Human Rights Council for its
third universal periodic review (Denmark);
75.23 Ratify all significant human rights treaties, so as to reinforce the
implementation of, and compliance with, international human rights law in the
country (Egypt);
75.24 Take steps to ratify the amendments to article 8 of the Rome Statute
of the International Criminal Court (Estonia);
75.25 Ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and
its two Optional Protocols (Estonia);
75.26 Ratify the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment and its Optional Protocol (Estonia);
75.27 Ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and
the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (France);
75.28 Ratify the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons
from Enforced Disappearance (France);
75.29 Ratify the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty (France);
16
75.30 Strengthen its national mechanisms for the prevention of torture, by
considering its accession to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Indonesia);
75.31 Join more human rights treaties and their Optional Protocols,
especially the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Israel);
75.32 Continue its efforts towards early ratification of the main
international human rights treaties, including the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights (Japan);
75.33 Accelerate the analysis process for the ratification of international
human rights treaties to which it is not yet a party and take appropriate
measures for reporting progress on the implementation of the instruments to
which it is already a party (Mexico);
75.34 Ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
(Montenegro);
75.35 Ratify the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty
(Montenegro);
75.36 Consider ratifying the International Covenant on Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights and its Optional Protocols (Namibia);
75.37 Include sex and disability as grounds for non-discrimination in the
Constitution (Slovenia);
75.38 Revise the Constitution to add gender and disability as grounds for
which no one may be discriminated (Belgium);
75.39 Bring national legislation into line with international commitments
made by the Marshall Islands on non-discrimination against women, in
particular the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
against Women and continue its efforts to implement the Convention (France);
75.40 Adopt and implement the Child Protection Bill, preventing children
from becoming victims of child abuse and publicly raising awareness for their
rights (Germany);
75.41 Ensure that all forms of discrimination based on gender or sexual
orientation are fully prohibited; implement the legal protection foreseen and
provide assistance to victims of gender-based, sexual or domestic violence
(Germany);
75.42 Continue with the current law reform effort to include measures
protecting against discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity
or disability (Israel);
75.43 Continue efforts to strengthen the legal and institutional framework
in the field of human rights (Morocco);
75.44 Establish a national commission on human rights (Rwanda);
75.45 Consider establishing a national human rights institution which is in
line with the Paris Principles, which would help monitor and better integrate
human rights norms into national policies (Sierra Leone);
75.46 Establish a national institution to promote and protect human rights
in accordance with the Paris Principles (Uruguay);
75.47 Establish a national commission on human rights to coordinate,
provide capacity development and assist with strengthening human rights
implementation throughout the country (Egypt);
75.48 Establish a national human rights institution in conformity with the
Paris Principles (France);
75.49 Continue efforts to establish a national human rights institution that
is in line with the Paris Principles and allocate adequate resources (Germany);
75.50 Further strengthen its national human rights institution in
accordance with the Paris Principles and pursue the development of a
comprehensive national human rights action plan (Indonesia);
75.51 Request assistance from the specialized agencies, funds and
programmes of the United Nations in order to establish a national human
rights institution which would strengthen, coordinate and develop the required
measures to respect the human rights of all in the country (Mexico);
75.52 Promote good governance and transparency at the national and atoll
administration levels, strengthen public and private sector accountability; and
develop a human rights policy and management framework, including annual
reporting on their social, environmental and economic impact, with
appropriate monitoring and evaluation (Egypt);
75.53 Continue to promote good governance and rule of law through
effective policy coordination at national and atoll levels (Singapore);
75.54 Actively implement the policy to promote gender equality, to improve
the quality of life of persons with disabilities and development of youth
(Russian Federation);
75.55 Endorse and begin implementing the National Gender Policy
(Estonia);
75.56 Implement the National Gender Policy and work with women’s civil
society groups to implement it in all spheres of national life (Fiji);
75.57 Make national planning and national budgeting gender-responsive
(Fiji);
75.58 Adopt and seek technical assistance from donor agencies to
implement a national training programme for judges, lawyers, civil society
groups and schoolchildren on their rights to water, food security, life, education
and health in relation to climate change, and the ways in which the courts can
help to develop a Pacific jurisprudence on the relationship between climate
change and human rights (Fiji);
75.59 Take all necessary steps to promptly adopt and implement a
comprehensive national disability policy in full compliance with international
standards (Maldives);
75.60 Design a strategy to manage resources more efficiently, so as to deal
with the most pressing human rights issues, and pay particular attention to the
marginalized sectors of the population (Mexico);
75.61 Continue to enhance its partnership with specialized agencies of the
United Nations in order to implement human rights and boost its cooperation
18
with special procedures mandate holders of the Human Rights Council
(Congo);
75.62 Step up existing cooperation with international bodies in respect of
the human right to water and sanitation, in particular with the United Nations
Environment Programme and with the Special Rapporteur on the human right
to safe drinking water and sanitation (Spain);
75.63 Continue to engage its regional and international partners with a
view to seeking technical and other assistance towards its full compliance with
its human rights treaty obligations (Philippines);
75.64 Submit the overdue reports to the Committee on the Elimination of
Discrimination against Women and the Committee on the Rights of the Child at
the earliest possible stage (Portugal);
75.65 Seek technical assistance and cooperation to combat the high
prevalence of non-communicable diseases and its root causes (Maldives);
75.66 Strengthen cooperation and partnership, including with OHCHR, to
continue with the implementation of national policy in the matters of disability,
health and disaster management (Morocco);
75.67 Pursue efforts to combat all forms of discrimination against women
(Algeria);
75.68 Take the measures necessary to review its domestic legislation in
order to guarantee the free and compulsory birth registration of all children
born in the country (Argentina);
75.69 Introduce a national plan of action to combat violence against women
(New Zealand);
75.70 Build on the Domestic Violence Prevention and Protection Act and
the National Gender Policy to implement more concrete programmes and
policies to combat violence against women and children, and to promote the full
and equitable participation by women in society (Singapore);
75.71 Continue its efforts towards the effective implementation of the
Domestic Violence Prevention and Protection Act, including through
awareness-raising and changing mindsets and attitudes (Slovenia);
75.72 Step up measures of awareness-raising on gender-based violence to
promote the prevention of this phenomenon (Spain);
75.73 Take all appropriate measures to end domestic violence (Sweden);
75.74 Continue combating violence against women and children by
prohibiting the right to use force and severe corporal punishment of children at
home, and effectively enforcing the existing laws in this area, especially the
Domestic Violence Prevention and Protection Act (Thailand);
75.75 Take further steps to combat domestic violence, including a greater
gender sensitization (Timor-Leste);
75.76 Move towards swift implementation of its National Gender Policy as
a positive step towards the goal of eliminating gender-based violence (United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland);
75.77 Effectively implement the Domestic Violence Prevention and
Protection Act through advocacy and awareness-raising amongst targeted
audiences (Australia);
75.78 Finalize and implement the first response protocol for urgent
intervention, so that the problem of violence against women and girls is dealt
with effectively and that ministries concerned are provided with the budget
necessary to apply the Domestic Violence Prevention and Protection Act
(Belgium);
75.79 Take steps to strengthen the enforcement of existing laws
criminalizing rape and domestic violence, including by vigorously investigating
and prosecuting violence against women, and providing targeted training and
capacity-building to law enforcement officials (Canada);
75.80 Set up its efforts for the effective implementation of those
mechanisms allowing for the application of the Domestic Violence Prevention
and Protection Act (Congo);
75.81 Raise the minimum age of criminal responsibility to 18 years and
abolish child marriage by raising the age of marriage to 18 (Sierra Leone);
75.82 Pursue efforts undertaken to prevent and more effectively punish
acts of domestic violence committed against women and children, through
strengthening the legislative arsenal and the resources allocated to the
judiciary, police force and justice (France);
75.83 Further develop policies to combat domestic and gender-based
violence (Israel);
75.84 More actively conduct education and awareness campaigns on the
issue of trafficking in persons and make efforts to study human trafficking in
the country, adopt proactive procedures to identify victims of trafficking
among vulnerable groups, such as foreign workers and women in prostitution,
and investigate trafficking cases (United States of America);
75.85 Prohibit corporal punishment of children in all settings, including the
home, and repeal the authorization of the use of force to correct children’s
misconduct in the Criminal Code (Sweden);
75.86 Reform its legislation with a view to establish the prohibition of all
forms of corporal punishment of children, an indispensable component for the
prevention and elimination of violence against children, as well as for the
respect for children’s rights, dignity and physical integrity (Brazil);
75.87 Adopt legislation to prohibit all forms of corporal punishment of
children in all settings, and explicitly repeal the right to use force for
“prevention or punishment of the minor’s misconduct” and for the
maintenance of “reasonable discipline” in the Criminal Code (Namibia);
75.88 Ensure political participation of women in governmental decision-
making bodies in order to generate inclusive and balanced decision-making in
matters that concern both women and men (Netherlands);
75.89 Take measures to promote greater participation and representation
of women in public positions, especially in politics (Costa Rica);
75.90 Adopt temporary special measures to facilitate greater participation
and representation of women in public offices, particularly in fields relating to
political and civil rights (Egypt);
20
75.91 Adopt measures to facilitate greater representation of women in
public office and improve the participation of women in political life (Ireland);
75.92 Take measures to facilitate greater participation and representation
of women in public offices (Israel);
75.93 Provide legal protection for equality of opportunity in employment
for all of its citizens, particularly for persons with disabilities (United States of
America);
75.94 Continue strengthening its development policies, as well as its social
protection programmes, that it is already implementing, to give a better quality
of life and well-being to its people, and for this purpose it is very important to
have the technical cooperation and technical assistance that the country
requires (Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela);
75.95 Improve public infrastructure such as water supply, sanitation and
waste management so as to ensure adequate living standards and the right to
health for its people (China);
75.96 Review current policies and develop, together with the private sector,
a code of practice on HIV in the workplace, taking into account the
international standards of the World Health Organization and the conventions
and recommendations adopted by the International Labour Organization
(Netherlands);
75.97 Thoroughly implement the 2014–2016 strategy to prevent adolescent
pregnancy, in cooperation with UNFPA (Portugal);
75.98 Provide greater access to public health services with adequate health
coverage, particularly in the outer islands (Thailand);
75.99 Request technical assistance from specialized agencies of the United
Nations in order to promote human rights through partnerships in the
education and health sectors in particular to face up to the consequences of the
nuclear tests (Algeria);
75.100 Take action at all levels to address the interlinked root causes of
preventable mortality and morbidity of children under 5 and consider applying
the technical guidance on the application of a human rights-based approach to
the implementation of policies and programmes to reduce and eliminate
preventable mortality and morbidity of children under 5 years of age
(A/HRC/27/31) (Ireland);
75.101 Continue efforts to reduce non-attendance and the dropout rate from
the educational system (Slovenia);
75.102 Continue its efforts and adopt further measures to promote the
realization of the right to education for all in an inclusive and non-
discriminatory way, including for persons with disabilities (Portugal);
75.103 Implement specific measures to promote inclusive education of
children with disabilities (Israel);
75.104 Continue strengthening protection of the rights of persons with
disabilities, particularly through approving a national disability strategy, which
particularly focuses on boys, girls and women with disabilities (Spain);
75.105 Give appropriate resourcing to implement its Disability Inclusive
Development Policy (Australia);
75.106 Adopt a practical approach in addressing its development and human
rights challenges (Singapore);
75.107 Continue taking measures to ensure adequate protection of human
rights in actions taken to address climate change (Costa Rica);
75.108 Pay attention to the impact of climate change on the country’s human
rights situation and fully address this impact with the support of the
international community (China);
75.109 Continue leading the international dialogue in an effort to reduce the
effects of climate change and to adopt effective adaptation measures (Cuba);
75.110 Keep up its work to combat the adverse consequences of the nuclear
testing programme, including the provision by its promoters of the necessary
resources to deal with those consequences (Cuba);
75.111 Actively seek, with the help of the international community, a
resolution to restore the natural environment, affected by the nuclear testing of
the United States on the Marshall Islands (Russian Federation).
76. All conclusions and recommendations contained in the present report reflect
the position of the submitting State and the State under review. They should not be
construed as endorsed by the Working Group as a whole.
22
Annex
[English only]
Composition of the delegation
The delegation of the Marshall Islands was headed by H.E. Mr. Tony A. deBrum,
Minister for Foreign Affairs, and composed of the following members
• Mr. Bernard Adiniwin, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General
• Mr. Laurence Enos Edwards II, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney
General
• Mr. Warwick Harris, Deputy Director, Office of Environmental Planning and Policy
Coordination
• Ms. Morina Mook, Chief of Waste and Pollutant, Environmental Protection
Authority
• Mr. Caleb Christopher, Legal Advisor, Permanent Mission at the United Nations
• Mr. Mark Atterton, Human Rights Advisor, Ministry for Foreign Affairs