Original HRC document

PDF

Document Type: Final Report

Date: 2015 Dec

Session: 31st Regular Session (2016 Feb)

Agenda Item:

Human Rights Council Thirty-first session

Agenda items 2 and 3

Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner

for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the

High Commissioner and the Secretary-General

Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil

political, economic, social and cultural rights,

including the right to development

Realization of the right to work

Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

Summary

The present report, prepared pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution 28/15,

presents an overview of the scope of and applicable standards relative to the right to work;

an overview of the recognition of this right in international human rights and international

labour law and of its interpretation by United Nations treaty bodies and the International

Labour Organization; as well as examples drawn from national experiences.

2

I. Introduction

1. In its resolution 28/15, the Human Rights Council requested the United Nations

High Commissioner for Human Rights to prepare a report in consultation with States,

United Nations agencies, funds and programmes, particularly the International Labour

Organization, as well as the treaty bodies, special procedures, civil society and other

relevant stakeholders on the realization of the right to work, in accordance with their

respective obligations under international human rights law and the relevant major

challenges and best practices in that regard, and to submit the report to the Human Rights

Council prior to its thirty-first session.

2. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) solicited

submissions from States, United Nations agencies, trade unions, employers’ associations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and, as of 7 December 2015, 26 responses

had been received from States,1 the International Labour Office and the NGO ESCR-Net.

3. The report offers an overview of the scope and content of the right to work, drawing

on applicable human rights instruments, the work of the human rights treaty bodies,

international labour standards and doctrine of the International Labour Organization (ILO),

and the submissions received.

II. Normative recognition of the human right to work

4. Since the beginning of the twentieth century, the recognition of the right to work has

been affirmed in national constitutions, international treaties and non-binding instruments.

The establishment of ILO in 1919 was an important step in this process, establishing the

basic principle that “labour is not a commodity”, as stated in the Treaty of Versailles and reaffirmed in the Declaration concerning the aims and purposes of the International Labour

Organization (Declaration of Philadelphia) of 1944. Article III (a) of the Declaration

recognizes the “solemn obligation of the International Labour Organization to further among the nations of the world programmes which will achieve full employment and the

raising of standards of living”.

5. This recognition is underpinned by the belief that work is a means for human beings

to transform the world and themselves through individual and collective production; to

access socially produced assets; to organize basic structures for living together; to learn

from each other and build solidarity; to contribute to the common well-being and to self-

realization; and to develop a personal and collective identity. Work should not be viewed as

a commodity for sale subject to the laws of the marketplace, as this risks treating people as

mere economic resources and violating their right to live in dignity. On account of the link

between work and a dignified life, the simple recognition of the freedom to work is

inadequate. In order to fully accord work its central role in the context of human rights, the

right to work should include positive duties and correlative entitlements.

6. International law has progressively incorporated the understanding that work is not

purely a means of generating income. The right to work implies just and favourable work

conditions2 and full and productive work should be promoted under conditions

safeguarding fundamental political and economic freedoms to the individual.3 These enable

1 Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Brazil, Bulgaria, Egypt, Fiji, France, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary,

Kazakhstan, Malta, Mauritania, Mexico, Oman, Paraguay, Peru, Qatar, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain,

Turkey and Uzbekistan.

2 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 23; International Covenant on Economic, Social and

Cultural Rights, art. 7.

3 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, art. 6.

the development of workers’ capacities for their personal fulfilment and the common well- being4 and signify that work is not merely an instrument for achieving personal and

collective economic goals. Work, as a human right, is not only essential for realizing other

human rights, but is an inseparable and inherent part of human dignity.5

7. The right to work has been recognized more broadly at the international level since

its inclusion in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (arts. 23 and 24), the

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (arts. 6, 7 and 8) and the

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (art. 8 (3) (a)). It is recognized in the

International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (arts. 5

(e) (i)), the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women

(art. 11 (1) (a)), the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant

Workers and Members of Their Families (arts. 11, 25, 26, 40, 52 and 54) and the

Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (art. 27).

8. At the regional level, the European Social Charter of 1961 and the revised Charter of

1996 devote considerable attention to the right to work. The Charter of Fundamental Rights

of the European Union addresses the right to work in articles 15, 23, 31 and 34. It is also

the subject of article 14 of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man of the

Organization of American States (OAS); article 6 of the Additional Protocol to the

American Convention on Human Rights in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural

Rights (Protocol of San Salvador); article 15 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights; and article 34 of the Arab Charter on Human Rights.

9. In fulfilment of its mandate to support the realization of the right to work, ILO has

produced a substantial body of international labour standards in this area, even if the

customary language of human rights is not always utilized.6 Of particular importance are

the Employment Policy Convention, 1964 (No. 122), the Human Resources Development

Convention, 1975 (No. 142), the Termination of Employment Convention, 1982 (No. 158),

the Employment Promotion and Protection against Unemployment Convention, 1988 (No.

168) and the Decent Work Agenda, which is organized into four major strategic objectives:

employment, social protection, social dialogue and rights at work.7

10. At the World Summit in 2005, States Members of the United Nations agreed to

make the goals of full and productive employment and decent work for all, including for

women and young people, a central objective of their relevant national and international

policies as well as their national development strategies.8 The recently adopted Sustainable

Development Goals include the promotion of full and productive employment and decent

work for all, with specific targets.9 At the national level, the right to work has been

recognized in many constitutions throughout the world.10

11. Despite this extensive normative recognition, the realization of the right to work

continues to be a challenge, particularly in the current global economic crisis. As noted by

ILO, it is necessary to “put the aim of full and productive employment and decent work at the heart of the crisis responses”.11

4 ILO Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization (2008).

5 Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, general comment No. 18 (2005) on the right to

work, para. 1.

6 International Labour Office submission, p. 1.

7 ILO Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization.

8 General Assembly resolution 60/1, para. 47.

9 General Assembly resolution 70/1, goal 8.

10 ILO, General Survey concerning employment instruments in light of the 2008 Declaration on Social

Justice for a Fair Globalization, Report III (Part 1B) (Geneva, 2010), paras. 14-18 and 29.

11 ILO, Recovering from the Crisis: A Global Jobs Pact (2009), para. 11.

4

III. Scope and content of the right to work

12. The clarification of the scope and normative content of the right to work is essential

to its realization and to overcoming any uncertainty as to its legal character. A right to

accessible work which ensures the satisfaction of human needs and values is central to a

dignified life and has several dimensions. General comment No. 18 on the right to work,

adopted by the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in 2005, reviews these

normative dimensions in light of the interdependence of articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Covenant

and constitutes an important starting point for the clarification of its content. ILO standards

and declarations, other international and regional standards as well as national constitutions

and practices set out key components which reinforce the right to work as a whole.

13. The right to work may be interpreted as encompassing the following interdependent

and mutually reinforcing aspects:

(a) The right of every person to productive and freely chosen work that ensures a

dignified life for him- or herself and his or her family, without discrimination;

(b) The right to economic and environmental conditions in the workplace that are

conducive to meeting the needs of the individual and to realizing associated freedoms,

including the right not to be arbitrarily deprived of work;

(c) The material conditions related to safety, security and dignity in the

workplace;

(d) The social conditions relating to labour rights, family leave and gender

equality.

A. The freedom and opportunity to work

1. Right to work and employment policies

14. Article 6 (2) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

emphasizes the link between the right to work and full employment, identifying a non-

exhaustive list of measures to ensure its realization. These include policies and techniques

to achieve steady economic, social and cultural development and full and productive

employment. Drawing on article 23 (1) of the Universal Declaration, article 1 of the ILO

Employment Policy Convention, 1964 (No. 122) provides that policies to ensure the

availability of full, productive and freely chosen employment must guarantee that (a) there

is work for all who are available for and seeking work; (b) such work is as productive as

possible; and (c) there is freedom of choice of employment and the fullest possible

opportunity for each worker to qualify for, and to use his skills and endowments in, a job

for which he is well suited, irrespective of race, colour, sex, religion, political opinion,

national extraction or social origin. Paragraph 1 of the ILO Employment Policy

(Supplementary Provisions) Recommendation, 1984 (No. 169) defines full employment as

“a means of achieving in practice the realization of the right to work”, noting that deterioration in job opportunities can provoke social tension and thus create conditions

which can endanger peace and prejudice the exercise of the right to work.

15. According to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the right to

work should not be understood as an absolute and unconditional right to obtain

employment.12 Nevertheless, States parties have an immediate obligation to move as

expeditiously and effectively as possible, to the maximum of their available resources,

towards adopting policies aimed at attaining full employment. Policies should also aim to

12 General comment No. 18 (2005), para. 6.

ensure that everyone benefits from a protection system that promotes equal access to

employment under just and favourable conditions and that no one is unfairly deprived of

work.13

16. The ILO Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and

Recommendations, in its 2010 General Survey, recommended that States adopt the

following approach: (a) a policy commitment to obtaining full employment, reflected in

legislation; (b) the establishment of institutions focused on full employment, such as job

services, social dialogue mechanisms and professional and technical training, and initiatives

to foster small and medium enterprises and cooperatives; (c) deploying the best possible

efforts of these institutions and structures in macroeconomic, trade, investment and

industrial promotion policies, with regular monitoring. In the light of article 3 of

Convention No. 122, the Committee stressed the importance for representatives of those

affected, especially representatives of employers and workers, to be consulted prior to the

formulation and during the application of these policies, including representatives of the

rural sector and of the informal economy.

17. Although international law does not prescribe any particular economic model,

policies towards full and productive employment should meet the qualitative requirements

of just and favourable conditions14 or conditions safeguarding fundamental political and

economic freedoms to the individual15 so that individuals can develop and update the

necessary capacities and skills they need to enable them to be productively occupied for

their personal fulfilment and the common well-being.16

18. Consequently, policies that result in the proliferation of precarious jobs would not be

in line with the right to work.17 The mere reduction of unemployment does not always fulfil

the right to work, as policies need to meet qualitative requirements in relation to just and

favourable conditions and content of work.18 The Committee on Economic, Social and

Cultural Rights has stressed that the State should ensure that measures aimed at increasing

the flexibility of the market do not undermine workers’ rights.19 Human rights norms proscribe the adoption of retrogressive measures on labour protection under the guise of

creating jobs, the effectiveness of which has been persuasively discredited by recent ILO

studies.20 States have a duty to take into account their legal obligations when concluding

bilateral or multilateral agreements with other States, international organizations and

multinational entities.21 Full employment must include non-salaried forms of employment

13 Ibid., paras. 4, 6 and 20.

14 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 23.

15 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, art. 6 (2).

16 ILO Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization.

17 ILO, World Employment and Social Outlook 2015: The Changing Nature of Jobs (Geneva, 2015),

preface.

18 See, for example, Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, concluding observations on

the Plurinational State of Bolivia (E/C.12/BOL/CO/2) and Ethiopia (E/C.12/ETH/CO/1-3), stating

that economic growth had not been used to create decent jobs and recommending the adoption of firm

and sustained measures to tackle precarious employment. The Committee recommended that Spain

avoid any step backwards in the field of employment, including with regard to the protection of

labour rights (E/C.12/ESP/CO/5). It also recommended that the Czech Republic assess the impact of

the economic and fiscal measures taken during the financial and economic crisis on the labour market

and on the enjoyment of the right to work (E/C.12/CZE/CO/2).

19 General comment No. 18, para. 25. In its submission Brazil emphasizes the integration of

macroeconomic employment policies with labour, social and educational policies around the Decent

Work Agenda, while Mexico incorporated the concept of decent work into its labour law.

20 ILO, World Employment and Social Outlook, pp. 118-129.

21 General comment No. 18, para. 33.

6

such as cooperative work and self-employment, without undermining the protection of

salaried workers.22

2. Freedom to choose work and to practise a profession

19. Article 23 of the Universal Declaration and article 6 of the International Covenant

on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights emphasize that freedom to work is a fundamental

component of the right to work. The freedom to work involves both prohibitions (such as

those on forced labour and unjustified or discriminatory obstacles to work) and positive

duties (including the adoption of measures of promotion of conditions conducive to

freedom and opportunity).

20. While freedom to work does not imply an absolute right to a specific job, it does

entail the right to pursue professional options under equal conditions without unjustified

barriers that prevent those choices. The freedom to exercise a profession requires that any

limitation must be objectively justified, proportional, strictly necessary and provided for by

law.

21. The right to freely choose a job involves a prohibition on being compelled to accept

work. Forced or compulsory labour is defined as “all work or service which is exacted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which said person has not offered

himself voluntarily”,23 which includes being forced to remain in employment against one’s will even if the initial acceptance was voluntary. States have an immediate obligation not to

trade in forced labour and to abolish, eradicate and punish the use of forced labour in all its

forms. It is one of the most extreme forms of human rights violation and it affects millions

of people, especially vulnerable populations, such as migrant workers.24 When reviewing

States parties’ reports, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has identified forced labour practices in many countries.25 The ILO Committee of Experts has

called for increased resources for labour inspection services, for law enforcement and

judicial authorities to combat forced labour practices and for the imposition of

administrative, criminal and economic sanctions to ensure that victims receive support and

compensation.26

22. There are strong links between forced labour and trafficking in persons.

Employment agencies can perpetrate abuses by promoting or facilitating the forced labour

of migrant workers. Consequently, States must cooperate to regulate, license and monitor

labour recruiters and employment agencies and eliminate the charging of recruitment fees

to workers to prevent debt bondage and other forms of economic coercion.27 The

exploitation of immigrants forced to work illegally, including in domestic work, merits

special attention and inspection.

22 Ibid., para. 44, underlining that employment policies should respect and protect self-employment as

well as employment with remuneration that enables workers and their families to enjoy an adequate

standard of living.

23 ILO Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29), art. 2 (1); ILO Abolition of Forced Labour

Convention, 1957 (No. 105).

24 ILO, Protocol of 2014 to the Forced Labour Convention, 1930, preamble.

25 See concluding observations on Paraguay (E/C.12/PRY/CO/4), Peru (E/C.12/PER/CO/2-4), Brazil

(E/C.12/BRA/CO/2), the Plurinational State of Bolivia (E/C.12/BOL/CO/2), Ecuador

(E/C.12/ECU/CO/3), Mauritania (E/C.12/MRT/CO/1), Ukraine (E/C.12/UKR/CO/6) and Serbia

(E/C.12/SRB/CO/2). Concern about forced labour of detainees in the Russian Federation

(E/C.12/RUS/CO/5) and the Netherlands (E/C.12/NDL/CO/4) was mentioned.

26 ILO, General Survey on the fundamental Conventions concerning rights at work in light of the ILO

Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization, 2008, Report III (Part 1B) (2012), Part III,

para. 326. Malta highlights that its inspectorate is empowered.

27 ILO, Forced Labour (Supplementary Measures) Recommendation, 2014 (No. 203), para. 4 (i).

3. Employment services

23. The existence of specialized services to assist workers to access appropriate work,

using information networks at the relevant level, is a necessary component of the

employment policies required for fulfilling the right to work.28 The importance of these

services increases in times of crisis; they are vital for vulnerable groups, such as migrants

and long-term unemployed workers, facilitating their placement.29 Consequently,

specialized services must be adequately equipped to fulfil their mandates without

discrimination, thus promoting equality and accessibility.30

24. States have a duty to provide free public employment services and, when registering

or licensing private services, to ensure the regulation and monitoring of their activities to

prevent abuses. No cost or fee should be charged directly or indirectly to workers benefiting

from public and private employment services,31 which should respect fundamental rights

such as freedom of association and the prohibition of discrimination, forced or child labour

and trafficking in persons.32

4. Technical and vocational education and guidance

25. Technical and vocational education and guidance is another essential component of

measures required to create equal conditions in the labour market, since unequal access to

opportunities for training and capacity-building results in inequalities in the labour market.

Acquiring, developing and updating skills and knowledge is a key part of personal

development and self-fulfilment through professional life, and all aspects are core to the

right to work.33 Articles 23 and 26 (1) of the Universal Declaration and articles 6 (2) and 13

(2) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights link the right to

work to the right to education as a means for personal development and meaningful

participation in society, since technical and vocational guidance and training are part of

education in general.34 Technical and vocational training should be promoted, together with

equality and accessibility, for both those seeking work and those seeking to improve their

skills in a trade or profession.35

26. For members of minority and vulnerable groups, barriers to equal access to

education and guidance and technical-professional training reduce professional and job

opportunities.36 Special measures are essential for these groups to combat inequality.37

28 General comment No. 18, paras. 12 and 26.

29 See Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, concluding observations on Bosnia and

Herzegovina (E/C.12/BIH/CO/2), noting that persons working in the informal sector are sanctioned

by still having their registration with the employment bureaux suspended for a period of six months.

30 Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, general comment No. 2 (2014) on accessibility,

para. 41.

31 See ILO Convention No. 181, art. 7 and ILO, General Survey (2010), chap. III.

32 See observations of the ILO Committee of Experts regarding Conventions Nos. 88 and 181 in

General Survey (2010), chap. III.

33 See ILO Human Resources Development Convention, 1975 (No. 142), art. 1 (4) and (5).

34 Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, general comment No. 13 (1999) on the right to

education, paras. 15-16.

35 Bulgaria, Egypt, Fiji, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Slovenia and Spain highlight good practices in their

training programmes for work.

36 See also Declaration of Philadelphia, art. III (j).

37 The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has expressed concern about unequal access

to professional training for minority and vulnerable groups and recommended the adoption of

measures to El Salvador (E/C.12/SLV/CO/3-5), Bosnia and Herzegovina (E/C.12/BIH/CO/2),

Bulgaria (E/C.12/BGR/CO/4-5), Norway (E/C.12/NOR/CO/5), Ukraine (E/C.12/UKR/CO/6),

Armenia (E/C.12/ARM/CO/2-3), Austria (E/C.12/AUT/CO/4), Morocco (E/C.12/MAR/CO/3),

8

27. The failure to establish adequate technical and professional programmes may

constitute a violation of the right to work. Training and employment policies should be

coordinated and implemented with the participation of stakeholders, as emphasized by the

ILO Committee of Experts.38

5. Equal access to work opportunities

28. Equality and non-discrimination are fundamental human rights principles and they

apply to the right to work.39 Ensuring equality and non-discrimination in access to work is

crucial as the labour market reflects the social prejudices and disadvantages that undermine

equality and dignity.40 Full employment is a function of the achievement of equal access to

work opportunities and self-realization.

29. The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has stressed the need for

measures to combat discrimination and promote equality in relation to minorities and

disadvantaged groups, which constitute immediate obligations.41 It is the duty of States to

ensure equal access to work while respecting and providing equal conditions, removing

barriers to access and protecting workers against discrimination. Measures that could have

the effect of increasing discrimination or weakening the protection of disadvantaged groups

must be avoided. Action plans aimed at removing discrimination in access to work must be

developed in a participatory manner, with special attention given to the concerned groups in

their formulation and monitoring.42

30. Equality and non-discrimination are among the fundamental rights of workers

identified in the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and the

subject of Conventions Nos. 100 and 111. Recommendation No. 169 provides that in the

context of an overall employment policy, Members should adopt measures to respond to the

needs of all categories of persons frequently having difficulties in finding lasting

employment, such as certain women, certain young workers, persons with disabilities, older

workers, the long-term unemployed and migrant workers lawfully within their territory

(para. 15).43 The general objectives of full employment should be articulated, taking into

account the needs of specific groups experiencing discrimination. While recognizing other

bases for inequality and discrimination, the following sections will focus on women,

migrants and refugees and persons with disabilities in order to illustrate the scope of the

prohibition on discrimination in access to work opportunities.

31. The right of women to equal access to work is pivotal to the full enjoyment of all

their human rights. Violence and gender discrimination are too often present in the work

environment. Women bear a disproportionate share of the most precarious working

conditions, including little or no legal protection, lower levels of remuneration and

Cameroon (E/C.12/CMR/CO/2-3), the Congo (E/C.12/COG/CO/1), Egypt (E/C.12/EGY/CO/2-4), the

Republic of Moldova (E/C.12/MDA/CO/2), Romania (E/C.12/ROU/CO/3-5), Latvia

(E/C.12/LVA/CO/1), France (E/C.12/FRA/CO/3) and Afghanistan (E/C.12/AFG/CO/2-4).

38 See ILO, General Survey (2010). See also Convention No. 142 and Recommendation No. 195.

Bulgaria, Oman and Slovenia mention their tripartite dialogue mechanisms.

39 Universal Declaration, art. 2; International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, art. 2

(2).

40 Azerbaijan, Bulgaria and Serbia mention their labour legislation to combat discrimination based on

wide variety of grounds.

41 General comment No. 18, paras. 12-19, 23, 31 and 33.

42 Good practices in combating discrimination were mentioned for Brazil (E/C.12/BRA/CO/2) (sexual

orientation), Costa Rica (E/C.12/CRI/CO/4), the Dominican Republic (E/C.12/DOM/CO/3), Mexico

(E/C.12/MEX/CO/4), Nicaragua (E/C.12/NIC/CO/4), Uruguay (E/C.12/URY/CO/3-4), Algeria

(E/C.12/DZA/CO/4), Benin (E/C.12/BEN/CO/2), Ukraine (E/C.12/UKR/CO/6), Slovenia

(E/C.12/SVN/CO/2) and Liechtenstein (E/C.12/LIE/CO/1).

43 Bulgaria stresses its active policy of employment focused on vulnerable groups.

temporary and part-time employment. Beyond ensuring equal pay for work of equal value,

it is important to ensure equal access to opportunities and to give equal value to women’s skills and contribution to production through a global system of protection against gender

discrimination and the promotion of equality of opportunity and treatment.44 Pregnancy, for

instance, should not pose obstacles to the right to be hired and to remain in employment and

the right to paid maternity leave should not result in discrimination.45

32. Persons with disabilities represent about 15 per cent of the world’s population. Even though a high percentage are able to work, their employment rate is much lower than that of

the general population. Persons with disabilities in employment are frequently subject to

less favourable conditions of pay, precarious work regimes and poor career prospects. Data

show that there is a high correlation between disability and poverty.46

33. Persons with disabilities face environmental, social and economic barriers in

accessing work and within work, as well as in education and training. Prejudice and

physical, communication and attitudinal barriers limit the availability of workplaces, many

of which neglect the potential of persons with disabilities and restrict their opportunities for

earning a living through their capabilities.

34. Article 27 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities recognizes

the right to work of persons with disabilities, on an equal basis with others, in a work

environment that is open, inclusive and accessible. The provision details measures to be

taken to realize the right, including measures to ensure equal opportunities, equal

remuneration for work of equal value and protection from harassment. It prohibits forced

labour and discrimination due to disability, in the context, among others, of hiring

arrangements, continuation of employment, career advancement and safe and healthy

working conditions. It also requires respect for labour and trade union rights, access to

vocational and continuing training, and the promotion of the acquisition of work experience

and career advancement opportunities for persons with disabilities. Furthermore, it expands

the concept of work to include forms of self-employment, entrepreneurship and cooperative

arrangements. Opportunities must be prioritized in the open labour market to ensure

inclusion and accessibility. Thus, sheltered or segregated forms of employment might not

be appropriate for fulfilling the right to work.

35. The Convention includes a non-exhaustive list of duties focused on removing

structural and institutional obstacles that hinder equality of opportunity for persons with

disabilities in the labour market (see A/HCR/22/25 and Corr.1, para. 10). Among these

duties is the provision of reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Denial of reasonable

accommodation is explicitly considered to be a form of discrimination. Article 4 (3) of the

Convention calls for the effective participation of persons with disabilities and for

consultation with their organizations in the development and implementation of legislation

and policies relevant to their concerns, including the right to work.

44 See Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, general comment No. 16 (2005) on the

equal right of men and women to the enjoyment of all economic, social and cultural rights.

45 See Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, concluding observations on Kenya

(E/C.12/KEN/CO/1), Austria (E/C.12/AUT/CO/3) and Canada (E/C.12/CAN/CO/4) (recommending

increase of the parental or maternity leave period). See also the Committee’s concluding observations

on Algeria (E/C.12/DZA/CO/4), Brazil (E/C.12/BRA/CO/2), Nicaragua (E/C.12/NIC/CO/4)

(concerns about workers in a precarious contract without maternity leave or sick leave entitlements)

and Jamaica (E/C.12/JAM/CO/3-4). Regarding Finland, the Committee expressed concern about

reported information about dismissals, non-recruitments or non-renewals of labour contracts owing to

pregnancy, childbirth or maternity leave (E/C.12/FIN/CO/6).

46 See World Health Organization, World Report on Disability (Geneva, 2011).

10

36. The search for work is an important driver of migration today.47 Whether migration

from the place of origin is determined by the lack of decent work or by other reasons such

as persecution, conflict, poverty, discrimination or environmental degradation, work is an

essential condition for integrating in the host country.48 Migration is also a key factor for

the interdependent economic and social development of countries of origin, transit and

destination.49 Migrant workers and their families often find themselves in vulnerable

situations in the State of employment,50 which may be aggravated by factors such as

gender, ethnicity, religion, language or legal status. Many suffer abuse and discrimination,

including low wages, lack of decent working conditions, lack of social protection and

denial of basic rights and freedoms. Non-discrimination on the basis of national origin also

applies to the right to work.51 States must take immediate steps to prevent migrant workers

from being victims of discrimination and exploitation while adopting special measures to

facilitate their access to the labour market. Articles 17-19 of the 1951 Convention relating

to the Status of Refugees include specific provisions to ensure access to work opportunities

for refugees, which entail, at a minimum, the removal of legal barriers to refugees engaging

in gainful employment.

37. Asymmetries between national immigration policies and economic and social

pressures influencing emigration result in millions of migrant workers remaining

undocumented52 and vulnerable to discrimination, violations of their fundamental rights and

exploitation at work. Migrants who are unable to access safe and regular channels for

labour migration will often end up in an irregular situation. Article 25 (3) of International

Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their

Families provides that States parties shall take all appropriate measures to ensure that

migrant workers are not deprived of any rights derived from this principle by reason of any

irregularity in their stay or employment. In particular, employers shall not be relieved of

any legal or contractual obligations, nor shall their obligations be limited in any manner by

reason of such irregularity.53 Even people who have not been granted authorization to work

because of their migration status are entitled, once they are employed, to protection from

exploitative or forced work or discrimination in the enjoyment and exercise of their human

rights, including those related to employment.54 Migrants who are in a regular situation can,

similarly, be vulnerable to abuse and exploitation, such as when their work and residence

permits are tied to one employer.

6. Right to work and child protection

38. Certain norms and standards in the area of the right to work are relevant for children

and adolescents. On the one hand, there is an important connection between the right to

47 See ILO, International Labour Migration: A Rights-Based Approach (Geneva, 2010).

48 Thus, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is concerned about the situation of

States parties such as Bulgaria, where asylum seekers are not allowed to work during the first year of

their stay in the State party (E/C.12/BGR/CO/4-5).

49 Egypt highlights this aspect in its contribution, while Guatemala and Serbia underscore their

legislative measures regarding migrant labour.

50 International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of

Their Families, preamble; Commission on Human Rights resolution 2002/62, preamble.

51 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, art. 2 (2); International Convention

on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, art. 25.

52 European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, Fundamental Rights of Migrants in an Irregular

Situation in the European Union (Vienna, European Union, 2011); Parliamentary Assembly of the

Council of Europe, resolution 1509 (2006) on human rights of irregular migrants.

53 See OHCHR, The Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of Migrants in an Irregular Situation, United

Nations publication, Sales No. E.14.XIV.4, chap. VI.

54 Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Juridical condition and rights of undocumented migrants,

advisory opinion OC-18/03 of 17 September 2003, paras. 133-134.

education, the specific right to technical and vocational education and guidance and the

right to work, as one of the functions of education is preparation for professional life.55 On

the other hand, the State duty to protect children entails protection against all forms of

labour and exploitation or violence that could interfere in their education, development and

health, which involves minimum age requirements for entry into the labour market and the

appropriate regulation of hours and conditions of employment.56

39. ILO considers the abolition of child labour as one of the four fundamental rights and

principles at work that are considered mandatory for all States members of the

organization.57 There is a strong association between child labour, poverty and the violation

of other human rights, since working during childhood may be detrimental to the

development of the child. In 2010, 215 million children were still engaged in unlawful,

mostly unpaid, hazardous, compulsory labour or in the informal economy.58 According to

article 2 (3) of the Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138), the minimum age of

employment shall not be less than the age of completion of compulsory schooling.59 The

State should ensure effective access to education and vocational programmes at least up to

that minimum age for all children.60

7. Protection against unemployment

40. While the right to work is interdependent with and indivisible from all other human

rights, it is important to underscore the particular complementarity of State obligations

regarding the rights to work and to social security. As noted above, the right to work does

not entail an absolute and unconditional right to obtain employment. This constitutes a

recognition that, while States have a duty to adopt proactive employment policies, the

provision of employment for each individual may be beyond their control. Thus, the

positive obligation to take steps to promote an economic environment conducive to the

creation of jobs should be seen as an obligation of conduct, rather than as an obligation of

result.61

41. However, while unemployment and underemployment rates are a function of

multiple causes and may not be directly attributable to the State, the failure to fulfil the

right to work invokes more exacting obligations in relation to the right to social security.

Indeed, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has recognized that the

right to social security includes both contributory and non-contributory schemes62 and has

identified — in line with Convention No. 102 — unemployment as a contingency that should be covered by social security: “In addition to promoting full, productive and freely chosen employment, States parties must endeavour to provide benefits to cover the loss or

55 See International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, art. 13, especially 13 (2) (b);

Convention on the Rights of the Child, art. 28 (1) (d).

56 See Convention on the Rights of the Child, art. 32 (2) (b) and, generally, arts. 32-36.

57 See ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work; Minimum Age Convention,

1973 (No. 138); and Recommendation (No. 146); Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999

(No. 182) and Recommendation (No. 190); and ILO, General Survey (2012), Part IV.

58 ILO, General Survey (2012), Part IV, para. 328.

59 The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has expressed concern about mismatches

between the minimum age to work and the period of compulsory education. See concluding

observations on Mexico (E/C.12/MEX/CO/4), Cameroon (E/C.12/CMR/CO/2-3) and Rwanda

(E/C.12/RWA/CO/2-4).

60 See Convention No. 138, art. 8.

61 See, for example, ILO Employment Promotion and Protection against Unemployment Convention,

1988 (No. 168), art.7: “Each Member shall declare as a priority objective a policy designed to

promote full, productive and freely chosen employment by all appropriate means, including social

security.”

62 General comment No. 19 (2007) on the right to social security, para. 4.

12

lack of earnings due to the inability to obtain or maintain suitable employment.”63 The Social Protection Floors Recommendation, 2012 (No. 202) takes a similar approach by

recommending that nationally adopted social protection floors should comprise, at a

minimum, among other elements, basic income security, at least at a nationally defined

minimum level, for persons in active age who are unable to earn sufficient income, in

particular in cases of sickness, unemployment, maternity and disability (para. 5 (c)).

42. The interdependence of the right to work and the right to social security has multiple

applications. Both Convention No. 168 and Recommendation No. 202 build on the idea that

social security should serve as a means of promoting full, productive and freely chosen

employment and support active labour market policies, requiring an active coordination of

social security benefits with other means of employment and with social policies serving

the goal of employment promotion. Conversely, the correlation between suitable

employment and freedom of choice of employment means that entitlements to

unemployment benefits and employment services cannot be made conditional on the

acceptance of any type of work. Similarly, the imposition of compulsory work requirements

as a condition for receiving unemployment benefits would not qualify as suitable

employment.

43. The failure to ensure the full realization of the right to work for reasons beyond the

State’s control — such as financial or economic crisis or downturn — requires States to adopt appropriate measures to promote the creation of jobs and to take steps to extend

social protection to those who are not able to obtain or maintain suitable employment.64

Monitoring the fulfilment of the right to work through adequate indicators should, at the

same time, serve as the basis for identifying those in need for social protection purposes.

B. Just and favourable conditions

44. The right to work is not only the right to employment, but to work that respects the

fundamental rights of the person and worker and ensures just and favourable conditions of

work, safeguarding the fundamental political and economic freedoms of individuals

(including the freedom to organize trade unions and collective bargaining) and their

personal development and fulfilment. This implies norms giving rise to a number of duties

and entitlements, including equality in working conditions throughout the employment or

occupation relationship.65

1. Legal protection of decent work

45. As with all human rights, the right to work entails duties to respect, protect and

fulfil. Many of these duties require the adoption of legislative measures66 establishing

labour regulations, the protection of workers’ rights against any unfavourable balance of power as well as institutional guarantees of inspection and implementation.67 These

standards and institutions are usually provided for under national labour laws. Workers in

the informal economy or those on the margins of legal protection are subject to more

hardship and discrimination68 and are more likely to be victims of precarious employment,

63 Ibid., para. 16. See also Convention No. 168, art. 10 (1).

64 See Convention No. 168, arts. 7, 8 and 10.

65 Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, general comment No. 20 (2009) on non-

discrimination in economic, social and cultural rights, para. 3.

66 Ibid.

67 Kazakhstan reports on its new legal framework , including administrative and criminal measures and

incentives to prevent labour law violations.

68 ILO, Extending the Scope of Application of Labour Laws to the Informal Economy: Digest of

Comments of the ILO’s Supervisory Bodies Related to the Informal Economy (Geneva, 2010).

low productivity, low aggregate demand and low job creation.69 According to the 2008 ILO

Declaration, the importance of the employment relationship should be recognized as a

means of providing legal protection to workers. In order to ensure equal protection of the

law, the State must take measures to compel employers to respect labour legislation and

declare their employees, thus enabling the latter to enjoy all the rights of workers.70

46. Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural

Right are strongly interdependent. For instance, a decent living wage,71 safe and healthy

working conditions,72 rest, leisure and limitation of working time,73 freedom to form and

join trade unions and collective bargaining are key elements of the right to work. While

dealing exhaustively with all aspects of articles 7 and 8 is beyond the scope of the present

report, it is important to highlight certain aspects to demonstrate just and favourable

conditions as an integral part of the right to work.

2. Mechanisms for promoting formalization

47. Approximately 60 per cent of jobs are in the informal economy and unevenly

distributed around the world.74 Formalization is the first step to decent work. To attain this,

States parties must take the requisite measures, legislative or otherwise, to reduce to the

fullest extent possible the number of workers outside the formal economy, workers who as

a result of that situation have no protection.75 Such measures include laws, policies and

programmes to deal with the factors responsible for informality, to extend protection to all

workers and to remove the barriers to entry into the mainstream economy.76 In accordance

with Recommendation No. 204, they should encompass an integrated policy framework

with strategies adapted to the unique situation of each country. This includes preventive and

sanctioning mechanisms that reinforce labour inspections and monitoring mechanisms;77

69 ILO, World Employment and Social Outlook 2015.

70 General comment No. 18, para. 10.

71 Universal Declaration, art. 23 (3); International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,

art. 7 (a) (ii).

72 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, art. 7 (ii) (b). See general comment

No. 18, para. 7. In its contribution France stresses that national legislation and jurisprudence affirm

the employer’s obligation not only to prevent accidents and occupational diseases but also to ensure

the health of workers, involving all the risks they may be exposed to, including psychosocial risks.

73 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, art. 7 (ii) (d).

74 ILO, World Employment and Social Outlook 2015. See also the Transition from the Informal to the

Formal Economy Recommendation, 2015 (No. 204), paras. 2-5.

75 Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, general comment No. 18, para. 10. The

Committee has expressed concern about the high percentages of workers in the informal economy and

recommended extending social protection to include them. See concluding observations on Bosnia

and Herzegovina (E/C.12/BIH/CO/2), Monaco (E/C.12/MCO/CO/2-3), Ukraine (E/C.12/UKR/CO/6),

the Republic of Moldova (E/C.12/MDA/CO/2, the Russian Federation (E/C.12/RUS/CO/5), Serbia

(E/C.12/SRB/CO/2), Armenia (E/C.12/ARM/CO/2-3), Paraguay (E/C.12/PRY/CO/4), Brazil

(E/C.12/BRA/CO/2), Colombia (E/C.12/COL/CO/5), Costa Rica (E/C.12/CRI/CO/4), the Dominican

Republic (E/C.12/DOM/CO/3), Ecuador (E/C.12/ECU/CO/3), Mexico (E/C.12/MEX/CO/4),

Nicaragua (E/C.12/NIC/CO/4), Egypt (E/C.12/EGY/CO/2-4), Ethiopia (E/C.12/ETH/CO/1-3),

Mauritania (E/C.12/MRT/CO/1), Rwanda (E/C.12/RWA/CO/2-4), the United Republic of Tanzania

(E/C.12/TZA/CO/1-3), Cambodia (E/C.12/KHM/CO/1), China (E/C.12/CHN/CO/2), Indonesia

(E/C.12/IDN/CO/1) and the Islamic Republic of Iran (E/C.12/IRN/CO/2).

76 Resolution concerning decent work and the informal economy adopted by the ILO General

Conference (2002), para. 21.

77 The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights was concerned at the lack of any form of

monitoring of conditions of work in the informal economy and at the absence of opportunity for

social security affiliation for workers therein (concluding observations on Mauritania

(E/C.12/MRT/CO/1), para. 14).

14

reduce administrative and tax burdens to encourage formalization,78 especially in small and

medium enterprises; facilitate financial services and international cooperation; and give

special attention to disadvantaged groups. Lack of formalization in relation to an

employment contract or the employer’s activity cannot be a reason for depriving a worker of the rights provided to formally hired workers, including trade union rights.79

3. Prevention of fraud and discriminatory exclusions

48. The State’s duty to ensure equal enforcement of the legal standards protecting the rights of workers constitutes an immediate obligation. The applicability of labour laws

should not be subject to the discretion of employers or authorities, waived by the

employee,80 or circumvented by fraudulent mechanisms designed to conceal factual

employment status (such as falsely attributing a non-working character to a contract or

hiding the true employer). Inspectorates and access to legal remedies must be made readily

available. Moreover, the law itself must respect equal treatment. The arbitrary exclusion by

law of certain types of workers from the general definition of employment constitutes a

violation of the right to work. As highlighted by the Committee on Economic, Social and

Cultural Rights, legislation must ensure that domestic and agricultural workers receive the

same level of protection as other workers.81

4. Self-realization and content of work

49. The interdependence of the rights to work, health and the full development of the

human personality calls for attention to the qualitative aspect of employment. Decent work

should provide reasonable opportunities for self-realization and the enhancement of self-

esteem. The Declaration of Philadelphia declares as a goal in article III (b) the employment

of workers in the occupations in which they can have the satisfaction of giving the fullest

measure of their skill and attainments and make their greatest contribution to the common

well-being. In its 2008 Declaration, ILO refers to work in which individuals can develop

their skills in order to achieve personal fulfilment and the common well-being.

50. The right to work includes basic requirements of qualitative content of the activity,

which should not be meaningless or excessively repetitive or exhausting. Workplace

conditions82 that enhance self-realization include respect for the fundamental political and

economic freedoms of the individual; the possibility of cooperation and dialogue between

workers and with the organization’s management; recognition of the worker’s contribution; career prospects and professional development;83 the promotion of the physical and mental

health of the worker; respect for individuality and morality; the absence of discrimination

and sexual and moral harassment; and respect. It is the duty of the State to implement and

protect this right and to enforce the duty of employers to respect it.

5. Protection against unfair deprivation of work

51. The right to work entails a right not to be deprived of work unfairly. Failure to

protect workers against unlawful dismissal is a violation of the obligation to protect the

right to work.84 The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has recalled ILO

78 Mexico reports recent initiatives in this regard.

79 ILO, General Survey (2012), para. 53.

80 Guatemala, Paraguay and Serbia stress in their contributions that, under their national constitutions,

workers’ rights are not subject to waiver or limitation by contract.

81 See ILO, General Survey (2012), para. 742.

82 Hungary underlines the State’s duty to ensure the legislative, organizational and institutional

conditions of occupational health and safety.

83 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, art. 7 (ii) (c).

84 General comment No. 18, paras. 4, 6 and 35.

Convention No. 158, which imposes the requirement to provide valid grounds for dismissal

connected with the capacity or conduct of the worker or with the operational requirements

of the undertaking, such as economic, technological, structural or similar reasons. The aim

of Convention No. 158 and its accompanying Recommendation No. 166 is to ensure the

employer’s right to dismiss a worker for a valid reason and the worker’s right not to be deprived of work unfairly. The purpose of the instruments is therefore to provide a balance

between the interests of the employer and those of the worker and to promote the use of

social dialogue as a means of achieving that balance.85

52. The absence of a legal burden on the employer to provide a valid reason for

dismissal exposes the worker to threats, discrimination and abuse. Adequate safeguards

should consider a distinct treatment between dismissals based on an objective reason where

a severance allowance system and/or unemployment insurance exists, on the one hand, and

dismissals without any reason or based on unfair grounds, where the violation of workers’ rights is more severe, on the other hand. Adequate protection in the latter cases may include

reinstatement and/or the payment of compensation. Fair procedures and access to an

impartial body are also required as a guarantee of defence in the event of alleged

justifications of dismissal based on performance or the employee’s conduct; additional procedures in case of collective dismissal include the notification to a competent authority,

such as the labour inspectorate.86

6. Recognition and protection of self-employed work

53. The right to work encompasses all forms of work, whether independent work or

dependent, wage-paid work.87 Human work is worthy of social value in its various forms.88

Although some rights, such as paid holidays, are specific to wage-paid workers, self-

employed and cooperative workers also have the right to just and favourable conditions of

work.89 The appreciation of other forms of work depends on two conditions: (a) that it does

not undermine the definition or the protection of waged work; and (b) that regardless of the

different protection schemes applicable to unwaged workers, they should enjoy just and

favourable conditions of work equivalent to wage-paid workers.

54. The national employment strategy must respect and protect self-employment as long

as it enables workers and their families to enjoy an adequate standard of living.90 Self-

employed and cooperative workers should also have the right to protection against

discrimination, safe and healthy occupational conditions, maternity protection, freedom of

association, freedom of disposal of their remuneration and protection from unemployment.

85 See report of the Tripartite Meeting of Experts to Examine the Termination of Employment

Convention, 1982 (No. 158), and the Termination of Employment Recommendation, 1982 (No. 166).

86 France, Serbia and Turkey underline their legal protection against unfair dismissal, including the right

of defence prior to dismissal on the basis of the worker’s conduct or performance.

87 General comment No. 18, para. 6.

88 Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, concluding observations on Chad

(E/C.12/TCD/CO/3): “The Committee is concerned that the State party’s social security system does

not provide universal coverage and that a large number of vulnerable and marginalized groups, such

as casual workers and the self-employed, are excluded” (para. 18).

89 Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, concluding observations on Ecuador

(E/C.12/ECU/CO/3): “The State party [should] develop mechanisms for monitoring the

implementation of the Labour Rights Protection Act and the Act in Support of Retailers, Self-

employed Persons and Microentrepreneurs in order to ensure that working conditions for all persons

in the State party are fair and decent” (para. 15).

90 General comment No. 18, para. 44.

16

IV. Conclusions: towards a better protection of the right to work

55. The mapping of the various normative dimensions of the right to work provides

guidance for its comprehensive implementation. At the same time, the gap between

the realities of work in the world today and the normative standards of the right to

work clearly demonstrate the need to further strengthen its protection.

56. Work is key to equality, dignity, justice and human development and is

important for social participation and individual and collective self-realization. Decent

work is also a means to stimulate the type of economic activity that will contribute to

overcoming the global economic crisis. Increased productivity and sustainability of

demand depends on the improvement of existing working conditions.

57. In addition to the provisions included in ILO conventions, human rights

instruments require States to respect, protect and fulfil the right to work as a whole.

As shown in the present report, the mutual reinforcement of international labour and

human rights standards and the complementarity of their respective supervisory

mechanisms contribute to a better understanding of the right to work and should be

strengthened further. The observations of the monitoring mechanisms illustrate both

good examples and the important gaps in the realization of the right.

58. States have an obligation to put in place comprehensive policies and to take

legislative and administrative measures necessary to ensure the full realization of the

right to work. Adequate means also include the coordination of international policies

relevant to work, such as trade and migration, and the reinforcement of international

cooperation mechanisms.