32/7 Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Estonia
Document Type: Final Report
Date: 2016 Apr
Session: 32nd Regular Session (2016 Jun)
Agenda Item: Item6: Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Council Thirty-second session
Agenda item 6
Universal periodic review
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review*
Estonia
* The annex is being circulated in the language of submission only.
Contents
Page
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3
I. Summary of the proceedings of the review process ......................................................................... 3
A. Presentation by the State under review .................................................................................... 3
B. Interactive dialogue and responses by the State under review ................................................. 5
II. Conclusions and/or recommendations .............................................................................................. 15
Annex
Composition of the delegation ......................................................................................................... 27
Introduction
1. The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, established in accordance
with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1, held its twenty-fourth session from 18 to 29
January 2016. The review of Estonia was held at the 4th meeting on 19 January 2016. The
delegation of Estonia was headed by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Marina Kaljurand. At
its 10th meeting held on 22 January 2016, the Working Group adopted the report on
Estonia.
2. On 12 January 2016, the Human Rights Council selected the following group of
rapporteurs (troika) to facilitate the review of Estonia: Burundi, Qatar and United Kingdom
of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
3. In accordance with paragraph 15 of the annex to Human Rights Council
resolution 5/1 and paragraph 5 of the annex to Council resolution 16/21, the following
documents were issued for the review of Estonia:
(a) A national report submitted/written presentation made in accordance with
paragraph 15 (a) (A/HRC/WG.6/24/EST/1);
(b) A compilation prepared by the Office of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in accordance with paragraph 15 (b)
(A/HRC/WG.6/24/EST/2);
(c) A summary prepared by OHCHR in accordance with paragraph 15 (c)
(A/HRC/WG.6/24/EST/3).
4. A list of questions prepared in advance by Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany,
Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom was transmitted
to Estonia through the troika. These questions are available on the extranet of the universal
periodic review.
I. Summary of the proceedings of the review process
A. Presentation by the State under review
5. The delegation stated that the expansion of the space for human rights, democracy,
rule of law and advancement of international law remained one of the priorities of the
country’s foreign policy. Estonia was a party to the core international human rights
conventions and the majority of regional human rights treaties, and regularly submitted its
reports on their implementation.
6. Estonia remained committed to protecting and promoting human rights and
fundamental freedoms at the national and international level. It had issued a standing
invitation to the special procedure mandate holders of the Human Rights Council to visit
the country. Estonia would continue paying special attention to ensure the involvement and
participation of civil society in the work of the Council.
7. The delegation reported on the active participation of Estonia in the work of the
Human Rights Council during its membership of 2013–2015. The rights of women and
children, consideration of the gender perspective in conflict situations, the fight against
impunity, protection of the rights of indigenous peoples, freedom of expression, including
on the Internet, and non-discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and
intersex persons were the focus of the work of Estonia during its membership of the
Council.
8. Estonia considered the universal periodic review as an effective tool to promote
human rights and to exchange best practices. Since its first review in 2011, Estonia had
undertaken a coordinated effort to implement the recommendations and voluntary
commitments. Estonia had implemented an overwhelming majority of the accepted
recommendations, and a few of them remained in the process of implementation.
9. During the reporting period, Estonia engaged in continual cooperation with human
rights bodies of the United Nations. It received several visits of the special rapporteurs of
the Human Rights Council and submitted periodic reports to the Committee on the
Elimination of Racial Discrimination, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination
against Women, the Committee on the Rights of the Child, the Committee against Torture
and the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, as well as its common core
document in 2015. In addition, the Government maintained continuing dialogue and
consultations with representatives of civil society on human rights issues.
10. The delegation expressed its gratitude to all States that had submitted advance
questions. It continued its statement in order to provide a response to those questions. The
protection of the rights of persons belonging to national minorities remained a priority of
the Government. The Estonian population comprised over 190 nationalities, and minorities
constituted approximately 31 percent of the population. Estonia had been implementing its
national integration programmes since 2000. The new programme for the period
2014-2020, which had been developed by taking into account new developments in society,
assessments of regular monitoring and the opinions of representatives of national minorities
and experts had set three main objectives, including the provision of continuing support to
long-term residents belonging to national minorities to integrate them into society. The
Ministry of Culture, along with several other ministries, had been responsible for the
realization of the national integration policy, encompassing different areas of life. The
integration monitoring survey carried out in 2014 and 2015 indicated positive results of the
integration efforts.
11. The delegation reported on the launch of a new Russian-language public television
channel, targeting a Russian-speaking audience and aimed at providing objective
information on daily life in Estonia and helping with the integration of the
Russian-speaking population in the society. Furthermore, the provision of free courses on
the Estonian language was envisaged in the integration strategy to enhance the command of
the state language among minorities.
12. One of the priorities of the Government was to reduce the number of persons with
undetermined citizenship. The amendments to the Citizenship Act were aimed at
simplifying naturalization requirements and targeted especially the children of parents with
undetermined citizenship, beneficiaries of international protection and older persons. The
number of persons with undetermined citizenship had decreased due to the continual efforts
of the Government.
13. Estonia complied with European Union legislation related to the regulations and
requirements concerning determination of refugee status, as well as the provision of legal
guarantees for them. In that respect, the 2016 legal amendments would further incorporate
European Union legislation.
14. Estonia took steps to improve the living conditions of asylum seekers. In 2014, an
accommodation centre for asylum seekers had been moved to a new location, which was
closer to public services, including education institutions, the labour market and health-care
services, than the previous one. Estonia took measures to ensure that the children of newly
arrived migrants, refugees or asylum seekers received adequate education. The Estonian
language immersion programme had proven effective; the children of refugees who had
started school in autumn 2015 already had a good command of Estonian.
15. Estonia took steps to promote tolerance and cultural diversity. Incitement to hatred,
violence or discrimination was criminalized. Further improvement of the Criminal Code
was envisaged. Additionally, Estonia had been continually tackling those issues through
education. The general education programme for the period 2016–2019 included specific
activities on human rights. Estonia had also joined the “No hate speech” initiative of the
Council of Europe.
16. The delegation expressed the commitment of Estonia to promoting gender equality.
The empowerment of women and their equal rights remained one of the priorities of
development cooperation of Estonia. The Government had adopted the second action plan
for the period 2015-2019 on the implementation of Security Council resolution 1325 (2000)
on women, peace and security to improve the situation of women in conflict areas.
17. Estonia was in the process of preparing its first action plan on equality policies,
including gender equality, for the period 2016–2023 in order to promote the equal
participation of women in decision-making at all levels. A set of activities in various areas
was envisaged to reduce the pay gap. The Government had taken special measures to
address gender stereotypes as a root cause of gender inequality in general, and the gender
pay gap in particular. For example, in 2013 an awareness-raising campaign had been
carried out to tackle gender stereotypes. The Gender Equality Act provided legal guarantees
for equal treatment of men and women in vocational education and professional training
opportunities. The Government paid special attention to ensuring equal employment
opportunities for men and women in institutions of higher education. The mandate of the
labour inspectorate was broadened to include scrutinizing the implementation of the legal
requirement of equal pay.
18. Combating domestic violence, violence against women and trafficking in persons
remained a priority. Thus, the Government continued to implement, inter alia,
awareness-raising campaigns and provide training and seminars for the police, prosecutors
and judges.
19. The Registered Partnership Act, which had entered into force in January 2016,
legalized same-sex partnership. The adoption of relevant acts for its implementation was
planned for 2016.
20. The Ombudsman for Children had been established in 2011, and its duties were
assigned to the Chancellor of Justice. Estonia had initiated a process of establishing an
independent monitoring mechanism to implement the provisions of the Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities, right after becoming a party to the Convention. Estonia
had taken measures to reform the social welfare framework for persons with disabilities and
other vulnerable groups.
21. The establishment of a national human rights institution remained under
consideration by the Government. No new institution might be established, given several
objective factors. The Chancellor of Justice, which was an independent institution with a
mandate to receive complains and oversee the application of international human rights
norms in Estonia, had been covering most of the functions of such an institution in
compliance with the principles relating to the status of national institutions for the
promotion and protection of human rights (the “Paris Principles”).
B. Interactive dialogue and responses by the State under review
22. During the interactive dialogue, 73 delegations made statements. Recommendations
made during the dialogue are to be found in section II of the present report.
23. The Dominican Republic noted the efforts of Estonia to adhere to the Convention on
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and promote the rights of women and gender
equality, in particular an action plan on reducing the pay gap. It highlighted efforts to
improve prison conditions and made recommendations.
24. Ecuador underscored the creation of institutions such as the Ombudsman for
Children and the Gender Equality Council. Equal treatment of minorities remained a
challenge. Ecuador expressed concern over the situation of persons with “undetermined
citizenship”. It made recommendations.
25. Egypt commended the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the
involvement of children in armed conflict, the creation of the Ombudsman for Children and
efforts to combat trafficking in human beings. Egypt expressed concern about xenophobic
and racist discourse in media and politics, the situation of Roma and racially motivated hate
crimes, including against asylum seekers in Vao village. It made recommendations.
26. Finland noted with appreciation steps taken by Estonia to ensure the rights of
children and welcomed a national strategy for Roma integration. It encouraged Estonia to
adopt legislative measures and policies to provide protection against discrimination based
on sexual orientation and gender identity. Finland made recommendations.
27. Morocco noted the legislative reforms regarding the rights to social security and
adequate standards of living, and progress made in combating trafficking in persons. It
noted with appreciation the endeavours of Estonia to protect the rights of children and
measures taken to promote gender equality in education. Morocco made recommendations.
28. Georgia commended Estonia for becoming a party to several international
conventions, its efforts in ensuring gender equality, the creation of the Ombudsman for
Children and adoption of a child protection act. It encouraged Estonia to continue the
practice of submitting midterm reports on the follow-up to the review. Georgia made
recommendations.
29. Germany welcomed several steps taken to implement reforms to which Estonia had
committed itself under the universal periodic review of 2011, while noting that some
challenges remained. It made recommendations.
30. Ghana noted with appreciation steps taken by Estonia to establish a national human
rights institute in accordance with the Paris Principles. It made recommendations.
31. Hungary welcomed the amendment to the Penal Code that included the definition of
torture used in the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment. It asked Estonia about further measures foreseen to effectively
prevent trafficking in human beings. Hungary made recommendations.
32. Iceland commended Estonia for its efforts to better integrate ethnic and linguistic
minorities. It encouraged the Government to accelerate its efforts to ensure a coherent
framework for protection of persons belonging to the Russian-speaking linguistic minority.
Iceland made recommendations.
33. Indonesia commended Estonia for the establishment of the Ombudsman for Children
and the Gender Equality and Equal Treatment Commissioner, and for improvements to
legislation in various fields, including education and trafficking in human beings. Indonesia
made recommendations.
34. The Islamic Republic of Iran called on the Government to prepare a national strategy
for the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. It
expressed concern regarding discrimination against ethnic and religious minorities, and
detainees. The Islamic Republic of Iran made recommendations.
35. Iraq acknowledged the accession of Estonia to various international human rights
instruments and the important role that Estonia played during its membership of the Human
Rights Council. Iraq made recommendations.
36. Ireland urged Estonia to implement fully the Registered Partnership Act and to
consider ratifying the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms
of Discrimination against Women. It welcomed amendments to the Citizenship Act easing
some requirements for naturalization. However, Ireland shared the concern of the
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights regarding language barriers facing the
Russian-speaking minority. It made recommendations.
37. Italy welcomed the creation of the Ombudsman for Children, the Gender Equality
Council and an independent monitoring mechanism of the Committee on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities. Italy found the introduction of “I-voting” a very interesting tool
to ensure the realization of rights not only offline but also online. Italy made
recommendations.
38. Latvia noted positively the active involvement of Estonia in the work of the Human
Rights Council. As a strong advocate of the universal ratification of the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court, Latvia welcomed the leadership of Estonia in raising
awareness of that issue in the Council. It made recommendations.
39. Libya noted positive developments since the first review of Estonia, including the
standing invitation to the special procedure mandate holders of the Council and the
adoption of the 2014 strategy on integration and social cohesion aimed at the effective
participation of minority groups in society. Libya made recommendations.
40. Lithuania commended Estonia for the establishment of the Ombudsman for Children
and the Gender Equality Council, the adoption of the Child Protection Act and the signing
of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against
Women and Domestic Violence. Lithuania made recommendations.
41. China noted the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities and other instruments, the development of an action plan to prevent violence,
the adoption of a law on the protection of children and the strengthening of efforts to
combat trafficking in human beings. China made recommendations.
42. Mexico welcomed the establishment of the Ombudsman for Children and the
Gender Equality Council. It commended Estonia for efforts to ensure the implementation of
the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Mexico made recommendations.
43. Montenegro welcomed the adoption of the Registered Partnership Act and the new
Child Protection Act. It noted that Estonia had approved an action plan to reduce the gender
pay gap and asked the delegation to elaborate more on the results achieved. Montenegro
made recommendations.
44. France commended the adoption of the Registered Partnership Act, which was a step
forward in ensuring the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons.
45. Namibia congratulated Estonia on the establishment of the Ombudsman for Children
and the Gender Equality Council. It noted the welfare development plan for the period
2016–2023. Namibia encouraged Estonia to continue taking measures to implement an
action plan to reduce the gender pay gap. It made recommendations.
46. The Netherlands commended Estonia for adopting the Registered Partnership Act,
which granted legal protection to families regardless of their composition. It also noted the
active role played by Estonia in the field of freedom of the media and the Internet. The
Netherlands made recommendations.
47. The delegation stated that Estonia had been facing challenges related to an influx of
migrants. In that context, the Government continued its efforts to tackle racism and
xenophobia in society. Some public figures, including the President and the Chancellor of
Justice, had taken a strong stance in the public discussion against hate speech and other
forms of expression of racism and xenophobia. Due to public discussions, as well as the
judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Delfi v. Estonia, the acknowledgement
by the media of its role and responsibilities in addressing the issue had been strengthened.
48. The Minister of Justice had held discussions and consultations with law enforcement
authorities to address hate-motivated offences effectively. The Government worked
constantly to improve the education system in order to tackle the manifestations of racism
and xenophobia and build a human rights culture in the society.
49. Furthermore, the fight against racism and xenophobia and the integration of
migrants remained at the centre of several policies, programmes and action plans. A special
programme on migrants envisaged the provision of support to migrants to settle in the
country. The new strategy on integration and social cohesion, entitled “Integrating Estonia
2020”, addressed integration as a complex process, with an emphasis on preservation of
ethnic identity and the cultures of minority groups and guarantees for their equal
opportunity to participate in public life.
50. Incitement to hatred, violence or discrimination on various grounds was prohibited
and punishable by law. The Minister of Justice had been drafting legal amendments to
further improve the legislation on hate and racist crimes, including by incorporating racist
and hate motives as aggravating circumstances. The 2015 amendments to the Criminal
Code already envisaged punishment for organizations encouraging racial discrimination or
violence.
51. In response to questions on prison conditions, the delegation reported that the living
conditions of detainees had gradually improved owing to newly built or renovated detention
facilities. The minimum requirement for living space was met at the new prisons of Viru
and Tartu. The building of new premises of the Tallinn prison and detention centre had
commenced. None of the old type of prison would remain by 2019, and thus all prisons
would have been modernized to meet living condition standards.
52. Legal amendments prohibited overcrowding in prisons and stipulated the maximum
number of prisoners each prison was permitted to accommodate. Several offences had been
decriminalized and conditions for release on parole and probation had been made more
flexible in 2015. Thus, the prison population was slowly decreasing due to targeted
measures taken by the Government. Furthermore, the Government was carrying out a
reform of the juvenile justice system to reduce the number of minors in the criminal justice
system, which was already small, and ensure juveniles access to education.
53. The 2012 amendments to the Criminal Code had criminalized all elements of the
specific crime of human trafficking in accordance with international law. In 2013, the Act
on Victims Support had been supplemented with new provisions concerning victims of
human trafficking and child victims of sexual abuse. The 2015 amendments to the Criminal
Code stipulated more severe punishment for cases of domestic violence than those
involving other form of violence. In 2015, Estonia had ratified the Council of Europe
Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings. In 2014, it had signed the
Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and
Domestic Violence.
54. Domestic violence, violence against women and trafficking in human beings
remained a priority issue of the Government. A strategy for preventing violence for the
period 2015-2020 put an emphasis on raising public awareness about those issues. Several
training sessions and workshops for various sectors of society and professional groups,
including law enforcement agencies and judges, had been organized. By utilizing new
communication and information technology, various projects had been carried out to
combat trafficking in human beings.
55. Women victims of violence had been provided with State-funded shelters, covering
the entire territory of Estonia and providing psychological, social and legal counselling.
56. The new development goals of Estonia were aimed at advancing the welfare and
quality of life of children and their families. Among other measures, Estonia afforded
generous parental benefits for the first 18 months of parental leave. However, that
opportunity had mostly been used by women. Men comprised less than 10 per cent of
parents who had applied for the parental leave, indicating that societal attitudes towards
traditional gender roles prevailed. Nevertheless, the Government had and would continue to
take measures to promote gender equality.
57. The new Child Protection Act had introduced a major reform in child protection by
putting the interests of the child even further in the forefront and positioning the child as an
equal member of society. The delegation reaffirmed the commitment of Estonia to ending
corporal punishment and promoting positive parenting methods of child upbringing.
58. Estonia submitted its initial report to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities in 2015. The Gender Equality and Equal Treatment Commissioner would be
officially designated to fulfil the duties of the independent monitoring mechanism under the
Convention. The Government had been working to ensure equal access by persons with
disabilities to the labour market and the provision of community-based social services to
promote independent living among persons with disabilities. The 2016 Social Welfare Act
would also assist in that work.
59. Nicaragua emphasized the progress achieved by Estonia in the areas of social
equality, the rights of women and labour rights. It welcomed the adoption of the strategy on
integration and social cohesion. Nicaragua made recommendations.
60. Norway noted the remaining challenges in relation to non-Estonian residents,
especially with regard to their socioeconomic conditions. It noted with appreciation
improvements in the availability of Russian-language broadcasting, amendments to the
Citizenship Act that addressed some of the problems of persons without citizenship, and the
adoption of the Registered Partnership Act. Norway made recommendations.
61. Oman stated that it had closely reviewed the national report of Estonia. It made
recommendations.
62. Pakistan commended Estonia for its legislation strengthening the protection of
human rights and its ratification of international human rights instruments. Pakistan
appreciated the special care development plan, the social integration strategy, inclusive
education and the Roma integration strategy. It made recommendations.
63. Panama commended the measures adopted by Estonia to combat all forms of
discrimination, trafficking in persons and violence against women. It was alarmed over
growing attacks and racist and xenophobic incidents directed at specific groups of the
population. Panama made recommendations.
64. The Philippines noted with appreciation the ratification of several international and
regional human rights treaties, including the Convention on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities and its Optional Protocol. It welcomed the abolition of the death penalty and
acknowledged policies and programmes of Estonia to combat trafficking in persons. The
Philippines made recommendations.
65. Poland acknowledged the efforts of Estonia to comply with the recommendations
accepted during the first review. Poland particularly appreciated the measures taken to
develop the institutional and legal framework for the protection of national minorities.
Poland made recommendations.
66. Portugal welcomed the fact that, since its first review, Estonia had become party to
the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol.
Portugal commended that Estonia consider establishing a national institution for the
protection of human rights. Portugal made recommendations.
67. The Republic of Korea welcomed the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities, the establishment of the position of the Ombudsman for Children
and the Gender Equality Council and the enactment of a new Child Protection Act in 2014.
It made recommendations.
68. The Republic of Moldova noted the achievements of Estonia in ensuring freedom of
expression, equality and the rights of women, children and minorities. It welcomed the
amendments to the Criminal Code to bring the definition of torture into compliance with
the Convention against Torture and encouraged Estonia to make declarations under articles
21 and 22 of that convention. The Republic of Moldova made a recommendation.
69. Romania welcomed the policy of trying to achieve the right balance in guaranteeing
the rights of members of minority groups to use their language, on one the hand, and
ensuring universal knowledge of the state official language, on the other. It made
recommendations.
70. The Russian Federation was concerned about systematic violations of the rights of
the non-titular population to use and be educated in their language and to work, and about
discrimination against non-citizens regarding their political and economic rights. It made
recommendations.
71. Serbia encouraged Estonia to continue strengthening the independent human rights
institutions and consult widely with civil society with regard to improving the Equal
Treatment Act. It made recommendations.
72. Singapore welcomed measures to combat domestic violence and violence against
women and underscored the importance of the implementation of initiatives such as paid
paternity leave and an action plan to reduce the gender pay gap. Singapore made
recommendations.
73. Slovakia commended Estonia for strengthening the legal and institutional framework
on human rights and welcomed the adoption of acts on citizenship and child protection. It
noted efforts to improve the protection of vulnerable groups and the integration of asylum
seekers, and promote the quality of life of older persons. Slovakia made recommendations.
74. Slovenia commended initiatives concerning the right to participate in public and
political life, the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
and its Optional Protocol and the simplification of naturalization requirements for several
categories of people. It noted that the strict language requirements for employment in the
public and private sectors could put ethnic minorities at a disadvantage. Slovenia made
recommendations.
75. Spain highlighted the adoption of the Registered Partnership Act and the
amendments made to the Citizenship Act, which had simplified many aspects of
naturalization procedures for non-citizens. Spain made recommendations.
76. Sweden welcomed efforts to decrease the number of detainees in prisons and
detention centres. New and modern prisons had been constructed. However, there was still
room for improvement with regard to the conditions under which prisoners were held.
Sweden made a recommendation.
77. Tajikistan welcomed efforts taken by Estonia to ensure the rights of children and
older persons. It made recommendations.
78. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia encouraged Estonia to intensify its
efforts with regard to combating domestic violence and violence against women, including
the adoption of amendments to the Penal Code to establish those acts as specific criminal
offences. It requested information on the process of establishing a national human rights
institution. It made a recommendation.
79. Turkey noted the amendments to the Citizenship Act that facilitated the acquisition
of Estonian citizenship by stateless persons. It was concerned, however, about a growing
tendency towards manifestations of racism, xenophobia and Islamophobia in Estonian
society. Turkey made recommendations.
80. Ukraine commended the reform of the Penal Code, the adoption of the new strategy
on integration, the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
and its Optional Protocol, and the special care development plan. It praised the positive
attitude of Estonia towards the social and cultural needs of national minorities, including
the Ukrainian community. Ukraine encouraged Estonia to continue its efforts to become
party to the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced
Disappearance, among others.
81. The United Arab Emirates praised the establishment of the Gender Equality Council
and measures to address the gender pay gap and promote gender equality in education. It
expressed concern, however, about reports of religious and racial discrimination and
Islamophobia. It made recommendations.
82. The United Kingdom welcomed progress made in implementing its
recommendations to Estonia during the first review, including the ratification of the
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and legal recognition of same-sex
partners. It encouraged the full implementation of the strategy on integration. It made
recommendations.
83. The delegation stated that the 2015 amendments to the Constitution had lowered the
minimum age for voting in local elections to 16 years. The Government was considering
granting prisoners the right to participate in elections.
84. The use of electronic voting systems had reached 30 per cent during the 2015
elections. The “I-voting” system had been continually monitored and improved to ensure
privacy and confidentiality. The confidentiality of personal data was protected by several
security measures. Legal remedies were in place in the event of a breach of confidentiality
in personal data management.
85. The delegation recalled that Estonia was one of the most active advocates of
cybersecurity and that Estonia had launched a number of key initiatives related thereto.
Estonia utilized technological solutions to protect personal data within the state information
system. Over 150 inspections had been carried out by data protection inspectors in 2015 as
a part of their mandate to oversee that data protection regulations were met. Additionally,
the Government had conducted an in-depth analysis of existing legislation and its
implementation in practice in order to improve further the level of protection of personal
data in telecommunication. Estonia envisaged introducing a more effective distinction
between different approaches and situations in which retained data might be used,
narrowing the scope and laying down more tailor-made provisions for different areas,
including criminal proceedings and national security.
86. The Constitution entitled everyone, including prisoners, to the right to judicial
review in cases of human rights violations. In that regard, several improvements had been
made to the work of the judiciary. The average duration of court proceedings had been
reduced in the previous three years. Members of the judiciary received training on the case
law of the European Court of Human Rights. The 2015 amendments to the State Liability
Act stipulated the provision of compensation for lengthy criminal procedures. Estonia had
started to draft legal amendments to ensure compensation for delays in civil and
administrative procedures.
87. In response to questions regarding the teaching of minority languages, the delegation
stated that State-funded schools provided education in different languages in addition to the
state official languages. Education in Russian was available in public and private schools at
all levels. According to the legislation, if there were at least 10 people of the same
nationality residing in a local municipality, they were entitled to education in their mother
tongue.
88. While in primary education the school chose the language of instruction, in upper
secondary education at least 60 per cent of the curriculum should be completed in Estonian.
The purpose of that requirement was to facilitate enhancement of knowledge of Estonian
among all members of the population and to ensure access by members of minority groups
to higher education and the labour market, as well as effective integration in society. The
transition to 60 per cent of teaching in the education system being in Estonian had been
carried out gradually between 2007 and 2014.
89. State exams and self-assessments by schools indicated that academic achievement
had not been diminished as a result of that change and knowledge of Estonian had
improved. Six of the fifteen highest-ranking schools were schools with education in
Russian. Additionally, half of the schools using Russian had joined the language immersion
programme, ensuring that students of those schools would have a good command of
Estonian, Russian and English. The programme had also been proven effective for the
children of migrants and refugees.
90. Estonia also provided support to adults to learn Estonian by reimbursing the cost of
language courses for those who successfully passed language tests. The State provided free
language courses for employees in the public sector, long-term residents and newly arrived
migrants. As for the requirements for language proficiency in certain positions, the
delegation emphasized that the requirements had been put in place to ensure the provision
of public services and information in Estonian. The language requirement was also in
accordance with the particular nature of the work. For example, the required proficiency for
doctors or pharmacists was higher than for service staff.
91. The delegation confirmed that the punitive role of the Estonian language
inspectorate had considerably decreased. The requirement to impose fines had been
eliminated for several categories in January 2015. Insufficient command of the state
language was no longer an administrative offence. Language inspectors should allow a
realistic amount of time to enhance the language skills of an employee. Inspectors had
demonstrated more flexibility and had often provided practical solutions in specific cases to
ensure that services were provided in Estonian.
92. The new integration strategy focused on socioeconomic, educational, cultural and
political integration. Integration was seen as a two-way process, influencing the society as a
whole. The cultural advisory council of national minorities had been established in 2008
with the objective of presenting the interests of minority groups in decision-making. The
Council promoted the cultural life and activities of national minorities and participated in
implementing integration policy.
93. In 2015, the Minister of Culture had established the National Roma Integration
Council, which involved different ministries and local governments, representatives of
Roma organizations and experts. The aim of the Council was to encourage and facilitate
dialogue, promote cooperation and provide an opportunity to hold discussions related to
questions on the integration of the Roma.
94. Unemployment rates among Estonians and non-Estonians had decreased in recent
years. Discrepancies in unemployment rates between Estonian and ethnic minorities had
also decreased in 2015. The Government paid special attention to the development of
Ida-Virumaa, where the Russian-speaking minority comprised the majority of the
population. The Estonian regional development strategy and the Ida-Viru county action
plan for the period 2015-2020 foresaw measures to improve living conditions, strengthen
civil society and promote economic and employment opportunities.
95. The United States of America urged Estonia to take further steps to counter
prejudice and discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex
persons, migrants, asylum seekers, refugees and members of ethnic and religious
minorities. It commended Estonia for its continued efforts to promote a tolerant and
integrated society. The United States made recommendations.
96. Uruguay emphasized the accession by Estonia to the Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol, and the Optional Protocol to the
Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. It
took note of the efforts made by Estonia to establish a national human rights institution in
accordance with the Paris Principles. Uruguay made recommendations.
97. Uzbekistan noted with satisfaction efforts taken to strengthen the legal and
institutional framework for the protection and promotion of human rights. It noted concerns
expressed about cases of discrimination against minorities, migrants and refugees, hate
speech and gender discrimination. Uzbekistan made recommendations.
98. Afghanistan acknowledged the reform of the Penal Code and all measures taken to
combat all forms of violence. It noted with appreciation the general education programme
for the period 2016–2019 that included human rights education. Afghanistan made a
recommendation.
99. Albania commended the Government for the welfare development plan for the
period 2016-2023 and for adopting a new development plan to prevent violence. It
encouraged Estonia to make further improvements in human rights. Albania made
recommendations.
100. Algeria welcomed the positive steps taken by Estonia to improve the human rights
situation since its first review. It noted with satisfaction the ratification of the Convention
on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, as had been recommended by Algeria and many
other delegations in the previous review. Algeria made recommendations.
101. Argentina noted with satisfaction the efforts taken by the Government concerning
education and congratulated Estonia for incorporating human rights in primary education
curricula. It stated that challenges persisted, especially in relation to minority groups.
Argentina made recommendations.
102. Armenia highlighted the new project to enhance communication and mutual
understanding between young people and was pleased that the new strategy on integration
and social cohesion addressed issues of integration. Armenia made recommendations.
103. Australia commended Estonia for implementing reforms to which it had committed
during the review in 2011, including the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol, and the Optional Protocol to the
Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. It
commended the adoption of the Co-habitation Act, which extended the rights of married
couples to unmarried persons, including same-sex couples. Australia made
recommendations.
104. Azerbaijan noted that some United Nations treaty bodies had expressed concern
about problems related to discrimination, xenophobia and racist attitudes, as well as torture,
ill-treatment and excessive use of force. Azerbaijan made recommendations.
105. Bahrain applauded the efforts made by Estonia in implementing recommendations
of its first review. However, it remained concerned that there was no amendment to the
Criminal Code prohibiting racist organizations and the dissemination of ideas that promote
racial supremacy and racial hatred. Bahrain made recommendations.
106. Belarus noted measures taken to improve the situation of minorities. It noted
discrimination in education and employment owing to restrictive measures taken to
promote the state language. It called on Estonia to eliminate those restrictions. Belarus
noted stigmatization of minorities and hate speech by politicians. It made
recommendations.
107. Belgium offered congratulations on the adoption of an action plan to implement
Security Council resolution 1325 (2000) and the ratification of the Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the
Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Nevertheless,
Belgium underscored efforts still to be made in the area of combating all forms of
discrimination and racism. Belgium made recommendations.
108. Botswana applauded efforts by Estonia in the fight against impunity and
commended the ratification of the Kampala Amendments to the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court, and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of
the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. It remained concerned,
however, about reports of continued stigmatization of certain national minority groups. It
made recommendations.
109. Brazil was concerned about incidents of possible disrespect of the principle of
non-refoulement; the electronic communications act, which set the conditions for service
providers to provide data to government agencies; and amendments to the Citizenship Law
that might not cover children between 15 and 18 years of age. It urged Estonia to ratify the
two conventions on statelessness. Brazil made recommendations.
110. Bulgaria noted that since the first review in 2011 Estonia had become party to
several international human rights instruments, without making any reservations. It
appreciated the creation of the position of the Ombudsman for Children and the
establishment of the Gender Equality Council. Bulgaria made recommendations.
111. Burundi noted with satisfaction various measures taken by Estonia to protect gender
equality. It commended the adoption of the Child Protection Act and the establishment of
the Ombudsman for Children. It noted with appreciation different measures taken to
improve the human rights of older persons. Burundi made a recommendation.
112. Canada commended Estonia for the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities. It encouraged the full implementation of the Registered
Partnership Act. It noted the passage of amendments to the Citizenship Act that granted
citizenship to children 15 years old and younger born to stateless parents and simplified
language requirements for older persons. Canada made recommendations.
113. Chile underscored efforts by Estonia to reinforce its legal and institutional
framework and adopt national human rights programmes such as a national plan to prevent
violence against women, the Child Protection Act and amendments to the Penal Code to
address trafficking in persons. Chile made recommendations.
114. Malaysia noted the adoption of the Child Protection Act and a plan for the period
2015-2010 on preventing violence, and the creation of the Ombudsman for Children. It
noted that its recommendations of the first review had been accepted by Estonia. Malaysia
made recommendations.
115. Costa Rica highlighted the incorporation of human rights education in the
curriculum and appreciated efforts to improve legislation to combat torture. It expressed
concern at the persistence of gender violence and sexual abuses, as well as the continuing
gender pay gap. Costa Rica made recommendations.
116. Croatia commended the adoption of the new Child Protection Act and further
strengthening of protection of the rights of the child. It was pleased that Estonia had
fulfilled its commitment to enact a new law explicitly prohibiting corporal punishment.
Croatia made recommendations.
117. Cuba highlighted the efforts made by Estonia in improving its gender equality
indicators and the rights of women. It noted that several United Nations treaty bodies, and
regional and non-governmental organizations, had expressed their concerns over continuing
economic inequality, high unemployment rates and discrimination in employment affecting
ethnic minorities. Cuba made recommendations.
118. The Czech Republic made recommendations.
119. Djibouti applauded the efforts of Estonia to implement recommendations from the
first review. It was pleased with the decision to incorporate human rights in the school
curriculum. It called upon Estonia to redouble its efforts to promote and protect human
rights. Djibouti made recommendations.
120. In conclusion, the delegation expressed its gratitude to all States that had contributed
to the discussion during the interactive dialogue. All comments and recommendations
would be given due consideration by the Government, and recommendations accepted by
Estonia would be thoroughly implemented. The follow-up to the review would become an
essential part of the work of national institutions involved in the protection of human rights.
121. The delegation reaffirmed the commitment of Estonia to continue promoting and
protecting human rights and stated that the universal periodic review mechanism remained
a useful part of that work. As part of the follow-up to the review, Estonia would continue its
efforts to become a party to the remaining international human rights instruments, including
the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced
Disappearance, the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence
against Women and Domestic Violence and the Convention against Discrimination in
Education. Estonia would adopt and implement a development and action plan in the areas
of employment, social protection, inclusion, gender equality and equal opportunities for the
period 2016–2023.
II. Conclusions and/or recommendations**
122. The recommendations formulated during the interactive dialogue and listed
below have been examined by Estonia and enjoy the support of Estonia:
122.1 Sign and ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (Turkey);
** The conclusions and recommendations have not been edited.
122.2 Step up its efforts to ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention
on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (the former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia);
122.3 Ratify the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons
from Enforced Disappearance (Argentina);
122.4 Sign and ratify the International Convention for the Protection of All
Persons from Enforced Disappearance (Oman);
122.5 Take necessary steps to ratify the International Convention for the
Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (Slovakia);
122.6 Consider ratifying the International Convention for the Protection of
All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (Uruguay);
122.7 Ratify the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons
from Enforced Disappearance and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on
the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (Portugal);
122.8 Consider ratifying the International Convention for the Protection of
All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, the Optional Protocol to the
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
and the Convention against Discrimination in Education (Ghana);
122.9 Ratify the Convention against Discrimination in Education
(Uzbekistan);
122.10 Consider ratifying the Convention against Discrimination in
Education (Republic of Korea);
122.11 Accept and ratify the Convention against Discrimination in
Education (Afghanistan);
122.12 Prioritize the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on
Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence
and of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms
of Discrimination against Women (Italy);
122.13 Ratify the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and
Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Montenegro);
122.14 Complete the ratification process of the Council of Europe’s
“Istanbul Convention” (Turkey);
122.15 Establish a national human rights institution (Iraq) (Algeria);
122.16 Establish a national human rights institution compliant with the
Paris Principles (Hungary);
122.17 Establish a national human rights institution in full compliance with
the Paris Principles (Australia);
122.18 Establish a national institution for protection of human rights in
conformity with the Paris Principles (Burundi);
122.19 Establish a national human rights institution in conformity with the
Paris Principles (Djibouti);
122.20 Establish a national human rights institution in accordance with the
Paris Principles (Pakistan) (Poland) (Azerbaijan);
122.21 Establish a national institution for the protection of human rights in
accordance with the Paris Principles (Bulgaria) (Portugal);
122.22 Establish or designate a national human rights institution compliant
with the Paris Principles (Namibia);
122.23 Establish a national human rights institution (Oman);
122.24 Continue consideration of the establishment of a national human
rights institution compliant with the Paris Principles (Georgia);
122.25 Consider establishing a national human rights institution in
compliance with the Paris Principles (Republic of Korea);
122.26 Continue its efforts to establish a national human rights institution, in
line with the Paris Principles and with the full participation of civil society
(Indonesia);
122.27 Continue efforts to create a national human rights institution
(Libya);
122.28 Establish as soon as possible a national human rights institution in
accordance with the Paris Principles (Egypt);
122.29 Expedite establishment of a national human rights institution in
accordance with Paris Principles (Latvia);
122.30 Expedite the process of establishing an independent and effective
national human rights institution with a broad human rights mandate, in
accordance with the Paris Principles (Ireland);
122.31 Take concrete steps towards the establishment of a national human
rights institution in accordance with the Paris Principles (Malaysia);
122.32 Ensure that the Ombudsman enjoys full autonomy in accordance
with the Paris Principle (Nicaragua);
122.33 Spare no efforts for the necessary establishment of a national human
rights institution (Dominican Republic);
122.34 Accelerate the creation of a completely independent and sufficiently
funded body with the capacity to defend human rights in Estonia, such as a
national human rights institution (Costa Rica);
122.35 Further raise public awareness about the content of the new
legislation and profile of the Ombudsman, in cooperation with NGOs, and in
the education system raise awareness of children’s rights, especially in cases of
abuse and children’s participation in civil and criminal proceedings
(Lithuania);
122.36 Provide the Gender Equality Commissioner with sufficient resources
to enable the institution to fulfil its mandate effectively and independently
(Namibia);
122.37 Ensure the functioning of the Gender Equality and Equal Treatment
Commissioner by providing sufficient resources for this institution (France);
122.38 Create an independent mechanism in charge of monitoring the
implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
(France);
122.39 Continue conducting policy programmes to support the effective
implementation of the new Child Protection Act, in particular focusing on
prevention and early intervention in cases of child abuse and domestic violence
(Finland);
122.40 Continue reinforcing its efforts to protect children’s rights (Georgia);
122.41 Continue to adopt measures in order to ensure the protection of the
rights of the child (Romania);
122.42 Continue to implement Child Protection Act (Pakistan);
122.43 Adopt and fully implement the Welfare and Development Plan
2016-2023, in accordance with the commitment set out in paragraph 143 of its
national report (Panama);
122.44 Engage civil society in the follow-up implementation process of the
universal periodic review recommendations (Poland);
122.45 Improve the submission of reports to the treaty bodies and
strengthen its capacity-building in this sphere (China);
122.46 Continue to adopt measures in order to ensure the creation of a
comprehensive anti-discrimination framework (Romania);
122.47 Allocate necessary resources to strengthen gender equality (Bahrain);
122.48 Operationalize/enforce legal mechanisms on ensuring gender equality
(Tajikistan);
122.49 Continue efforts made towards the promotion of a culture of gender
equality in society through awareness-raising campaigns (Morocco);
122.50 Address the gender pay gap for work of equal value (Egypt);
122.51 Take further measures aimed at achieving equal remuneration for
men and women for the same work (Oman);
122.52 Provide more opportunities to women in the labour market (Oman);
122.53 Take measures, while fully respecting freedom of expression, to
curtail stereotyping of minorities, particularly the Muslim community in the
society (Iran (Islamic Republic of));
122.54 Adopt measures to restrict the use of stereotypes towards minorities
in the media and to promote the use of minority languages in the mass media
and the press (Cuba);
122.55 Take necessary measures against discrimination based on ethnic and
religious origin and language in employment and prosecute such cases (Iran
(Islamic Republic of));
122.56 Condemn discrimination based on ethnic origin and language in
employment and take active measures to prosecute such cases (Slovenia);
122.57 Step up efforts to tackle the socioeconomic gap and discrimination on
the basis of ethnic origin, race or language, especially with regard to education
and employment (Republic of Korea);
122.58 Prosecute cases of discrimination based on ethnic origin and language
in employment (Iceland);
122.59 Promote equal opportunities for ethnic and national minorities, in
particular in the area of education, vocational training and employment
(Uzbekistan);
122.60 Combat discrimination on account of nationality, ethnic or religious
affiliation, and sexual orientation or gender identity (United States of
America);
122.61 Continue efforts on the legislative front to combat incitement to
hatred, violence and racial discrimination on the grounds of nationality,
ethnicity, language, colour, religion or any other grounds, and address different
existing challenges and concerns in this regard (Libya);
122.62 Continue legislative efforts to combat public incitement to racial
discrimination and particularly against persons speaking other languages
(Mexico);
122.63 Deepen awareness measures against racial discrimination and
xenophobia, particularly by criminalizing behaviors such as incitement to
hatred (Argentina);
122.64 Strengthen laws prohibiting religious and racial discrimination and
criminalizing hate speech and incitement to religious and racial hatred (United
Arab Emirates);
122.65 Take concrete measures to curb incitement to hatred, violence and
discrimination through the enactment of legislation, as well as policies and
programmes that promote tolerance and intercultural, interracial and
interreligious understanding (Malaysia);
122.66 Develop effective measures to eradicate racism and xenophobia,
including hate speech (Botswana);
122.67 Prevent and combat xenophobic statements and acts targeting
migrants, asylum seekers and refugees (Azerbaijan);
122.68 Strengthen the Penal Code as an effective instrument in combating
hate speech (Norway);
122.69 Classify hate speech with racist content and incitement to hatred as
crimes punishable under criminal law (Russian Federation);
122.70 Enact laws and take appropriate measures in order to criminalize
hate speech (Oman);
122.71 Pursue “hate speech” offences more vigorously by not only
condemning violations but also investigating, prosecuting and punishing
violators in a consistent manner (Germany);
122.72 Amend the Criminal Code so that it explicitly provides sanctions
against organizations propagating racist ideas as well as hate speech (Belgium);
122.73 Implement their “Diversity Enriches” programme to promote
inclusion, tolerance and integration of people from different backgrounds,
nationalities, religions, genders and sexual orientations (United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Northern Ireland);
122.74 Launch a debate on issues concerning ethnic and cultural diversity
aiming at promoting tolerance towards divergent cultural, religious and sexual
orientations within the Estonian society (Germany);
122.75 Take further steps to promote tolerance, cultural diversity and
integration in the country and internationally (Armenia);
122.76 Establish measures to promote tolerance of ethnic and religious
diversity in society (United States of America);
122.77 Develop and implement public awareness campaigns and education
programmes to promote diversity and inclusion, while combating racism and
xenophobia (Canada);
122.78 Reform its education and training programmes, including those for
the media and security officials, so that these programmes contribute more to
the promotion of tolerance among nationalities and ethnic and religious groups
(Belgium);
122.79 Revise its legislation and legal practice to ensure that sexual
orientation and gender identity as motivation for criminal offence are treated
as aggravating circumstances (Finland);
122.80 Develop and adopt legislation that would recognize explicitly hatred
on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity as a motive and make it
an aggravated circumstance in a crime (Bulgaria);
122.81 Develop and adopt legislation that would explicitly recognize hatred
on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity as a motive and make it
an aggravated circumstance in a crime (Slovenia);
122.82 Thoroughly investigate and prosecute all acts of violence against
ethnic and racial minorities and vulnerable groups, including lesbian, gay,
bisexual, transgender and intersex persons, and enact legislation on hate crimes
based on sexual orientation or gender identity (Canada);
122.83 Amend the Penal Code to include a definition of torture in
conformity with the Convention against Torture and conduct independent and
prompt investigation of all claims of torture and ill-treatment (Egypt);
122.84 Investigate all allegations of torture, ill-treatment and excessive use of
force by law enforcement officials and bring those responsible to justice
(Azerbaijan);
122.85 Strengthen the Criminal Code and structures established to fight
against violence and discrimination against women, in particular the Office of
the Gender Equality and Equal Treatment Commissioner (Belgium);
122.86 Combat more vigorously the phenomenon of domestic violence, in
particular violence against children, including by the introduction of a coherent
and clear legislative framework prohibiting corporal punishment (Hungary);
122.87 Continue its good efforts to address violence against women and
domestic violence, in particular through the ratification of the Council of
Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women
and Domestic Violence (Latvia);
122.88 Continue to prioritize efforts to prevent and tackle violence against
women, and work with relevant stakeholders to strengthen the national victim
support system (Singapore);
122.89 Undertake the necessary legislative measures to criminalize domestic
violence (Panama);
122.90 Strengthen prevention efforts, including through legislative measures
aimed against domestic violence and ensure that all professionals working with
victims of domestic violence receive regular and comprehensive training (Czech
Republic);
122.91 Increase efforts to prevent and sanction gender violence and sexual
abuse (Costa Rica);
122.92 Reinforce mechanisms to detect and investigate cases of domestic
violence, train law enforcement officials to deal with such cases and fully
implement the provisions of the National Plan for Preventing Violence for the
period 2015–2020 (Republic of Moldova);
122.93 Adequate financing of the new gender equality institution, promotion
of its role through public awareness campaigns, and improvement in data
collection on gender equality, domestic violence and violence against women
and children (Lithuania);
122.94 Further promote large-scale awareness raising campaigns to prevent
and combat violence against women and domestic violence (Italy);
122.95 Continue public information campaigns to combat domestic violence,
and above all violence against women (Mexico);
122.96 Take necessary measures to prevent possible cases of corporal
punishment against children in the home and in all other settings (Mexico);
122.97 Continue with efforts to prevent violence against children at schools
and other institutions where children are present, to ensure that children are
aware of their right to be protected from all forms of violence and of the
assistance provided if they are victims of violence (Croatia);
122.98 Reinforce measures to combat human trafficking (Azerbaijan);
122.99 Fight against trafficking in human beings (Djibouti);
122.100 Take further measures to prevent human trafficking, strengthen the
protection of victims and provide them with redress (Serbia);
122.101 Take effective measures to prevent and investigate cases of human
trafficking for forced prostitution and forced labor (Russian Federation);
122.102 Increase efforts to investigate, prosecute and convict trafficking
offenders under article 133 of the Penal Code (United States of America);
122.103 Take further measures to prevent trafficking in persons in
investigating and prosecuting offenders and provide effective support and
redress to victims, as well as step up efforts to raise awareness about human
trafficking (United Arab Emirates);
122.104 Make efforts taken in the field of measures to improve access to
justice (Iraq);
122.105 Ensure that all persons detained by the police are fully informed of
their fundamental rights from the very outset of their deprivation of liberty
(Islamic Republic of Iran);
122.106 Continue the efforts to reduce overcrowding and take action to
improve the general conditions in prisons and detention centres (Sweden);
122.107 Continue working to improve detention conditions and to address the
problem of overcrowding in prisons (Georgia);
122.108 Redouble its efforts to develop the Welfare Development Plan
2016-2023, with particular emphasis on the protection and promotion of the
rights of older persons (Singapore);
122.109 Promote access to education, especially for minorities (Dominican
Republic);
122.110 Continue to work on programmes to motivate and promote education
for young people (Nicaragua);
122.111 Combat school dropouts and increase the number of students who
finish secondary education (Bahrain);
122.112 Adopt measures targeted to remedy school dropouts (Djibouti);
122.113 Introduce programmes and projects within the concept of human
rights education on the prevention of genocide, war crimes and crimes against
humanity (Armenia);
122.114 Promote the realization of the right of everyone to take part in
cultural life, including by ensuring the facilitation of access to cultural goods,
particularly for disadvantaged and marginalized individuals and groups
(Albania);
122.115 Increase the number of measures for persons with disabilities to
obtain appropriate jobs (Bahrain);
122.116 Prepare, in consultation with persons with disabilities, a national
strategy for the promotion and protection of rights of persons with disabilities,
in line with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and
strengthen measures protecting persons with disabilities against discrimination,
including through strengthening the Equal Treatment Act in this regard (Czech
Republic);
122.117 Continue efforts in combating discrimination against persons
belonging to a Russian-speaking minority (France);
122.118 Grant access to quality education for Roma children in mainstream
schools (Portugal);
122.119 Assess the overall situation of the Roma community and adopt a
comprehensive strategy to tackle discrimination and other problems faced by
that community (Albania);
122.120 Intensify efforts to address the disadvantages faced by minority
groups with regard to employment and remuneration based on language
proficiency (Norway);
122.121 Expand mechanisms aimed at ensuring consultation with people
belonging to national minorities and that the representatives of these minorities
participate effectively in making decisions that affect them (Cuba);
122.122 Continue strengthening the integration programmes of national
minorities to ensure their economic, social and cultural rights (Chile);
122.123 Continue its efforts in providing migrants and other sectors in
vulnerable situations greater access to health, education and other social
services, in the face of an increased number of migrants entering Europe
(Philippines);
122.124 Work actively to reduce the number of stateless residents in the
country (Iceland);
122.125 Continue efforts to reduce statelessness and to facilitate access to
citizenship for long-term residents in Estonia (Norway);
122.126 Further strengthen its norms, in conformity with the provisions of the
Refugee Conventions, including procedures for asylum request,
non-refoulement and access to legal advice, among others (Chile).
123. The following recommendations will be examined by Estonia, which will
provide responses in due time, but no later than the thirty-second session of the
Human Rights Council in June 2016:
123.1 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the
Child on a communications procedure (Montenegro) (France) (Czech Republic)
(Portugal);
123.2 Consider the ratification of the Optional Protocol to the Convention
on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure (Slovakia);
123.3 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (France) (Spain) (Portugal);
123.4 Consider ratifying the Optional Protocol to the International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Ghana);
123.5 Ratify without reservations the Optional Protocol to the International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and opt in to the inquiry
and inter-State procedures (Bulgaria);
123.6 Ratify the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons
from Enforced Disappearance and recognize the competence of the Committee
on Enforced Disappearances (in accordance with articles 31 and 32 of this
instrument) (France);
123.7 Ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of
All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (Egypt) (Azerbaijan);
123.8 Ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of
All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families , as previously
recommended (Algeria);
123.9 Sign and ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the
Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (Turkey);
123.10 Consider the ratification of the International Convention on the
Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their
Families (Indonesia);
123.11 Move towards the ratification of the International Convention on the
Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their
Families (Chile);
123.12 Consider ratifying the International Convention on the Protection of
the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families and
International Labour Organization Convention No. 189 (Philippines);
123.13 Ratify, among other international instruments, the International
Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and
Members of Their Families, the Convention relating to the Status of Stateless
Persons and the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness, and continue its
efforts to legalize the situation of persons with “undetermined nationality”,
guaranteeing their right to nationality (Ecuador);
123.14 Consider ratifying the International Convention on the Protection of
the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (Ghana)
(Uruguay);
123.15 Consider ratifying the Convention relating to the Status of Stateless
Persons of 1954 and the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness of 1961
(Uruguay);
123.16 Accede to the Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons
1954 and the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness 1961, and ensure
that language requirements relating to employment are implemented in a fair
and objective manner and that the rights of ethnic and linguistic minorities are
actively promoted and protected (Ireland);
123.17 Ratify the Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons
(1954) and the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness (1961) (Panama)
(Australia);
123.18 Ratify the 1954 Convention on the Status of Stateless Persons
(Spain);
123.19 Consider ratifying the 1961 Convention on the Reduction of
Statelessness (Croatia);
123.20 Continue efforts towards ratification of international conventions
(Morocco);
123.21 Step up its efforts towards the ratification of other international
human rights treaties that it is not yet a state party (Philippines);
123.22 Continue efforts for the creation of a national human rights
institution, in accordance with international standards, which contributes to
the preparation of an action plan on social welfare, ensuring the inclusion and
equal opportunities for all the population, with special attention to minorities
(Ecuador);
123.23 Establish a body (ombudsman, commissioner or the like) as a
prominent institution to protect the rights of minorities and immigrants
(Germany);
123.24 Establish a post of an Ombudsman on the issues of national
minorities, as recommended previously (Russian Federation);
123.25 Increase the resources allocated to the Gender Equality and Equal
Treatment Commissioner as a matter of priority (Norway);
123.26 Adopt a national action plan to implement the United Nations
Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (Netherlands);
123.27 Develop National Human Rights Indicators as suggested by OHCHR,
as an instrument that allows for a more precise and coherent evaluation of its
national human rights policies (Portugal);
123.28 Stop discrimination in the area of employment on the grounds of
ethnic origin and language and adopt active measures to prosecute such cases
in the courts (Russian Federation);
123.29 Support fully to the adoption of the necessary information-
educational measures to promote racial, ethnic and religious tolerance, with the
emphasis on those characteristics that are results of natural-historical
development (Tajikistan);
123.30 Develop a holistic strategy to allow combating racism, racial
discrimination, xenophobia and other related forms of intolerance (Panama);
123.31 Initiate a comprehensive strategy to address manifestation of racism,
xenophobia and Islamophobia, especially in view to preventing xenophobic acts
(Turkey);
123.32 Ban organizations that encourage and incite racial discrimination
(Uzbekistan);
123.33 Ban organizations which promote and instigate racial discrimination
and hatred (Russian Federation);
123.34 Amend the Criminal Code to prohibit racist organizations and
establish criminal liability for hate speech with racist content and incitement to
hatred (Belarus);
123.35 Stop the participation of members of the Estonian armed forces in
annual so called remembrance events glorifying the former legionaries of
“Waffen SS” and Nazi collaborators (Russian Federation);
123.36 Review the discriminatory linguistic policy, including the work of the
Language Inspectorates whose targets are mainly teachers of Russian language
schools and kindergartens (Russian Federation);
123.37 Apply aggravating circumstance in hate-motivated crimes as well as
prohibit and criminalize racist organizations, hate speech, incitement to hatred
and the dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority and hatred (Egypt);
123.38 Legally recognize marriage between persons of the same sex (Spain);
123.39 Ensure the necessary legislation is passed to ensure the Registered
Partnership Act comes into force (United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland);
123.40 Adopt the necessary implementation legislation for Registered
Partnership Act and ensure its full implementation (Netherlands);
123.41 Build on efforts to address all forms of violence against women by
enacting specific laws that prohibit domestic and sexual violence, including
intimate partner violence, and by investigating all allegations of violence,
prosecuting perpetrators, and ensuring victims are protected and have access
to medical and legal services (Canada);
123.42 Adopt a new law to prohibit trafficking in human beings and increase
protection granted to victims (Bahrain);
123.43 Respect the right to vote of all inmates (Canada);
123.44 Consider additional safeguards for minorities in the criminal justice
system, namely to introduce guarantees with respect to the right to use a
minority language in all stages of the criminal proceedings (Serbia);
123.45 Undertake a review of the communications surveillance laws, policies
and practices with a view to upholding the right to privacy in line with
international human rights law (Brazil);
123.46 Provide protection for the family as the natural and fundamental unit
of the society (Egypt);
123.47 Take measures to ensure full participation of all groups of individuals
in the political and public affairs of the country (Botswana);
123.48 Continue promoting and implementing its programs of social
inclusion to make citizens’ participation more active, and in particular the
participation of minorities or excluded groups (Nicaragua);
123.49 Ensure equal representation of the titular and non-titular
communities in local self-government bodies (Russian Federation);
123.50 Further guarantee the status and rights of national ethnic and
linguistic minorities on the legislative and judicial front as well as in the policy
front (China);
123.51 Provide the necessary status to languages of minorities and create
conditions where minorities do not fear of discrimination (Belarus);
123.52 Fulfil its obligations under the International Covenant on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights so that the Russian-speaking linguistic minority
fully enjoys the right to equal opportunities in the labour market (Iceland);
123.53 Continue improving reforms to legislation on citizenship and
nationality, reducing the cost of procedures and by making the language test
less demanding to the minimum indispensable (Uruguay);
123.54 Confer nationality to all stateless minor children, regardless of age or
the condition or nationality of their parents (Spain);
123.55 Avoid detaining asylum seekers and ensure all asylum seekers the
right to lodge asylum applications at border-crossing points and in transit
zones (Brazil).
124. All conclusions and/or recommendations contained in the present report reflect
the position of the submitting State(s) and/or the State under review. They should not
be construed as endorsed by the Working Group as a whole.
Annex
Composition of the delegation
The delegation of Estonia was headed by Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ms. Marina
Kaljurand and composed of the following members:
• Mr. Andre Pung, Ambassador, Permanent Representative, Permanent Mission of
Estonia In Geneva;
• Ms. Riia Salsa, Deputy Permanent Representative, Permanent Mission of Estonia In
Geneva;
• Ms. Merje Mägi, 3rd Secretary, Permanent Mission of Estonia in Geneva;
• Ms. Karmen Laus, Director of Second Division (International Organisations),
Political Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs;
• Ms. Triinu Kallas, Director of International Law Division, Legal Department,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs;
• Mr. Jaanus Kirikmäe, Senior Counsellor, Second Division (International
Organisations), Political Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs;
• Mr. Jürgo Loo, Counsellor, International Law Division, Legal Department, Ministry
of Foreign Affairs;
• Ms. Kai Härmand, Deputy Secretary General, Legislative Policy Department,
Ministry of Justice;
• Ms. Kristel Siitam-Nyiri, Deputy Secretary General, Criminal Policy Department,
Ministry of Justice;
• Ms. Anne-Ly Reimaa, Undersecretary (Cultural Diversity), Ministry of Culture;
• Ms. Mall Saul, Chief Specialist, Cultural Diversity Department, Ministry of Culture;
• Ms. Birgit Lüüs, Deputy Department Head For Migration, Citizenship And
Migration Policy Department, Ministry Of The Interior;
• Ms. Siiri Leskov, Adviser, Citizenship and Migration Policy Department, Ministry
of the Interior;
• Mr. Rait Kuuse, Deputy Secretary General on Social Policy, Ministry of Social
Affairs;
• Ms. Helena Pall, Adviser, Equality Policies Department, Ministry of Social Affairs;
• Ms. Eha Lannes, Adviser, Social Welfare Department, Ministry of Social Affairs;
• Ms. Mariann Rikka, Chief Expert, General Education Department, Ministry of
Education and Research.