33/31 Right to development
Document Type: Final Report
Date: 2016 Jul
Session: 33rd Regular Session (2016 Sep)
Agenda Item: Item2: Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General, Item3: Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development
GE.16-12922(E)
Human Rights Council Thirty-third session
Agenda items 2 and 3
Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner
for Human Rights and reports of the Office of
the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General
Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil,
political, economic, social and cultural rights,
including the right to development
Right to development*
Report of the Secretary-General and the United Nations
High Commissioner for Human Rights
Summary
The present report contains an overview of the activities of the Office of the United
Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights relating to the promotion and realization of
the right to development. It covers the period from May 2015 to June 2016 and
complements the report of the Secretary-General and the High Commissioner on the right
to development submitted to the Human Rights Council at its thirtieth session
(A/HRC/30/22).
* The annexes are being circulated as received in the language of submission only.
I. Introduction
1. In its resolution 48/141 establishing the post of United Nations High Commissioner
for Human Rights, the General Assembly decided that the High Commissioner would, inter
alia, promote and protect the realization of the right to development and enhance support
from relevant bodies of the United Nations system for this purpose. The Assembly also
decided that the High Commissioner would recognize the importance of promoting a
balanced and sustainable development for all people and of ensuring the realization of the
right to development, as established in the United Nations Declaration on the Right to
Development.
2. The Human Rights Council, in its resolution 30/28, requested the Office of the
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to continue to submit to
the Council an annual report on its activities, including on inter-agency coordination within
the United Nations system, relating to the promotion and the realization of the right to
development.
3. In its resolution 70/155, the General Assembly reaffirmed the request to the High
Commissioner, in mainstreaming the right to development, to effectively undertake
activities aimed at strengthening the global partnership for development among Member
States, development agencies and the international development, financial and trade
institutions and to reflect those activities in detail in his next report to the Human Rights
Council.
4. In the same resolution, the General Assembly requested the Secretary-General to
submit a report to the Assembly at its seventy-first session and an interim report to the
Human Rights Council on the implementation of the resolution, including efforts
undertaken at the national, regional and international levels in the promotion and realization
of the right to development.
5. The present report is submitted in accordance with the above requests and provides
information on the activities undertaken by OHCHR and the United Nations human rights
mechanisms between May 2015 and June 2016.
II. Activities of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
6. In implementing its mandate to promote and protect the realization of the right to
development, OHCHR is guided by the Declaration on the Right to Development, the
Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, relevant resolutions of the General
Assembly, the Commission on Human Rights and the Human Rights Council and agreed
conclusions and recommendations of the Working Group on the Right to Development.
7. The OHCHR operational programme for the realization of the right to development
is contained in the Secretary-General’s strategic framework for the period 2016-2017 and
the OHCHR management plan for the period 2014-2017.1
1 See A/69/6/Rev.1, pp. 465-466; OHCHR Management Plan 2014-2017: Working for your rights,
pp. 63-71; and A/HRC/27/27, paras. 6-13.
A. Support to the Working Group on the Right to Development
8. OHCHR provided support to the Working Group on the Right to Development for
the organization of its resumed sixteenth annual session,2 held from 1 to 4 September 2015,
and its seventeenth annual session,3 held from 25 April to 3 May 2016. OHCHR also
supported the Chair-Rapporteur during the intersessional period, in holding informal
consultations and presenting the report of the Working Group to the Human Rights Council
and the General Assembly.
9. At its sixteenth session, the Working Group considered a draft framework to
improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the Working Group, prepared by the former
Chair-Rapporteur.4 At its seventeenth session, it considered standards for the
implementation of the right to development, prepared by the Chair-Rapporteur.5 The
Working Group also completed the second reading of the draft right to development criteria
and operational subcriteria.6
10. The Working Group held an interactive dialogue on the 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development with the former co-facilitators of the intergovernmental
negotiations on the post-2015 development agenda, the Permanent Representative of
Ireland to the United Nations and the Permanent Representative of Kenya to the United
Nations.7
B. Activities relating to the promotion and realization of the right
to development
11. During the period under review, OHCHR conducted numerous activities, many of
which were devoted to marking the thirtieth anniversary of the Declaration on the Right to
Development. Examples of these activities are summarized below.8 In addition, OHCHR
paid due attention to the right to development in the context of its support to human rights
mechanisms.
12. In Colombia, OHCHR advocated for the incorporation of a human rights-based
approach to the national development plan as a means of achieving the right to
development and peace. Special attention was paid to devising indicators for measuring the
realization of economic, social and cultural rights. OHCHR also worked to promote and
protect the right to development of indigenous peoples and Afro-Colombians and supported
the creation of a network of 14 indigenous peoples to claim their collective rights.
13. In Uganda, OHCHR focused on building institutional capacities to promote and
protect the right to development. It provided technical assistance to the Government on
integrating a human rights-based approach to programming in the national development
plan, including by integrating human rights indicators in its monitoring and evaluation
framework. OHCHR strengthened the capacity of non-governmental organizations to
effectively participate in the development process and to monitor the implementation of the
plan and supported the launch of a network of public interest litigators, with a focus on
2 See A/HRC/30/71.
3 See A/HRC/33/45.
4 A/HRC/WG.2/16/2.
5 A/HRC/WG.2/17/2.
6 A/HRC/15/WG.2/TF/2/Add.2.
7 See A/HRC/33/45.
8 More information on these and other activities is available at www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/
Development/Pages/DevelopmentIndex.aspx.
economic, social and cultural rights. In parallel, OHCHR conducted training sessions for
judges of the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal and the Constitutional Court on
adjudicating violations of economic, social and cultural rights. Finally, the OHCHR office
in Uganda supported a consortium of civil society organizations and legal networks, which
organized the second National Conference on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights on the
theme “Tackling social exclusion in access to socioeconomic goods and services for
sustainable development”.
14. In South America, OHCHR supported the implementation of the Sustainable
Development Goals from a human rights-based perspective and focused on the
dissemination of OHCHR key messages on human rights in the 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development, training and capacity-building. In Africa, OHCHR continued to
work on a human rights impact assessment of the Continental Free Trade Area agreement
in collaboration with the Economic Commission for Africa through a scoping study.9
Several risks were identified in relation to the negotiation of the agreement and preliminary
recommendations were made with regard to food security, employment and freedom of
movement. The assessment provides the negotiating countries with an evidence base and
policy recommendations from which to develop an effective and cohesive trade policy that
is aligned with human rights and development commitments and priorities.
15. At the global level, OHCHR advocated integrating the right to development into the
financing for development, climate change and sustainable development processes,
provided technical advice in the areas of trade and investment, intellectual property and
access to medicines and supported special procedure mandate holders in these areas.
16. OHCHR also prepared a think piece on responsible contracting and harnessing
human rights to transform investment10 for the E15 initiative on strengthening the global
trade and investment system for sustainable development, which was coordinated by the
World Economic Forum and the International Centre for Trade and Sustainable
Development. The paper was aimed at infusing ethical and normative considerations into
State-investor contracts and incorporating human rights into these contracts. In addition,
OHCHR published the report “Principles for responsible contracts: integrating the
management of human rights risks into State-investor contract negotiations – Guidance for
negotiators”,11 carried out research and issued a report and a companion document setting
out guidance to improve corporate accountability and access to judicial remedies for
victims of business-related human rights abuse.12
17. OHCHR prepared the annual report of the Secretary-General to the General
Assembly on globalization and its impact on the full enjoyment of all human rights.13 In the
report, common concerns were identified and recommendations were made on how to
address the negative impact of globalization on the full enjoyment of human rights.
OHCHR published an illustrated report on access to medicines in the context of the right to
health14 that outlines the main conclusions and recommendations of the 2015 Social Forum
9 See “Designing the Continental Free Trade Area (CFTA): an African human rights perspective”
(May 2012), available at www.fes-globalization.org/geneva/documents/2016/2016_05_HRIA
%20of%20the%20CFTA_Publication.pdf.
10 Available at www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Globalization/E15-Investment-OHCHR.pdf.
11 See A/HRC/17/31/Add.3; also available at www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/Principles_
ResponsibleContracts_HR_PUB_15_1_EN.pdf.
12 See A/HRC/32/19 and Add.1.
13 A/70/154.
14 Available at www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/SForum/SForum2015/OHCHR_2015-
Access_medicines_EN_WEB.pdf.
of the Human Rights Council on the same topic. OHCHR finalized a publication on human
rights and budgets, which will become available during the course of 2016.
18. To mark the thirtieth anniversary of the Declaration on the Right to Development,
OHCHR published a fact sheet entitled “Frequently asked questions on the right to
development” and produced a short video entitled “The right to development –
development is a human right”.15 OHCHR also published the booklet “International Decade
for People of African Descent, 2015-2024: recognition – justice – development”, which
contains a chapter on the right to development and measures against poverty.16
19. In May 2015, OHCHR co-organized with the Prince Claus Chair, the International
Institute of Social Studies (Erasmus University, Rotterdam) and The Hague Institute for
Global Justice a high-level round table on the theme “Thinking ahead: the right to
development approaching 30”. The objective of the round table was to consider the
continued relevance of the right to development and how it could be revitalized and
implemented so as to equitably meet the developmental and environmental needs of present
and future generations. During the discussion, OHCHR underscored the continued
relevance of the right to development, in particular as a framework for achieving
sustainable development.17
20. In September 2015, the Office organized the first Human Rights Council biennial
panel discussion on unilateral coercive measures and human rights. The objective of the
discussion was to increase awareness of the negative impact that unilateral coercive
measures can have on the enjoyment of human rights in targeted and non-targeted
countries.18
21. During the March 2016 session of the Human Rights Council, OHCHR organized a
panel discussion on human rights mainstreaming, focusing on the 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development and human rights, with an emphasis on the right to development.
The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights underscored that the right to
development provided an enabling environment to ensure that the goals of the 2030 Agenda
would be achieved in practice, and that processes of development were inclusive and just.
Referring to further convergences between the 2030 Agenda and the Declaration, the High
Commissioner noted that the Declaration addressed the structural impediments that
disadvantaged the poor and prevented development from benefiting all.19
22. OHCHR also organized, together with the University for Peace and the Forum of
Catholic-inspired Non-governmental Organizations, a side-event entitled “In search of
dignity and sustainable development for all”. The objective of the event was to consider
how operationalizing the right to development could create an environment conducive to
the realization of the 2030 Agenda and how the 2030 Agenda could support the realization
of the right to development. Participants also discussed the means to integrate, claim and
build capacity on the right to development among local communities, and research and
educational programmes.20
15 Available at www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/FSheet37_RtD_EN.pdf and
www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdKfypBTtdI#t=16, respectively.
16 Available at www.un.org/en/events/africandescentdecade/pdf/African%20Descent%20Booklet_
WEB_English.pdf.
17 See www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Development/PrinceClausReport27May2015.pdf.
18 See A/HRC/31/82.
19 See www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=17109&LangID=E.
20 See www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Development/Pages/SearchOfDignity.aspx.
23. The Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights delivered remarks at the African
Group side event on the right to development. She highlighted the importance of the 2030
Agenda for Sustainable Development, the Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third
International Conference on Financing for Development and the Paris Agreement on
climate change for the realization of the right to development. She also underlined the need
to combat inequality within and among countries so as to leave no one behind, starting first,
wherever possible, with those furthest behind. She stated that persistent poverty and
deepening inequalities were major threats to human rights and development, and thus
directly to peace and security.21
24. OHCHR supported the intergovernmental processes leading to the adoption of the
Addis Ababa Action Agenda on financing for development, the 2030 Agenda, including the
Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement on climate change. OHCHR
published the advocacy tool “Key messages on human rights and financing for
development” (see annex I). The High Commissioner sent an open letter on human rights in
the financing for development agenda22 to States calling upon them to take specific
measures to ensure an inclusive and participatory financing for development agenda that
would benefit the most vulnerable, hold all parties and stakeholders accountable, and fulfil
the human rights commitments to work together towards a better world.
25. OHCHR also organized a side event and delivered a statement on behalf of the High
Commissioner to the plenary session of the Third International Conference on Financing
for Development. In the statement, the High Commissioner underscored that financing for
development must satisfy the demands of all persons to have their most basic needs met in
a world that did not lack the means, but had failed to demonstrate the will, to make human
rights a reality for all. He called upon States to ensure that their efforts to finance the 2030
Agenda for Sustainable Development reflected the needs and demands of people, that they
fully integrated relevant human rights commitments and encapsulated the imperative of
human rights-based policy coherence.23
26. As a result of advocacy by OHCHR and others, the Addis Ababa Action Agenda
contains numerous human rights considerations such as the Guiding Principles on Business
and Human Rights, reporting on environmental, social and governance impacts and the
need for environmental and social safeguards in the context of activities by businesses and
development banks. Members States agreed to promote financial inclusion, reduce
inequalities, seek to eradicate extreme poverty, ensure gender equality and provide social
protection and essential public services for all, with a focus on those furthest below the
poverty line. Civil society organizations increasingly adopted a rights-based analysis to
financing for development.
27. OHCHR advocated for the centrality of all human rights, including the right to
development, in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, and called for more
equitable development, including at the global level. OHCHR has consistently emphasized
that the 2030 Agenda is explicitly guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter of
the United Nations, including full respect for international law, grounded in the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, international human rights treaties and informed by other
instruments, including the Declaration on the Right to Development.24 OHCHR played an
active role in the development of the Sustainable Development Goal indicators and
21 See www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=17126&LangID=E.
22 See letter at www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/MDGs/Post2015/20150617_HC_open_letter_
HR_FFD.pdf.
23 See statement at www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=16246.
24 See General Assembly resolution 70/1, para. 10.
advocated for data disaggregation in line with the recognized grounds of discrimination, to
capture progress in combatting inequalities, inequities and discrimination. OHCHR
published the guidance note to data collection and disaggregation entitled “A human rights-
based approach to data: leaving no one behind in the 2030 Agenda”.25
28. OHCHR organized the signing ceremony for the Geneva Pledge for Human Rights
in Climate Action, which was hosted by the Permanent Mission of Costa Rica to the United
Nations Office and other international organizations in Geneva. The pledge calls for
meaningful collaboration among national representatives in the human rights and climate
change processes to inform climate action. OHCHR engaged in the negotiations of the
twenty-first session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change, held in Paris in December 2015. OHCHR advocated the
most ambitious climate mitigation target possible, demanded accelerated and equitable
climate action and called for all such action to respect and protect human rights, including
the right to development. The OHCHR “Key messages on human rights and climate
change” (see annex II) served as the basis for this advocacy.
29. The High Commissioner issued an op-ed and press releases and called for, inter alia,
limiting warming to no more than 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, improved international
cooperation to address climate change and the inclusion of strong human rights language in
the operative part of the Paris Agreement. OHCHR submitted a paper entitled
“Understanding human rights and climate change”26 to the twenty-first session of the
Conference of the Parties in Paris, supported several special procedure mandate holders in
their engagement in the negotiations, participated in multiple side events and organized a
press conference on human rights and climate change during Human Rights Day. During
the twenty-ninth session of the Human Rights Council, OHCHR organized a panel
discussion on the impacts of climate change on the enjoyment of the right to health.
Panellists, including the Director General of the World Health Organization and the Special
Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of
physical and mental health, emphasized the need for a rights-based approach to climate
action.27
30. As a result of this and other advocacy, the Paris Agreement is the first multilateral
climate agreement of its kind to include explicit reference to human rights. The Agreement
also contains the ambitious objective of limiting warming to below 2°C and pursuing
efforts to bring it to 1.5°C. Other positive elements include references to the principle of
common but differentiated responsibility and equity, commitments on climate finance, a
new transparency framework, a mechanism for monitoring and ratcheting up climate
commitments, strengthened cooperation on loss and damages and special provisions for
least developed countries and small island developing States as well as vulnerable groups,
gender equality and women’s empowerment.
C. Inter-agency cooperation and mainstreaming the right to development
31. Mainstreaming human rights, including the right to development, into United
Nations system policies, operational activities, guidelines and tools on development
25 See www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/HRIndicators/GuidanceNoteonApproachtoData.pdf.
26 See www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/ClimateChange/COP21.pdf.
27 See A/HRC/32/24 and A/HRC/32/23, also www.google.ch/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=
web&cd=2&ved=0ahUKEwix94Pc_obOAhUBECwKHZVXDeEQFgglMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2
Fwww.ohchr.org%2FEN%2FHRBodies%2FHRC%2FRegularSessions%2FSession31%2FDocuments
%2FClimateChange.doc&usg=AFQjCNFCFELeQzIQ8zwDseu8SZ8xY_yC8A.
programming is an integral part of the High Commissioner’s mandate and a major pillar of
the programme of work of the Office.
32. Through its country and regional offices, as well as through the Human Rights
Working Group of the United Nations Development Group, OHCHR has provided support
and technical assistance, including human rights advisers, to United Nations country teams
on the application of a human rights-based approach to common country programming and
in their work to assist Member States with the implementation of the 2030 Agenda,
including in relation to the means of implementation. OHCHR worked to mainstream
human rights and the right to development within the United Nations system, including by
strengthening the human rights leadership capacities of resident coordinators and United
Nations leaders through leadership dialogues and the induction programme for resident
coordinators. OHCHR also contributed to the United Nations Development Group 2015
publication, Guidance Note on Human Rights for Resident Coordinators and UN Country
Teams.28
33. During the 15-year effort to achieve the Millennium Development Goals,
multilateral development bank support grew from $50 billion to $127 billion a year in
grants, concessional and non-concessional loans, risk-sharing instruments, guarantees and
equity investment.29 However, trillions of dollars will be needed to finance the Sustainable
Development Goals, including in high-risk sectors such as large-scale infrastructure.
OHCHR has engaged with multilateral development banks since 2014 advocating, in
accordance with the principles of the Declaration on the Right to Development, for more
equitable development and more rigorous safeguard policies for investment lending with a
view to ensuring that supported projects do not cause or contribute to human rights
violations. In 2015, OHCHR focused primarily on the Environmental and Social
Framework consultation processes of the World Bank and the Asian Infrastructure
Investment Bank.
34. OHCHR continued to coordinate and support United Nations and inter-agency
initiatives, such as the Fit for Purpose and the Mainstreaming, Acceleration, Policy Support
initiatives, on mainstreaming human rights, including the right to development, in United
Nations policies and operational programmes. The Human Rights Working Group of the
United Nations Development Group, with the financial support of a multi-donor trust fund,
advocated the integration of human rights in United Nations development work in all
countries. OHCHR also supported the United Nations development system in delivering on
the responsibilities and demands of the Human Rights Up Front initiative.
35. In March 2016, the United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination
adopted a statement of commitment aimed at placing the imperative of combating
inequalities, inequities and discrimination at the forefront of United Nations efforts to
support Member States in implementing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
The statement of commitment was based on a positioning paper on equality and non-
discrimination prepared by the High-level Committee on Programmes.30 As part of this
initiative, OHCHR, jointly with the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the
Empowerment of Women (UN-Women), is developing a shared framework for action on
combating inequalities and discrimination.
28 Available at https://undg.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/UNDG-Guidance-Note-on-Human-Rights-
for-RCs-and-UNCTs-final.pdf.
29 See www.worldbank.org/en/news/speech/2015/07/13/third-international-conference-financing-
development.
30 See CEB/2015/6, annex III.
III. 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the implementation of the right to development
36. As the High Commissioner stated during the Human Rights Council high-level
panel discussion on human rights mainstreaming, the 2030 Agenda and the Declaration on
the Right to Development are powerfully linked. By placing people at its centre, the 2030
Agenda could generate political momentum for the realization of the right to development,
while the right to development provided a vital enabling environment to ensure that the
goals of the 2030 Agenda would be achieved in practice and that development processes
were inclusive and just.31
37. The High Commissioner underscored the substantive convergence between the
Declaration and the 2030 Agenda, the overall objective to eradicate discrimination and
inequality, the need for international cooperation and assistance and the need to pay equal
attention to freedom from fear and freedom from want. He also underlined the importance
of accountability and of human rights indicators or data in this regard and the need to link
human rights monitoring with the follow-up and review of the implementation of the
Sustainable Development Goals.
38. The 2030 Agenda is informed by the Declaration on the Right to Development.32 It
is guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, including
respect for international law and it is grounded in the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights and international human rights treaties. The 2030 Agenda recognizes the need to
build peaceful, just and inclusive societies that provide equal access to justice and that are
based on, inter alia, respect for human rights (including the right to development).33
39. In addition to explicit recognition of the right to development, the 2030 Agenda
indirectly reaffirms and recognizes that it is grounded in the right to development by citing
the Millennium Declaration as a source. In the Declaration, Heads of State and Government
committed to making the right to development a reality for everyone and to freeing the
entire human race from want.34 The 2030 Agenda also reaffirms the principles of the Rio
Declaration on Environment and Development,35 of which principle 3 stipulates that the
right to development must be fulfilled so as to equitably meet the developmental and
environmental needs of present and future generations.
40. Besides this direct and indirect recognition of the linkage between the 2030 Agenda
for Sustainable Development and the right to development, there is also substantive
convergence. Under article 4 (1) of the Declaration on the Right to Development, States
have the duty to take steps, individually and collectively, to formulate international
development policies with a view to facilitating the full realization of the right to
development. Undoubtedly, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development constitutes such
an international development policy.
41. Both the Declaration and the 2030 Agenda envisage a human-centred development
process, in which all human rights can be fully realized. They both seek to eradicate
poverty, discrimination and inequality, both within and among countries, with a view to
improving the well-being of the human person and addressing the structural impediments
that disadvantage the poor and prevent development from benefiting all. The 2030 Agenda,
31 See www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=17107&LangID=E.
32 See General Assembly resolution 70/1, para. 10.
33 Ibid., para. 35.
34 See General Assembly resolution 55/2, para. 11.
35 See General Assembly resolution 70/1, para. 12.
for example, pledges to leave no one behind and to focus on those furthest behind first.
Two goals are dedicated to equality, with commitments to end discrimination against and
exclusion of women and girls.
42. The 2030 Agenda acknowledges that freedom from want and freedom from fear
need to be addressed together — echoing the emphasis placed by the right to development on human well-being, the indivisibility of all human rights and the right of every member
of society to fully and freely participate in decision-making. The Declaration on the Right
to Development proclaims development to be a right that entitles everyone to active, free
and meaningful participation in development and to fair distribution of its benefits.
43. States have the duty to cooperate with each other to eliminate obstacles to
development and to promote an economic order based on sovereign equality. The 2030
Agenda gives effect to this commitment through the specific implementation targets under
each Goal as well as through the partnership commitments under Goal 17.
44. The Declaration addresses root causes, systemic issues and structural challenges in
its quest for a new order for development at all levels. It recognizes the need for an
enabling environment that is conducive to peace, human rights and socially and
ecologically sustainable development. Likewise, the 2030 Agenda acknowledges the need
to go far beyond the traditional development paradigm — which was focused on economic development — and to replace it with a holistic, transformative vision, covering all three dimensions of development: the economic, social and environmental.
45. Together with the Addis Ababa Action Agenda, Sustainable Development Goal 17
provides momentum for the realization of the right to development. Goal 17 targets
announce commitments with regard to the mobilization of requisite financial resources;
cooperation on and access to science, technology and innovation and knowledge sharing;
enhancing international support for implementing effective and targeted capacity-building
in developing countries; and promoting a universal, rules-based, open, non-discriminatory
and equitable multilateral trading system.
46. The 2030 Agenda and the Addis Ababa Action Agenda also recognize the positive
contribution and role of the private sector in development, while underscoring the need to
protect labour rights and environmental and health standards in accordance with relevant
international standards, agreements and other initiatives, such as the Guiding Principles on
Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and remedy” Framework.36
47. There are also differences between the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
and the Declaration on the Right to Development. Most importantly, the right to
development is a human right. Expressed as an entitlement, development goes beyond
volunteerism and charity; it is a right with corresponding obligations and duties. The
Sustainable Development Goals, on the contrary, are an international development policy
and a political commitment. The implementation of the Goals contributes to the realization
of the right to development.
48. The Working Group on the Right to Development discussed the 2030 Agenda in the
context of the right to development. Two of its recommendations are particularly relevant
to this topic. It recommended that, in its future deliberations, the Working Group should
study the contributions of States to the implementation of the right to development, at the
national, regional and international levels, in keeping with the mechanisms relating to the
Sustainable Development Goals. It also recommended that OHCHR consider facilitating
the participation of experts in the eighteenth session of the Working Group to provide
36 A/HRC/17/31.
advice in order to contribute to the discussion on the implementation and realization of the
right to development and on relevant implications of the 2030 Agenda.37
49. These recommendations point to the future direction of the work of the Working
Group and their implementation may contribute to making that work less politicized and
more attuned to the ongoing intergovernmental process for the implementation of the
Sustainable Development Goals.
IV. Conclusions and recommendations
50. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development can be considered an eminent
international development policy and action agenda for the realization of the right to
development. It is informed by and grounded in the right to development; indeed the
right to development and, by extension, all human rights are at the heart of the 2030
Agenda.
51. The 2030 Agenda must be implemented in line with international law, including
international human rights law. All human rights, including the right to development,
must guide the implementation process at all levels.
52. Operationalizing the commitment to leave no one behind demands a coherent
and integrated United Nations system-wide approach. All United Nations system
policies and programmes relating to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda should
therefore be explicitly anchored in and aligned with all human rights, including the
right to development. Human rights principles and standards, including those of the
right to development, should be increasingly integrated into finance, trade and
investment policies in support of the Sustainable Development Goals.
53. The follow-up and review of the implementation of the Goals provide a solid
basis for assessing the progressive realization of the right to development. Devising
indicators to measure and serve as a tool for achieving the Goals, in particular the
collection and disaggregation of data, must be based on human rights principles and
standards.
54. Assessment of the progress in the implementation of the 2030 Agenda can
provide complementary information to the human rights mechanisms, including the
Working Group on the Right to Development, for their assessment of progress in the
realization of human rights, including the right to development. At the same time,
recommendations made by the Working Group and other human rights mechanisms
can provide useful information for the Financing for Development follow-up and for
the High-level Political Forum assessment of progress in the implementation of the
2030 Agenda.
55. The Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the principles for
responsible contracts38 provide a solid basis for framing and directing private-sector
engagement in the implementation of the 2030 Agenda and the Addis Ababa Action
Agenda.
56. Efforts of civil society and national human rights institutions aimed at ensuring
that all human rights, including the right to development, are respected in the
implementation of the 2030 Agenda should be encouraged and supported.
37 See A/HRC/33/45.
38 See A/HRC/17/31/Add.3.
Annex I
Key messages on human rights and financing for development of the
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
1. The following obligations and responsibilities should be reflected in efforts to
finance development in order to foster policy coherence and to ensure equitable, inclusive
development that benefits all persons without discrimination.
To expend maximum available resources
2. Under core human rights treaties, States acting individually and collectively, are
obligated to mobilize and allocate the maximum available resources for the progressive
realization of economic, social and cultural rights, as well as the advancement of civil and
political rights and the right to development. To eradicate poverty, achieve the Sustainable
Development Goals and fulfil their human rights commitments, States must endorse a
financing framework that equals these ambitions. To mobilize the unprecedented amount of
resources needed for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,
all stakeholders will need to effectively mobilize all available resources, including through
new and innovative sources of finance (such as financial transaction taxes and carbon taxes)
that are additional to traditional official development assistance (ODA), predictable and
stable, and distribute global income to reduce inequalities.
International cooperation
3. States have committed to international cooperation for the realization of human
rights. Meeting existing ODA commitments fully and in a timely manner will be critical to
achieve the goal of ending extreme poverty by 2030 and represents one key step towards
the fulfilment of State human rights commitments to mobilize maximum available
resources for the promotion, protection and fulfilment of human rights. Pursuant to relevant
human rights principles, ODA should be effective and transparent, it should be
administered through participatory and accountable processes, and it should be targeted
towards the people and groups most in need, including within those States where the ability
to mobilize domestic resources is weakest.
To ensure participatory, human rights-based development
4. National Governments bear the primary responsibility for development in their own
countries. National financing strategies, fiscal policies, tax systems, subsidies, development
plans, and budgets should benefit the poorest and most marginalized and be the product of
transparent and participatory processes. Effective governance for sustainable development
demands that public institutions in all countries and at all levels conform to international
human rights standards and principles and thus that they be non-discriminatory, inclusive,
participatory and accountable to people. Laws and institutions must protect human rights
under the rule of law, including in the economic sphere.
To create an international order in which all human rights can be realized
5. All countries bear responsibilities for international cooperation and to create an
enabling international environment for development. The new global partnership for
sustainable development must tackle global inequities, including in trade, finance and
investment, as well as combating corruption, illicit flows of funds, trade mispricing and tax
evasion.
To guarantee equal access and non-discrimination
6. States have committed to guarantee equality and non-discrimination. They should
strive to ensure universal and transparent access to affordable and appropriate financial
services across income, gender, geography, age and other groups. This implies establishing
effective regulation, recourse mechanisms and consumer protection agencies to prevent
predatory lending and ensure greater financial literacy of consumers.
To ensure empowerment of excluded groups
7. Specific barriers to women’s access to finance must be eliminated. Women and girls
must have equal access to financial services and the right to own land and other assets.
Indigenous peoples’ rights should be fully reflected in line with the United Nations
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. In particular, their rights to their lands,
natural resources and territories, and to the benefits from their traditional knowledge should
be protected. Actions likely to impact their rights should not be taken without their free,
prior and informed consent. Indigenous peoples have the right to participate in decision-
making related to and to benefit from the use of their knowledge, innovations and practices.
The human rights of migrants should be protected, regardless of their status. Discriminatory
barriers to their development should be removed. Migrants should not be treated as an
economic commodity. Policies on remittances should take into account that remittances are
private sources of finance and seek to reduce their costs.
To respect human rights and do no harm
8. As businesses assume an ever-expanding role in the development and economic
spheres their adherence to the human rights responsibilities outlined in the Guiding
Principles on Business and Human Rights becomes increasingly critical. Businesses must
respect human rights and do no harm. These responsibilities apply in the context of public
private partnerships, blended finance instruments, foreign direct investment and all private
business activities. With regard to public-private partnerships and blended finance, the risks
and benefits of investments should be shared equitably between public and private
investors. Both private and public sector partners must meet their respective human rights
responsibilities and obligations. In working together, States and businesses should
incorporate social, environmental, labour, human rights and gender equality considerations
into their activities and subject public private partnerships to human rights safeguards and
rigorous due diligence, including human rights impact assessments.
To protect persons from human rights abuses committed by private actors
9. States have an obligation to actively prevent private activities, including
investments, from undermining human rights. States should establish appropriate
regulations and oversight mechanisms to protect human rights from the potentially negative
impacts of public-private partnerships and blended finance instruments. Measures should be
taken to ensure that the provisions of international trade and investment agreements do not
protect investor interests at the expense of State policy space to promote the realization of
human rights.
To ensure accountability
10. All States should adopt policies and institutional, legal and regulatory frameworks to
encourage responsible and accountable investment in sustainable development. Such
frameworks should include human rights and sustainability criteria and align investor
incentives with sustainable development. They should go beyond voluntary reporting and
require all companies to undertake mandatory economic, environment, social and
governance reporting commensurate with the level of risk posed by their activities. This
will help to identify, prevent and mitigate any risk of adverse human rights impacts.
To guarantee all persons enjoy the rights to food and health as well as the benefits
of science and its applications
11. States must take steps to ensure that global intellectual property regimes do not
obstruct the realization of the right to food, hinder access to medicines, or impede the
benefits of development from reaching the poor and marginalized, including through
application of the trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights flexibilities, while at
the same time ensuring that intellectual property regimes create appropriate incentives to
help meet sustainable development objectives. Environmentally clean and sound
technologies should be accessibly priced and broadly disseminated. The cost of their
development should be equitably shared, and their benefits should be equitably distributed
between and within countries.
To ensure sovereign debt arrangements do not undercut the realization
of human rights
12. States have committed to cooperate to mobilize maximum available resources for
the progressive realization of human rights. Unsustainable debt burdens should not be
permitted to threaten State efforts to fulfil their human rights obligations. All States would
benefit from a permanent, fair and effective sovereign debt workout mechanism. All States,
international financial institutions, relevant United Nations agencies, funds and
programmes and the private sector, should cooperate to avoid sovereign debt crises by
agreeing to guidelines that ensure sustainable, transparent lending and borrowing that
benefits and is accountable to people, taking into consideration the guiding principles on
foreign debt and human rights endorsed by the Human Rights Council.
To address climate harms to human rights
13. Climate change affects people everywhere. Yet, the poorest and most marginalized
individuals, communities and countries that have contributed the least to greenhouse
emissions often bear the greatest burden. Efforts to mitigate and adapt to the impacts of
climate change should therefore meet the special needs and circumstances of developing
countries and of vulnerable and marginalized persons everywhere. For example, harmful
fossil fuel and agricultural subsidies, both direct and indirect, should be phased out with
safeguards that minimize the impact on the poorest and most vulnerable. Conversely,
carbon taxes, with appropriate safeguards to minimize impacts on the poorest and most
vulnerable, could be designed to internalize environmental externalities and finance
sustainable development efforts.
To align economic policies and institutions with human rights standards
14. A road map should be put in place for economic governance reforms that ensure fair
representation of emerging and developing countries in international financial and
economic decision making, prevent future economic crises and promote sustainable,
inclusive economic progress. Policy coherence, particularly human rights policy coherence,
will be critical for the successful implementation of the 2030 Agenda. This will entail
taking measures to ensure coherence between current international legal regimes for trade,
finance, and investment on the one hand and norms and standards for labour, the
environment, human rights, equality and sustainability on the other hand.
To monitor human rights progress
15. A people-centred and planet-sensitive post-2015 human rights and development
agenda must adopt a broader measure of progress than the gross domestic product. It must
take into account the three dimensions of sustainable development and be rooted in a
human rights-based approach to development. The objective should be to capture the
degree to which the strength of an economy meets the needs and rights of people, and how
sustainably and equitably it does so. By monitoring progress toward fulfilment of human
rights objectives, States can make informed decisions regarding the effective use of
resources for the progressive realization of human rights.
To ensure accountability of all duty bearers to rights holders
16. States should regularly review and monitor the global partnership for sustainable
development based on specific, measureable, time-bound targets to ensure the
accountability of all States for their commitments. The review of the global partnership for
sustainable development should draw upon and feed into existing monitoring mechanisms,
including by integrating in a structured manner the work of relevant human rights bodies.
The monitoring of financing for development needs to go beyond the tracking of financial
flows and also assess the development results of such financial flows as well as progress on
addressing systemic issues. Monitoring efforts must be underpinned by a human rights-
based data revolution that makes information more available, accessible and more broadly
disaggregated to track development impacts for all people in all countries.
Annex II
Key messages on human rights and climate change of the Office of the
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Right
1. In order to foster policy coherence and help ensure that climate change mitigation
and adaptation efforts are adequate, sufficiently ambitious, non-discriminatory and
otherwise compliant with human rights obligations, the following considerations should be
reflected in all climate action.
To mitigate climate change and to prevent its negative human rights impacts
2. States have an obligation to respect, protect, fulfil and promote all human rights for
all persons without discrimination. Failure to take affirmative measures to prevent human
rights harms caused by climate change, including foreseeable long-term harms, breaches
this obligation. The fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change confirms that climate change is caused by anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse
gases. Among other impacts, climate change negatively affects people’s rights to health,
housing, water and food. These negative impacts will increase exponentially according to
the degree of climate change that ultimately takes place and will disproportionately affect
individuals, groups and peoples in vulnerable situations including, women, children, older
persons, indigenous peoples, minorities, migrants, rural workers, persons with disabilities
and the poor. Therefore, States must act to limit anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse
gases (e.g. mitigate climate change), including through regulatory measures, in order to
prevent to the greatest extent possible the current and future negative human rights impacts
of climate change.
To ensure that all persons have the necessary capacity to adapt to climate change
3. States must ensure that appropriate adaptation measures are taken to protect and
fulfil the rights of all persons, particularly those most endangered by the negative impacts
of climate change such as those living in vulnerable areas (e.g. small islands, riparian and
low-lying coastal zones, arid regions and the poles). States must build adaptive capacities in
vulnerable communities, including by recognizing the manner in which factors such as
discrimination, and disparities in education and health affect climate vulnerability, and by
devoting adequate resources to the realization of the economic, social and cultural rights of
all persons, particularly those facing the greatest risks.
To ensure accountability and effective remedy for human rights harms
caused by climate change
4. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights and other human rights instruments require States to guarantee
effective remedies for human rights violations. Climate change and its impacts, including
sea-level rise, extreme weather events and droughts have already inflicted human rights
harms on millions of people. For States and communities on the frontline, survival itself is
at stake. Those affected, now and in the future, must have access to meaningful remedies,
including judicial and other redress mechanisms. The obligations of States in the context of
climate change and other environmental harms extend to all rights holders and to harm that
occurs both inside and beyond boundaries. States should be accountable to rights holders
for their contributions to climate change, including for failure to adequately regulate the
emissions of businesses under their jurisdiction, regardless of where such emissions or their
harms actually occur.
To mobilize maximum available resources for sustainable, human rights-based
development
5. Under core human rights treaties, States acting individually and collectively are
obligated to mobilize and allocate the maximum available resources for the progressive
realization of economic, social and cultural rights, as well as for the advancement of civil
and political rights and the right to development. The failure to adopt reasonable measures
to mobilize available resources to prevent foreseeable human rights harms caused by
climate change breaches this obligation. The mobilization of resources to address climate
change should complement and not compromise other efforts of Governments to pursue the
full realization of all human rights for all, including the right to development. Innovative
measures such as carbon taxes, with appropriate safeguards to minimize negative impacts
on the poor, can be designed to internalize environmental externalities and mobilize
additional resources to finance mitigation and adaptation efforts that benefit the poorest and
most marginalized.
International cooperation
6. The Charter of the United Nations, the International Covenant on Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights and other human rights instruments impose upon States the duty to
cooperate to ensure the realization of all human rights. Climate change is a human rights
threat with causes and consequences that cross borders; thus, it requires a global response,
underpinned by international solidarity. States should share resources, knowledge and
technology in order to address climate change. International assistance for climate change
mitigation and adaptation should be additional to existing official development assistance
commitments. Pursuant to relevant human rights principles, climate assistance should be
adequate, effective and transparent, it should be administered through participatory,
accountable and non-discriminatory processes, and it should be targeted toward persons,
groups, and peoples most in need. States should engage in cooperative efforts to respond to
climate-related displacement and migration and to address climate-related conflicts and
security risks.
To ensure equity in climate action
7. The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, the Vienna Declaration and
Programme of Action and The Future We Want all call for the right to development, which
is articulated in the Declaration on the Right to Development, to be fulfilled so as to meet
equitably the developmental and environmental needs of present and future generations.
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change calls for States to protect
future generations and to take action on climate change “on the basis of equity and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities and respective
capabilities”. While climate change affects people everywhere, those who have contributed the least to greenhouse gas emissions (i.e. the poor, children and future generations) are
those most affected. Equity in climate action requires that efforts to mitigate and adapt to
the impacts of climate change should benefit people in developing countries, indigenous
peoples, people in vulnerable situations and future generations.
To guarantee that everyone enjoys the benefits of science and its applications
8. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights states that
everyone has the right to enjoy the benefits of science and its applications. All States should
actively support the development and dissemination of new climate mitigation and
adaptation technologies including technologies for sustainable production and consumption.
Environmentally clean and sound technologies should be accessibly priced, the cost of their
development should be equitably shared, and their benefits should be fairly distributed
between and within countries. Technology transfers between States should take place as
needed and appropriate to ensure a just, comprehensive and effective international response
to climate change. States should also take steps to ensure that global intellectual property
regimes do not obstruct the dissemination of mitigation and adaptation technologies while
at the same time ensuring that these regimes create appropriate incentives to help meet
sustainable development objectives. The right of indigenous peoples to participate in
decision-making related to and benefit from the use of their knowledge, innovations and
practices should be protected.
To protect human rights from business harms
9. The Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights affirm that States have an
obligation to protect human rights from harm by businesses, while businesses have a
responsibility to respect human rights and to do no harm. States must take adequate
measures to protect all persons from human rights harms caused by businesses; to ensure
that their own activities, including activities conducted in partnership with the private
sector, respect and protect human rights; and where such harms do occur to ensure effective
remedies. Businesses are also duty bearers. They must be accountable for their climate
impacts and participate responsibly in climate change mitigation and adaptation efforts with
full respect for human rights. Where States incorporate private financing or market-based
approaches to climate change within the international climate change framework, the
compliance of businesses with these responsibilities is especially critical.
To guarantee equality and non-discrimination
10. States have committed to guarantee equality and non-discrimination. Efforts to
address climate change should not exacerbate inequalities within or between States. For
example, indigenous peoples’ rights should be fully reflected in line with the United
Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and actions likely to impact their
rights should not be taken without their free, prior and informed consent. Care should also
be taken to ensure that a gender perspective, including efforts to ensure gender equality, is
included in all planning for climate change mitigation and adaptation. The rights of
children, older persons, minorities, migrants and others in vulnerable situations must be
effectively protected.
To ensure meaningful and informed participation
11. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and other human rights
instruments guarantee all persons the right to free, active, meaningful and informed
participation in public affairs. This is critical for effective rights-based climate action and
requires open and participatory institutions and processes, as well as accurate and
transparent measurements of greenhouse gas emissions, climate change and its impacts.
States should make early-warning information regarding climate effects and natural
disasters available to all sectors of society. Adaptation and mitigation plans should be
publicly available, transparently financed and developed in consultation with affected
groups. Particular care should be taken to comply with relevant human rights obligations
related to participation of persons, groups and peoples in vulnerable situations in decision-
making processes and to ensure that adaptation and mitigation efforts do not have adverse
effects on those that they should be protecting. Human rights impact assessments of climate
actions should be employed to ensure that they respect human rights. Further, States should
develop and monitor relevant human rights indicators in the context of climate change,
keeping disaggregated data to track the varied impacts of climate change across
demographic groups and enabling effective, targeted and human rights compliant climate
action.