Original HRC document

PDF

Document Type: Final Report

Date: 2016 May

Session: 32nd Regular Session (2016 Jun)

Agenda Item: Item3: Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development

GE.16-08582(E)



Human Rights Council Thirty-second session

Agenda items 3, 4, 7, 9 and 10

Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil,

political, economic, social and cultural rights,

including the right to development

Human rights situations that require the Council’s attention

Human rights situation in Palestine and other

occupied Arab territories

Racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related

forms of intolerance, follow-up to and implementation

of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action

Technical assistance and capacity-building

Communications report of Special Procedures*

Communications sent, 1 December 2015 to 29 February 2016;

Replies received, 1 February to 30 April 2016

Joint report by the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the

right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this

context; the Independent Expert on the enjoyment of human rights by persons with

albinism; the Working Group of Experts on people of African descent; the Working

Group on arbitrary detention; the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human

rights in Belarus; the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in

Cambodia; the Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in the Central

African Republic; the Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights; the

Independent expert on the promotion of a democratic and equitable international

order; the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Democratic

People’s Republic of Korea; the Special Rapporteur on the rights of persons with

disabilities; the Special Rapporteur on the right to education; the Independent Expert

on the issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean,

healthy and sustainable environment; the Working Group on enforced or involuntary

disappearances; the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Eritrea;

* The present report is circulated as received.

United Nations

A/HRC/32/53

General Assembly Distr.: General 27 May 2016

English/French/Spanish only

the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights; the Special

Rapporteur on the right to food; the Independent expert on the effects of foreign debt

and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of

human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights; the Special

Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and

expression; the Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and

of association; the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief; the

Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Haiti; the Special Rapporteur

on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of

physical and mental health; the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights

defenders; the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers; the

Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples; the Special Rapporteur on the

human rights of internally displaced persons; the Special Rapporteur on the situation

of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran; the Working Group on the use of

mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the

right of peoples to self-determination; the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of

migrants; the Special Rapporteur on minority issues; the Special Rapporteur on the

situation of human rights in Myanmar; the Independent Expert on the enjoyment of

all human rights by older persons; the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human

rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967; the Special Rapporteur on

the right to privacy; the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial

discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance; the Special Rapporteur on the

sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography; the Special Rapporteur on

contemporary forms of slavery, including its causes and consequences; the

Independent Expert on the situation on human rights in the Sudan; the Special

Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions; the Special

Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental

freedoms while countering terrorism; the Special Rapporteur on torture and other

cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; the Special Rapporteur on the

implications for human rights of the environmentally sound management and disposal

of hazardous substances and wastes; the Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons,

especially women and children; the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth,

justice, reparation & guarantees of non-recurrence; the Working Group on the issue

of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises; the

Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of the unilateral coercive measures on the

enjoyment of human rights; the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its

causes and consequences; the Working Group on the issue of discrimination against

women in law and in practice; and the Special Rapporteur on the human right to safe

drinking water and sanitation.

Contents

Page

Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................... 4

I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 6

II. Communications sent and replies received ...................................................................................... 11

A. Communications sent between 1 December 2015 and 29 February 2016 and replies

received between 1 February and 30 April 2016 ..................................................................... 11

B. Replies received between 1February and 30 April 2016

relating to communications sent before 1 December 2015 ...................................................... 93

Appendix

Mandates of special procedures ....................................................................................................... 114

Abbreviations

Adequate housing Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard

of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context

Albinism Independent Expert on the enjoyment of human rights by persons with albinism

African Descent

Arbitrary detention

Working Group of Experts on people of African descent

Working Group on Arbitrary Detention

Belarus Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus

Burundi Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Burundi

Business enterprises Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other

business enterprises

Cambodia Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia

Central Africa Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in the Central African Republic

Côte d'Ivoire Independent Expert on capacity-building and technical cooperation with Côte d’Ivoire in the

field of human rights

Cultural Rights Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights

Democratic and equitable

international order

Independent expert on the promotion of a democratic and equitable international order

Disability Special Rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities

Disappearances Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances

Discrimination against

women

Working Group on the issue of discrimination against women in law and in practice

DPR Korea Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of

Korea

Education Special Rapporteur on the right to education

Environment Independent Expert on the issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a

safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment

Eritrea Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Eritrea

Extreme poverty Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights

Food Special Rapporteur on the right to food

Foreign debt Independent expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial

obligations of States on the full enjoyment of human rights, particularly economic, social

and cultural rights

Freedom of expression Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and

expression

Freedom of peaceful

assembly and of

association

Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association

Freedom of religion Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief

Haiti Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Haiti

Health Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable

standard of physical and mental health

Human rights defenders Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders

Independence of judges

and lawyers

Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers

Indigenous peoples Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples

Internally displaced

persons

Special Rapporteur on the human rights of internally displaced persons

International Solidarity Independent Expert on Human Rights and International solidarity

Iran Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran

Mali Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Mali

Mercenaries Working Group on the use of mercenaries

Migrants Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants

Minority issues Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues

Myanmar Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar

OPT Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied

since 1967

Older persons Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons

Privacy Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy

Racism Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and

related intolerance

Sale of children Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography

Slavery Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery

Somalia Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia

Sudan Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in the Sudan

Summary executions Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions

Terrorism Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental

freedoms while countering terrorism

Torture Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or

punishment

Hazardous substances and

wastes

Special Rapporteur on the implications for human rights of the environmentally sound

management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes

Trafficking Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and children

Truth justice, reparation &

guarantees on non-

recurrence

Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation & guarantees of non-

recurrence

Unilateral coercive

measures

Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment

of human rights

Violence against women Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences

Water and Sanitation Special Rapporteur on the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation

Other abbreviations

AL Letter of allegation

JAL Joint letter of allegation

JUA Joint urgent appeal

UA Urgent appeal

I. Introduction

1. Special procedures are mandated by the Human Rights Council to report to it on

their activities (see Appendix).

2. In 2009, the sixteenth annual meeting of special procedures mandate holders decided

that a joint communications report would be prepared (cf. A/HRC/12/47, paras 24-26), with

this decision being reconfirmed by the seventeenth annual meeting of special procedures in

2010 in order to avoid duplication, rationalize documentation, allow examination of cross

cutting issues and ensure that the content of communications and any follow-up would feed

into the universal periodic review mechanism more effectively. Mandate holders decided

that the report should contain summaries of communications and statistical information

(A/HRC/15/44, para. 26-27).

3. The Outcome of the review of the work and functioning of the Human Rights

Council calls on the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to maintain

information on special procedures in a comprehensive and easily accessible manner, and

encourages the use of modern information technology to reduce the circulation of paper

(A/HRC/RES/16/21, Annex, paras. 29 and 60).

4. Short summaries of allegations communicated to the respective State or other entity

are included in the report, and the communications sent and responses received are

accessible electronically through hyperlinks. Communications are reproduced in the

language in which they were sent. Replies received in Arabic, Chinese or Russian are

included with translations into English, where available.

5. This report covers all urgent appeals, and letters of allegations sent by special

procedures mandate holders between 1 December 2015 and 29 February 2016 and replies

received between 1 February and 30 April 2016. Communications sent before 1 December

2015 are reported in A/HRC/31/79, A/HRC/30/27, A/HRC/29/50, A/HRC/28/85,

A/HRC/27/72, A/HRC/26/21, A/HRC/25/74, A/HRC/24/21, A/HRC/23/51, A/HRC/22/67,

A/HRC/22/67 corr.1 and corr.2, A/HRC/21/49, A/HRC/20/30, A/HRC/19/44 and

A/HRC/18/51 respectively.

6. The report also includes replies received between 1 February and 30 April 2016

relating to communications sent by special procedures mandate holders before 1 December

2015. Some of these replies supplement information communicated earlier by the

respective State.

7. The present report contains urgent appeals sent by the Working Group on Arbitrary

Detention and the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances and joint

urgent appeals sent by them together with other mandates. It does not contain other types of

communications issued by these mandates, which are processed according to their own

distinctive procedures, and are reported in the annual reports of these two working groups.

8. The names of some alleged victims have been obscured in order to protect their

privacy and prevent further victimization. Names of victims who would otherwise have

their identities protected are mentioned only when the individual concerned or their direct

family has expressly consented or requested to have his or her name in the public report. In

the original communications, the full names of the alleged victims were provided to the

Government concerned. Names of alleged perpetrators have systematically been darkened

in State replies to preserve the presumption of innocence.

9. In preparing the statistics included in this report, uniform reporting periods have

been used, reflecting all communications sent between 1 December 2015 and 29 February

2016, and responses received in relation to these communications up to 30 April 2016.

Communications and replies by mandate

Mandate

Reporting period:

1 December 2015 to 29 February 2016

Reporting period:

1 June 2006 to 29 February 2016

Communications

sent

replied to by 30

April 2016

response

rate

Communications

sent

replied to by 30

April 2016

response

rate

Adequate housing 6 0 0% 295 142 48%

African descent 1 1 100% 16 10 63 %

Albinism 2 0 0% 4 0 0%

Arbitrary detention (+) 13 6 46% 1,300 723 56 %

Belarus* 0 0 0 % 9 6 67 %

Burundi** 0 0 0 % 6 0 0%

Business enterprises 26 11 42% 61 31 51 %

Cambodia 2 1 50% 26 5 19%

Central Africa 0 0 0 % 1 0 0%

Cultural Rights 7 0 0% 53 33 62%

Democratic and equitable international order 0 0 0 % 14 9 64%

Disability 3 0 0% 20 8 40%

Disappearances (+) 5 1 20% 321 144 45%

Discrimination against women in law and in

practice

8 2 25% 158 73 46%

DPR Korea 2 0 0% 9 1 11%

Education 0 0 0% 66 40 61%

Environment 10 4 40% 32 17 53%

Eritrea 0 0 0% 2 0 0%

Extreme poverty 6 2 33% 51 35 69%

Food 7 2 29% 213 83 39%

Foreign debt 0 0 0% 14 9 64%

Freedom of expression 58 25 43% 2,512 1,312 52%

Freedom of peaceful assembly and of

association

47 22 47% 862 508 59%

Freedom of religion 9 6 67% 416 249 60%

Haiti 0 0 0% 9 3 33%

Hazardous substances and wastes*** 14 5 36% 62 36 58%

Mandate

Reporting period:

1 December 2015 to 29 February 2016

Reporting period:

1 June 2006 to 29 February 2016

Communications

sent

replied to by 30

April 2016

response

rate

Communications

sent

replied to by 30

April 2016

response

rate

Health 36 12 33% 491 274 55%

Human rights defenders 59 23 39% 2,796 1,565 56%

Independence of judges and lawyers 18 7 39% 1,088 580 53%

Indigenous peoples 14 7 50% 350 206 59%

Internally displaced persons 0 0 0% 19 7 37%

Iran 6 0 0% 111 55 50%

Liberia 0 0 0% 2 0 0%

Mercenaries 0 0 0% 70 26 37%

Migrants 2 1 50% 214 135 63%

Minority issues 3 2 67% 214 127 59%

Myanmar 1 1 100% 104 51 49%

Older persons 0 0 0% 1 1 100%

OPT 3 0 0% 33 7 21%

Privacy 2 1 50% 2 1 50%

Racism 1 1 100% 109 65 60%

Sale of children 2 0 0% 55 21 38%

Slavery 3 1 33% 39 21 54%

Somalia 4 2 50% 17 3 18%

Sudan 2 2 100% 29 6 21%

Summary executions 22 6 27% 1,199 571 48%

Terrorism 7 3 43% 272 129 48%

Torture 29 5 17% 2,027 1,081 53%

Trafficking 1 1 100% 75 44 59%

Truth, justice, reparation & guarantees on

non-rec

2 0 0% 35 19 54%

Unilateral coercive measures 1 1 100% 1 1 100%

Violence against women 10 2 20% 506 263 52%

Water and Sanitation 4 3 75% 68 42 62%

(*) mandate re-established in June 2012, (**) mandate terminated, (***) mandate name changed from ‘toxic waste’

(+) These figures do not include communications on standard cases sent to Governments by the Working Group on arbitrary

detention and the Working Group on enforced or involuntary disappearances.

Please note: Totals are higher than the actual number of communications sent or replies received in the given period, as many

communications are sent jointly by two or more mandate holders.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 1

II. Communications sent and replies received

A. Communications sent between 1 December 2015 and 29 February 2016 and replies received between 1

February and 30 April 2016

10. Communications are presented in chronological order. Copies of the full text of the communications sent and replies received may

be accessed from the electronic version of this report available on the OHCHR website. Some names of individuals or other

information have been rendered anonymous or otherwise unidentifiable.

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

01/12/2015

AL

BRA 9/2015

Brazil

Indigenous

peoples;

Alleged lack of adequate action to stop ongoing forest fires in Arariboia protected

land, an area which contains Amazon rainforest. According to the information

received, the forest fires are threatening indigenous peoples who live in the

protected area, including Tenetehara / Guajajara peoples and Awá peoples who live

in voluntary isolation. There are allegations of a lack of adequate, timely and

coordinated steps by the authorities to extinguish the fire and protect indigenous

peoples. Concern is also raised about an alleged lack of investigation into the cause

of the fire, which may have been deliberately started by illegal loggers as an act of

retaliation against indigenous peoples following defence of their land rights.

05/02/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 2

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

01/12/2015

JUA

TUR 4/2015

Turkey

Freedom of

expression;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Summary

executions;

Alleged killing of a well-known human rights lawyer in Diyarbakir, Turkey.

According to the information received, Mr. Tahir Elçi, a human rights lawyer and

head of the Bar Association of Diyarbakir, was shot dead on 28 November 2015 in

what was reported as a ‘gun battle’ between police officers and unidentified armed

men in the old town of Diyarbakir. His death happened shortly after he had

delivered a press statement, calling for an end to violence between Turkish security

forces and the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK). Serious concerns are expressed

about the killing of Mr. Tahir Elçi and the possible negative effect it could have on

lawyers and human rights defenders, in particular with regard to the exercise of

their right to freedom of opinion and expression. The authorities are called to carry

out a thorough, independent and transparent investigation and bring those

responsible to justice, in line with Turkey’s international human rights obligations.

31/12/2015

01/12/2015

AL

USA 20/2015

United States of

America

Summary

executions;

Alleged large number of killings as a result of gun violence in the United States of

America. According to the information received, 49 school shootings were

reported so far in the country in 2015. Reports also indicate that in 2015 alone

there were 41,909 incidents of gun violence leading to 10,577 deaths, and 21,499

persons injured. 274 mass shootings were also reported in this period, as well as

1,500 accidental shootings. Concern is expressed that the legal framework in place

for the use and possession of firearms in the country may not provide an

environment conducive to the protection of the right to life and may therefore be in

breach of the State’s duty to exercise due diligence to prevent violations of this

right.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 3

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

02/12/2015

JAL

PAK 12/2015

Pakistan

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Summary

executions;

Allegations concerning the killing of a Pakistani journalist and human rights

activist in relation to the exercise of his legitimate right to freedom of opinion and

expression. According to the information received, on 3 November 2015, Mr.

Zaman Mehsud was shot dead by unknown gunmen while riding his motorbike in

Tank, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Mr. Mehsud was a journalist and member of

the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, a non-governmental organization. It is

reported that a Taliban commander claimed responsibility for the attack hours after

it occurred. Mr. Mehsud is reportedly one of 50 journalists who have been killed in

Pakistan since 2001. Reports indicate that only two of these cases have resulted in

convictions against the perpetrators. Five of these murders, including Mr.

Mehsud’s killing, have occurred in 2015. Serious concern is expressed over the

dangerous conditions journalists and human rights defenders encounter in Pakistan

when exercising their legitimate rights to freedom of opinion and expression, and

freedom of association.

03/12/2015

JAL

KHM 6/2015

Cambodia

Cambodia;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Alleged physical harassment of two Parliamentarians of the main opposition

Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP) in their legitimate and peaceful exercise

of the right to freedom of association and the right to participate in political and

public life. According to the information received, on 26 October 2015, Mr. Kong

Saphea and Mr. Nhay Chamroeun were violently assaulted following a large-scale

pro-Government protest outside Cambodia’s National Assembly building in

Phnom Penh involving heavy presence of law enforcement officers in civilian

clothing. Mr. Saphea and Mr. Chamroeun were dragged out of their official

vehicles and severely beaten by a group of masked men in the alleged presence of

the police. As a result of the violent attack, the two Parliamentarians reported

serious injuries. The home of Mr. Kem Sokha, the Vice-President of the opposition

Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP) in Phnom Penh was also attacked by a

group of several hundred protesters later in the day. The police reportedly took no

effective action to stop violence.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 4

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

03/12/2015

JUA

IRN 23/2015

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Disappearances;

Freedom of

expression;

Human rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Iran;

Torture;

Alleged prosecution of teachers and teachers’ organizations in the Islamic Republic

of Iran. According to the information received, Mr. Esmail Abdi, General

Secretary of the Iranian Teachers’ Trade Association (ITTA), was arrested in June

2015 and is currently being held in Evin Prison in Tehran on unknown charges.

The whereabouts of Mr. Ramin Zandnia, a well-known and active ITTA member,

and Ms. Pravin Mohammadi, a human rights activist, are unknown since their

arrest on 15 October 2015 by Revolutionary guards. Mr. Rasoul Bodahi, a member

of ITTA, is currently serving a three year prison sentence handed down to him

while he was already serving a prison sentence after he had been arrested in

September 2009. Mr. Abdholreza Ghanbari, a literature professor and unionist, was

arrested on 4 January 2010 and sentenced to 15 years in prison; he remains

imprisoned and in poor health. Mr. Ali Akbar Baghani, the Deputy Director of the

ITTA, was sentenced to 5 years in prison and has been detained since his arrest in

May 2015. Mr. Mohammad Reza Niknejad and Mr. Mehdi Bohlooli, both ITTA

activists, were released on a high bail after their arrest on 31 August 2015; their

trial is pending.

03/12/2015

JUA

KWT 6/2015

Kuwait

Arbitrary

detention;

Freedom of

religion; Health;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Torture;

Allegations of arbitrary arrest and detention, initially incommunicado, torture and

ill-treatment, including forced confessions, denial of access to adequate medical

treatment and services, and religious intolerance, including at least two instances of

denial of religious practice in detention, of 8 Kuwaiti citizens by Kuwaiti security

forces. According to the information received, Mr. Hasan Al Attar, Mr. Jassim

Mohamed Ghadanfari, Mr. Abdul Mohsen AlShatti, Mr. Hasan Ali Jamal, Mr.

Mohamed Jasim al-Meraj, Mr. Hasan Abdulhadi Hajih, Mr. Mohammed al-

Husaini, and Mr. Abdulla al-Husain were all arrested, separately, in August 2015,

and transferred to the State Security detention centre where they were held

incommunicado and allegedly tortured for several days. Following forced

confessions, they were transferred to the Central Prison of Kuwait. Several of them

were reportedly denied access to a lawyer.

17/12/2015

21/01/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 5

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

03/12/2015

JUA

PER 5/2015

Peru

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Alegaciones de atentados a la vida, amenazas de muerte y cargos judiciales contra

un defensor de derechos humanos. Según las informaciones recibidas, el 15 de

septiembre de 2015, el periodista Sr. César Estrada Chuquilin habría sufrido un

atentado después de haber participado en una inspección de un proyecto minero de

la empresa Minera Yanacocha, en la región de Cajamarca, Perú. Posteriormente, el

26 de octubre de 2015, el Sr. Chuquilin habría recibido amenazas de muerte en

relación con su documentación y activismo acerca del efecto medioambiental del

mismo proyecto. El 31 de octubre de 2015, el defensor habría sido víctima de otro

atentado. El 4 de noviembre, la esposa de Sr. Estrada Chuquilin recibió amenazas

de muerte mientras que el Sr. Estrada Chuquilin asistió a una conferencia de

defensores de derechos humanos en Dublín, Irlanda. Además, Sr. Chuquilin está

enfrentando procesos judiciales acusado de secuestro que según el defensor, no

tiene fundamento. El juicio está programado para enero de 2015.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 6

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

03/12/2015

JAL

VEN 15/2015

Venezuela

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Alegaciones sobre restricciones a la libertad de expresión y asociación en el marco

del proceso electoral legislativo el 6 de Diciembre de 2015. Según la información

recibida, el activista político Luis Díaz habría muerto de un disparo durante un

evento de campaña electoral. Se reportan otros actos de intimidación y violencia

durante eventos de esa naturaleza. Adicionalmente, se alega que la detención

arbitraria de líderes políticos de la oposición tendría como efecto de restringir el

debate democrático y las libertades públicas de sectores de la sociedad. Asimismo,

se reporta la inhabilitación política de líderes de oposición, impedidos de

postularse como candidatos, la cual no se basaría sobre decisión judicial o

administrativa. Se reportan otros obstáculos que pondrían en duda la independencia

e imparcialidad del Consejo Nacional Electoral, órgano rector y ejecutor de las

elecciones. Se expresa preocupación por un ambiente pre electoral que parece no

contar con las garantías necesarias en la satisfacción de las y libertades públicas de

las víctimas. (Comunicaciones previas, ver: A/HRC/24/21, caso VEN 4/2013 del

16 de mayo 2013; A/HRC/27/72, caso VEN 1/2014 del 3 de marzo 2014;

A/HRC/28/85, caso 5/2014 del 27 de junio 2014; A/HRC/28/85, caso VEN 6/2014

del 6 de agosto 2014; A/HRC/29/50, caso VEN 8/2014 del 22 de diciembre 2014;

A/HRC/29/50, caso VEN 3/2015 del 23 de febrero 2015; A/HRC/30/27, caso VEN

6/2015 del 28 de mayo 2015 y caso VEN 13/2015 del 8 de noviembre 2015.

23/12/2015

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 7

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

07/12/2015

JUA

BDI 7/2015

Burundi

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders; Truth,

justice, reparation

& guarantees on

non-rec;

Allégations de violations des droits à la liberté d’association et liberté d’opinion et

expression de plusieurs associations ainsi que du directeur d’un journal

indépendant au Burundi. Selon les informations reçues, les comptes bancaires de

dix organisations non-gouvernementales auraient été gelés et une ordonnance

ministérielle aurait ordonné la suspension de leurs activités. Un ordre d’extradition

aurait été formulé contre M. Antoine Kaburahe en lien avec ses activités légitimes

en tant que journaliste. Des préoccupations sont exprimées quant au fait que ces

mesures cherchent à restreindre les activités légitimes des organisations de la

société civile et des médias au Burundi. Des préoccupations sont exprimées quant

au fait que ces atteintes au droit à la liberté d’association et au droit à la liberté

d’opinion et d’expression auraient lieu dans un contexte de graves violations des

droits de l’homme dont seraient responsables notamment les forces de sécurité

burundaises, et pourraient faire partie d’une répression systématique de la société

civile et des médias indépendants au Burundi. Cette situation pousserait un nombre

croissant de défenseurs des droits de l’homme et de journalistes à fuir le pays.

07/12/2015

JAL

OTH 10/2015

Other

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Alleged stigmatization and criminal proceedings against a civil society association

and its members. According to the information received, on 17 April 2015, an

online statement was made by the Committee of State Security (KGB) of the

Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova in which the human rights

association, Promo-LEX, and its members were accused of being funded by

western donors in order to destabilize the region of Transnistria, and to pose a

direct threat to the security of the area. The statement also announced ‘special

investigation measures’ against Promo-LEX, in preparation of criminal

proceedings against the association and its members. On 7 May 2015, a second

online statement was emitted by the KGB of the Transnistrian region, in which the

Director of Promo-LEX, Mr. Ion Manole, was personally targeted and stigmatized.

The communication was sent through the UN Resident Coordinator in the Republic

of Moldova to the relevant authorities in the Transnistrian region and the same

communication was sent to the Republic of Moldova, see below, case no. MDA

5/2015.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 8

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

07/12/2015

JAL

OTH 11/2015

Other

Business

enterprises;

Hazardous

substances and

wastes; Health;

Indigenous

peoples; Water

and Sanitation;

Letter to BHP Billiton Ltd on alleged detrimental human rights impacts caused by

the collapse of an ore tailing waste dam in Bento Rodrigues, a district of Mariana

municipality in Minas Gerais state, Brazil, belonging to Samarco Mining S.A., a

joint venture between Vale S.A. and BHP Billiton Brazil Ltd. According to the

information received, 50 million cubic metres of iron ore waste washed away the

Bento Rodrigues district of 600 inhabitants and the ‘mud wave’ penetrated the

whole extension of the Doce river and the sea beyond the estuary, affecting the

entire ecosystem of the region in its downstream path of 850 km towards the sea.

Around 3 million people are estimated to be affected. Studies have shown the

toxicity of the wastes, with high levels of hazardous substances such as arsenic,

barium, lead, manganese, copper, iron, nickel, zinc, antimony, chrome, cobalt,

vanadium, phosphor and aluminium reported. Most cities in the flood path have

had water cuts, since their main water source is the Doce River and the water is

untreatable for human consumption due to the large presence of suspended solids

and heavy metals. It is reported that 11 bodies have been found and 12 persons are

missing. Hospitals have also received patients displaying symptoms of intoxication

by heavy metals. Similar communications were sent to Samarco Mining and Vale,

see below, case nos. OTH 12/2015 and 13/2015.

10/12/2015

14/01/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 9

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

07/12/2015

JAL

OTH 12/2015

Other

Business

enterprises;

Hazardous

substances and

wastes; Health;

Indigenous

peoples; Water

and Sanitation;

Letter to Samarco Mining S.A. on alleged detrimental human rights impacts caused

by the collapse of an ore tailing waste dam in Bento Rodrigues, a district of

Mariana municipality in Minas Gerais state, Brazil, belonging to Samarco Mining

S.A., a joint venture between Vale S.A. and BHP Billiton Brazil Ltd. According to

the information received, 50 million cubic metres of iron ore waste washed away

the Bento Rodrigues district of 600 inhabitants and the ‘mud wave’ penetrated the

whole extension of the Doce river and the sea beyond the estuary, affecting the

entire ecosystem of the region in its downstream path of 850 km towards the sea.

Around 3 million people are estimated to be affected. Studies have shown the

toxicity of the wastes, with high levels of hazardous substances such as arsenic,

barium, lead, manganese, copper, iron, nickel, zinc, antimony, chrome, cobalt,

vanadium, phosphor and aluminium reported. Most cities in the flood path have

had water cuts, since their main water source is the Doce River and the water is

untreatable for human consumption due to the large presence of suspended solids

and heavy metals. It is reported that 11 bodies have been found and 12 persons are

missing. Hospitals have also received patients displaying symptoms of intoxication

by heavy metals. Similar communications were sent to BHP Billiton Ltd, see

above, case no. OTH 11/2015, and to Vale S.A , see below, case no. OTH 13/2015.

14/01/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

2 0

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

07/12/2015

JAL

OTH 13/2015

Other

Business

enterprises;

Hazardous

substances and

wastes; Health;

Indigenous

peoples; Water

and Sanitation;

Letter to Vale S.A on alleged detrimental human rights impacts caused by the

collapse of an ore tailing waste dam in Bento Rodrigues, a district of Mariana

municipality in Minas Gerais state, Brazil, belonging to Samarco Mining S.A., a

joint venture between Vale S.A. and BHP Billiton Brazil Ltd. According to the

information received, 50 million cubic metres of iron ore waste washed away the

Bento Rodrigues district of 600 inhabitants and the ‘mud wave’ penetrated the

whole extension of the Doce river and the sea beyond the estuary, affecting the

entire ecosystem of the region in its downstream path of 850 km towards the sea.

Around 3 million people are estimated to be affected. Studies have shown the

toxicity of the wastes, with high levels of hazardous substances such as arsenic,

barium, lead, manganese, copper, iron, nickel, zinc, antimony, chrome, cobalt,

vanadium, phosphor and aluminium reported. Most cities in the flood path have

had water cuts, since their main water source is the Doce River and the water is

untreatable for human consumption due to the large presence of suspended solids

and heavy metals. It is reported that 11 bodies have been found and 12 persons are

missing. Hospitals have also received patients displaying symptoms of intoxication

by heavy metals. Similar communications were sent to BHP Billiton Ltd and

Samarco Mining S.A., see above, case nos. OTH 11/2015 and OTH 12/2015.

23/12/2015

07/12/2015

JAL

MDA 5/2015

Republic of

Moldova

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Alleged stigmatization and criminal proceedings against a civil society association

and its members. According to the information received, on 17 April 2015, an

online statement was made by the Committee of State Security (KGB) of the

Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova in which the human rights

association, Promo-LEX, and its members were accused of being funded by

western donors in order to destabilize the region of Transnistria, and to pose a

direct threat to the security of area. The statement also announced ‘special

investigation measures’ against Promo-LEX, in preparation of criminal

proceedings against the association and its members. On 7 May 2015, a second

online statement was emitted by the KGB of the Transnistrian region, in which the

Director of Promo-LEX, Mr. Ion Manole, was personally targeted and stigmatized.

The same case was sent to the relevant authorities in the Transnistrian region, see

above, case no. OTH 10/2015.

21/01/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

2 1

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

08/12/2015

JUA

IDN 10/2015

Indonesia

Freedom of

expression;

Human rights

defenders;

Torture;

Allegations of arrest, detention and potential deportation of a human rights

defender following a request from the authorities of the United Arab Emirates.

According to the information received, on 2 October 2015, Mr. Abdulrahman

Khalifa Salem Binsobeih, an Emirati citizen, was arrested in Batam, Indonesia, on

allegations of illegal residence. He was subsequently detained in the Police Office

of the District of Batam. Immediately following his arrest, a request was made by

the Emirati Embassy in Indonesia for Mr. Binsobeih to be handed over to Emirati

authorities in order for him to be extradited to the United Arab Emirates, where, in

2013, Mr. Binsobeih was sentenced in absentia to 10 years’ imprisonment for

charges originating in his membership of Al Islah, a human rights organization.

This request was rejected. However, it is alleged that Emirati authorities and

intelligence services continue efforts to negotiate his extradition. Mr. Binsobeih

was the subject of three previous communications dated 7 November 2013, see

A/HRC/25/74, case no. ARE 5/2013; 6 August 2013, see A/HRC/25/74, case no.

ARE 4/2013; and 16 April 2013, see A/HRC/24/21, case no. ARE 1/2013.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

2 2

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

08/12/2015

JUA

ISR 9/2015

Israel

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders; OPT;

Summary

executions;

Torture;

Alleged obstruction of the work of, and intimidation against, Palestinian human

rights defenders. According to the information received, in September, October

and November 2015, Israeli authorities carried out several acts against Youth

Against Settlements, a Palestinian human rights organization, and its members, in

relation to their work in documenting human rights violations in Hebron, Occupied

Palestinian Territory. These acts included intimidation and death threats, arbitrary

detention, a 24 hour take-over and raid on the premises of the organization, and

seizing of its cameras and other equipment. In addition, Israeli authorities

reportedly failed to intervene against threats and harassment by settlers against the

human rights defenders. Concerns are raised about violations relating to the rights

to life, liberty and security, the right of persons deprived of their liberty to be

treated with dignity, the protection against arbitrary or unlawful interference with

privacy, home and correspondence, the right to freedom of opinion and expression,

and the right to peaceful assembly. Youth Against Settlements and its members

have been the subject of two previous communications sent on 3 August 2013, see

A/HRC/25/74, case no. ISR 7/2013, and on 28 May 2014, see A/HRC/27/72, case

no. ISR 3/2014.

08/12/2015

AL

TUN 3/2015

Tunisie

Freedom of

religion;

Allégation de suspensions multiples d’une hôtesse de l’air à Tunisair pour avoir

porté son voile au travail. Selon les informations reçues, Madame Nebiha Jallouli,

en sa qualité de Chef de Cabine, a été suspendue par le commandant de bord qui a

refusé qu’elle assure sa mission en raison de son voile. Le 10 septembre 2015,

Mme Jallouli a déposé une plainte contre Tunisair devant le Tribunal

Administratif. La section de l’emploi du Tribunal administratif a délivré un

jugement en référé, le 19 septembre 2015, faisant injonction à Tunisair de permette

à Mme Jallouli de reprendre ses fonctions, et de lui verser toutes ses rémunérations

et indemnités. Tunisair continuerait, cependant, et malgré cette décision de justice,

à exclure Mme Jallouli des plannings des vols et continuerait à bloquer son salaire.

Le 29 octobre 2015, Mme Jallouli a été entendue par le conseil de discipline au

sujet du port du voile. Elle risquerait, selon ses dires, d’être suspendue pour une

durée d’un mois, comme sanction disciplinaire.

11/04/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

2 3

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

09/12/2015

JAL

COG 2/2015

Congo

(Republic of

the)

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Allégations d’arrestations d’opposants politiques, de restrictions indues du droit de

réunion pacifique et d’usage excessif de la force dans le cadre de plusieurs

manifestations, en majorité pacifiques, contre le référendum constitutionnel du 25

octobre 2015 proposé par le président congolais actuel. Selon les informations

reçues, le 20 et 21 octobre, plusieurs manifestations organisées pour protester

contre la tenue du référendum constitutionnel du 25 octobre dans différentes villes

du Congo ont été réprimées de façon brutale et disproportionnée par les forces de

l’ordre. Plusieurs affrontements ont alors éclaté entre les forces de l’ordre et

certains des manifestants, engendrant la mort de trois personnes à Brazzaville et

d’au moins deux personnes à Pointe Noire. De plus, le 21 octobre, six dirigeants de

l’opposition, M. Clément Mierassa, M. Emmanuel Boungouandza, M. Guy-

Romain Akifoussia, M. Pastere Kitemoso, Mme Marion Mabzimba et M. Henri

Doukoulou ont été arrêtés puis libérés alors qu’ils devaient participer à une

conférence de presse au siège de l’Union panafricaine pour la démocratie et la

République du Congo.

11/12/2015

08/02/2016

02/03/2016

04/04/2016

10/12/2015

JAL

COD 5/2015

Democratic

Republic of the

Congo

Disappearances;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Summary

executions;

Allégations de violations du droit à la vie. Selon les informations reçues, entre le

15 novembre 2013 et le 15 février 2014, dans le cadre de l’Opération Likofi

menées à Kinshasa, la Police nationale congolaise (PNC) serait responsable de

graves violations des droits de l’homme y compris des exécutions sommaires et

extrajudiciaires, et des disparitions forcées. Au moins 41 personnes- notamment

des jeunes soupçonnés d’appartenir à des bandes armées - ont été exécutées ou sont

portées disparues suite à leur arrestation sans mandat. Mise à part la condamnation

par le Tribunal militaire de Garnisson du directeur de la Police de Masina à10 ans

de travaux forcés aucun progrès significatif n’a été enregistré dans le cadre des

enquêtes sur ces allégations. En janvier 2015, la police aurait sévèrement réprimé

les manifestations organisées contre une réforme de la loi électorale congolaise.

Des opposants politiques et des défenseurs des droits de l’homme ont été réprimés

et arrêtés, en négation flagrante de leur liberté d’expression et de réunion. Des

exécutions sommaires et extrajudiciaires ont été également rapportées. Le 19 mars

2015, un charnier qui pourrait contenir les corps des victimes des récents

évènements a été découvert à Maluku (Kinshasa).

29/01/2016

11/02/2016

02/03/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

2 4

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

10/12/2015

JAL

ECU 6/2015

Ecuador

Environment;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Violence against

women;

Alegaciones sobre actos de violencia física y verbal y actos de intimidación contra

mujeres defensoras de derechos humanos. Según las informaciones recibidas, el 20

de octubre de 2015, Lina Solano, Maria Herlinda Gutama, Georgina Gutama, Elsa

Urgilés, Nancy Gutama, Etelvina Misacango, Maria Mercedes Gutama y Maria

Ángeles Gutama habrían participado en una manifestación pacífica en contra del

proyecto minero ‘Rio Blanco’ cuando policías y agentes de seguridad publica las

habrían agredido de manera física y verbal y las habrían retenido por más de dos

horas. Agentes de seguridad pública las habrían amenazado con detenerlas

diciendo que estaban fichadas. Se expresa grave preocupación por estas

alegaciones que restringirían indebidamente sus derechos a la libertad de expresión

y de la reunión pacífica y sus actividades en la promoción de los derechos

humanos.

20/04/2016

10/12/2015

JAL

IND 15/2015

India

Cultural Rights;

Freedom of

expression;

Human rights

defenders;

Alleged arrest and detention of a folk singer and activist, on charges of sedition for

the lyrics of two of his recently released songs criticizing the Tamil Nadu state

government and Chief Minister. According to the information received, Mr. S.

Sivadas, also known by his stage name Kovan, was arrested in the night of 30

October 2015 at his home. The legal procedure for his arrest was not respected and

a Habeas Corpus had to be filed by his lawyer. Mr. Kovan was released on bail on

16 November 2015. He has reportedly been charged with sedition, even though not

yet formally, and is awaiting trial. Concern is raised that his arrest and detention

may be related to his legitimate exercise of his rights to freedom of opinion and

expression in the form of art, to take part in cultural life, and to the freedom

indispensable for creative activities, as well as his work as a human rights

defender.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

2 5

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

10/12/2015

JAL

MNE 2/2015

Montenegro

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Alleged situation of intimidation and violence against journalists and media outlets

in Montenegro. According to the information received, in May 2015, the car of

journalist, Ms. Zorica Bulatovic, was attacked; in October 2015, Ms. Marijana

Bojanic, a journalist, received two death threats against her and her children;

journalist, Ms. Ivana Drobnjak, was physically attacked and her offices stoned; and

journalists, Mr. Gojko Raicevic and Mr. Dražen Živkovic were arrested and Mr.

Raicevic was beaten by the police on two occasions. Also in October 2015, the

investigation into an attack carried out against Mr. Tufik Softic in 2007 was

dropped. Grave concern is expressed at the reported intimidation and violence

against journalists and media outlets, as well as the culture of impunity in such

cases, also reported by the Special Rapporteur on the right to freedom of opinion

and expression after his country visit in 2013 (see A/HRC/26/30/Add.1).

16/01/2016

10/12/2015

JAL

UZB 3/2015

Uzbekistan

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Torture;

Allegations of arrest, beatings, judicial investigation and harassment against human

rights defender. According to the information received, on 20 September 2015, Mr.

Dmitry Tikhonov was arrested in Angren City, in the Tashkent region of

Uzbekistan, whilst documenting enforced cotton picking in the region. He was

brought to the Criminal Investigation Unit of the city police station and allegedly

beaten and threatened before being released five hours later, after having been

forced to sign a statement denying any police wrongdoing. On 19 October 2015, he

was informed that a criminal investigation had been opened against him, following

a complaint of disorderly conduct made by three regional representatives involved

in the organisation of citizens for cotton picking. On 20 October 2015, his office

was burnt down in a suspected act of arson. In the fire, extensive technical

equipment documenting human rights violations, in particular the policy of forced

recruitment for cotton picking was lost.

12/02/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

2 6

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

11/12/2015

AL

KOR 4/2015

Republic of

Korea

Freedom of

religion;

Alleged imprisonment of conscientious objectors in South Korea. According to the

information received, at least 600 conscientious objectors are currently in prison in

South Korea for refusing to undergo compulsory military service. The Military

Service Act establishes a compulsory military service for all males aged between

18 and 35, which lasts between 21 and 24 months. Contrary to recommendations

made by the United Nations Human Rights Committee and the South Korean

National Human Rights Commission, South Korea does not offer an alternative

civil service to compulsory military service, and the refusal to undertake the

service is punished with up to three years´ imprisonment and lifetime exclusion

from public employment.

24/02/2016

11/12/2015

JUA

SAU 11/2015

Saudi Arabia

Arbitrary

detention;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Freedom of

religion; Human

rights defenders;

Torture;

Allegations of arbitrary convictions and sentences of two bloggers and human

rights defenders, including corporal punishment. According to the information

received, in 2014, Mr. Raef Badawi and Mr. Milif bin Daham al Shammari were

sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment and 1000 lashes, and two years’

imprisonment and 200 lashes, respectively. Both sentences were upheld on appeal.

The individuals remain in detention and may be publicly flogged at any time. Mr.

Badawi was the subject of five previous communications sent on 12 July 2012, see

A/HRC/22/67, case no. SAU 9/2012; 31 January 2014, see A/HRC/26/21, case no.

SAU 2/2014; 31 October 2014, see A/HRC/28/85, case no. SAU 13/2014; 22

January 2015, case no. SAU 1/2015, see A/HRC/29/50; and 12 June 2015, see

A/HRC/31/79, case no. SAU 3/2015. Mr. Badawi was also the subject of Working

Group on Arbitrary Detention Opinion No. 38/2015 issued on 4 September 2015,

see A/HRC/WGAD/2015/38. Mr. Al Shammari was the subject of five previous

communications sent on 1 March 2012, see A/HRC/20/30, case no. SAU 6/2012; 3

May 2012, see A/HRC/21/49, case no. SAU 7/2012; 12 July 2012, see

A/HRC/22/67, case no. SAU 9/2012; 12 September 2013, see A/HRC/25/74, case

no. SAU 8/2013; and 8 December 2014, see A/HRC/29/50, case no. SAU 14/2014.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

2 7

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

14/12/2015

JUA

BHR 10/2015

Bahrain

Freedom of

expression;

Human rights

defenders;

Torture;

Allegations of arbitrary arrest, detention, charges and prosecution, and in some

cases torture and ill-treatment, of ten individuals, including human rights defenders

and one child, for the exercise of their right to freedom of expression. According to

the information received, since 2013, ten individuals, namely Messrs. Ebrahim

Karimi, Husain Ali Isa Mahdi, Ammar al Abid, Mahmood Tarish, Mohsen Abd-

Ali, Hasan Abd-Ali, Nader Ebrahim Abdul-Imam, Nabeel Rajab, Ali Ebrahim al

Heli and Ali al Shofa, were convicted and charged with criminal offences for

exercising their right to freedom of expression. Reportedly, cyberspace regulatory

measures disproportionately violate the right to freedom of expression and opinion.

Mr. Rajab was the subject of ten communications sent on 6 October 2004, case no.

BHR 6/2004; 25 July 2005, case no. BHR 3/2005; 5 March 2010, case no. 1/2010;

22 March 2011, see A/HRC/18/51, case no. BHR 4/2011; 16 June 2011, see

A/HRC/19/44, case no. BHR 12/2011; 9 September 2011, see A/HRC/19/44, case

no. 18/2011; 24 July 2012, see A/HRC/22/67, case. no. BHR 6/2012; 23 May

2013, see A/HRC/24/21, case no. BHR 3/2013; 14 October 2014, see

A/HRC/28/85, case no. BHR 13/2014; and 15 April 2015, see A/HRC/30/27, case

no. BHR 2/2015. Mr. Rajab was the subject of the Working Group on Arbitrary

Detention Opinion No. 12/2013, see A/HRC/WGAD/2013/12.

18/01/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

2 8

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

14/12/2015

AL

PAK 13/2015

Pakistan

Freedom of

expression;

Letter expressing concerns relating to the draft “Prevention of Electronic Crimes

Act” (hereinafter the “draft Cyber-Crime Bill”), which allegedly contains various

provisions that could unduly restrict the right to freedom of expression in Pakistan.

According to the information received, the draft Cyber-Crime Bill includes overly

broad provisions that lack sufficiently clear definitions, in particular sections 3, 4

and 10 of the draft Bill that use overly broad terms, permitting authorities to

criminalize online expression and to gain access to Internet data without any

judicial control. Concerns are expressed at the Bill, which , if adopted in its current

form, could criminalize a legitimate exercise of the right to freedom of expression

and access to information. The draft legislation could result in significant

censorship of and self-censorship by the media, especially those critical of the

Government and investigative journalism, and could also seriously deter

whistleblowers who, by definition, reveal information of general interest by

transmitting data they are not authorized to access, copy or transmit.

15/01/2016

14/12/2015

JAL

SEN 1/2015

Senegal

Arbitrary

detention; Health;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers;

Allégations concernant l’arrestation et la détention arbitraire de sept individus et

leur condamnation pour des relations sexuelles entre adultes consentants du même

sexe. Selon les informations reçues, le 21 juillet 2015 sept jeunes hommes ont été

arrêtés lors d’une opération de police qui s’est déroulée sans présentation d’un

mandat de perquisition ou d’un mandat d’arrêt. Ils ont été condamnés à six mois de

prison immédiats et 18 mois additionnels avec sursis en application de l’article 319

du Code Pénal qui interdit les actes soi-disant « contre nature » entre personnes de

même sexe, ce qui pose des préoccupations en matière de la non-discrimination, de

respect de la vie privée et d’égalité devant la loi. Des préservatifs et des lubrifiants

trouvés dans l’appartement de l’arrestation ont constitué la preuve principale qui a

mené à la condamnation, ce qui pose également des préoccupations quant à

l’impact que ce verdict pourrait avoir sur les efforts menés dans la lutte contre le

VIH-Sida visant à promouvoir l’utilisation de préservatifs. L’avocat des sept

jeunes hommes n’ayant pas été notifié de la décision de la cour, il n’aurait pas pu

faire recours en appel.

15/12/2015

08/02/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

2 9

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

15/12/2015

JUA

FIN 1/2015

Finland

Environment;

Indigenous

peoples;

Alleged lack of meaningful and effective public participation during the drafting

phase of new legislation to regulate the Finnish Forest and Parks Enterprise

(Metsähallitus), which regulates the management of State owned lands. Alleged

lack of recognition of the Sami and their rights as an indigenous people, notably

their right to free, prior and informed consent and to enjoy their own culture and

the right to their lands and resources, in the proposed new law. According to the

information received, the Sami Parliament has been unable to participate in the

law-making process and the most recent draft does not include articles

safeguarding the rights of the Sami as an indigenous people. Serious concerns are

expressed, inter alia, that the business operations of the proposed company will

lead to increased deforestation and mining activities in the Sami Homeland region

and to further fragmentation and destruction of the Sami people’s traditional

herding, hunting and fishing grounds resulting in an imminent threat to the Sami

people and their traditional livelihoods and other land-based cultural activities.

22/12/2015

15/12/2015

JUA

IND 16/2015

India

Food; Health;

Unilateral coercive

measures; Water

and Sanitation;

Alleged blockage at the Nepal-India border of vessels carrying essential goods

resulting in a lack of basic supplies and services, including food, fuel, water and

sanitation, and medical supplies and services available to the people of Nepal.

According to the information received, on 20 September 2015, Nepal promulgated

a new constitution, the adoption of which eventually resulted in a blockage at the

border with India. On 24 September 2015, vehicles carrying essential supplies

were prevented from entering Nepal. A lack of medical supplies combined with

water shortages have reportedly reduced the availability of certain medical

procedures, while the shortage of other vital supplies such as food and fuel had a

detrimental impact on the health of persons in situation of vulnerability, school

closures, and deforestation for use as fuel. As a consequence of this blockage and

due to Nepal’s heavy reliance on the border trade and transactions the country risks

facing a humanitarian crisis.

28/12/2015

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

3 0

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

16/12/2015

JAL

MYS 4/2015

Malaysia

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Allegations of charges brought against a woman human rights defender for her role

in organizing peaceful protests. According to the information received, on 29 July

2015, the announcement of a peaceful rally was made by BERSIH 2.0, a coalition

of Malaysian non-governmental organizations. The rally was set to take place on

29 and 30 August 2015. In advance of its occurrence, Ms. Maria Chin Abdullah,

chairperson of BERSIH 2.0, met twice with the local police to discuss the rally and

to present them with a formal notification. On 29 and 30 August 2015, the rally

took place in several cities in Malaysia. On 1 September 2015, Ms. Abdullah was

questioned, along with several other BERSIH 2.0 members. On 3 November 2015,

Ms. Abdullah was charged under the Peaceful Assembly Act, 2012, for failing to

inform the police of the rally. Her trial was set to begin on 11 December 2015.

Members of BERSIH 2.0 were the subjects of previous communications sent on 6

July 2011, see A/HRC/19/44, case no MYS 6/2011; 28 July 2011, see

A/HRC/19/44, case no. MYS 7/2011; 16 May 2012, see A/HRC/21/49, case no.

MYS 3/2012; and 1 June 2012, see A/HRC/22/67, case no. MYS 4/2012.

17/12/2015

JAL

AFG 3/2015

Afghanistan

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Summary

executions;

Terrorism;

Allegations concerning a landmine attack against members of the Afghanistan

Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC). According to the information

received, on 26 October 2015, at approximately 8 a.m. Afghan time, a minibus

carrying eight staff members of the AIHRC’s regional office in Nangerhar

Province was attacked using a remote-controlled improvised explosive device

while traveling through the city of Jalalabad. Two male staff were immediately

killed in the attack and one female staff was seriously wounded. The other staff

members suffered minor injuries.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

3 1

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

17/12/2015

JUA

EGY 17/2015

Egypt

Arbitrary

detention;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Torture;

Alleged arbitrary arrest, detention and torture of a peaceful protestor and human

rights defender. According to the information received, on 25 January 2014, Mr.

Mahmoud Mohamed Ahmed Hussein was arrested by police at El-Marg

checkpoint in Cairo. He was 18 years old at the time. Mr. Hussein was reportedly

arrested for wearing a scarf with symbol associated with the opposition and a t-

shirt with anti-torture slogans. He was reportedly interrogated that same day,

handcuffed and blindfolded, and subjected to torture. It is alleged that Mr. Hussein

was coerced through torture to confess various crimes. He was then brought to a

prison in Cairo and remains in detention to this date. Mr. Hussein has been held in

custody for nearly two years, and is yet to be charged with any crime. His trial date

has been delayed at least 20 times, the last time on 17 November 2015 when his

detention was prolonged for an additional period of 45 days. He has undergone

numerous 45-day pre-trial detention renewals and is rarely permitted to attend

these hearings.

02/02/2016

17/12/2015

AL

IRN 24/2015

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Discrimination

against women;

Follow-up letter following the Government’s response to communication IRN

15/2015 about allegations of discriminatory legal provisions against women in

marital status matters. The Working Group thanks the additional information

provided by the Government on the integration of gender equality in some aspects

of women’s marital status. It requests additional specific details on the measures

taken to advance reform of marital status legislation, including a reform of the

Iranian Civil Code. Communication IRN 15/2015 was sent on 24 August 2015, see

A/HRC/31/79.

14/04/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

3 2

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

17/12/2015

JAL

KWT 7/2015

Kuwait

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Allegations regarding the sentencing of a Kuwaiti human rights defender and steps

taken towards revoking his citizenship. According to the information received, on

9 April 2013, Mr. Abdullah Fairouz Abdullah Abd al-Kareem, a human rights

defender and journalist, was arrested by the Criminal Investigation Department of

Kuwait on charges of insulting the judiciary in relation to statements he had made

on social media critical of the Kuwaiti courts. He was subsequently detained for

seven days before being released on 15 April 2013 upon payment of 200 Kuwait

Dinars (approximately 658 USD). On 4 November 2013, Mr. Al-Kareem was

again arrested, this time by State security officials and on the basis of statements

made on social media relating to the Emir. It is reported that he was beaten during

his arrest. On 9 January 2014, Mr. Al-Kareem was sentenced to five years’

imprisonment and subsequent deportation from Kuwait. He is currently serving his

sentence in the Central Jail in Kuwait and processes for the revocation of his

citizenship have reportedly been initiated.

11/02/2016

17/12/2015

JAL

SLE 2/2015

Sierra Leone

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Allegations of systemic judicial harassment of land rights defenders. According to

the information received, on 16 October 2013, six members of the Malen Land

Owners and Users Association (MALOA) were arrested and detained on charges

allegedly based on their land rights advocacy in opposition to the activities of the

palm-oil company Socfin Agricultural Company Sierra Leone Ltd (SAC), a

subsidiary of the Belgian-based Socfin Group. They were released on 24 October

2013 and their trial before the High Court began a year later, on 20 October 2014.

The latest hearing in their case took place on 4 November 2015. Two other

MALOA members and nine MALOA supporters were arrested between 28 January

and 26 February 2014 on similar charges and are also standing trial. Their next

court date is set for 20 November 2015. On 8 September 2015, seven additional

MALOA members were arrested on similar charges, before being released on 10

September 2015 pending trial, after having posted bail.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

3 3

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

18/12/2015

UA

PAK 14/2015

Pakistan

Summary

executions;

Alleged violation of the right to life. According to the information received, in

1993, Mr. Muhammad Anwar, a Pakistani national, was arrested by police in

Vehari district for murder. Mr. Anwar was reportedly below the age of 18 at the

time of his conviction. After a 5-year trial, he was sentenced to death in June 1998

despite evidence of his juvenility during the time of the offence. He is being held in

District Jail Vehari and is scheduled to be executed on 19 December 2015. Serious

concern is expressed regarding, among others, the imminent execution of Mr.

Anwar who was a minor at the time of the alleged crime.

21/12/2015

JUA

KHM 7/2015

Cambodia

Cambodia;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Health; Human

rights defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers;

Allegations of arbitrary arrest and detention, and lack of due process guarantees

and fair trial, of members of the opposition parties Cambodia National Rescue

Party (CNRP) and Sam Rainsy Party (SRP- which later merged into CNRP).

According to the information received, seven CNRP members of Parliament, Ms.

Mu Sochua and Messrs. Men Sothavrin, Hor Vann, Keo Phirum, Real Khmerin,

Nut Romduol and Long Ry, and three CNRP members and activists, Messrs. Yon

Kimhour, Roeun Chetra, and Yea Thong, are currently under investigation in

relation to a protest held on 15 July 2014 in Freedom Park, Phnom Penh, that

turned violent. The seven members of Parliament were released on bail on 22 July

2014. The three activists were arrested one year after the protest, on 4 August

2015, and remain in pre-trial detention since. 11 other CNRP members and

activists - Messrs. Oeur Narith, Khin Chamreun, Meach Sovannara, San Kimheng,

Neang Sokhun, San Seihak, An Pakthorm, Ouk Pich Samnang, Ke Khim, Sum

Puthy, and Tep Narin – were all charged and convicted in relation to the same

incident on 15 July 2015 and are currently serving their sentences. Separately, Mr.

Hong Sok Hour, a Senator for SRP, is currently under investigation for a post he

made on Facebook. Aside from reported irregularities observed in his trial, Mr.

Hong Sok Hour has been denied his right to adequate and non-discriminatory

medical attention and care for his existing medical conditions. LICADHO, a

human rights organization, has been hindered from conducting medical

examinations at the detention facility. Lastly, Mr. Sam Rainsy, the leader of the

CNRP has had his parliamentary status and immunity arbitrarily removed on the

basis of a conviction dating back to 2011.

14/01/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

3 4

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

21/12/2015

JAL

SLE 3/2015

Sierra Leone

Discrimination

against women;

Health; Torture;

Violence against

women;

Alleged governmental policy statement that is discriminatory against pregnant girls

and young women. According to the information received, on 2 April 2015, the

Ministry of Education, Science and Technology published a policy statement

formally indicating that girls who were pregnant would not be allowed to attend

school and sit exams during their pregnancy. This policy statement entered into

force immediately. Grave concern is expressed as this policy seems to be based on

misguided, discriminatory and stigmatizing attitudes, beliefs and stereotypes as

well as perpetuating gender inequality and violating young women and girls’ rights

to education, economic opportunities, health, including reproductive health,

privacy, and physical and psychological integrity and dignity.

22/12/2015

JUA

DZA 3/2015

Algérie

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Allégations de détention arbitraire et harcèlement judiciaire d’un journaliste et

défenseur des droits de l’homme. Selon les informations reçues, le 2 octobre 2015,

M. Hassan Bouras aurait été arrêté à son domicile par 29 agents de la Brigade de

recherche et d’intervention. Du matériel informatique appartenant à M. Bouras,

mais également à des membres de sa famille, aurait été confisqué. Le 4 octobre, M.

Bouras aurait été présenté devant le procureur de la municipalité d’El Bayadh

accusé d’ « outrage à corps constitué » et « incitation à des citoyens à s’armer

contre l’autorité de l’Etat ». M. Bouras reste toujours en détention en attendant

l’enquête et la date de son procès. Des préoccupations sont exprimées au sujet de la

détention de M. Bouras qui serait liée à ses activités de journaliste dénonçant la

situation des droits de l’homme dans le pays. M. Bouras a fait l’objet de

condamnation de prison et amendes pour avoir publié des articles sur la corruption

et la pauvreté en Algérie dans le passé.

22/03/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

3 5

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

22/12/2015

JAL

KGZ 4/2015

Kyrgyz

Republic

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Alleged ban imposed against a human rights defender from entering the Kyrgyz

Republic. According to the information received, on 2 December 2015, Ms. Mihra

Rittmann, director of the Bishkek office of Human Rights Watch, was refused

entry into the Kyrgyz Republic by immigration officials at Manas International

Airport, Bishkek. She learnt that she had been declared “persona non grata” and

was being accused of violating the Kyrgyz Republic’s migration law. She was

placed on a flight out of the Kyrgyz Republic on the same day. Serious concern is

expressed that the action taken against Ms. Rittman is directly connected to her

human rights work and role as Director of the Bishkek office of Human Rights

Watch. Ms. Rittman was the subject of a previous communication sent on 30 July

2015, see A/HRC/31/79, case no. KGZ 2/2015.

22/12/2015

JAL

SRB 3/2015

Serbia

Disappearances;

Sale of children;

Alleged shortcomings of the “draft law on determining the facts on the position of

newborn infants suspected to have disappeared in maternity hospitals in the

Republic of Serbia” to adequately secure the establishment of a mechanism aimed

at providing individual redress to all parents of infants who have disappeared from

maternity wards in Serbia. According to the information received, on 26 March

2013 the European Court of Human Rights found Serbia in violation of the

European Convention on Human Rights in the lead case of Zorica Jovanovic v.

Serbia, and held that Serbia “must […], take all appropriate measures, preferably

by means of a lex specialis […] to secure the establishment of a mechanism aimed

at providing individual redress to all parents in a situation such as, or sufficiently

similar to, the applicant’s”. In July 2015, a draft law was reportedly circulated to a

number of concerned civil society organizations by the Ministry of Justice of

Serbia, yet a number of concerns have been raised regarding the content of the

draft legislation, as well as the process by which it was drafted.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

3 6

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

22/12/2015

JAL

GBR 4/2015

United

Kingdom of

Great Britain

and Northern

Ireland

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Allegedly a number of provisions contained in a draft bill unduly interfere with the

rights to privacy and freedom of opinion and expression, both within and outside

the United Kingdom. According to the information received, on 4 November 2015,

the draft “Investigatory Powers Bill” was introduced in Parliament. The draft bill

allegedly contains provisions governing the authorisation of warrants to identify

“journalistic sources”, warrants for mass surveillance and notices for the retention

of data by telecommunications operators. Serious concern is expressed about the

specific provisions of the draft Bill that provide for overly broad exceptions of the

right to privacy and freedom of expression without independent oversight and the

lack of sufficiently clear definitions.

17/02/2016

10/03/2016

22/12/2015

JUA

UZB 4/2015

Uzbekistan

Arbitrary

detention;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Alleged arbitrary arrest, incommunicado detention and charging of a human rights

defender and journalist. According to the information received, on 16 November

2015, the home of Mr. Uktam Pardayev, Chairperson of the Independent Human

Rights Society in Uzbekistan (IHRSU), in Dzhizakh, was searched by police

officers, resulting in the confiscation of his electronic equipment. He was

subsequently arrested and detained at the temporary detention facility at Dustlik

district police station. On 18 November 2015, he was charged with fraud and

bribery, under articles 168 and 211 of the Criminal Code. The charges, which carry

a potential 10 year prison sentence, were brought in relation to testimonies from

nine individuals alleging that Mr. Pardayev had defrauded them of money. Mr.

Pardayev was reportedly detained incommunicado for four days before being given

access to his lawyer on 20 November 2015. He is currently detained in the

Department of Internal Affairs in Dustlik. It is alleged that his family members

have not been permitted to contact him by any means.

21/01/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

3 7

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

23/12/2015

JAL

CHN 13/2015

China (People's

Republic of)

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Alleged sentencing of a human rights defender. According to the information

received, on 27 November 2015, Mr. Yang Maodong, also known by his pen name

Guo Feixiong, a human rights defender and pro-democracy activist, was sentenced

to six years’ imprisonment by the Tianhe District People’s Court in Guangzhou on

charges of “gathering crowds to disturb social order” and “picking quarrels and

provoking trouble”. Serious concern is expressed that the reported reason for his

arrest, detention and sentencing might be related to his legitimate work as a human

rights defender and to the exercise of his right to freedom of expression. Mr.

Maodong was the subject of six previous communications sent on 6 March 2006,

case no. CHN 8/2006; 19 October 2006, A/case no. CHN 39/2006; 1 December

2006, case no. CHN 40/2006, see HRC/4/37/Add.1; 30 November 2007, see

A/HRC/7/28/Add.1 case no. CHN 42/2007; 22 August 2013, see A/HCR/25/74,

case no. CHN 9/2013; and 7 August 2015, see A/HRC/31/79, case no. CHN

8/2015.

10/02/2016

23/12/2015

JUA

ISR 10/2015

Israel

Arbitrary

detention; Human

rights defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; OPT;

Torture;

Alleged arbitrary arrest and detention of a human rights defender and two of his

colleagues. According to the information received, on 7 September 2015, Israeli

soldiers arrested Mr. Judeh Deeb Ibrahim Jamal at his apartment in East Jerusalem,

Occupied Palestinian Territory, without an arrest warrant. On the same day, two of

his colleagues, Ms. Najwan Odeh and Mr. Fadi Mansra, were also arrested. Mr.

Jamal, who had been working as the Acting Director of Qatar Charity in its

Ramallah office since March 2011, was held in solitary confinement between 7

September and 10 October 2015. During this period of time, he was also deprived

of access to a doctor or medicine as well as denied the right to consult a lawyer and

to contact his family. The lawyer of Mr. Jamal had no access to the case file and

evidence until 12 October 2015 when the Israeli military prosecutor formally

issued a list of charges against Mr. Jamal. Since his arrest, Mr. Jamal has been held

in military detention and his family has not been allowed to visit him to date.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

3 8

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

24/12/2015

UA

ISR 11/2015

Israel

Torture;

Alleged imminent refoulement/return of a Palestinian citizen to Gaza where he is at

high risk of torture and ill-treatment. According to the information received, Mr. X,

who is currently detained in Israel, will likely be returned to Gaza, where he faces

a high risk of torture and ill-treatment due to his former collaboration with Israeli

Intelligence organizations.

24/12/2015

JAL

PHL 6/2015

Philippines

Human rights

defenders;

Summary

executions;

Alleged killing of three activists, and attempted killing and filing of charges

against a human rights defender. According to the information received, from 10 to

12 June 2015, Ms. Aida Seisa, a human rights defender and the spokesperson of

Paquibato District Peasant Alliance, led a fact finding mission into allegations of

human rights violations committed by members of the 69th Infantry Battalion of

the Philippine Army (69th IBPA) in communities in the Paquibato District of

Davao City, Mindanao. On 12 June 2015, Ms. Seisa was made aware that charges

of murder and frustrated murder had been filed against her by members of the 69th

IBPA. The allegations were made in connection to a skirmish between the 69th

IBPA and members of the New People’s Army, an insurgent group, on 6 May

2015. In the night of 13 June 2015, the home of Ms. Seisa was fired upon by

members of the 69th IBPA, resulting in the killings of Mr. Datu Ruben Laydan

Enlog Jr., a tribal chieftain, Mr. Randy Lavarcon Carnasa, a village leader, and Mr.

Oligario Quimbo, a farmer and activist, who had been in attendance at her home.

Ms. Seisa was able to escape unharmed, along with her family, however, the case

filed against her remains pending.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

3 9

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

24/12/2015

JUA

SAU 12/2015

Saudi Arabia

Summary

executions;

Torture;

Alleged violations of the rights to life, liberty and security of the person, and fair

trial, as well as the right to be free from torture and other cruel, inhuman or

degrading treatment. According to the information received, on 24 February 2007,

Mr. Ali Agirdas, a Turkish national, was arrested for drug smuggling in Saudi

Arabia. In 2008, he was convicted and sentenced to death by a General Court in

Riyadh following a reportedly unfair trial. After the exhaustion of all local

remedies, he was executed in Riyadh on 20 November 2014. Despite repeated

requests from his family, the Saudi authorities have failed to return the body to his

family for burial. Concerns are raised that the body of Mr. Agirdas was not

returned to his family after his execution in 2014 and that the death penalty may

have been carried out against him following judicial proceedings that do not appear

to have fulfilled the most stringent guarantees of fair trial and due process.

24/12/2015

UA

TUR 5/2015

Turkey

Summary

executions;

Alleged killings in the context of violent clashes between security forces and

armed groups in the southeast of Turkey. According to the information received,

550 people, including 150 civilians, have been killed since the breakdown of the

peace process between the Government of Turkey and the Kurdistan Workers’

Party (PKK). Since August 2015, authorities in the southeast of Turkey have

imposed repeated prolonged curfews, during which security forces have conducted

counter-terrorism operations against the Patriotic Revolutionary Youth Movement,

an armed movement associated with the PKK. Meanwhile, supporters of the Youth

Movement have dug trenches, often planted with explosives, and erected

barricades to seal off neighbourhoods. Witness reports indicate that security forces

opened fire indiscriminately on people in the streets and denied wounded people

access to medical treatment.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

4 0

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

28/12/2015

JUA

ETH 5/2015

Ethiopia

Disappearances;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Summary

executions;

Allegations of violent repression of peaceful protests. According to the information

received, since mid-November 2015, several peaceful demonstrations have been

organized by students throughout the Oromia region of Ethiopia to protest against

the “Addis Ababa Integrated Development Master Plan” which aims at expanding

Addis Ababa’s municipal boundaries. The police and military have allegedly

violently repressed several peaceful demonstrations by firing live ammunition at

protesters resulting in the deaths of at least 75 of persons. On 15 December 2015,

Ethiopian State intelligence services issued a statement claiming that Oromo

protesters had a “direct connection with forces that have taken mission from

foreign terrorist groups” and labelling them as “terrorists”, which permits the

authorities to enforce the Anti-Terrorism Proclamation 652/2009. Concerns

relative to the application of this law have been mentioned in several previous

communications since its implementation in 2009, especially in those sent on 05

October 2011, see A/HRC/19/44, case no. ETH 4/2011; 19 December 2011, see

A/HRC/20/30, case no. ETH 7/2011; 16 March 2012, see A/HRC/21/49, case no.

ETH 1/2012; 31 July 2012, see A/HRC/22/67, ETH 4/2012; 15 April 2014, see

A/HRC/27/72, case no. ETH 2/2014; 11 July 2014, see A/HRC/28/85, case no.

ETH 6/2014; 27 February 2015, see A/HRC/29/50, case no. ETH 1/2015; 26

February 2015, see A/HRC/29/50, case no. ETH 2/2015; and 21 October 2015, see

A/HRC/31/79, case no. ETH 4/2015.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

4 1

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

28/12/2015

JAL

FRA 7/2015

France

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Privacy;

Terrorism;

Analyse de la loi n° 2015-1556 du 30 novembre 2015 relative aux mesures de

surveillance des communications électroniques internationales et de la loi n°2015-

1501 du 20 novembre 2015 prorogeant l’application de la loi n° 55-385 du 3 avril

1955 relative à l’état d’urgence et renforçant l’efficacité de ses dispositions, au

regard des obligations internationales de la France en matière de droits de

l’homme. Selon les informations reçues, certaines dispositions de ces lois

pourraient imposer des restrictions indues à l’exercice légitime du droit à la liberté

d’expression, du droit à la vie privée, du droit à la liberté de réunion pacifique et à

la liberté d’association. Des inquiétudes sont exprimées concernant l’assignation à

résidence, dans le cadre de l’application de la loi sur l’état d’urgence, notamment

contre des militants écologistes. Ces préoccupations s’ajoutent à celles formulées

dans la communication conjointe portant sur la loi n° 2014-1353 et des mesures

relatives à la lutte contre le terrorisme et aux infractions de « provocation » et «

apologie » du terrorisme ; communication envoyée le 3 février 2015, voir

A/HRC/29/50, numéro cas FRA 1/2015.

26/02/2016

28/12/2015

JUA

GMB 3/2015

Gambia

Arbitrary

detention;

Freedom of

expression;

Torture;

Alleged arbitrary arrest, detention and charges filed against a journalist for

exercising his right to freedom of opinion and expression. According to the

information received, on 2 July 2015, Mr. Alhagie Abdoulie Ceesay was arrested,

detained and tortured by state security officers. On 13 July 2015, Mr. Ceesay was

released without charge. On 17 July 2015, Mr. Ceesay was again arrested and

detained by State security officers and charged with several offences, including

sedition and “publishing false news with intent to alarm and fear the public”.

Reportedly, a range of measures and laws disproportionately violate freedom of

opinion and expression in the country. Grave concern is expressed at the alleged

reason for the detention and charges filed against Mr. Ceesay, namely for the

exercise of his right to freedom of expression, as well as disproportionate

restrictions of this fundamental right. Mr. Ceesay was the subject of the Working

Group on Arbitrary Detention Opinion No. 50/2015, issued on 4 December 2015,

see A/HRC/WGAD/2015/50. The Information and Communications Act was the

subject of a previous communication sent on 16 July 2013, see A/HRC/25/74, case

no. GMB 1/2013.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

4 2

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

28/12/2015

JAL

SDN 7/2015

Sudan

Human rights

defenders; Sudan;

Violence against

women;

Alleged acts of intimidation and reprisal against three Darfuri students and

members of the Darfuri Student Association, including one female, and one

woman human rights defender and translator, for cooperating with the mandate of

the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences,

during the official visit of the former mandate holder to Sudan in May 2015.

According to the information received, on 16 May 2015, the four individuals met

with a United Nations staff member accompanying the Special Rapporteur in the

Corinthia hotel to report on alleged human rights violations. However, the students

concluded the meeting due to the intimidating presence of security agents. When

the group was leaving the hotel, these agents attempted to arrest the two men and

threatened the two women, who were trying to impede the men’s arrest. The four

individuals were threatened, even when the Special Rapporteur arrived at the

scene. The two male students were placed in a pickup truck and remained in

custody in a police station for about seven hours. After the Special Rapporteur left

the country, the students continued to receive threats from security officers,

including death threats in one case.

01/03/2016

17/03/2016

11/04/2016

29/12/2015

JUA

DJI 2/2015

Djibouti

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Freedom of

religion; Human

rights defenders;

Allégations concernant l’usage excessif et de manière indiscriminée de la force par

les forces de sécurité, dans le cadre d’affrontements entre des manifestants et les

autorités. Selon les informations reçues, le 21 décembre 2015, des affrontements

auraient éclaté suite à la tentative des forces de police de disperser une cérémonie

religieuse. Les forces de sécurité auraient répondu en faisant un usage excessif et

aveugle de la force en ouvrant le feu, tuant au moins 27 personnes et blessant 150

autres. Le même jour, des forces de sécurité auraient violemment interrompu une

réunion pacifique de l’opposition politique, l’Union pour le Salut National,

organisée suite à ces événements. Plusieurs dirigeants auraient été violemment

battus et blessés par des tirs de balles en résine de 6mm, dont M. Houssein Robleh

qui serait actuellement hospitalisé dans l’Hôpital Militaire Français Bouffard à

Djibouti dans un état grave. Le personnel médical aurait indiqué qu’il nécessiterait

une évacuation rapide dans un autre pays pour suivre des traitements urgents. La

rétention, par les autorités djiboutiennes, du passeport de M. Robleh empêcherait

son évacuation urgente pour raison médicales.

11/01/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

4 3

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

29/12/2015

AL

DEU 2/2015

Germany

Freedom of

religion;

Allegations concerning the removing of 42 children of members of the Twelve

Tribes religious community in Bavaria. According to the information received, on

5 September 2013, around 100 police officers and 50 youth workers raided two

locations of the Twelve Tribes religious community in Klosterzimmern and

Woernitz, Bavaria, and removed 42 children from 13 families. The authorities

reportedly justified their actions by pointing to the need of protecting the children

from corporal punishment, which the Twelve Tribes openly admits to apply as part

of their Bible-based education. Members of the Twelve Tribes also complained

about excessive restrictions to their rights as parents after the court decision to

remove the children from their custody.

08/03/2016

06/01/2016

JUA

VNM 3/2015

Viet Nam

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Allegations of physical assault of four human rights defenders, and arrest and

detention of one of them. According to the information received, on 6 December

2015, Mr. Nguyen Van Dai, Mr. Vu Van Minh, Mr. Ly Quang Son and Mr. Le

Manh Thang organized a human rights workshop, which took place in Nam Dan

District, Nghe An Province, outside Hanoi. While on their way back to Hanoi after

the conclusion of the workshop, the vehicle of the four human rights defenders was

halted by approximately 20 plain clothed police officers, who proceeded to beat

them and the driver of the vehicle with metal bars and wooden sticks. Mr. Vu, Mr.

Ly and Mr. Le were able to escape; however, Mr. Nguyen was taken away by

police officers to Cua Lo, 20 km from Nghi Loc, where he was subjected to further

beatings. On 16 December 2015, Mr. Nguyen was arrested at his home in Hanoi in

connection with his participation in the annual EU-Vietnam dialogue on human

rights. He is detained in B14 Detention Camp, Hanoi, and charged with

“conducting propaganda” against the State. Mr. Nguyen was the subject of three

previous communications sent on 12 November 2006, see A/HRC/4/37/Add.1,

case no. VNM 5/2006, 25 May 2007, case no. VNM 6/2007; 9 March 2007, case

no. VNM 3/2007, see A/HRC/7/28/Add.1.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

4 4

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

07/01/2016

JUA

SLV 3/2015

El Salvador

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers;

Alegaciones sobre actos de vigilancia, amenazas y acoso judicial contra dos

abogadas de derechos humanos. Según las informaciones recibidas, en enero de

2015, la Fiscalía General de la República de El Salvador habría presentado una

queja administrativa contra la Fundación de Estudios para la Aplicación de la Ley

(FESPAD), a la cual pertenecen las Sras. Teresa Naves y Bertha de León. Esta

queja tendría relación con la supuesta divulgación de información confidencial en

el contexto de su demanda contra el ex-presidente, el Sr. Francisco Flores, por

desfalco, enriquecimiento ilícito y desobediencia. La Fiscalía General también

habría enviado cartas a la FESPAD amenazando de presentar una denuncia penal

en contra de la organización. El juicio del Sr. Francisco Flores inició el 5 de

noviembre de 2015. Inmediatamente después, las Sras. Naves y de León,

querellantes en la acción, habrían sido objeto de actos de acoso y vigilancia

constante e intimidante por desconocidos. Además, el 17 de noviembre de 2015, la

Sra. Naves habría recibido una amenaza de muerte por teléfono. Se expresa grave

preocupación de que abogados y defensores de derechos humanos puedan ser

objeto de vigilancia, amenazas y acoso judicial por el trabajo que realizan y ejercer

sus derechos.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

4 5

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

07/01/2016

JUA

GTM 6/2015

Guatemala

Environment;

Freedom of

expression;

Human rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Summary

executions;

Alegaciones de hostigamiento y amenazas de muerte en contra de un abogado y

defensor de los derechos humanos. Según las informaciones recibidas, el 11 de

mayo de 2015, el Sr. Pedro Rafael Maldonado Flores, abogado y director del área

legal del Centro de Acción Legal-Ambiental y Social de Guatemala (CALAS),

habría recibido amenazas de muerte de una mujer desconocida. El 27 de mayo de

2015, el Sr. Maldonado habría sido objeto de una nota publicada en un diario

electrónico desprestigiando su trabajo de abogado de derechos humanos. El 29 de

julio de 2015, una persona desconocida habría disparado en contra de la oficina del

Sr. Maldonado en el CALAS, mientras él estaba trabajando adentro. El 3 y el 4 de

diciembre de 2015, el Sr. Maldonado habría recibido amenazas de muerte en su

cuenta en la red social Twitter. El Sr. Maldonado y el CALAS fueron objetos de

comunicaciones anteriores, con fechas del 23 de septiembre de 2008 (véase

A/HRC/10/12/Add.1, caso no. 19/2008), del 5 de agosto de 2013 (véase

A/HRC/25/74, caso no. GTM 6/2013) y del 25 de noviembre de 2015 (véase

A/HRC/31/79, caso no. GTM 4/2015).

07/01/2016

AL

ESP 1/2016

Spain

Torture;

Alegaciones sobre el maltrato y confinamiento solitario prolongado de un detenido

por parte de Agentes del Estado. Según las informaciones recibidas, el día 16 de

enero de 2015, el Sr. Juan José Gabarri Gabarri habría sido trasladado del Centro

Penitenciario de Tarragona al Hospital de Santa Tecla de Tarragona para recibir

tratamiento médico. En el Hospital, el Sr. Gabarri Gabarri habría recibido golpes y

otros malos tratos por parte de dos agentes de los Mossos d’Esquadra que lo

custodiaban. El Sr. Gabarri Gabarri habría sido trasladado de nuevo al Centro

Penitenciario y sometido a aislamiento solitario durante 65 días. Se alega que tras

los presuntos malos tratos, el Sr. Gabarri Gabarri no habría sido sometido a ningún

examen médico. El 23 de marzo de 2015, el Sr. Gabarri Gabarri habría sido

llevado como imputado al Juzgado de Instrucción 5 de Tarragona, acusado de

atentado y resistencia a la autoridad y lesiones. En dicha audiencia el Sr. Gabarri

Gabarri habría presentado también su denuncia sobre malos tratos.

14/03/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

4 6

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

11/01/2016

JAL

ZMB 4/2015

Zambia

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Alleged undue delays in the registration process of a non-governmental

organization working on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex

(LGBTI) rights. According to the information received, Mr. Paul Kasonkomona,

Head of Engender Rights Center for Justice, a non-governmental organization

working to promote respect for the rights of LGBTI persons, has since 2011

repeatedly requested the Zambian authorities to register his organization without

success. On 7 August 2015, the Registrar of the Ministry of Community

Development, Mother and Child Health communicated the decision to refuse

registration of the organization as its objectives reportedly conflict with the Penal

Code of Zambia. In addition, on 7 April 2013, Mr. Kasonkomona was arrested and

charged with “soliciting for immoral purposes” after he had appeared on a

television programme in which he expressed the view that Zambia needed to

protect and respect the human rights of all people, including LGBTI persons. He

was acquitted by the High Court on 15 May 2015. Mr. Kasonkomona was the

subject of a previous communication sent on 14 May 2013, see A/HRC/24/21, case

no. ZMB 1/2013.

13/01/2016

JAL

AUS 9/2015

Australia

Business

enterprises;

Extreme poverty;

Somalia;

Terrorism;

Allegations concerning the negative impact of termination of accounts of Somali

money transfer operators (MTOs) by commercial banks in Australia on the human

rights of Somali-Australians and people living in Somalia who are dependent on

remittances from Australia. According to the information received, the

implementation and enforcement of domestic and international anti-money

laundering and counter-terrorism (AML/CFT) legislation and regulations resulted

in increasing and widespread closure of bank accounts of Somali MTOs in

Australia. There are concerns that the closing of bank accounts of Somali MTOs

and the accompanying reduction in the level of remittances to Somalia may have a

direct and significant impact on the enjoyment of a wide range of human rights of

Somali-Australians as well as people living in Somalia, including the rights to

equality, culture, food, education, health and life. Related communications were

sent to the Governments of Somalia, the Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern

Ireland, and the United States of America on 13 January 2016, see below, case nos.

SOM 2/2015, GBR 5/2015 and USA 21/2015.

17/03/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

4 7

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

13/01/2016

JUA

PAK 1/2016

Pakistan

Adequate housing;

Cultural Rights;

Alleged destruction of many historic buildings and neighbourhoods for the purpose

of the Orange metro line in Lahore, in violation of the right to housing and cultural

rights. According to the information received, works for the construction of the

Orange metro line have started regardless of the important opposition the project

has met and of procedural flaws. Concerns are expressed about the lack of

transparency and adequate information to the affected residents, forced evictions

and disregard for various Pakistani law provisions prohibiting construction near

heritage sites as well as activities leading to environmental degradation.

13/01/2016

JAL

SOM 2/2015

Somalia

Business

enterprises;

Extreme poverty;

Somalia;

Terrorism;

Allegations concerning the negative impact of termination of accounts of Somali

money transfer operators (MTOs) by commercial banks in diaspora countries on

the human rights of people living in Somalia who are dependent on remittances

from these countries. According to the information received, the implementation

and enforcement of domestic and international anti-money laundering and counter-

terrorism (AML/CFT) legislation and regulations in diaspora countries, such as the

United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, resulted in increasing and

widespread closure of bank accounts of Somali MTOs. While the closure is largely

influenced by the regulatory environment in the diaspora countries, it is also

allegedly influenced by the current state of Somalia’s banking system. There are

concerns that the closing of bank accounts of Somali MTOs and the accompanying

reduction in the level of remittances to Somalia may have a direct and significant

impact on the enjoyment of a wide range of human rights of people living in

Somalia, including the rights to food, education, health and life. Related

communications were sent to the Governments of Australia, the United States of

America and the Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on 13 January

2016, see above, case no. AUS 9/2015, and below case nos. GBR 5/2015 and USA

21/2015.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

4 8

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

13/01/2016

JAL

ESP 2/2016

Spain

Disability; Health;

Seguimiento a la presunta exclusión de facto del sistema general educativo,

discriminación e impacto negativo en el estado de salud físico y mental de una niña

autista, así como a la respuesta del Gobierno de España a una primera

comunicación sobre el caso. Según la información adicional recibida, la niña

autista de 10 años que habría sido excluida de facto del sistema general de

educación todavía seguiría sin tener asignada una escuela para el curso académico

2015-2016, debido a la falta de un plan de intervención pedagógico y de

alternativas válidas por parte del Estado que cumplan con las necesidades de

ajustes razonables y recursos necesarios para la niña. Se señala asimismo, la

necesidad de facilitar un entorno educativo adecuado que asegure el pleno disfrute

del más alto nivel de salud física y mental, así como el bienestar de la niña y de su

familia. Una comunicación previa fue enviada al Gobierno de España el 18 de

mayo de 2015, ver A/HRC/30/27, numero caso ESP 8/2015.

13/01/2016

JAL

GBR 5/2015

United

Kingdom of

Great Britain

and Northern

Ireland

Business

enterprises;

Extreme poverty;

Somalia;

Terrorism;

Allegations concerning the negative impact of termination of accounts of Somali

money transfer operators (MTOs) by commercial banks in the United Kingdom on

the human rights of Somali-Britons and people living in Somalia who are

dependent on remittances from the United Kingdom. According to the information

received, the implementation and enforcement of domestic and international anti-

money laundering and counter-terrorism (AML/CFT) legislation and regulations

resulted in increasing and widespread closure of bank accounts of Somali MTOs in

the United Kingdom. There are concerns that the closing of bank accounts of

Somali MTOs and the accompanying reduction in the level of remittances to

Somalia may have a direct and significant impact on the enjoyment of a wide range

of human rights of Somali-Britons as well as people living in Somalia, including

the rights to equality, culture, food, education, health and life. Related

communications were sent to the Governments of Australia, Somalia and the

United States of America on 13 January 2016, see above, case nos. AUS 9/2015

and SOM 2/2015, and below, case no. USA 21/2015.

24/03/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

4 9

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

13/01/2016

JAL

USA 21/2015

United States of

America

Business

enterprises;

Extreme poverty;

Somalia;

Terrorism;

Allegations concerning the negative impact of termination of accounts of Somali

money transfer operators (MTOs) by commercial banks in the United States on the

human rights of Somali-Americans and people living in Somalia who are

dependent on remittances from the United States. According to the information

received, the implementation and enforcement of domestic and international anti-

money laundering and counter-terrorism (AML/CFT) legislation and regulations

resulted in increasing and widespread closure of bank accounts of Somali MTOs in

the United States. There are concerns that the closing of bank accounts of Somali

MTOs and the accompanying reduction in the level of remittances to Somalia may

have a direct and significant impact on the enjoyment of a wide range of human

rights of Somali-Americans as well as people living in Somalia, including the

rights to equality, culture, food, education, health and life. Related communications

were sent to the Governments of Australia, Somalia and the Kingdom of Great

Britain and Northern Ireland on 13 January 2016, see above, case nos. AUS

9/2015, SOM 2/2015 and GBR 5/2015.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

5 0

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

14/01/2016

JUA

HND 1/2016

Honduras

Business

enterprises;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Indigenous

peoples; Summary

executions;

Alegaciones de asesinato, ataques, intimidación y amenazas contra miembros de

comunidades indígenas y defensores de derechos humanos. Según las

informaciones recibidas, el 27 de septiembre del 2015 una persona habría muerto y

varias heridas en un enfrentamiento entre miembros del consejo indígena San

Isidro y afines de un proyecto hidroeléctrico, en el municipio de Santa Elena. El Sr.

Rosalio Vasquez Pineda, Presidente del consejo indígena de San Isidro, habría sido

acusado de homicidio e intento de homicidio, aunque no habría estado presente. El

10 de octubre de 2015, el Sr. Yobany Alonzo Vasquez, miembro de Movimiento

Indígena Lenca de la Paz (MILPAH) habría sido detenido de manera violenta y

amenazado de muerte por una patrulla de diez policías. El 22 de octubre de 2015, a

las 4:30 de la mañana, 30 policías, militares y civiles armados habrían entrado de

manera violenta en la vivienda del Sr. Rosalio Vásquez Pineda y la Sra. Ana

Miriam Romero, y atacado miembros de su familia. Los Sres. Porfirio Vasquez

Pineda y Rodolfo Vasquez Pineda fueron detenidos. Las Sras. Romero y Rosaura

Vásquez Pineda habrían sufrido consecuencias graves de los golpes recibidos

durante el ataque. El 20 de diciembre de 2015 el Sr. Javier Vásquez Benítez,

miembro de MILPAH, habría sido encontrado asesinado en un barranco en el

municipio Santa Elena en La Paz.

04/04/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

5 1

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

14/01/2016

JAL

NIC 6/2015

Nicaragua

Business

enterprises;

Environment;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Indigenous

peoples;

Alegaciones de abuso de autoridad y funciones, y falta de protección de

manifestantes y defensores de derechos humanos, por parte de la Policía Nacional

nicaragüense en el marco de una manifestación campesina contra la construcción

del Canal interoceánico en Nicaragua. Según las informaciones recibidas, en el

contexto de acciones de comunidades campesinas y pueblos indígenas contra la

construcción del Canal interoceánico en Nicaragua, el Consejo por la Defensa de la

Tierra, Lago y Soberanía habría convocado una marcha campesina a nivel nacional

para el 27 de octubre de 2015, con el fin de protestar contra el mencionado

proyecto y demandar la derogación de la “Ley Especial para el Desarrollo de

Infraestructura y Transporte Nicaragüense atingente a El Canal, Zonas de Libre

Comercio e Infraestructuras Asociadas” (Ley n. 840). Las autoridades habrían

obstaculizado la participación de las personas en las manifestaciones sin razón o

motivo aparente. Se reportaron varias detenciones, presuntamente arbitrarias,

confiscación de bienes personales, sin mandato judicial y agresiones a los

manifestantes por parte de otros grupos de individuos, sin la debida protección

por parte de las autoridades. Estas alegaciones conllevarían presuntas violaciones

de los derechos a la libertad de reunión y libertad de expresión, así como el

derecho a la libertad y a la seguridad personal.

11/03/2016

11/03/2016

15/01/2016

AL

CHL 1/2016

Chile

Indigenous

peoples;

Alegaciones sobre violaciones de derechos de miembros del pueblo Rapa Nui en la

isla de Pascua, incluidas detenciones de dirigentes Rapa Nui y registro indebida y

clausura de las oficinas del Parlamento Rapa Nui. Según las informaciones

recibidas, los supuestos hechos estarían relacionados con los derechos de los Rapa

Nui sobre sus tierras, territorios y recursos, incluidos los sitios ceremoniales y de

uso ancestral ahora comprendidos en el Parque Nacional Rapa Nui. Alegaciones de

falta de efectividad del proceso de las comisiones de trabajo y los acuerdos

adoptados que no han conseguido instaurar un clima de diálogo y buena fe, a raíz

de alegaciones sobre las detenciones de representantes Rapa Nui e investigaciones

y registros de algunas de sus organizaciones.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

5 2

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

15/01/2016

JUA

CHN 1/2016

China (People's

Republic of)

Arbitrary

detention;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers;

Alleged arbitrary arrest and detention of six labour activists and human rights

defenders. According to the information received, in early December 2015, the

police arrested Ms. Zhu Xiaomei, Mr. Meng Han, Mr. Peng Jiayong, Mr. Deng

Xiaoming and another male labour activist for “gathering a crowd to disturb social

order”. They are all detained at the Guangzhou No. 1 Detention Center. In

addition, on 4 December 2015, the police arrested Mr. He Xiaobo for “illegal

misappropriation of workplace funds”. He is reportedly detained at the Foshan

Nanhai District Detention Center. It is alleged that the detention and prosecution of

these six individuals did not comply with the due process guarantees of a fair trial

and that the charges brought against them were unsubstantiated. All the detainees

have reportedly been denied access to a lawyer.

28/02/2016

15/01/2016

UA

SYR 1/2016

Syrian Arab

Republic

Food;

Allegations of starvation and situations of extreme malnutrition in besieged areas

in Syria. According to the information received, approximately 400,000 people

living in 15 besieged and hard-to-reach locations throughout Syria are trapped in

desperate circumstances and in urgent need of emergency assistance. Heavily

restricted access to essential supplies has resulted in besieged communities

enduring immense suffering with allegations suggesting that in the town of

Madaya alone 23 people, including children, starved to death since December

2015, while many others continue to suffer from acute malnutrition. Grave

concern is expressed at the reported suffering of the afore-mentioned besieged

populations, particularly at the reported cases of starvation and extreme

malnutrition.

18/01/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

5 3

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

20/01/2016

JUA

IRN 3/2016

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Discrimination

against women;

Iran; Summary

executions;

Torture; Violence

against women;

Alleged imminent risk of execution by stoning of an Iranian woman. According to

the information received, in November 2013, Ms. Fariba Khalegi was arrested on

suspicion of involvement in the murder of her husband. While she was initially

released without charge, Ms. Khalegi was later charged with having a sexual

relationship with her husband’s alleged, and later convicted, murderer. On 15

October 2014, Ms. Khalegi was reportedly convicted of adultery (zina-ye

mohsaneh) and sentenced to death by stoning. The sentence was reportedly upheld

by the Supreme Court on 27 January 2015. It is believed that her execution is

imminent as all legal avenues of appeal appear to have been exhausted.

20/01/2016

JUA

SDN 1/2016

Sudan

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

religion; Minority

issues; Sudan;

Summary

executions;

Allegations concerning a trial in Sudan against 22 Muslim men and three children

for apostasy. According to the information received, 27 persons (24 male adults

and three male children) were arrested in Khartoum on 2 and 3 November 2015 on

the charge of apostasy, which is punishable by death under article 126 of the

Sudanese criminal code. On 30 November 2015, the three boys, who had been held

in custody together with adults, were released by the Khartoum Criminal Court on

the condition that they attend the upcoming trial. On 9 December 2015, the Court

released two of the men due to insufficient evidence. On 14 December 2015, the

remaining 22 adult males were released on bail pending the next hearing, to be

held on 9 February 2016. The 25 defendants follow an interpretation of Islam

different from the Government-supported denomination and deny the charges of

apostasy filed against them.

29/04/2016

21/01/2016

AL

BDI 2/2016

Burundi

Albinism;

Allégations de violations des droits de l’homme de personnes atteintes d’albinisme.

Selon les informations reçues, le 15 décembre 2015, Mr. Augustin Girukwishaka,

une personne avec albinisme, a été agressé dans le but de lui sectionner un bras,

puis assassiné dans la commune de Kanyosha, zone de Muyira. Il est probable que

l’agression ait été perpétrée dans le but de découper des parties du corps de la

victime afin de les utiliser, ou de les vendre en vue de leur utilisation dans le cadre

de rituels de sorcellerie.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

5 4

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

21/01/2016

JUA

TUR 1/2016

Turkey

Health; Summary

executions;

Alleged obstructions of access to health care as well as alleged attacks against

health care workers in the context of violent clashes between security forces and

armed groups in the southeast of Turkey. According to the information received,

since 16 August 2015, authorities in the southeast of Turkey have imposed

repeated and indefinite curfews, and over 160 civilians have reportedly lost their

lives in the context of counter-terrorist operations conducted during these curfews.

It is alleged that several of these deaths occurred due to the obstruction of health

care access and delivery by security forces. Reports further indicate intensified

attacks on health workers, including arrests and killings. Finally, it is reported that

at least six civilians died due to the stress effects that the curfews and the

intensified attacks had on their health conditions.

25/02/2016

21/01/2016

JAL

UGA 1/2016

Uganda

Freedom of

expression;

Health; Torture;

Allegations of arbitrary arrest, detention, torture, denial of medical assistance and

charges filed against a journalist for the exercise of his right to freedom of

expression. According to the information received, on 13 July 2011, Mr. Augustine

Okello was arrested in Lira by security officers. From 13 July 2011 to 26 July

2012, he was held in pre-trial detention, after which he was released on bail.

During his detention, Mr. Okello was allegedly tortured and sustained injuries for

which he did not receive adequate and timely medical treatment. Mr. Okello has

been charged with treason and, if convicted, may face death penalty or life

imprisonment. He filed an application for review of his case at the High Court. He

has not heard from the High Court since and is currently awaiting the start of his

trial.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

5 5

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

22/01/2016

JUA

IRN 1/2016

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Health; Human

rights defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Iran;

Violence against

women;

Alleged arbitrary detention, denial of due process and inadequate medical

treatment of a human rights defender. According to the information received, Ms.

Bahareh Hedayat, a student and prominent women’s rights activist, has been in

prison since 31 December 2009. On 5 May 2010, she was sentenced to seven and a

half years of imprisonment on charges of crimes against national security, insulting

the President and insulting the Supreme Leader. In December 2010, Ms. Hedayat

reportedly received an additional six-month prison sentence on charges of

“propaganda against the state” for writing a letter from prison, in which she urged

Iranian students to continue their peaceful struggle. On 17 August 2015, the

Revolutionary Court issued a two-year suspended sentence at the request of

Tehran’s Prosecutor General. She is reportedly suffering from chronic illness and

has been diagnosed with gallstones during her imprisonment. However, Ms.

Hedayat has allegedly been denied adequate medical attention.

27/01/2016

JAL

SLE 1/2016

Sierra Leone

Discrimination

against women;

Health; Torture;

Violence against

women;

Allegations concerning the delay in signing the Safe Abortion Bill in Sierra Leone,

after its adoption by the Parliament. According to the information received, on 8

December 2015, the Parliament of Sierra Leone passed the 2015 Safe Abortion Bill

by large majority. On 23 December 2015, the Bill was sent for signature to the

President in order to become effective. The 2015 Safe Abortion Bill allows women

to have an abortion during the first twelve weeks of gestation, under any

circumstances, and between the thirteenth and twenty-fourth weeks of pregnancy

in cases of rape, incest, foetal impairment or risk for the woman’s health. The Bill

also authorizes abortion for girls under 18, with the consent of a parent, a guardian

or an “adult acting in loco parentis”. However, on 6 January 2016, after a meeting

with the Inter-Religious Council of Sierra Leone, the President decided to send the

Bill to Parliament for reconsideration. After meeting with key parliamentary

leaders on 14 January 2016, the Inter-Religious Council of Sierra Leone is

expected to address the Parliament on 27 January 2016 in order to express their

position on the Bill.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

5 6

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

01/02/2016

JUA

IRN 2/2016

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Arbitrary

detention;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Health; Iran;

Alleged arbitrary detention and denial of adequate medical treatment to an elderly

person. According to the information received, on 16 June 2015, Mr. Mohammad

Hossein Rafiee Fanood, a 70 years old retired university professor, was arrested

without a warrant by agents from the Ministry of Intelligence. Following his arrest,

Mr. Rafiee Fanood was transferred to Section 8 of Evin Prison, where he is

currently being held. In July 2015, Mr. Rafiee Fanood was verbally informed that

he had been arrested to serve a four-year prison sentence handed down in 2003 on

charges of “membership and activity with the illegal group” and for “spreading

propaganda against the State through his writings and statements.” Mr. Rafiee

Fanood suffers from serious health problems, including a heart condition, high

blood pressure, thyroid issues and severe allergies. It is reported that he does not

have access to a specialist physician and that the prison authorities have recently

refused to give him medicines provided by his family.

01/02/2016

JUA

PAK 3/2016

Pakistan

Disability; Health;

Summary

executions;

Torture;

Alleged torture and imminent execution of a person with disabilities. According to

the information received, on 28 July 2015, the Lahore High Court stayed the

execution of Mr. Abdul Basit and ordered an assessment of his medical situation.

On 17 August 2015, the Court issued a new warrant and re- scheduled Mr. Basit’s

execution for 22 September 2015. This second warrant was challenged by Mr.

Basit’s lawyers based on the fact that Pakistan’s Prison Rules do not provide any

procedures to execute a person who is paralyzed and because of the risk of an

appalling death. On 24 November 2015, the Presidency stayed his execution for

two months and ordered a new inquiry into the case. Despite repeated requests

from Mr. Basiz’s lawyers, details of the medical tests and assessments have not yet

been provided by the relevant authorities. Mr. Basit’s two-month stay of execution

expired on 23 January 2016 and another execution warrant could be issued at any

time. This case was the subject of an earlier communication sent on 24 July 2015,

see A/HRC/31/79, case no. PAK 5/2015.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

5 7

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

02/02/2016

JUA

DJI 1/2016

Djibouti

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Allégations de condamnation et détention arbitraire d’un défenseur des droits de

l’homme. Selon les informations reçues, le 17 janvier 2016, M. Omar Ali Ewado,

défenseur des droits de l’homme et membre fondateur de la Ligue djiboutienne des

droits humains (LDDH), aurait été condamné à trois mois de prison pour «

diffamation publique », pour avoir publié une liste des victimes et disparus lors des

évènements violents qui auraient eu lieu à Djibouti-ville le 21 décembre 2015. Les

gendarmes ont perquisitionné le bureau et le domicile de M. Ewado, saisissant des

documents et des éléments informatiques appartenant à la LDDH. La famille de M.

Ewado n’aurait pas été autorisée à le voir pendant sa détention. La condamnation et

la détention de M. Ewado sembleraient être liées à ses activités légitimes et

pacifiques en faveur de la défense des droits de l’homme et à l’exercice de son

droit à la liberté d’opinion et d’expression.

02/02/2016

JUA

MMR 1/2016

Myanmar

Health; Human

rights defenders;

Myanmar;

Alleged re-arrest and detention of a former prisoner of conscience. According to

the information received, Mr. Shin Gambira, also known as Nyi Nyi Lwin, who

was sentenced to 68 years in prison in 2008 in relation to anti-government protests

and released in 2012 following a presidential pardon, was again arrested on 19

January 2016 by police in Mandalay and charged with entering Myanmar illegally

in violation of Section 13(1) of Myanmar’s 1947 Immigration (Emergency

Provisions) Act. He had entered the country a few days before without difficulty at

an official crossing between Thailand and Myanmar with the purpose of applying

for a passport. Mr. Gambira is currently detained in Oh-Bo prison in Mandalay. He

has a serious mental health condition for which he is required to take medication

and which could worsen as a consequence of the detention. Mr. Gambira was the

subject of four previous communications sent on 21 November 2007, see

A/HRC/7/10/Add.1, paras. 186-189; 28 February 2008, see A/HRC/10/8/Add.1,

paras. 150-157; 28 November 2011, see A/HRC/19/44, case no. MMR 4/2011; and

12 December 2012, see A/HRC/23/51, case no. MMR 12/2012.

23/02/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

5 8

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

02/02/2016

JAL

PAK 2/2016

Pakistan

Discrimination

against women;

Freedom of

religion; Minority

issues; Sale of

children; Slavery;

Violence against

women;

Allegations concerning the reported abduction and subsequent forced conversion

and marriage of a 15 year old Hindu girl, in Allah Dino Magsi Village, Qambar

Shahdadkot, Sindh province. On 19 April 2015, six men allegedly kidnapped a 15

year old girl in her home at 1 p.m. in front of her parents. Thereafter her parents

reportedly tried to register a First Information Report at the police station on

several occasions but were repeatedly sent away. On 25 April 2015, a statement

from the girl was reportedly published in a newspaper in which she declared that

she was 22 years old, had converted to Islam, changed her name and had married a

boy. The parents allegedly brought the case to the Session Court of Qambar

Shahdadkot, Larkana, which decided on 2 June 2015 to have the girl placed in a

shelter called Dar-ul-Aman and have her age determined. One of the alleged

perpetrators reportedly filed an application before the High Court Sindh, Circuit

Court, Larkana to challenge the decision of the judge from the Session Court. On

24 June 2015, the High Court allegedly judged that the girl was an adult under

Sharia law and suspended the decision of the Session Court thus sending her back

to live with the aforementioned boy.

03/02/2016

JAL

COL 5/2015

Colombia

African descent;

Human rights

defenders;

Minority issues;

Racism; Summary

executions;

Alleged killings of, and death threats received by, a number of Afro-Colombian

human rights defenders and community leaders; alleged persistent structural

discrimination faced by Afro-Colombians which affects the enjoyment of their

economic, social and cultural rights. According to the information received, there

are patterns of human rights concerns arising from business ventures (including

environmental damage, displacement of persons, etc.); the negative impact of

extractive projects and illegal mining on the livelihood of Afro-Colombians. It is

also reported that Afro-Colombians have faced a disproportionate impact of the

armed conflict.

28/04/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

5 9

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

04/02/2016

UA

VEN 1/2016

Venezuela

Health;

Presunta crisis humanitaria en salud por la agravación en la escasez de

medicamentos, insumos médicos y creciente deterioro de la infraestructura

sanitaria en Venezuela. Según las informaciones recibidas, el 26 de enero de 2016,

la Asamblea Nacional de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela declaró una crisis

humanitaria en salud por la grave escasez de medicamentos, insumos médicos y

creciente deterioro de la infraestructura sanitaria. La persistencia de esta situación

seguiría impactando gravemente en el derecho a la salud de la población,

ocasionando incluso la muerte de personas con enfermedades crónicas por la falta

de condiciones mínimas de atención y medicamentos esenciales en la red pública

nacional de salud. El desabastecimiento de insumos y medicamentos ha sido objeto

de comunicaciones anteriores enviadas el 9 de abril de 2014, ver A/HRC/27/72,

caso no. VEN 2/2014; y 20 de julio de 2015, ver A/HRC/31/79, case no. VEN

10/2015.

05/02/2016

JUA

JOR 1/2016

Jordan

Arbitrary

detention;

Freedom of

expression;

Torture;

Alleged arbitrary arrest, detention and conviction of a university professor for

exercising his right to freedom of opinion and expression online. According to the

information received, on 10 June 2015, Dr. Eyad Qunaibi posted an article on his

Facebook page. He was subsequently summoned several times for interrogation by

the General Intelligence Directorate, and, on 15 June 2015, he was arrested and

detained. On 7 December 2015, Dr. Qunaibi was convicted of “undermining the

political regime in the Kingdom or incitement against it” and sentenced to two

years’ imprisonment. He is currently serving his sentence and concerns are

expressed at his conditions of detention, in particular the use of solitary

confinement, which may amount to torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading

treatment or punishment. Serious concern is expressed that the alleged reason for

the detention and conviction of Dr. Qunaibi relates to the legitimate exercise of his

right to freedom of opinion and expression on the Internet.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

6 0

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

08/02/2016

AL

CHN 2/2016

China (People's

Republic of)

Discrimination

against women;

Letter concerning the forced closure of the Zhongze Women’s Legal Counseling

and Service Centre in Beijing. Further to its country visit conducted from 12 to 19

December 2013 and exchanges of a previous follow-up letter, the Working Group

on Discrimination against Women, as part of a continuing dialogue, inquires about

the closure, as of 1 February 2016 upon the receipt of an order from the

Government, of the Zhongze Women’s Legal Counseling and Service Center - a

leading women’s legal aid centre in Beijing. The previous letter was sent on 28

April 2015, see A/HRC/31/79, case no. CHN 3/2015.

28/02/2016

08/02/2016

JUA

EGY 1/2016

Egypt

Arbitrary

detention;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Torture;

Alleged arbitrary arrest and detention of two journalists for the exercise of their

right to freedom of expression and association. According to the information

received, on 21 October 2015, the Mada Foundation for Media Development, a

non-governmental organization that provides training to local journalists, was

raided and Mr. Hisham Ahmed Awad Jafar, its Head and a journalist, was arrested

and detained in solitary confinement. He reportedly still remains in solitary

confinement without being informed of the charges filed against him and without

access to his family. On 29 November 2015, Mr. Ismail Alexandrani, a freelance

investigative journalist and academic, was arrested upon his arrival at Hurghada

Airport and detained. He was interrogated twice without access to a lawyer and

remains in detention without being informed of the charges filed against him.

Grave concern is expressed at the alleged motivation for the arrest and detention of

Mr. Jafar and of Mr. Alexandrani, which seems to be directly linked to their

legitimate exercise of their rights to freedom of expression and association.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

6 1

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

08/02/2016

JUA

GRC 1/2016

Greece

Arbitrary

detention;

Disability; Health;

Torture;

Allegations of extremely alarming living and care conditions of the internees of the

Disability Branch of the Centre of Social Welfare of Western Greece, formerly

known as the Children’s Care Centre of Lechaina. According to the information

received, this institution, which hosts approximately 55 to 60 persons with

intellectual disabilities, including five children, lacks adequate medical and health

care professionals. Due to shortage of staff, most internees are allegedly sedated,

spend their days in isolation and are confined in cage beds or cells with wooden

bars up to the ceiling. Several internees, including young children, have their limbs

reportedly strapped to their beds, some in unnatural forced positions. Such

conditions could seriously undermine the right of persons with disabilities to

liberty and security, to physical and mental integrity, to freedom from cruel,

inhuman or degrading treatment, to freedom from all forms of exploitation,

violence and abuse, and to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental

health.

10/02/2016

JAL

NGA 1/2016

Nigeria

Freedom of

expression;

Human rights

defenders;

Alleged restrictions on the right to freedom of expression in provisions of the Bill

“An Act to Prohibit Frivolous Petitions; and Other Matters Connected Therewith”.

According to the information received, this draft legislation contains provisions

that appear to unduly restrict the legitimate exercise of the right to freedom of

expression in Nigeria. The draft reportedly criminalizes free speech online, lacks

clear definitions and allows for the imposition of disproportionate penalties.

Concern is expressed that, if passed, the law could have a deterrent effect on the

exercise of the right to freedom of expression and the use of social media, and

potentially criminalize the work of human rights defenders in the country.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

6 2

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

11/02/2016

UA

BDI 1/2016

Burundi

Torture;

Allégations d’actes de torture et de mauvais traitements d’un General de l’armée

burundaise ainsi que de l’absence ou d’un retard disproportionnel des enquêtes et

poursuites des auteurs présumés responsables de ces actes. Selon les informations

reçues, M. Ndayirukiye aurait fait l’objet d’actes de torture et de mauvais

traitements pendant son arrestation et détention par la Garde présidentielle et de la

Brigade spéciale pour la protection des Institutions et de l’administration

pénitentiaire. En outre, M. Ndayirukiye aurait de facto été privé d’une assistance

juridique indépendante et efficace, une situation qui semble mettre en grand danger

sa santé et sa vie.

12/02/2016

JAL

AUS 1/2016

Australia

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Alleged restrictions to the rights to peaceful assembly and freedom of expression in

provisions of the Criminal Code Amendment (Prevention of Lawful Activity) Bill,

2015, in the state of Western Australia. According to the information received, the

Bill has undergone two readings in the Legislative Council of the State Parliament

and is scheduled to be debated on 16 February 2016. The Bill intends to prohibit

the physical prevention of lawful activities by protesters. It reportedly contains

various provisions that unduly restrict the rights to peaceful assembly and freedom

of expression in the State of Western Australia by criminalizing a wide range of

legitimate conduct, including peaceful protests that may entail blocking access to

roads or buildings. Concern is expressed that the mandatory and disproportionate

penalties could have a deterrent effect on the legitimate exercise of the right to

peaceful assembly and the right to freedom of expression.

13/04/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

6 3

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

12/02/2016

JAL

DOM 1/2016

Dominican

Republic

Discrimination

against women;

Health; Torture;

Violence against

women;

Alegaciones sobre la adopción de las reformas del Código Penal de la República

Dominicana que debería haber entrado en vigor el 19 de diciembre de 2015. Según

las informaciones recibidas, el 19 de diciembre de 2014, el Presidente de la

República Dominicana promulgó la Ley 550-14 aprobada por el Congreso que

reformaba el Código Penal. En enero de 2015, tres organizaciones de la sociedad

civil apelaron la Ley 550-14 ante el Tribunal Constitucional para cuestionar la

constitucionalidad de los artículos 107 a 110, relativos al aborto. El 2 de diciembre

de 2015, el Tribunal Constitucional declaró inconstitucional el procedimiento que

rodea la expedición del Código Penal, ya que la reforma fue aprobada solo por la

Cámara del Congreso de los Diputados. La reforma debía incluir también los votos

del Senado. Aunque el Tribunal no se ha pronunciado sobre las cuestiones de

fondo relacionadas al aborto, se restablecieron las disposiciones del Código Penal

de 1884 que criminalizan totalmente el aborto. Se expresa preocupación en cuanto

al restablecimiento del Código Penal de 1884 y se reiteran las mismas

preocupaciones relativas DOM 2/2014, a la violación de los derechos básicos de

las mujeres y adolescentes, ya expresadas en la comunicación enviada el 11 de

diciembre de 2014, ver A/HRC/29/50, caso no. DOM 2/2014. La reforma también

incluía la tipificación del feminicidio establecida en la Ley 550-14.

12/02/2016

JUA

EGY 2/2016

Egypt

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers;

Alleged arbitrary arrest, detention and charges against three human rights

defenders for their legitimate human rights work and the exercise of their rights to

freedom of association and freedom of expression. According to the information

received, on 1 May 2014, security forces raided the Belady Foundation, a non-

governmental organization supporting human rights initiatives, and arrested its

founders, Ms. Aya Hegazy and Mr. Mohamed Hassanein, and a volunteer, Ms.

Amira Farag. They were all detained in pre-trial detention, where they remain, and

have been charged with numerous offences. Ms. Hegazy could not present her

defence at several court hearings. Serious concern is expressed at the alleged

motivation for the arrest, detention and charges against the named persons,

allegedly linked to their human rights work at the Belady Foundation, as well as

for the principle of equality of arms in the trial against Ms. Hegazy.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

6 4

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

12/02/2016

JAL

OTH 2/2016

Other

Business

enterprises;

Hazardous

substances and

wastes; Health;

Alleged violations of the rights of at least 530 individuals who suffered from

adverse health impacts due to the exposure to hazardous chemicals found in

humidifier sterilizers, including over 140 deaths. According to the information

received, since 2011, several individuals have suffered from respiratory failure,

acute pneumonia and other unknown lung diseases as a result of using humidifiers

sterilizers manufactured and sold by several business entities, namely Aekyung Co.

Ltd., Costco Wholesale Korea, E-mart Co. Ltd., GS Retail Co. Ltd., Hanvit

Chemical Co. Ltd., Home Plus Co. Ltd., Lotte Shopping Co. Ltd., Oxy Reckitt

Benckiser, and SK Chemicals. It is alleged that two investigations carried out by

the Government to identify victims were based on a classification scheme which

resulted in identifying a limited number of victims and potentially excluding other

victims eligible for financial support, health monitoring and any other elements of

remedy. In addition to the current communication sent to Hanvit Chemical Co. Ltd,

related communications were sent to the above-mentioned companies and the

Governments of Republic of Korea on 12 February 2016. See below, case nos.

OTH 3/2016, OTH 4/2016, OTH 5/2016, OTH 6/2016, OTH 7/2016, OTH 8/2016,

OTH 9/2016, OTH 10/2016, and KOR 1/2016.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

6 5

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

12/02/2016

JAL

OTH 3/2016

Other

Business

enterprises;

Hazardous

substances and

wastes; Health;

Alleged violations of the rights of at least 530 individuals who suffered from

adverse health impacts due to the exposure to hazardous chemicals found in

humidifier sterilizers, including over 140 deaths. According to the information

received, since 2011, several individuals have suffered from respiratory failure,

acute pneumonia and other unknown lung diseases as a result of using humidifiers

sterilizers manufactured and sold by several business entities, namely, Aekyung

Co. Ltd., Costco Wholesale Korea, E-mart Co. Ltd., GS Retail Co. Ltd., Hanvit

Chemical Co. Ltd., Home Plus Co. Ltd., Lotte Shopping Co. Ltd., Oxy Reckitt

Benckiser, and SK Chemicals. It is alleged that two investigations carried out by

the Government to identify victims were based on a classification scheme which

resulted in identifying a limited number of victims and potentially excluding other

victims eligible for financial support, health monitoring and any other elements of

remedy. In addition to the current communication sent to Aekyung Co. Ltd.,

related communications were sent to the above-mentioned companies and the

Governments of Republic of Korea on 12 February 2016. See below, case nos.

OTH 2/2016, OTH 4/2016, OTH 5/2016, OTH 6/2016, OTH 7/2016, OTH 8/2016,

OTH 9/2016, OTH 10/2016, and KOR 1/2016.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

6 6

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

12/02/2016

JAL

OTH 4/2016

Other

Business

enterprises;

Hazardous

substances and

wastes; Health;

Alleged violations of the rights of at least 530 individuals who suffered from

adverse health impacts due to the exposure to hazardous chemicals found in

humidifier sterilizers, including over 140 deaths. According to the information

received, since 2011, several individuals have suffered from respiratory failure,

acute pneumonia and other unknown lung diseases as a result of using humidifiers

sterilizers manufactured and sold by several business entities, namely, Aekyung

Co. Ltd., Costco Wholesale Korea, E-mart Co. Ltd., GS Retail Co. Ltd., Hanvit

Chemical Co. Ltd., Home Plus Co. Ltd., Lotte Shopping Co. Ltd., Oxy Reckitt

Benckiser, and SK Chemicals. It is alleged that two investigations carried out by

the Government to identify victims were based on a classification scheme which

resulted in identifying a limited number of victims and potentially excluding other

victims eligible for financial support, health monitoring and any other elements of

remedy. In addition to the current communication sent to Oxy Reckitt Benckiser,

related communications were sent to the above-mentioned companies and the

Governments of Republic of Korea on 12 February 2016. See below, case nos.

OTH 2/2016, OTH 3/2016, OTH 5/2016, OTH 6/2016, OTH 7/2016, OTH 8/2016,

OTH 9/2016, OTH 10/2016, and KOR 1/2016.

12/04/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

6 7

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

12/02/2016

JAL

OTH 5/2016

Other

Business

enterprises;

Hazardous

substances and

wastes; Health;

Alleged violations of the rights of at least 530 individuals who suffered from

adverse health impacts due to the exposure to hazardous chemicals found in

humidifier sterilizers, including over 140 deaths. According to the information

received, since 2011, several individuals have suffered from respiratory failure,

acute pneumonia and other unknown lung diseases as a result of using humidifiers

sterilizers manufactured and sold by several business entities, namely, Aekyung

Co. Ltd., Costco Wholesale Korea, E-mart Co. Ltd., GS Retail Co. Ltd., Hanvit

Chemical Co. Ltd., Home Plus Co. Ltd., Lotte Shopping Co. Ltd., Oxy Reckitt

Benckiser, and SK Chemicals. It is alleged that two investigations carried out by

the Government to identify victims were based on a classification scheme which

resulted in identifying a limited number of victims and potentially excluding other

victims eligible for financial support, health monitoring and any other elements of

remedy. In addition to the current communication sent to Lotte Shopping Co. Ltd.,

related communications were sent to the above-mentioned companies and the

Governments of Republic of Korea on 12 February 2016. See below, case nos.

OTH 2/2016, OTH 3/2016, OTH 4/2016, OTH 6/2016, OTH 7/2016, OTH 8/2016,

OTH 9/2016, OTH 10/2016, and KOR 1/2016.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

6 8

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

12/02/2016

JAL

OTH 6/2016

Other

Business

enterprises;

Hazardous

substances and

wastes; Health;

Alleged violations of the rights of at least 530 individuals who suffered from

adverse health impacts due to the exposure to hazardous chemicals found in

humidifier sterilizers, including over 140 deaths. According to the information

received, since 2011, several individuals have suffered from respiratory failure,

acute pneumonia and other unknown lung diseases as a result of using humidifiers

sterilizers manufactured and sold by several business entities, namely, Aekyung

Co. Ltd., Costco Wholesale Korea, E-mart Co. Ltd., GS Retail Co. Ltd., Hanvit

Chemical Co. Ltd., Home Plus Co. Ltd., Lotte Shopping Co. Ltd., Oxy Reckitt

Benckiser, and SK Chemicals. It is alleged that two investigations carried out by

the Government to identify victims were based on a classification scheme which

resulted in identifying a limited number of victims and potentially excluding other

victims eligible for financial support, health monitoring and any other elements of

remedy. In addition to the current communication sent to E-mart Co. Ltd., related

communications were sent to the above-mentioned companies and the

Governments of Republic of Korea on 12 February 2016. See below, case nos.

OTH 2/2016, OTH 3/2016, OTH 4/2016, OTH 5/2016, OTH 7/2016, OTH 8/2016,

OTH 9/2016, OTH 10/2016, and KOR 1/2016.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

6 9

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

12/02/2016

JAL

OTH 7/2016

Other

Business

enterprises;

Hazardous

substances and

wastes; Health;

Alleged violations of the rights of at least 530 individuals who suffered from

adverse health impacts due to the exposure to hazardous chemicals found in

humidifier sterilizers, including over 140 deaths. According to the information

received, since 2011, several individuals have suffered from respiratory failure,

acute pneumonia and other unknown lung diseases as a result of using humidifiers

sterilizers manufactured and sold by several business entities, namely, Aekyung

Co. Ltd., Costco Wholesale Korea, E-mart Co. Ltd., GS Retail Co. Ltd., Hanvit

Chemical Co. Ltd., Home Plus Co. Ltd., Lotte Shopping Co. Ltd., Oxy Reckitt

Benckiser, and SK Chemicals. It is alleged that two investigations carried out by

the Government to identify victims were based on a classification scheme which

resulted in identifying a limited number of victims and potentially excluding other

victims eligible for financial support, health monitoring and any other elements of

remedy. In addition to the current communication sent to GS Retail Co. Ltd.,

related communications were sent to the above-mentioned companies and the

Governments of Republic of Korea on 12 February 2016. See above and below,

case nos. OTH 2/2016, OTH 3/2016, OTH 4/2016, OTH 5/2016, OTH 6/2016,

OTH 8/2016, OTH 9/2016, OTH 10/2016, and KOR 1/2016.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

7 0

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

12/02/2016

JAL

OTH 8/2016

Other

Business

enterprises;

Hazardous

substances and

wastes; Health;

Alleged violations of the rights of at least 530 individuals who suffered from

adverse health impacts due to the exposure to hazardous chemicals found in

humidifier sterilizers, including over 140 deaths. According to the information

received, since 2011, several individuals have suffered from respiratory failure,

acute pneumonia and other unknown lung diseases as a result of using humidifiers

sterilizers manufactured and sold by several business entities, namely, Aekyung

Co. Ltd., Costco Wholesale Korea, E-mart Co. Ltd., GS Retail Co. Ltd., Hanvit

Chemical Co. Ltd., Home Plus Co. Ltd., Lotte Shopping Co. Ltd., Oxy Reckitt

Benckiser, and SK Chemicals. It is alleged that two investigations carried out by

the Government to identify victims were based on a classification scheme which

resulted in identifying a limited number of victims and potentially excluding other

victims eligible for financial support, health monitoring and any other elements of

remedy. In addition to the current communication sent to Home Plus Co. Ltd.,

related communications were sent to the above-mentioned companies and the

Governments of Republic of Korea on 12 February 2016. See above and below,

case nos. OTH 2/2016, OTH 3/2016, OTH 4/2016, OTH 5/2016, OTH 6/2016,

OTH 7/2016, OTH 9/2016, OTH 10/2016, and KOR 1/2016.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

7 1

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

12/02/2016

JAL

OTH 9/2016

Other

Business

enterprises;

Hazardous

substances and

wastes; Health;

Alleged violations of the rights of at least 530 individuals who suffered from

adverse health impacts due to the exposure to hazardous chemicals found in

humidifier sterilizers, including over 140 deaths. According to the information

received, since 2011, several individuals have suffered from respiratory failure,

acute pneumonia and other unknown lung diseases as a result of using humidifiers

sterilizers manufactured and sold by several business entities, namely, Aekyung

Co. Ltd., Costco Wholesale Korea, E-mart Co. Ltd., GS Retail Co. Ltd., Hanvit

Chemical Co. Ltd., Home Plus Co. Ltd., Lotte Shopping Co. Ltd., Oxy Reckitt

Benckiser, and SK Chemicals. It is alleged that two investigations carried out by

the Government to identify victims were based on a classification scheme which

resulted in identifying a limited number of victims and potentially excluding other

victims eligible for financial support, health monitoring and any other elements of

remedy. In addition to the current communication sent to Costco Wholesale Korea,

related communications were sent to the above-mentioned companies and the

Governments of Republic of Korea on 12 February 2016. See above and below,

case nos. OTH 2/2016, OTH 3/2016, OTH 4/2016, OTH 5/2016, OTH 6/2016,

OTH 7/2016, OTH 8/2016, OTH 10/2016, and KOR 1/2016.

06/04/2015

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

7 2

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

12/02/2016

JAL

OTH 10/2016

Other

Business

enterprises;

Hazardous

substances and

wastes; Health;

Alleged violations of the rights of at least 530 individuals who suffered from

adverse health impacts due to the exposure to hazardous chemicals found in

humidifier sterilizers, including over 140 deaths. According to the information

received, since 2011, several individuals have suffered from respiratory failure,

acute pneumonia and other unknown lung diseases as a result of using humidifiers

sterilizers manufactured and sold by several business entities, namely, Aekyung

Co. Ltd., Costco Wholesale Korea, E-mart Co. Ltd., GS Retail Co. Ltd., Hanvit

Chemical Co. Ltd., Home Plus Co. Ltd., Lotte Shopping Co. Ltd., Oxy Reckitt

Benckiser, and SK Chemicals. It is alleged that two investigations carried out by

the Government to identify victims were based on a classification scheme which

resulted in identifying a limited number of victims and potentially excluding other

victims eligible for financial support, health monitoring and any other elements of

remedy. In addition to the current communication sent to SK Chemicals, related

communications were sent to the above-mentioned companies and the

Governments of Republic of Korea on 12 February 2016. See above and below,

case nos. OTH 2/2016, OTH 3/2016, OTH 4/2016, OTH 5/2016, OTH 6/2016,

OTH 7/2016, OTH 8/2016, OTH 9/2016, and KOR 1/2016.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

7 3

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

12/02/2016

JAL

KOR 1/2016

Republic of

Korea

Business

enterprises;

Hazardous

substances and

wastes; Health;

Alleged violations of the rights of at least 530 individuals who suffered from

adverse health impacts due to the exposure to hazardous chemicals found in

humidifier sterilizers, including over 140 deaths. According to the information

received, since 2011, several individuals have suffered from respiratory failure,

acute pneumonia and other unknown lung diseases as a result of using humidifiers

sterilizers manufactured and sold by several business entities, namely, Aekyung

Co. Ltd., Costco Wholesale Korea, E-mart Co. Ltd., GS Retail Co. Ltd., Hanvit

Chemical Co. Ltd., Home Plus Co. Ltd., Lotte Shopping Co. Ltd., Oxy Reckitt

Benckiser, and SK Chemicals. It is alleged that two investigations carried out by

the Government to identify victims were based on a classification scheme which

resulted in identifying a limited number of victims and potentially excluding other

victims eligible for financial support, health monitoring and any other elements of

remedy. Related communications were sent to the above-mentioned companies on

12 February 2016. See above, case nos. OTH 2/2016, OTH 3/2016, OTH 4/2016,

OTH 5/2016, OTH 6/2016, OTH 7/2016, OTH 8/2016, OTH 9/2016, OTH

10/2016, and OTH 11/2016.

20/04/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

7 4

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

15/02/2016

AL

PRK 1/2016

Democratic

People's

Republic of

Korea

DPR Korea;

Allegations of restrictions to the right of freedom of movement in relation to an

extradition treaty signed between the Russian Federation and the Democratic

People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). According to the information received, in

November 2015, the Russian Federation and DPRK signed an extradition treaty,

calling for mutual assistance in criminal matters. On 2 February 2016, DPRK and

the Russian Federation reportedly signed another treaty that calls for “transferring

and readmitting individuals who have illegally left and are illegally present” on the

territory of either country. The treaty aims to reduce the number of illegal migrants

present in both countries, which reportedly relates to an established practice where

DPRK sends its workers to work at logging and/or construction sites in the Russian

Federation where they are subjected to severe working conditions and limitations

of their basic rights, including freedom of movement. Some workers have

reportedly sought asylum outside the DPRK, including in the Russian Federation,

fearing persecution for deserting official employment, including torture, should

they return to their country. A related communication was sent to the Government

of the Russian Federation on 15 February 2016, see below, case no. RUS 1/2016.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

7 5

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

15/02/2016

AL

RUS 1/2016

Russian

Federation

DPR Korea;

Allegations of restrictions to the right of freedom of movement in relation to an

extradition treaty signed between the Russian Federation and the Democratic

People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). According to the information received, in

November 2015, the Russian Federation and DPRK signed an extradition treaty,

calling for mutual assistance in criminal matters. On 2 February 2016, DPRK and

the Russian Federation reportedly signed another treaty that calls for “transferring

and readmitting individuals who have illegally left and are illegally present” on the

territory of either country. The treaty aims to reduce the number of illegal migrants

present in both countries, which reportedly relates to an established practice where

DPRK sends its workers to work at logging and/or construction sites in the Russian

Federation where they are subjected to severe working conditions and limitations

of their basic rights, including freedom of movement. Some workers have

reportedly sought asylum outside the DPRK, including in the Russian Federation,

fearing persecution for deserting official employment, including torture, should

they return to their country. Concern is expressed that this treaty might be used in

contravention of the principle of non-refoulement. A related communication was

sent to the Government of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea on 15

February 2016, see above, case no. PRK 1/2016.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

7 6

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

16/02/2016

JUA

COD 1/2016

Democratic

Republic of the

Congo

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Allégations quant à l’arrestation et la détention arbitraire de neuf personnes dont

deux défenseurs des droits de l’homme. Selon les informations reçues, le 28

novembre 2015, M. Juvin Kombi et M. Pascal Byumanine, membres de la Lutte

pour le Changement (LUCHA), ainsi que M. Innocent Fumbu, M. Saïdi

Wetemwami Heshima, M. Gervais Semunda Rwamakuba, M. Nelson Katembo

Kalindalo, M. Jonathan Kambale Muhasa, M. Osée Kakule Kilala et M. Jojo

Semivumbi auraient été arrêtés par les autorités congolaises lors d’une

manifestation pacifique à Goma organisée par la LUCHA en mémoire des

victimes des tueries commises dans la région de Beni. Le 25 janvier 2016, la

demande de liberté provisoire formulée par les avocats des neuf personnes

détenues depuis le 28 novembre 2015, aurait été rejetée par le Tribunal de Grande

Instance de Goma et ensuite par la Cour d’Appel saisie au second degré.

L’audience a débuté le 4 février 2016. Certains membres ou proches de la

LUCHA ont fait l’objet de deux communications précédentes envoyées le 16 juin

2015 et le 30 novembre 2015, voir A/HRC/18/51, cas no COD 3/2015 et cas no

COD 4/2015).

16/02/2016

JAL

JOR 2/2016

Jordan

Business

enterprises;

Environment;

Freedom of

expression;

Human rights

defenders;

Allegations of intimidation, in the form of a verbal threat, and harassment, against

an environmental human rights defender following his complaints against the

fourth independent power plant (IPP4), Al-Manakher Power Plant, located in the

east of Amman, Jordan. According to the information received, on 8 September

and 24 November 2015, Mr. Farhan Issa Ahmed Al-Daboubi, a 60-year-old

engineer, was summoned by the authorities and questioned about his letters of

complaint against IPP4. It is alleged that on 24 November 2015, after being

detained for 24 hours, as a condition of release, the police requested Mr. Al-

Dadoubi to sign a document committing him not to write to any international

organization regarding the IPP4 Project and AES Levant Holding BV Jordan PSC.

A related communication was sent to AES Levant Holding BV Jordan PSC on 16

February 2016, see below, case no. OTH 1/2016.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

7 7

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

16/02/2016

JAL

LAO 1/2016

Lao People's

Democratic

Republic

Adequate housing;

Business

enterprises;

Cultural Rights;

Environment;

Food; Health;

Indigenous

peoples;

Alleged human rights violations associated with the Don Sahong dam development

project of the lower Mekong River in the territory of Lao People’s Democratic

Republic, 2 kilometres from the Laos-Cambodia border. According to the

information received, the dam construction, operated by a Malaysian developer,

Mega First, is likely to adversely affect approximately 29.7 million people residing

both upstream and downstream from the Mekong dam in Lao PDR, Cambodia,

Thailand and Vietnam. Despite the anticipated risks, it is alleged that the project is

proceeding without adequate environmental and human rights impact assessment

and in the absence of meaningful consultations with the concerned population

while posing a considerable threat to the livelihoods of people living in the area,

particularly in relation to their right to an adequate standard of living, including the

rights to adequate food and housing, the right to the highest standard of physical

and mental health, cultural rights, the rights to information and participation, as

well as the rights of indigenous peoples. A related communication was sent to the

Government of Malaysia on 29 February 2016, see below, case no. MYS 1/2016,

as well as to Mega First Corporation Berhad and the Mekong River Commission

on 29 February 2016, see below, case nos. OTH 12/2016 and OTH 13/2016.

16/02/2016

JAL

OTH 1/2016

Other

Business

enterprises;

Environment;

Freedom of

expression;

Human rights

defenders;

Allegations of intimidation, in the form of a verbal threat, and harassment, against

an environmental human rights defender following his complaints against the

fourth independent power plant (IPP4) Al-Manakher Power Plant located in the

east of Amman, Jordan. According to the information received, on 8 September

and 24 November 2015, Mr. Farhan Issa Ahmed Al-Daboubi, a 60-year old

engineer, was summoned by the authorities and questioned about his letters of

complaint against IPP4. It is alleged that on 24 November 2015, after being

detained for 24 hours, as a condition of release, the police requested Mr. Al-

Dadoubi to sign a document committing him not to write to any international

organization regarding the IPP4 Project and AES Levant Holding BV Jordan PSC.

A related communication was sent to the Government of Jordan on 16 February

2016, see above, case no. JOR 2/2016.

03/04/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

7 8

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

18/02/2016

JUA

BDI 3/2016

Burundi

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Allégations de disparition forcée d’une femme défenseur des droits de l’homme.

Selon les informations reçues, le 10 décembre 2015, Mme Marie-Claudette

Kwizera aurait été enlevée à Bujumbura. Elle aurait été forcée à monter dans un

véhicule de type Hilux. Il s’agirait du même type de véhicule utilisé par le Service

national de renseignement (SNR) burundais. Suite à cette disparition la famille de

Mme Kwizera aurait été forcée à payer une rançon à un membre SNR sans que

Mme Kwizera ne soit libérée par la suite. La famille de Mme Kwizera aurait subi

des pressions et, par crainte de représailles, n’aurait pas déposé de plainte formelle

auprès des autorités burundaises. Aucune information sur la localisation de Mme

Kwizera n’aurait pu être obtenue depuis le 10 décembre et rien n’aurait été fait

jusqu’à présent par les autorités pour enquêter sur cette disparition forcée.

18/02/2016

JUA

IRN 4/2016

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Cultural Rights;

Freedom of

expression; Iran;

Torture;

Allegations concerning the arrest, detention and sentencing of two musicians and a

filmmaker for producing and distributing underground music. According to the

information received, on 5 October 2013, Mr. Mehdi Rajabian, Mr. Yousef Emadi

and Mr. Hossein Rajabian were arrested by the intelligence unit of the

Revolutionary Guard and detained in the northern city of Sari, including in solitary

confinement and without access to a lawyer. After 18 days, all three men appeared

before the 3rd Branch of the Revolutionary Court and were sent to Evin Prison,

Tehran, before being released after a period ranging between 40 days and two

months, upon payment of a bail of 200 million Tomans (approximately 6.625

USD). In May 2015, the three individuals appeared at their trial before Branch 28

of the Revolutionary Court, who sentenced them to six years in prison and fined

them 200 million Tomans for “insulting the sacred” and “propaganda against the

state” through the production and promotion of underground music. On 22

December 2015, the three men appeared before Branch 54 of the Tehran Appeals

Court, whose decision is expected shortly.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

7 9

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

19/02/2016

JAL

GTM 1/2016

Guatemala

Extreme poverty;

Food;

Carta enviada a las autoridades de Guatemala con el fin de alentar a las nuevas

autoridades cumplir con cuarto sentencias del Juzgado de Niñez y Adolescencia

del Departamento de Zacapa del 2013, centrales al derecho a la alimentación en

Guatemala. Se alienta concluir a la brevedad posible los avances en la elaboración

y aprobación del Protocolo de actuación para el ejercicio del derecho humano a la

alimentación, en el marco del cumplimiento de estas sentencias.

19/02/2016

JUA

IRN 5/2016

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Freedom of

religion; Iran;

Alleged mass conviction of Baha’is for peaceful exercise of their right to freedom

of religion, expression and association. According to the information received, on 5

January 2016, Branch 2 of the Revolutionary Court in the city of Gorgan, Golestan

Province of Iran, sentenced 24 Iranian Baha’is (Shahnam Jazbani, 48 years old;

Sheida Ghoddousi, 47 years old; Farahnaz Tebyanian, 48 years old; Pouneh

Sanaie, 43 years old; Parisa Shahidi, 46 years old; Mona Amri, 32 years old;

Mojdeh Zohouri Golkenari, 43 years old; Behnam Hasani, 42 years old; Hona

Aghighian, 53 years old; Hona Koushk-Baghi, 37 years old; Bita Hedayati, 45

years old; Vesagh Sanaie, 39 years old; Shohreh Samimi, 41 years old; Tina

Mowhebati, 21 years old; Parivash Shojaie, 37 years old; Roufia Pakzadan, 27

years old; Nazi Tahghighi Hesari, 50 years old; Soudabeh Mehdinejad Behnamiri,

42 years old; Mitra Nouri, 55 years old; Shiva Rowhani, 45 years old; Navid

Moallem, 47 years old; Houshmand Dehghan, 46 years old; Karmilia Bidelian, 42

years old; Maryam Dehghan, 60 years old) to lengthy prison sentences, ranging

from 6 to 11 years. The Revolutionary Court reportedly convicted them for

violating the country’s national security laws, especially articles 498, 499, 500 and

508 of the Islamic Penal Code. Concern is expressed that the arrest, detention and

sentencing of the 24 aforementioned Baha’is may be solely related to the peaceful

exercise of their right to freedom of religion, expression and association.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

8 0

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

19/02/2016

JUA

LSO 1/2016

Lesotho

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Summary

executions;

Torture;

Alleged arbitrary arrest of, charges and serious threats against a lawyer

representing members of the Lesotho Defence Force accused of plotting a mutiny.

According to the information received, Mr. Kgotso Nthontho, a prominent lawyer

representing three members of the Lesotho Defence Force (LDF) accused of

plotting a mutiny, was arrested on 12 February 2016. The charges against him

reportedly relate to alleged perjury and appear to be directly related to his efforts in

challenging the detention of his clients. Mr. Nthontho was released on the same

day after the High Court had ordered his immediate and unconditional release. Mr.

Nthontho had previously been directly threatened in court by members of the LDF;

he had also been followed and monitored and his name, together with the names of

other lawyers representing soldiers detained on mutiny charges, had appeared on a

‘hit list’ circulated on social media back in November 2015. His arrest took place

in a context of increasing threats and attacks against the independence of the

judiciary and lawyers, and decline of the rule of law in Lesotho following the arrest

and detention of a number of LDF soldiers and the killing of the former

Commander of the LDF, which were the subject of a previous communication sent

on 30 November 2015, see A/HRC/31/79, case no. LSO 1/2015.

19/02/2016

JAL

TJK 1/2016

Tajikistan

Health; Privacy;

Torture;

Alleged restrictions to the right to be free from degrading treatment, and the rights

to health and privacy in connection with amendments to the “Family Code of the

Republic of Tajikistan” and the “Law on State Registration of Acts of Civil

Status”. According to the information received, the amendments will require

couples to undergo a mandatory medical examination, including HIV testing, prior

to registering their marriage. The test results will reportedly be disclosed to both

partners. Concern is expressed that the amendments, if applied without respecting

consent, confidentiality and necessity requirements, may amount to degrading

treatment. Such amendments could also seriously infringe upon the right to the

highest attainable standard of physical and mental health and the right to privacy as

they undermine informed consent and confidentiality, and could potentially lead to

the discrimination of persons living with HIV/AIDS based on their health status.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

8 1

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

23/02/2016

JAL

EGY 3/2016

Egypt

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Torture;

Alleged attempt to arbitrarily close a human rights organization in violation of the

rights to freedom of association and freedom of expression. According to the

information received, on 17 February 2016, an “administrative closing order” was

issued to the Nadeem Center for the Rehabilitation of Victims of Violence and

Torture, which provides support for victims of torture and their families. The

closure of the organization has been suspended until after a meeting between

representatives of the organization and the Ministry of Health, scheduled for 22

February 2016, after which the Nadeem Center may be closed immediately.

Serious concern is expressed at the reason for the closure of the organization,

namely its human rights work and the exercise of the rights to freedom of

association and freedom of expression. Further concern is expressed at the use of

NGO Law (84/2002) to restrict civil society space. NGO Law (84/2002) was the

subject of five previous communications sent on 17 November 2011, see

A/HRC/19/44, case no. EGY 12/2011; 12 February 2013, see A/HRC/23/51, case

no. EGY 4/2013; 20 March 2013, see A/HRC/24/21, case no. EGY 5/2013; 29

August 2014, see A/HRC/28/85, case no. EGY 11/2014; and 12 June 2015, see

A/HRC/31/79, case no. EGY 10/2015.

23/02/2016

AL

OTH 14/2016

Other

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Letter expressing concerns about Financial Action Task Force’s Recommendation

8 on combating the abuse of non-profit organizations. Recommendation 8

characterizes non-profit organizations as “particularly vulnerable”, a notion that

has sometimes been used by States to justify restrictive measures or overregulation

applied to the civil society sector. The Special Rapporteur urges the Financial

Action Task Force, an intergovernmental body tasked with developing policies to

combat money laundering, to consider launching a consultative revision process of

Recommendation 8 so that it better reflects approaches to anti-money laundering

and counter-terrorism that comply with international human rights standards.

23/03/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

8 2

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

24/02/2016

JUA

PAK 5/2016

Pakistan

Human rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Summary

executions;

Alleged serious threats to kill a lawyer and human rights defender as a result of her

legitimate human rights work. According to the information received, on 3

February 2016, while in Sri Lanka, Ms. Asma Jahangir, a prominent lawyer and

human rights defender, was advised not to return to Pakistan as she received

credible information that “Daesh” had planned an attack against her. Despite

promises by government officials that her security and that of her family would be

increased, such increase in protection has not happened at this stage. Ms. Jahangir

was the subject of five previous communications sent on 15 June 2012,

A/HRC/22/47/Add.4, case no. PAK 8/2012; 24 January 2011,

A/HRC/19/55/Add.2, case no. PAK 1/2011; 16 November 2007,

A/HRC/7/28/Add.1, case no. PAK 16/2007; 30 January 2006, A/HRC/4/37/Add.1,

case no. PAK 2/2006; and 18 May 2005, see E/CN.4/2006/95/Add.1, case no. PAK

7/2005.

24/02/2016

JAL

VEN 2/2016

Venezuela

Human rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Summary

executions;

Presunto asesinato de un abogado y defensor de los derechos humanos. Según las

informaciones recibidas, el 22 de enero, el Sr. Héctor Sánchez Lozada, abogado y

defensor de los derechos humanos fue matado por dos personas en motocicleta,

saliendo de una visita con un cliente en la Ciudad de Maturín en el Estado de

Monagas. Se expresa preocupación por el presunto asesinato del Sr. Lozada que

podría estar directamente relacionado con el desempeño de sus funciones de

abogado y su trabajo en defensa de los derechos humanos.

25/02/2016

AL

DEU 1/2016

Germany

Hazardous

substances and

wastes;

Letter in follow-up to the official country visit of the Special Rapporteur on the

implications for human rights of the environmentally sound management and

disposal of hazardous substances and wastes to Germany from 30 November to 7

December 2015. The letter contains a submission to the process of developing the

German National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights currently being

drafted under the auspices of the Federal Foreign Office. Concern is raised that on-

going challenges exist in relation to chemicals management. German businesses

are encouraged to emerge as leaders in the transition to safer chemicals and the

Government is encouraged to enable this shift by creating incentives and

frameworks for businesses to foster a positive human rights record.

29/02/2016

12/04/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

8 3

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

25/02/2016

JAL

NLD 1/2016

Netherlands

Adequate housing;

Extreme poverty;

Migrants;

Letter in follow-up to the response received from the Government of the

Netherlands on 9 July 2015 to a communication regarding the failure to provide

emergency assistance to homeless migrants in an irregular situation. The letter

argues that various forms of shelter provided to irregular migrants in the

Netherlands, elaborated in detail in the Government’s reply, still fail to prevent

them from becoming homeless. The letter sets out the Netherlands’ obligation

under regional and international human rights law to provide a minimum essential

level of the right to adequate housing as well as other related economic, social and

cultural rights for all, including irregular migrants on its territory. The above-

mentioned previous communication was sent to the Government of the Netherlands

on 12 December 2014, see A/HRC/29/50, case no. NLD 1/2014. For the response

of the Government of the Netherlands of 9 July 2015 to communication NLD

1/2014, see A/HRC/31/79.

25/02/2016

JAL

OTH 15/2016

Other

Freedom of

expression;

Human rights

defenders;

Alleged arbitrary withdrawal of journalistic accreditation of a journalist covering

United Nations affairs in New York. According to the information received, on 19

February 2016, Mr. Matthew Lee received a letter in which the United Nations

Under Secretary-General for Communications and Public Information informed

him of the Department of Public Information’s (DPI) decision to withdraw his

Resident Correspondent accreditation at the United Nations Office in New York in

favour of non-Resident Correspondent. Later that day, Mr. Lee was escorted from

the United Nations premises after his current credential was annulled. The

annulment of Mr. Lee’s accreditation was, according to the letter received, based

on an incident that occurred on 29 January 2016, during the United Nations

Correspondents Association Annual General Meeting, which DPI allegedly

determined was in violation of the United Nations Media Guidelines. On that date,

Mr. Lee’s allegedly tried to cover a meeting in the United Nations Press Briefing

Room, which he left after being informed by United Nations security of its

restricted nature. Allegedly, no information was requested from Mr. Lee nor was

any other written communication sent to him on this incident, until the receipt of

the letter on 19 February.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

8 4

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

25/02/2016

JUA

PAK 4/2016

Pakistan

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Terrorism;

Alleged arbitrary arrest, detention and charging of a human rights defender.

According to the information received, on 16 January 2016, Mr. Saeed Baloch,

board member of International Network for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,

secretary general of the Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum (PFF) and Muttahida Labour

Federation and Fishermen’s Cooperative Society (FCS), was summoned for

questioning by members of the Rangers, Pakistan’s Paramilitary police force, to

Keamari station. On 26 January 2016, he was presented before the Sindh High

Court and accused of financially assisting an individual involved in organized

crime, and of embezzling fisheries’ funds. The court placed Mr. Baloch under three

month of preventative detention under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997. The Rangers

stated he was arrested on 25 January 2016, however, on 19 January 2016 his family

petitioned the Rangers to allow them to visit him, which was denied.

25/02/2016

JAL

RUS 2/2016

Russian

Federation

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Human rights

defenders;

Alleged liquidation of a human rights non-governmental organization. According

to the information received, on 10 February 2016, the Supreme Court of the

Republic of Tatarstan approved the Ministry of Justice’s request for the liquidation

of Agora, a prominent non-governmental organization, following a series of

investigations in 2015 in relation to the work of the organization. The Ministry

accused Agora of, inter alia, conducting political actions with a view to

“influencing public opinion”, of publishing critical documents without indicating

that their author had been labelled a “foreign agent” organization, and of

undertaking efforts to be excluded from the registry of “foreign agents”. The

adoption and application of the Law on Introducing Amendments to Legislative

Acts of the Russian Federation in Part Regulating Activities of Non-commercial

Organizations which Carry Functions of Foreign Agents was the subject of six

previous communications sent on 11 July 2012, see A/HRC/22/67, case no. RUS

5/2012; 13 June 2013, see A/HRC/25/74, case no. RUS 3/2013; 18 December

2013, see A/HRC/26/21, case no. RUS 13/2013; 20 June 2014, see A/HRC/28/85,

case no. RUS 5/2014; 14 November 2014, see A/HRC/28/85, case no. RUS

9/2014; and 7 August 2015, see A/HRC/31/79, case no. RUS 4/2015.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

8 5

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

25/02/2016

JUA

THA 9/2015

Thailand

Arbitrary

detention;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful assembly

and of association;

Health; Human

rights defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers;

Alleged charges, detention and/or convictions of 26 persons in relation to lèse-

majesté offences, for having exercised their right to freedom of opinion and

expression. According to the information received, between May 2010 and August

2015, 26 persons were arrested, detained and/or convicted under article 112 of the

Thai Criminal Code (also known as the lèse-majesté law) and section 14 of the

Computer Crime Act. The 26 persons concerned are: Mr. Opas Chamsuksai, Mr.

Thiansutham Sutthijittaseranee, Mr. Hasadin Uraipaiwan, Mr. Wittaya Wongpoe,

Mr. Samak Pantae, Mr. Phongsak Sribunpeng, Ms. Sasiwimol Patomwongfa-

ngarm, Mr. Siraphob Kornaroot, Mr. Juesong Sae-kow, Mr. Nguenkhun

Udonkunakorn, Ms. Anchan Preelert, Mr. Prajakchai Chumkam, Ms. Jaruwan

Eiampong, Mr. Anon Masin, Mr. Chartchai Maneerat, Mr. Ekkachai

Hongkangwan, Mr. Yossawaris Chuklom, Mr. Prasit Chaisrisa, Mr. Patiwat

Saraiyaem, Ms. Porntip Munkhong, Mr. Udomsak Wattanaworachaiwathin, Mr.

Chaleaw Chankiat, Mr. Piya Jullakittipan, Mr. Tanapon Bumrungsuk, Mr. Jaran

Ditapichai, and Mr. Sombat Boonngam-anong. Fifteen of these persons were tried

by military courts, despite being civilians. The above-mentioned persons were

charged under article 112 of the Thai Criminal Code and section 14 of the

Computer Crime Act, inter alia, for expressing opinions either in private or public

spaces, including online. Concerns relate to the inconformity of the application of

these provisions with article 19 of the ICCPR, not meeting the strict tests of

necessity and proportionality. Concern is expressed at the “chilling effect” such

convictions may have on the enjoyment of the right to freedom of opinion and

expression in Thailand and at the continued restrictions on fundamental rights

particularly affecting political opponents in Thailand following the military coup of

22 May 2014. A previous related communication concerning allegations related to

charges against, detention and/or conviction of 21 persons under the lèse-majesté

law was sent on 8 December 2014, see A/HRC/29/50, case no. THA 13/2014.

29/02/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

8 6

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

25/02/2016

JAL

THA 1/2016

Thailand

Business

enterprises;

Migrants; Slavery;

Trafficking;

Alleged human rights violations of migrant workers, who are working within

poultry supply chains in Thailand. According to the information received, migrant

workers are exposed to extreme exploitation and slavery like conditions whilst

working in poultry processing sites. Human rights violations, including economic

exploitation; debt bondage; physical and verbal abuse; arbitrary manipulation of

salaries; a lack of social security and health protection; unsafe working conditions;

discrimination; and restrictions on workers’ freedom of movement, are alleged to

be perpetrated by recruitment intermediaries, employers and in certain cases local

police.

26/02/2016

26/02/2016

JAL

BDI 4/2016

Burundi

Albinism;

Violence against

women;

Allégations d’enlèvement, assassinat et amputation d’une jeune fille atteinte

d’albinisme au Burundi. Selon les informations reçues, le 17 février 2016, une

enfant, âgée de 4 ans et atteinte albinisme, a été enlevée, assassinée, puis amputée

d’un bras. Il est probable que l’agression ait été perpétrée dans le but de découper

des parties du corps de la victime afin de les utiliser, ou de les vendre en vue de

leur utilisation dans le cadre de rituels de sorcellerie.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

8 7

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

26/02/2016

JAL

GTM 2/2016

Guatemala

Disappearances;

Discrimination

against women;

Human rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers;

Indigenous

peoples; Slavery;

Summary

executions;

Torture; Truth,

justice, reparation

& guarantees on

non-rec; Violence

against women;

Comunicación relativa al desarrollo de tres procesos judiciales sobre violaciones

manifiestas de las normas internacionales de derechos humanos y violaciones

graves del derecho internacional humanitario, ocurridas durante el período del

conflicto armado interno en Guatemala. Según las informaciones recibidas,

procedimientos judiciales habrían iniciado en tres causas conocidas por los

nombres de CREOMPAZ; Molina Theissen; y Sepur Zarco. Dieciocho militares en

situación de retiro habrían sido objeto de órdenes de captura y habrían sido

acusados de varios delitos incluyendo delitos de lesa humanidad, masacres,

desaparición forzada, incluso en el caso de un niño, Marco Antonio Molina

Theissen, así como la esclavitud sexual y laboral de mujeres q’eqchíes que vivían

en la comunidad de Sepur Zarco, donde estaba ubicada una base militar durante la

época del conflicto armado interno. En el contexto de estos procesos judiciales, se

reportan un creciente número de mensajes y actos intimidatorios, incluyendo de

grupos ligados a los militares acusados, que buscarían desacreditar y presionar a

las víctimas y a quienes les apoyan en este proceso. Esta comunicación se refiere a

comunicaciones anteriores enviadas el 22 de diciembre de 2014, ver A/HRC/29/50,

caso no. GTM 8/2014; 18 de agosto de 2014, ver A/HRC/28/85, caso no. GTM

5/2014; el 2 de mayo 2014, ver A/HRC/27/72, caso no. GTM 4/2014; el 30 de

octubre 2013, ver A/HRC/25/74, caso no. GTM 9/2013; el 17 de mayo 2013, ver

A/HRC/24/21, caso, no. GTM 5/2013; y el 15 de marzo 2013, ver A/HRC/24/21,

caso no. GTM 2/2013.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

8 8

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

26/02/2016

JUA

ISR 2/2016

Israel

Health; OPT;

Torture;

Alleged arbitrary arrest and detention, and subsequent torture and ill-treatment, of

a Palestinian journalist working for the satellite channel Al-Majd. According to

information received, on 21 November 2015 Mr. Mohammed Al-Qiq was arrested

at his home and transferred to a series of detention centres. It is alleged that he was

tortured during the initial weeks of his detention. On 25 November, Mr. Al-Qiq

began a hunger strike to protest the arbitrary nature and conditions of his detention

and it is reported that his health has steadily deteriorated since then. He is currently

being held on a six month administrative detention order issued by Ofer Military

Court and has not been formally charged. On 4 February 2016, the Israeli High

Court of Justice decided to suspend the administrative detention order given his

deteriorating health, however the Court did not rule on the validity of his

administrative detention. In addition, the Court specified that the order would be

re-instated when Mr. Al-Qiq’s health improved. In response, Mr. Al-Qiq rejected

the Israeli Court’s decision to suspend his detention without trial and has continued

his hunger strike.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

8 9

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

29/02/2016

UA

AUS 2/2016

Australia

Indigenous

peoples;

Allegations that the proposed Carmichael Coal Mine by Adani Mining in the

Galilee Basin, Queensland, would threaten the ancestral lands, sacred sites and

cultural identity of the Wangan and Jagalingou peoples. According to the

information received, the extensive coal extraction plant, waste rock dumps and

associated infrastructure would have significant negative impact on the land and

that the mines would allegedly require 12 billion litres of water per year, thus

affecting the Carmichael River and the sacred Doongmabulla Springs. The

Wangan and Jagalingou peoples’ relationship to their ancestral land and water is

central to their culture and self-identity. The environmental destruction caused by

the mine would permanently rupture their relationship with their ancestral land and

water, deny their ability to transfer spiritual ties to their children and destroy their

culture beyond repair. The Wangan and Jagalingou people have faced intense

governmental and corporate pressure in relation to development of the mine.

Concerns have been raised over the failure by the National Native Title Tribunal

and the State and Federal government to ensure the free and informed consent prior

of the aboriginal community, who have a pending Native Title land claim on the

area since 2004.

01/04/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

9 0

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

29/02/2016

JAL

MYS 1/2016

Malaysia

Adequate housing;

Business

enterprises;

Cultural Rights;

Environment;

Food; Health;

Indigenous

peoples;

Alleged human rights violations associated with the Don Sahong dam development

project of the lower Mekong River in the territory of Lao People’s Democratic

Republic, 2 kilometres from the Laos-Cambodia border. According to the

information received, the dam construction, operated by a Malaysian developer,

Mega First, is likely to adversely affect approximately 29.7 million people residing

both upstream and downstream from the Mekong dam in Lao PDR, Cambodia,

Thailand and Vietnam. Despite the anticipated risks, it is alleged that the project is

proceeding without adequate environmental and human rights impact assessment

and in the absence of meaningful consultation with the concerned population while

posing a considerable threat to the livelihoods of people living in the area,

particularly in relation to their right to an adequate standard of living, including the

rights to adequate food and housing, the right to the highest attainable standard of

physical and mental health, cultural rights, the rights to information and

participation, as well as the rights of indigenous peoples. A related communication

was sent to the Government of Lao People’s Democratic Republic on 16 February

2016, see above, case no. LAO 1/2016, as well as to Mega First Corporation

Berhad and the Mekong River Commission on 29 February 2016, see below, case

nos. OTH 12/2016 and 13/2016.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

9 1

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

29/02/2016

JAL

OTH 12/2016

Other

Adequate housing;

Business

enterprises;

Cultural Rights;

Environment;

Food; Health;

Indigenous

peoples;

Alleged human rights violations associated with the Don Sahong dam development

project of the lower Mekong River in the territory of Lao People’s Democratic

Republic, 2 kilometres from the Laos-Cambodia border. According to the

information received, the dam construction, operated by a Malaysian developer,

Mega First, is likely to adversely affect approximately 29.7 million people residing

both upstream and downstream from the Mekong dam in Lao PDR, Cambodia,

Thailand and Vietnam. Despite the anticipated risks, it is alleged that the project is

proceeding without adequate environmental and human rights impact assessment

and in the absence of meaningful consultation with the concerned population while

posing a considerable threat to the livelihoods of people living in the area,

particularly in relation to their right to an adequate standard of living, including the

rights to adequate food and housing, the right to the highest attainable standard of

physical and mental health, cultural rights, the rights to information and

participation, as well as the rights of indigenous peoples. Related communications

were sent to the Governments of Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Malaysia

on 16 and 29 February 2016, respectively, see above, case nos. LAO 1/2016 and

MYS 1/2016, as well as to Mekong River Commission, see below, case no. OTH

13/2016.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

9 2

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

29/02/2016

JAL

OTH 13/2016

Other

Adequate housing;

Business

enterprises;

Cultural Rights;

Environment;

Food; Health;

Indigenous

peoples;

Alleged human rights violations associated with the Don Sahong dam development

project of the lower Mekong River in the territory of Lao People’s Democratic

Republic, 2 kilometres from the Laos-Cambodia border. According to the

information received, the dam construction, operated by a Malaysian developer,

Mega First, is likely to adversely affect approximately 29.7 million people residing

both upstream and downstream from the Mekong dam in Lao PDR, Cambodia,

Thailand and Vietnam. Despite the anticipated risks, it is alleged that the project is

proceeding without adequate environmental and human rights impact assessment

and in the absence of meaningful consultation with the concerned population while

posing a considerable threat to the livelihoods of people living in the area,

particularly in relation to their right to an adequate standard of living, including the

rights to adequate food and housing, the right to the highest standard of physical

and mental health, cultural rights, the rights to information and participation, as

well as the rights of indigenous peoples. Related communications were sent to the

Governments of Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Malaysia on 16 and 29

February 2016, respectively, see above, case nos. LAO 1/2016 and MYS 1/2016,

as well as to Mega First Corporation Berhad, see above, case no. OTH 12/2016.

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

9 3

B. Replies received between 1 February and 30 April 2016 relating to communications sent before 1

December 2015

11. The table below lists, in chronological order, communications dating before 1 December 2015 to which a reply or an

additional reply has been received in the period between 1 February and 30 April 2016. Copies of the full text of the

communications sent and the reply received during the reporting period can be accessed from the electronic version of this report

available on the OHCHR website. Some names of individuals or other information have been rendered anonymous or otherwise

unidentifiable. Government replies to cases COL 2/2014, MEX 3/2014, and ISR 1/2015 were omitted in the previous report

A/HRC/31/79 due to technical problems and are now included

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

27/01/2014

JUA

COL 2/2014

Colombia

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful

assembly and of

association;

Human rights

defenders;

Internally

displaced

persons;

Summary

executions;

Presunto patrón de asesinatos, ataques, y amenazas de muerte y allanamientos,

perpetrados por grupos armados ilegales en contra de defensores de derechos humanos

trabajando en conexión con el proceso de restitución de tierras en el país. Según la

información recibida, los Sres. Hermes Enrique Vidal Osorio, Ever Cordero Oviedo y

Giraldo Antonio Padilla Ortega habrían sido asesinados y el Sr. Bruno Federico habría

sufrido un ataque y actos de intimidación. Se expresa seria preocupación por las

alegaciones recibidas indicando que las violaciones en su contra pudieran estar

relacionadas con su trabajo en conexión con el proceso de restitución de tierras.

04/01/2016

27/02/2014

AL

TJK 2/2014

Tajikistan

Independence of

judges and

lawyers;

Alleged threat to the independence of the legal profession. According to the information

received, the draft law of the Republic of Tajikistan on the Advocacy and the Bar would

establish a Qualification Commission which would operate under the Ministry of Justice

and be responsible for regulating the legal profession. Concerns have been expressed

that the draft law, if passed in its current form, would leave the legal profession

vulnerable to interference from the executive branch of Government.

19/04/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

9 4

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

22/04/2014

JUA

MEX 3/2014

México

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful

assembly and of

association;

Human rights

defenders;

Torture;

Presunta detención arbitraria y tortura de un defensor de derechos humanos. Según la

información recibida, Damián Gallardo habría sido arrestado el 18 de mayo de 2013,

habría sufrido actos de tortura en detención y habría sido forzado a firmar una confesión,

en la cual se habría auto-inculpado en la comisión de delitos por los cuales

posteriormente habría sido imputado. El 25 de mayo y 16 de junio de 2013, recibió una

sentencia penal por los delitos de “delincuencia organizada” y “secuestro de menores”,

respectivamente. L’apelación estaría en proceso. Se expresa seria preocupación por la

integridad física y psicóloga de Damián Gallardo, quien sigue en detención. El Sr.

Gallardo Martínez es integrante de la Asamblea Popular de los Pueblos de Oaxaca

(APPO) y trabaja por los derechos de los pueblos indígenas y la educación comunitaria

de las comunidades indígenas de la Región Mixe y Zapoteca de la Sierra de Oaxaca. El

Sr. Gallardo y APPO han sido objeto de comunicaciones anteriores enviadas el 29 de

agosto de 2006, el 30 de octubre de 2006, y el 8 de noviembre de 2006, vea

A/HRC/4/37/Add.1, párrafos 435-437; el 16 de enero de 2007, vea A/HRC/7/28/Add.1,

párrafos 1301-1302, 1316-1317; y el 25 de marzo de 2009, vea A/HRC/13/22/Add.1,

párrafos 1397-1402.

04/09/2014

07/12/2015

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

9 5

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

18/08/2014

JAL

MYS 5/2014

Malaysia

Environment;

Freedom of

peaceful

assembly and of

association;

Human rights

defenders;

Toxic waste;

Allegations of excessive use of force by the police against environmental and human

rights defenders, and local residents who were peacefully protesting against an

Australian private company. According to the information received, Lynas Corporation,

and its Lynas Advanced Materials Plant (LAMP) is a rare earth processing plant

currently being set up in Kuantan, Malaysia, that will potentially impose tons of toxic

waste on the local community. On 22 June 2014, around 1,000 environmental activists,

human rights defenders and local residents gathered to peacefully protest against the

Australian mining company, Lynas Corporation, at Jalan Bandaran in Gebeng, Malaysia.

Reportedly, after attempts to negotiate with the police, several protesters were beaten

and arrested. Two protesters were hospitalized and one sustained serious injuries to his

head. Fifteen Malaysian protesters were charged with, among others, unlawful assembly

and rioting: Wong Tack, leader of Himpunan Hijau Hijau, (Green Assembly), a

Malaysian environmentalist movement, and five of its members - Phua Kia Yeow, Ho

Kam Huat, Wong Chee Wai, Wong Chee Wen and Foong Poh Choo - and Chong Kong

Yeun, Raymond Ng Abdullah, Hew Kuan Yau, Thomas Wang, Ta Weng Seng, Rapar

Ahmad, Lee Khai Ming, Tan Chee Hooi and Zamri Zonal. Ms. Natalie Lowrey, an

Australian citizen, was also arrested and detained for six days, during which she was

denied access to basic necessities, including water, before being deported to Australia on

27 June 2014.

05/02/2016

01/10/2014

JUA

MYS 6/2014

Malaysia

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful

assembly and of

association;

Human rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers;

Allegations of criminalization of the lawful exercise of the right to freedom of opinion

and expression, through application of the Sedition Act of 1948. According to the

information received, at least 23 persons, including elected Members of Parliament,

political activists, human rights defenders, academics, lawyers, students and journalists,

have been charged, detained and sentenced under the Sedition Act of 1948 for

expressing opinions and disseminating information through different channels, including

the internet and traditional media. It is reported that the Sedition Act of 1948 has been

increasingly used in recent months to prevent and criminalize democratic speech,

including criticism against the Government, its leaders and ruling political parties, as

well as to prevent discussions on religion and ethnicity issues.

14/10/2014

15/03/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

9 6

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

23/12/2014

JAL

MYS 8/2014

Malaysia

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful

assembly and of

association;

Human rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers;

Allegations related to the Sedition Act of 1948 and restrictions to the right to freedom of

opinion and expression. According to the information received, on the basis of the

Sedition Act of 1948 (the Act), law enforcement institutions enjoy unfettered discretion

to arrest and charge individuals who are merely exercising their right to freedom of

opinion and expression, as set forth in article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human

Rights. Reportedly, the Prime Minister of Malaysia made a statement on 27 November

2014 expressing the Government’s intention not only to retain, but also to strengthen, the

Act. It is also reported that since Special Rapporteurs’ last communicated with the

Government on the issue, there have been new cases of persons detained and charged

under the Act for acts related to the legitimate exercise of their rights to freedom of

opinion and expression. This communication is sent in follow-up to the response

received from the Government of Malaysia to the press release issued on 8 October

2014, following the communication sent on 1 October 2014, see A/HRC/28/85, case no.

MYS 6/2014.

15/03/2016

16/01/2015

JUA

IRN 1/2015

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Arbitrary

detention;

Freedom of

expression;

Human rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Iran;

Torture;

Alleged arbitrary arrest and detention of an Iranian woman for a drawing she created

protesting the banning of vasectomies and family planning. According to the information

received, on 10 January 2015, Ms. Atena Farghdani, a graphic arts student, was

summoned to Branch 15 of the Revolutionary Court, where she was arrested and

subsequently beaten in front of her parents. Upon Ms. Farghdani’s protest, she was taken

to a court room, where she was insulted and beaten again, this time allegedly in front of

a judge. She was then taken to Varamin prison, where she is currently being held. She

has been accused of propaganda against the system; acts against national security; and

insulting Members of Parliament. These accusations reportedly stem from a drawing she

created, protesting the banning of vasectomies and family planning. Concern is

expressed at the arrest and detention of Ms. Farghdani, and the physical abuse which

occurred inside a courtroom in the presence of authorities.

16/03/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

9 7

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

11/02/2015

AL

TJK 1/2015

Tajikistan

Independence of

judges and

lawyers;

Alleged threat to the independence of the legal profession. According to the information

received, a draft law on Advocacy and the Bar has passed the Lower House of

Parliament in Tajikistan. The draft law establishes a Qualification Commission as the

body responsible for regulating entry into the legal profession, disbarment, and issuing

licenses to practice law. The draft law provides that the Qualification Commission would

operate under the purview of the Ministry of Justice, leaving lawyers vulnerable to

interference from the Executive Branch of Government. The draft law on Advocacy and

the Bar was the subject of a previous communication sent on 27 February 2014, see

A/HRC/26/21, case no. TJK 2/2014.

16/04/2015

19/04/2016

12/02/2015

JUA

IRN 3/2015

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Iran; Summary

executions;

Torture;

Alleged imminent risk of execution of a juvenile offender in the Islamic Republic of

Iran. According to the information received, Mr. Saman Naseem was sentenced to death

in April 2013 by a criminal Court in Mahabad for Moharebeh (“enmity against God”)

and Ifsad fil-Arz (“corruption on earth”) in relation to his alleged involvement in an

armed confrontation between Revolutionary Guards and the Party for Free Life of

Kurdistan (PJAK) in Sardasht in 2011. The Supreme Court reportedly upheld the

sentence in December 2013. The Oroumieh Central Prison, where Mr. Naseem is

currently being held, has reportedly received clearance from the Judiciary’s

implementation division to carry out his execution on 19 February 2015. Mr. Naseem’s

lawyer has allegedly been prevented from reviewing the case file for information about

the impending execution and pursuing the case. Grave concern is expressed at the

imminent execution of Mr. Naseem, who at the time of the alleged crime is believed to

have been less than 18 years old, which would render his execution a violation of

international human rights law. Mr. Naseem was the subject of a previous

communication sent on 14 October 2014, see A/HRC/28/85, case no. IRN 23/2014.

16/06/2015

04/03/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

9 8

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

13/02/2015

JAL

ESP 4/2015

Spain

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful

assembly and of

association;

Human rights

defenders;

Migrants;

Alegaciones relativas a las disposiciones del Proyecto de Ley Orgánica de Protección de

la Seguridad Ciudadana (PLOPSC), las cuales contradecirían normas y estándares

internacionales en materia de derechos humanos. Según las informaciones recibidas, el

11 de diciembre de 2014, se habría aprobado el PLOPSC en el Pleno del Congreso de los

Diputados y sería inminente su aprobación en ley por el Senado. El nuevo texto

mantendría e incorporaría en proyecto de ley una serie de supuestos y disposiciones que

limitarían de forma desproporcionada e innecesaria el ejercicio de los derechos a las

libertades de expresión, opinión y reunión pacífica y presupondrían la posibilidad de

realizar expulsiones “en caliente” en Melilla y Ceuta. El anteproyecto de Ley Orgánica

de Protección de la Seguridad Ciudadana fue objeto de dos comunicaciones previas, el 5

de febrero de 2015, ver arriba, caso no. ESP 1/2015, y el 30 de diciembre de 2013, ver

referencia no. A/HRC/26/21, caso no. ESP 7/2013.

03/03/2016

19/03/2015

04/05/2015

JAL

MAR 2/2015

Maroc

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful

assembly and of

association;

Human rights

defenders;

Allégations de diverses restrictions au droit de réunion pacifique et à la liberté

d’association d’une organisation de défense des droits de l’homme. Selon les

informations reçues, depuis le mois de juillet 2014, l’Association marocaine des droits

de l’homme (AMDH) fait l’objet de diverses restrictions quant à son droit de tenir des

réunions pacifiques pour la protection et promotion des droits de l’homme. Il est

également rapporté que l’administration a refusé de réceptionner des documents, ou de

délivrer à diverses sections de l’association le récépissé confirmant leur notification de la

composition d’un nouveau comité directeur ou de nouveaux statuts, tel que prévu par la

législation nationale.

28/08/2015

16/03/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

9 9

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

12/05/2015

JAL

IRN 4/2015

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Freedom of

peaceful

assembly and of

association;

Freedom of

religion; Iran;

Minority issues;

Alleged mass arrest and harassment of Ahwazi Arab minorities in Khuzestan Province.

According to the information received, on 14 March 2015, Mr. X, an Ahwazi Arab,

reportedly set himself on fire in response to repeated harassment from local authorities

regarding licensure of his produce stand. Mr. X reportedly later died as a result of

inadequate medical attention to his burns. In response, protests were held in several

Arab-majority cities. On 17 March 2015, about one thousand protestors were reportedly

detained in Ahwaz and released only after signing a pledge. Several protestors remain

incarcerated with criminal charges pending against them. Following Mr. X’s death, his

family has reportedly been harassed by authorities. From mid-March to April 2015, up to

one hundred Ahwazi Arabs, including activists and several minors, were arrested

without warrants by armed masked men following peaceful protests leading up to the

tenth anniversary of the 15 April 2005 Ahwazi uprising.

04/03/2016

19/05/2015

JUA

IRN 5/2015

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Arbitrary

detention;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful

assembly and of

association;

Health; Human

rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Iran;

Alleged arbitrary arrest, detention and unfair trial of a human rights defender. According

to the information received, on 5 May 2015, Ms. Narges Mohammadi, the Deputy

Director and Spokeswoman for the Centre for Human Rights Defenders (CHRD) and

founder of the civil society group “Step by step to stop the death penalty” (LEGAM),

was arrested at her home by intelligence ministry agents that stated that she was being

taken into custody in order to serve the remainder of her six-year prison sentence that

she received on 22 April 2012. She was provisionally released on 31 July 2012 for

medical reasons linked to the medical treatment she received in prison. Two days prior

to Ms. Mohammadi’s arrest, she appeared before Branch 15 of the Revolutionary Court

in Tehran for her first session of trial where she faces new charges, including

“propaganda against the state”, “assembly and collusion against the state” and

“establishing the anti-security and illegal Step by Step to Stop Death Penalty” group.

The defence team was unable to review the case file prior to the trial. Ms. Mohammadi

has been the subject of several previous communications sent on 23 June 2010, see

A/HRC/16/44/Add.1, paras. 1220 - 1225, 11 October 2011, see A/HRC/19/44, case no.

IRN 13/2011, and 27 March 2012, see A/HRC/21/49, case no. IRN 5/2012.

16/03/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 0

0 Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

02/06/2015

JUA

IRN 7/2015

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Disappearances;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Iran;

Summary

executions;

Torture;

Alleged imminent execution of two juvenile offenders after trials that did not meet due

process and fair trial guarantees. According to the information received, on 18 March

2015, Mr. Saman Naseem, whose death sentence was upheld by the Supreme Court in

December 2013 and who was scheduled for execution on 19 February 2015, was

transferred from Oroumieh prison to an unknown location. In March 2015, the

authorities informed Mr. Naseem’s lawyer that his execution had not been carried out. In

2009, in another case, Mr. Hamid Ahmadi was reportedly sentenced to death. However,

the Supreme Court overturned his sentence and sent the case back to the Appeals Court

for re-trial. In March 2010, the Appeals Court in Gilan Province re-sentenced Mr.

Ahmadi to death, a decision which was upheld by the Supreme Court in November 2010.

Mr. Ahmadi’s application for judicial review is currently pending before the Supreme

Court. Mr. Naseem was the subject of two previous communications dated 14 October

2014, see A/HRC/28/85, case no. IRN 23/2014, and 12 February 2015, see

A/HRC/29/50, case no. IRN 3/2015.

04/03/2016

04/06/2015

JUA

IRN 6/2015

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Arbitrary

detention;

Freedom of

expression;

Human rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Iran;

Torture;

Alleged arbitrary arrest and detention, prolonged solitary confinement and unfair trial of

an artist and two journalists. According to the information received, on 26 February

2015, Ms. Atena Farghadani, a graphic arts student who had been detained in Gharchak

prison since August 2014, was taken to hospital after suffering a heart attack. After

release from hospital, Ms. Farghadani was reportedly taken to Evin prison where she is

being held in solitary confinement. On 19 May 2015 her trial commenced on charges of,

inter alia, “spreading propaganda against the system”, and “insulting the Supreme

Leader”, and on 1 June 2015, she was reportedly sentenced to 12 years and nine months

in prison. It is reported that her lawyer was not allowed to review her case file. On 22

July 2014, Mr. Jason Rezaian, an American-Iranian journalist, was arrested together with

his wife, Ms. Yeganeh Salehi, also a journalist. Ms. Salehi was released on bail in

October 2014. In April 2015, Mr. Rezaian was formally charged with espionage. Mr.

Rezaian’s and Ms. Salehi’s trial started on 26 May 2015. During his detention, Mr.

Rezaian spent a number of months in solitary confinement, during which he was

interrogated repeatedly. Ms. Farghadani and Mr. Rezaian were the subject of two

previous communications sent on 6 August 2014, see A/HRC/28/85, case no. IRN

16/2014, and on 16 January 2015, see A/HRC/29/50, case no. IRN 1/2015.

04/03/2016

16/03/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 0

1

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

11/06/2015

JUA

KOR 2/2015

Republic of

Korea

Arbitrary

detention;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful

assembly and of

association;

Human rights

defenders;

Alleged excessive use of force against and detention of protestors and human rights

activists during peaceful protests commemorating the Sewol ferry accident and during

the Labour Day march. According to the information received, on 11 April 2015, Mr.

Hyun-sik Kim and Mr. Hyung-jae Ham, both members of the People’s Committee for

the Sewol Ferry tragedy, were arrested following their participation in a peaceful protest

that called for an independent investigation into the Sewol ferry accident. On 16 and 18

April 2015, protests were held in Seou to mark the one-year anniversary of the Sewol

ferry accident. The police reportedly used water cannons containing pepper spray and

tear gas to control the crowds and arrested 79 protestors, including Mr. Jang-hee Kwon

and Mr. Kwang-chul Kang. On 1 and 2 May 2015 at 3 p.m., the Korean Confederation

of Trade Unions organized a Labour Day March, which was joined by Sewol families

and members of the Coalition on the Sewol Ferry Disaster in solidarity with the workers.

It is reported that approximately forty people were arrested, including Mr. Gil-soo Ahn

and Mr. Gi-ho Lee. To date, Mr. Hyung-jae Ham, Mr. Hyun-sik Kim, Mr. Jang-hee

Kwon, Mr. Kwang-chul Kang, Mr. Gil-soo Ahn, and Mr. Gi-ho Lee remain in detention.

01/02/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 0

2 Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

24/06/2015

JUA

IRN 9/2015

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Freedom of

expression;

Health; Human

rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Iran;

Torture;

Allegations concerning the arrest, detention, ill-treatment and sentencing of a civil rights

activist and a journalist after unfair trials. According to the information received, on 21

October 2014, Ms. Atena Daemi was arrested and detained in Evin Prison. She was

reportedly held in solitary confinement for 58 days under degrading conditions, and

without access to a lawyer. While in detention, she was subjected to extensive

interrogations and ill-treatment. On 12 May 2015, Ms. Daemi was sentenced to 14 years

in prison by Branch 28 of the Revolutionary Court of Tehran for inter alia “spreading

propaganda against the system” and “insulting the founder of the Islamic Republic of

Iran” based on her criticism on social media of the high number of executions in Iran and

other peaceful activities. While in prison, Ms. Daemi has reportedly developed health

problems but the authorities have to this date refused to grant her medical leave. On 10

May 2014, Mr. Seraj Mirdamadi was arrested and detained in Evin prison. He was held

in solitary confinement for six months. On 27 July 2014, Mr. Mirdamadi was sentenced

to six years in prison by Branch 15 of the Tehran Revolutionary Court for “propaganda

against the state” and “conspiracy against national security. On 29 October 2014, the

Appeal Court reduced his sentence to three years in prison and a two-year travel ban.

Despite having had critical health issues, Mr. Mirdamadi did not receive adequate

medical treatment for five months before he finally underwent surgery on 28 May 2015.

16/03/2016

07/07/2015

JUA

SGP 1/2015

Singapore

Freedom of

expression;

Health; Human

rights

defenders;

Torture;

Allegations concerning the prosecution, detention and sentencing of two bloggers, of

which one minor, in relation to the legitimate and peaceful exercise of their right to

freedom of opinion and expression. According to the information received, Mr. Roy

Ngerng Yi Ling, a blogger and human rights defender writing on issues of government

transparency and accountability, was charged for defamation following a blog critical of

the Prime Minister. It is reported that he may be ordered to pay more than 250,000 USD

in damages. Mr. Ngerng also lost his job at a hospital as a consequence of his blogs

critical of the Government. On 6 July 2015, in another case, a 16-year-old blogger was

sentenced to four weeks in prison, after being held in custody for more than 50 days, in

relation to a cartoon and video criticizing public figures he had posted on his blog on the

internet. It is reported that the 16-year-old was detained in Changi Remand Centre and

the Institute for Mental Health under conditions that amount to torture, including under a

regime akin to solitary confinement.

23/12/2015

24/03/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 0

3

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

14/08/2015

AL

MUS 2/2015

Mauritius

Health;

Alleged retrogressive measures in Mauritius regarding long-term harm-reduced services

for people who use drugs. According to the information received, harm-reduction

services implemented since 2006 are being drastically reduced in terms of coverage and

accessibility, putting people who use drugs at unnecessary and avoidable risk of HIV and

blood-borne infections. Amendments include halting induction of new patients;

decreased hours of opioid substitution therapy (OST) distribution, new distribution

vehicles in front of police stations and mandatory provisions for non-governmental

organizations to disclose the identity of the programmes’ users. Measures have been

taken without consultation with expert stakeholders and have disregarded harm-

reduction services’ positive impact in decreasing HIV incidence, criminality rates and in

improving the physical and mental health of their users.

22/04/2016

18/08/2015

JAL

MYS 3/2015

Malaysia

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful

assembly and of

association;

Alleged violations of the rights to freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful

assembly in Malaysia, including the blocking of the website “Sarawak Report” and

harassment of its journalists, as well as the suspension of two other news outlets and

arrest of peaceful protestors. According to the information received, on 19 July 2015, the

Malaysian Communication and Multimedia Commission allegedly blocked the “Sarawak

Report”, an independent news blog, after it had reportedly published documents alleging

a financial scandal involving the Malaysian Prime Minister and the State-owned

development firm “1Malaysia Development Berhad”. On 4 August 2015, Malaysian

authorities issued an arrest warrant for Ms. Clare Rewcastle-Brown, a British journalist

who is the founder and editor of the Sarawak Report, pursuant to sections 124B and 124I

of the Penal Code and are now reportedly pressing for Ms. Rewcastle-Brown to be

placed on Aseanapol and Interpol Red Notice Wanted Lists. Concern is expressed at the

use of the Sedition Act of 1948 to arrest, detain and charge human rights activists, for

exercising their rights to freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful assembly in

Malaysia.

30/03/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 0

4 Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

25/08/2015

JUA

PER 3/2015

Peru

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful

assembly and of

association;

Human rights

defenders;

Summary

executions;

Presuntos actos de intimidación y amenazas de muerte contra una defensora de derechos

humanos, en relación con un proyecto minero. Según la información recibida, el 30 de

julio de 2015 un empleado de la empresa minera Yanacocha amenazó con “hacer

desaparecer” a la Sra. Máxima Acuña de Chaupe, defensora de derechos humanos,

miembro de la Asociación de Mujeres en Defensa de la Vida y de la Unión

Latinoamericana de Mujeres, y líder de un movimiento de oposición a un proyecto

minero en Sorochuco, Cajamarca. El 5 de agosto de 2015, un grupo de aproximadamente

30 policías y 50 comuneros se habría reunido en las inmediaciones de las tierras de la

Sra. Acuña de Chaupe a fin de intimidarla. La empresa minera Yanacocha habría situado

a varios empleados en el perímetro de sus tierras con el objeto de vigilar

permanentemente su domicilio. La defensora ha sido víctima de otros actos de

hostigamiento desde 2011, con el fin de intimidarla y desalojarla de sus tierras. La

empresa asegura que las tierras le pertenecen por un acuerdo de venta comunitario. La

Sra. Acuña de Chaupe fue objeto de una comunicación previa enviada el 20 de febrero

de 2014, véase A/HRC/26/21, caso no. PER 1/2014.

14/04/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 0

5

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

27/08/2015

JAL

PER 4/2015

Peru

Hazardous

substances and

wastes;

Indigenous

peoples;

Carta de seguimiento respecto a la aplicación de los acuerdos del Acta de Lima para la

reparación de las violaciones de los derechos humanos de los pueblos indígenas

afectados por la explotación petrolera del Lote 192 y al proceso de consulta llevado a

cabo para la nueva licitación en la zona. Según la información recibida, la ejecución por

parte del Gobierno del Perú de las medidas acordadas con las Federaciones indígenas

representantes de las comunidades indígenas del Lote 192, en el Departamento de

Loreto, para la reparación de las graves violaciones de derechos humanos, resultado de

44 años de explotación petrolera en los territorios indígenas, está siendo lenta, limitada y

no se han realizado las acciones previstas sobre los temas centrales de titulación de

tierras, estudios de salud y remediación ambiental de la grave situación en la zona. En

relación con el proceso de consulta a las comunidades afectadas acordado por el

Gobierno con las Federaciones indígenas, se alega que el Estado no ha tenido en cuenta

las propuestas presentadas por las comunidades de manera cabal y que dichas consultas

no se han realizado con la necesaria buena fe, por lo que es necesario establecer un

nuevo proceso de diálogo para superar el fracaso de las conversaciones anteriores antes

de la nueva e inminente licitación del Lote. La grave situación de contaminación y sus

impactos en los derechos humanos fundamentales de los pueblos indígenas en el área fue

motivo de dos comunicaciones anteriores, el 5 de diciembre de 2014, véase

A/HRC/29/50, caso no. PER 3/2014 y el 28 de mayo de 2015, véase A/HRC/30/27, caso

no. PER 1/2015.

26/10/2015

01/12/2015

07/12/2015

14/04/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 0

6 Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

25/09/2015

AL

DEU 1/2015

Germany

Freedom of

expression;

Alleged investigation in Germany of two journalists on charges of treason, following the

publication of classified Government documents. According to the information received,

on 25 February 2015 and 15 April 2015 respectively, the digital rights blog,

“Netzpolizik”, for which the two journalists, Mr. Markus Beckedahl and Mr. André

Meister, work, published two articles on the Government’s plans for internet

surveillance. On 13 May 2015, the Federal Office of Criminal Investigation initiated an

investigation into the actions of the journalists. However, it was not until 30 July 2015

that the journalists officially received notification of the investigation. In early August,

the Minister of Justice expressed his doubts regarding the merits of the case against the

journalists and, shortly thereafter, the Prosecutor General was suspended. It later

emerged that no state secrets had been revealed. On 10 August 2015, after a public

outcry, charges against the journalists were dropped. Concern is expressed the charges

brought against the journalists may have a significant “chilling effect” on other

journalists and whistleblowers who report on or provide critical information on sensitive

issues in Germany.

17/03/2016

16/10/2015

JAL

IRN 19/2015

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Iran; Summary

executions;

Violence against

women;

Allegations concerning the executions of juvenile offenders. According to the

information received, on 13 October 2015, Ms. Fatemeh Salbehi was executed in Shiraz.

In May 2010, Ms. Salbehi was sentenced to death for allegedly having killed her

husband in 2008, when Ms. Salbehi was seventeen years old. In September 2013, the

Supreme Court granted a request for a judicial review of her case based on a new

provision in Iran’s 2013 Penal Code. Her entire trial in 2014 lasted barely three hours

and her sentence was upheld. On 6 October 2015, Mr. Samad Zahabi was reportedly

executed in secret in Kermanshah’s Dizel Abad Prison. He was sentenced to death in

March 2013 for the killing of a fellow shepherd, which Mr. Zahabi claimed was in self-

defence. He was seventeen years old at the time of alleged killing. The Supreme Court

had reportedly earlier upheld his death sentence.

13/11/2015

16/03/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 0

7

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

23/10/2015

JAL

OTH 7/2015

Other

Adequate

housing;

Extreme

poverty; Haiti;

Health; Water

and Sanitation;

Letter sent in follow-up to the allegation letter transmitted to the United Nations

Secretary General on 25 September 2014 concerning the cholera outbreak in Haiti in

2010. The letter expresses concern about the inability of the victims of the cholera

outbreak to vindicate their rights and to obtain access to a remedy for the harms suffered

to date. The letter urges the United Nations to provide the victims with access to a

transparent, independent and impartial mechanism to review and decide on their claims

in order to ensure adequate reparation. The first letter transmitted on 25 September 2014

is included in A/HRC/28/85, see case no. HTI 3/2014.

25/02/2016

29/10/2015

JAL

IRN 16/2015

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Iran;

Summary

executions;

Torture;

Allegations concerning the execution of a Kurdish man on charges of moharebeh

(enmity against God) in Iran. On 26 August 2015, Mr. Behrouz Alkhani, a 30-year-old

Kurdish man, was executed while awaiting the outcome of a Supreme Court appeal. He

had reportedly been held in solitary confinement without access to a lawyer for over a

year prior to his execution. Mr. Alkhani was arrested in January 2010 in West

Azerbaijan and, in 2011, convicted and sentenced to death on charges of “effective

collaboration with PJAK” (Party of Free Life of Kurdistan) and “enmity against God

(moharebeh) for his alleged role in the assassination of the Prosecutor of Khoy, in the

West Azerbaijan province. Following his execution, authorities have reportedly refused

to return his body to his family for burial.

26/04/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 0

8 Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

29/10/2015

JUA

IRN 20/2015

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Cultural Rights;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful

assembly and of

association;

Health; Human

rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Iran;

Torture;

Violence against

women;

Alleged arbitrary detention, sentencing to flogging and subjecting human rights activists

to a virginity test. According to the information received, Ms. Fatemeh Ekhtesari was

sentenced to over 11 years in prison for her collection of poetry. Mr. Mehdi Moosavi

was sentenced to six years in prison for his poetry. Ms. Atena Farghadani was sentenced

to over twelve years for a cartoon. All three were also charged with “illegitimate sexual

relationship short of adultery” for shaking hands with a non-relative of the opposite sex.

Ms. Ekhtesari and Mr. Moosavi were sentenced to ninety-nine lashes. Ms. Farghadani

has not been sentenced but has already been subjected to forced virginity and pregnancy

testing. Ms. Narges Mohammadi, a prominent Iranian rearrested 5 May 2015, has been

subjected to harassment and deprived of necessary medical care. Ms Farghadani and Ms

Mohammadi have been the subjects of seven previous communications, the most recent

of which was sent 4 June 2015, see above, case no. IRN 6/2015.

04/03/2016

16/03/2016

30/10/2015

JAL

BHR 6/2015

Bahrain

Cultural Rights;

Extreme

poverty;

Freedom of

religion;

Alleged patterns of continuous discrimination against Shia citizens, including through

cultural, economic, educational and social government policies in Bahrain since 2011.

According to the information received, peaceful protestors and other Shia citizens have

experienced excessive use of force during and after the protests of 2011, with Shia

religious clergy being particularly targeted. Government violence has also led to the

destruction of many Shia mosques and sites of religious and cultural significance and of

other signs of Shia presence in the country. The official historical narrative which

systematically undermines the role of Baharna and Shia religious and cultural heritage in

the country is also promoted in the official school curricula and media. Shia citizens

allegedly also experience discrimination in access to citizenship, public sector

employment and government social policies, particularly housing and welfare programs,

making them more vulnerable to poverty. Various aspects of this situation, including the

destruction of two mosques and withdrawal of citizenship, have already been raised in

previous communications sent on 5 may 2011, see A/HRC/18/51, case no. BHR 8/2011,

and on 29 November 2012, see A/HRC/23/51, case no. BHR 12/2012.

25/12/2015

01/02/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 0

9

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

30/10/2015

JAL

SGP 2/2015

Singapore

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful

assembly and of

association;

Human rights

defenders;

Alleged charges brought against a human rights defender and blogger for organizing a

peaceful assembly. According to the information received, on 27 September 2014, Ms.

Han Hui Hui organized a peaceful protest in Hong Lim Park to raise awareness about

problems with Singapore’s Central Provident Fund. On 10 October 2014, Ms. Hui was

questioned for eight hours in relation to this protest. On 27 October 2014, she was

charged, along with five other protestors, with creating a public nuisance and organizing

a demonstration without approval. Her next court date is scheduled for 24 February

2016.

24/12/2015

24/03/2016

02/11/2015

JAL

TUN 2/2015

Tunisie

Arbitrary

detention;

Health;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers;

Torture;

Allégations d’abus physiques, d’examen médical dégradant, de procédure judiciaire

irrégulière, et de condamnation pénale d’un homme de 22 ans apparemment fondée

uniquement sur son orientation sexuelle perçue. Selon les informations reçues, le 6

septembre 2015, M. X a été arrêté par la police et interrogé sur la mort violente d’un

autre homme. Les policiers ont accusé M. X d’avoir eu des relations homosexuelles avec

l’homme décédé, puis ils l’ont physiquement et verbalement abusé pendant

l’interrogatoire. Sous cette contrainte, M. X a confirmé avoir eu une relation

homosexuelle avec la personne décédée. Il a par la suite été soumis à un examen médical

dégradant et humiliant mené sans son consentement éclairé. Le 22 septembre 2015, Mr.

X a été condamné à un an d’emprisonnement pour violation de l’article 230 du code

pénal tunisien qui criminalise la sodomie. La procédure judiciaire dont M. X a fait

l’objet a été menée sans qu’il puisse bénéficier d’un avocat.

09/02/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 1

0 Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

05/11/2015

JAL

RUS 7/2015

Russian

Federation

Freedom of

expression;

Human rights

defenders;

Migrants;

Retrospective charging and trial of a human rights defender. According to the

information received, since 2011, Ms. Tatiana Kotlyar has allowed migrants and asylum

seekers to register her home as their place of residence free of charge in order to enable

them to apply for citizenship in the Russian Federation. On 2 January 2014, amendments

were made to Articles 322.2 and 322.3 of the Criminal Code, criminalizing the false

registration of migrants. Ms. Kotlyar had previously spoken out in opposition to

proposals of such amendments. On 11 March 2014, a criminal case was opened against

Ms. Kotlyar alleging she violated the amended articles. On 30 April 2014, a psychiatric

examination of Ms. Kotlyar was ordered by the investigating officer in her case. This

was subsequently annulled, before the opening of a second criminal case against Ms.

Kotlyar, again in relation to registration of migrants. The trial of Ms. Kotlyar began at

the Magistrates Court of Obninsk City on 2 October 2015. The next hearing is scheduled

for 6 November 2015.

08/02/2016

11/11/2015

JAL

HND 3/2015

Honduras

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful

assembly and of

association;

Human rights

defenders;

Summary

executions;

Alegaciones de muertes violentas y ataques contra defensores y defensoras de derechos

de las personas lesbianas, gays, bisexuales, trans e intersexuales (LGBTI). Según la

información recibida, el 23 de junio de 2015, el periodista y defensor de derechos de las

personas LGBTI, Juan Carlos Cruz Andara, habría sido víctima de una muerte violenta

en Puerto Cortés. El 25 de junio de 2015, la defensora de derechos LGBTI y miembro de

la Asociación Arcoiris, Sra. Angy Ferreira, habría sido encontrada muerta a unas cuadras

de la oficina de Arcoiris. El 23 de agosto 2015, la defensora transgénero de derechos

LGBTI Sra. Violeta Rivas habría aparecido muerta de forma violenta en El Carrisal,

Tegucigalpa. El 11 de octubre de 2015, el abogado de derechos humanos y defensor de

la comunidad LGBTI, Sr. Francisco Mencía, fue atacado y dejado por muerto cerca de

su casa en Tegucigalpa. El Sr. Mencía ha colaborado con la Asociación por una Vida

Mejor (APUVIMEH), la cual ha sido objeto de tres comunicaciones anteriores enviadas

al Gobierno de su Excelencia con fecha de 29 de agosto de 2013, véase A/HRC/25/74,

caso HND 5/2013; el 20 de enero de 2014, véase A/HRC/26/21, caso HND 1/2014; y el

9 de diciembre de 2014, véase A/HRC/29/50, caso HND 8/2014.

01/02/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 1

1

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

11/11/2015

JUA

IRN 21/2015

Iran (Islamic

Republic of)

Freedom of

religion;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers; Iran;

Summary

executions;

Torture;

Alleged imminent executions of two men who were under the age of 18 at the time of

the alleged offences and of one political activist in Iran, following repeated torture

during detention and the extraction of confessions under torture and after trials that did

not comply with due process and fair trial guarantees. According to the information

received, Mr. Mohammad Ali Zehi is currently imprisoned in Adelabad Prison, where he

is to be executed for his alleged involvement in drug trafficking for activities that

occurred when he was under the age of 18. Mr. Milad Azimi was convicted for allegedly

causing death by stabbing in a fight that the court has acknowledged occurred when he

was 17 years old. Mr. Shahram Ahmadi was convicted of “waging war against God”

through “links to Salafi groups” and “propaganda against the system, through

participating in ideological and political classes and possessing, selling, and buying

books and CDs of speeches related to Sunni beliefs.” He is being held in Raja’i Shahr

Prison. All three men are at risk of imminent execution.

18/04/2016

23/11/2015

JUA

BHR 7/2015

Bahrain

Independence of

judges and

lawyers;

Summary

executions;

Torture;

Allegations of torture and imminent execution of two individuals in Bahrain following

unfair trials and confessions extracted under torture. According to information received,

Mr. Mohamad Ramadan and Mr. Husain Ali Moosa were arrested in early 2014 and

subjected to torture. They were forced to confess under duress and later recanted their

confessions. On 29 December 2014, a Bahraini criminal court sentenced them to death

for their alleged involvement in a bomb explosion in Al Dair, which resulted in the

killing of a police officer. The defense claims that the death penalty was imposed

without evidence of guilt of the defendants, and in disregard of abundant evidence of ill-

treatment, torture, and politically motivated charges. On 16 November 2015, Bahrain’s

Court of Cassation rejected the final appeal brought on behalf of the defendants and the

sentences were subsequently sent to His Majesty the King for final approval. Mr.

Mohamad Ramadan was the subject of a previous communication sent on 14 August

2014, see A/HRC/28/85, case no. BHR 11/2014.

23/02/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 1

2 Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

25/11/2015

JAL

GTM 4/2015

Guatemala

Business

enterprises;

Environment;

Food;

Hazardous

substances and

wastes; Human

rights

defenders;

Summary

executions;

Water and

Sanitation;

Presuntas violaciones de varios derechos humanos de al menos 12.000 personas que

viven en 14 comunidades en el departamento de El Petén, Guatemala, debido a la

contaminación del río La Pasión además de alegaciones de restricciones en el trabajo de

defensores de derechos humanos denunciando esta situación. Según la información

recibida, desde abril de 2015 se ha encontrado una gran cantidad de peces muertos

flotando en el río. Se alega que la muerte de peces en el río La Pasión está relacionada

con la presencia de altos niveles de un pesticida organofosforado llamado "malatión". La

contaminación del río fue responsabilidad de REPSA, una empresa de aceite de palma

que tiene una plantación y una planta de procesamiento ubicada cerca de los afluentes de

dicho río. Se alega además que el río La Pasión es una fuente hídrica esencial para el

sustento de aproximadamente 12.000 personas del municipio de Sayaxché. Igualmente,

se ha constatado que miembros de las comunidades utilizan el agua del río para lavar

ropa, pesca cocinar, beber, bañarse y para la agricultura de subsistencia.

14/03/2016

30/11/2015

JUA

MEX 13/2015

México

Arbitrary

detention;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

peaceful

assembly and of

association;

Human rights

defenders;

Alegaciones de detención arbitraria y malos tratos a cuatro defensores de los derechos

humanos. Según las informaciones recibidas, el 28 y 29 de octubre de 2015, los Sres.

Juan Carlos Orozco Matus, Othón Nazareiga Segura, Efraín Picaso Pérez y Roberto Abel

Jiménez García, fueron detenidos en diferentes lugares en el Estado de Oaxaca, en

relación con manifestaciones pacíficas en contra de la reforma educativa, que tuvieron

lugar entre julio de 2014 y junio de 2015. Los defensores fueron llevados a la Ciudad de

México para ser presentados ante la Procuraduría General de la República y

posteriormente fueron trasladados a la prisión de Altiplano en Almoloya de Huárez,

Estado de México, donde siguen privados de libertad. Los cuatro defensores se enfrentan

a acusaciones de robo agravado, disturbios, daños a la propiedad y crímenes en contra de

la riqueza nacional. Se alega que todos ellos habrían sido objetos de golpes y malos

tratos al momento de su arresto.

01/04/2016

A /H

R C

/3 2

/5 3

1 1

3

Date

Type

Case No

Country Mandate(s) Summary of the allegation transmitted Reply

30/11/2015

JUA

SAU 10/2015

Saudi Arabia

Cultural Rights;

Freedom of

expression;

Freedom of

religion;

Human rights

defenders;

Independence of

judges and

lawyers;

Summary

executions;

Torture;

Allegations concerning the imposition of the death sentence following an unfair trial

against a poet of Palestinian origin in Saudi Arabia. According to the information

received, on 25 May 2014, Mr. Ashraf Fayadh was sentenced to four years imprisonment

and 800 lashes for allegedly having committed apostasy. The prosecution appealed the

verdict and, on 17 November 2015, the General Court of Abha sentenced Mr. Fayadh to

death under the same charge. Mr. Fayadh, who had no legal representation during the

judicial proceedings, was given 30 days to appeal the sentence. He remains in detention.

04/03/2016

114

Appendix

Mandates of special procedures

Mandate title

Human Rights

Council

resolution

Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context

25/17

Working Group of Experts on people of African descent 27/25

Independent Expert on the enjoyment of human rights of persons with albinism 28/6

Working Group on Arbitrary Detention 24/7

Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus 23/15

Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia 24/29

Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Central African Republic 24/34

Independent Expert on capacity-building and technical cooperation with Côte d’Ivoire 26/32

Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights 28/9

Independent expert on the promotion of a democratic and equitable international order 27/9

Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

25/25

Special Rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities 26/20

Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Eritrea 23/21

Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances 27/1

Independent expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights

25/16

Special Rapporteur on the right to education 26/17

Independent Expert on the issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment

28/11

Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights 26/3

Special Rapporteur on the right to food 22/9

Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression

25/2

Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association 24/5

Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief 31/16

115

Mandate title

Human Rights

Council

resolution

Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Haiti PRST 25/1

Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health

26/21

Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders 25/18

Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers 26/7

Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples 24/9

Special Rapporteur on the human rights of internally displaced persons 23/8

Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran 25/24

Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Mali 25/36

Working Group on the use of mercenaries 24/13

Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants 26/19

Special Rapporteur on minority issues 25/5

Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar 25/26

Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons 24/20

Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967

5/1

Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy 28/16

Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation & guarantees of non- recurrence

27/3

Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance

25/32

Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography 25/6

Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery 24/3

Independent Expert on human rights and international solidarity 26/6

Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in the Sudan 24/28

Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia 24/30

Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions 26/12

Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic S-18/1

Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism

31/3

116

Mandate title

Human Rights

Council

resolution

Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment

25/13

Special Rapporteur on the implications for human rights of the environmentally sound management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes

27/23

Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and children 26/8

Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises

26/22

Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of the unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights

27/21

Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences 23/25

Working Group on the issue of discrimination against women in law and in practice 23/7

Special Rapporteur on the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation 24/18