34/29 Realization of the right to work - Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Document Type: Final Report
Date: 2016 Dec
Session: 34th Regular Session (2017 Feb)
Agenda Item: Item2: Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General, Item3: Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development
GE.16-23165(E)
Human Rights Council Thirty-fourth session
27 February-24 March 2017
Agenda items 2 and 3
Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner
for Human Rights and reports of the Office of
the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General
Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil,
political, economic, social and cultural rights,
including the right to development
Realization of the right to work
Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Summary
The present report, prepared pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution 31/15,
gives an overview of the normative content of women’s right to work, and the main
challenges involved and good practices as regards the implementation of that right, on the
basis of international human rights law and international labour law and of its interpretation
by United Nations treaty bodies and the International Labour Organization. It also contains
examples drawn from national experiences.
United Nations A/HRC/34/29
I. Introduction
1. In its resolution 31/15, the Human Rights Council requested the United Nations
High Commissioner for Human Rights to prepare an analytical report, in consultation with
States, United Nations agencies, funds and programmes, particularly the International
Labour Organization, and the treaty bodies, special procedures, civil society and other
relevant stakeholders, on the relationship between the realization of the right to work and
the enjoyment of all human rights by women, with a particular emphasis on the
empowerment of women, in accordance with States’ respective obligations under
international human rights law and the relevant major challenges and best practices in that
regard, and to submit the report to the Human Rights Council prior to its thirty-fourth
session.
2. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
solicited submissions from States, United Nations agencies and non-governmental
organizations, and as at 28 November 2016, 32 responses had been received, from States,1
the International Labour Office, the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the
Empowerment of Women (UN-Women), the United Nations Research Institute for Social
Development, and non-governmental organizations.
3. The present report offers an overview of the scope and content of women’s right to
work, drawing on applicable human rights instruments, on the work of United Nations
human rights mechanisms, including treaty bodies, special procedures and the universal
periodic review, on international labour standards and the principles of the International
Labour Organization (ILO), and on the submissions received. It identifies challenges and
refers to good practices implemented by States to move towards full realization of the right
of work for women, underscoring the connection between this right and other human rights.
In order to analyse the main issues, the report focuses on three matters in particular: (a)
women’s right to decent work; (b) non-discrimination in working conditions; and (c)
women’s unpaid work. It does not elaborate on the specific elements of the right to work,
which have already been the subject of a report of the United Nations High Commissioner
for Human Rights on the realization of the right to work (A/HRC/31/32). Rather, it analyses
their implications for women, and the concomitant obligations on States for the elimination
of discrimination in the exercise of the right to work.
II. Normative recognition of women’s human right to work
4. The right to work is a universal human right, which finds ample recognition in
international human rights law and international labour instruments.2 Gender equality and
non-discrimination are fundamental human rights guarantees which fully apply to the right
to work. Women’s exercise of the right to work is a prerequisite for their enjoyment of
several other human rights, including the right to an adequate standard of living and the
right to social security. Women’s equal exercise of the right to work also depends on the
extent of their enjoyment of other rights, including the right to education.
1 Algeria, Argentina, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Cuba, Egypt, El Salvador, Georgia,
Germany, Greece, Italy, Jamaica, Kyrgyzstan, Madagascar, Mozambique, Oman, Paraguay, Portugal,
Republic of Moldova, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, South Africa, State of Palestine, Turkey and
United Arab Emirates. Submissions are available from
www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/ESCR/Pages/RightWorkReport.aspx.
2 See A/HRC/31/32.
5. The right to work is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in its
article 23.1, in which it is stated that “everyone has the right to work, to free choice of
employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against
unemployment”. In its article 2, the prohibition of discrimination is made applicable to all
the rights recognized in the Universal Declaration, including to the right to work, without
distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other
opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. The right to work is also
recognized in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, in its
article 6, and a general non-discrimination clause, applicable to all the rights set forth in the
Covenant, is incorporated in its article 2.2, in which discrimination on the grounds of “sex”
is proscribed. Furthermore, a specific gender equality clause is included in article 3 of the
Covenant, according to which “the States Parties ... undertake to ensure the equal right of
men and women to the enjoyment of all economic, social and cultural rights set forth in the
present Covenant”.
6. Discrimination against women is defined in article 1 of the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, and in article 11 of the
Convention the right of women to be free of discrimination in the field of employment is
reaffirmed, including the right to equal remuneration for work of equal value, the right to
social security and the right to safe conditions of work safeguarding women’s reproduction
function. According to article 11, “States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to
eliminate discrimination against women in the field of employment in order to ensure, on a
basis of equality of men and women, the same rights.”
7. In the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant
Workers and Members of Their Families, the right to work is referred to in articles 11, 25,
26, 40, 52 and 54, and prohibition of discrimination, including on the basis of sex, is made
applicable to the Convention by virtue of its article 1. Similarly, the right to work is
referred to in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in its article 27,
non-discrimination and equality between men and women are included as principles in its
article 3, these principles are further developed in its article 5 and there is a specific focus
on discrimination against women with disabilities in its article 6.
8. Regional human rights instruments also provide for recognition of the right to work
and the application of the principles of gender equality and non-discrimination to this right.
For instance, the European Social Charter of 1961 and the revised Charter of 1996 devote
considerable attention to the right to work, and pay specific attention to equal pay for equal
work and protection for women workers, including in the case of maternity. The Charter of
Fundamental Rights of the European Union addresses the right to work in its article 15.
Article 23, on equality between men and women, explicitly refers to employment, work and
pay, while article 33 mentions maternity protection and maternal and paternal leave as
measures for reconciling family and professional life. Articles 20 and 21 are devoted to
equality and non-discrimination.
9. The American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, of the Organization of
American States, refers to the right to work in its article 14, and to the principles of equality
and non-discrimination in its article 2, including on the basis of sex. The Additional
Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the Area of Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights (Protocol of San Salvador) protects the right to work in its article 6, and
makes specific mention of women’s work. Furthermore, the Additional Protocol enshrines
the prohibition of discrimination, including on the basis of sex, in its article 3.
10. The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights enshrines the right to work in its
article 15, and the prohibition of discrimination, including on the basis of sex, in its article
2. The Arab Charter on Human Rights, as revised in 2004, provides for the right to work, in
its article 34. It also includes a non-discrimination provision, in its article 3, that refers
specifically to discrimination on the grounds of sex and to equality between men and
women.
11. Several ILO texts are aimed at protecting and realizing women’s equal right to work.
In its article II (a), the Declaration concerning the aims and purposes of the International
Labour Organization (Declaration of Philadelphia), of 1944, specifies that “all human
beings, irrespective of race, creed or sex, have the right to pursue both their material well-
being and their spiritual development in conditions of freedom and dignity, of economic
security and equal opportunity”. Equality and non-discrimination, including on the basis of
sex, are also among the fundamental rights of workers identified in the ILO Declaration on
Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, and are the subject of the Equal Remuneration
Convention, 1951 (No. 100) and the Discrimination (Employment and Occupation)
Convention, 1958 (No. 111), both of which are fundamental ILO conventions.
12. Of particular importance is the more recent Domestic Workers Convention, 2011
(No. 189), as women carry out most domestic work. The ILO Employment Policy
(Supplementary Provisions) Recommendation, 1984 (No. 169), in paragraph 15, specifies
women among the categories of persons who may frequently have difficulties in finding
lasting employment and for which States are required to adopt measures to respond to their
needs in the context of an overall employment policy.
13. Many States have ratified the above-mentioned instruments. Most States have
enshrined the principle of equality between men and women in their constitutions. Many
have promulgated gender equality legislation to operationalize these convention-based and
constitutional commitments. Nonetheless, discrimination against women in the labour
market is pervasive, as reflected by the “glass ceiling”, the “gender pay gap” and the
“sticky floor”, which indicate the restrictions encountered by women in realizing their right
to work and in exercising opportunities at work. As such, the realization of women’s equal
enjoyment of the right to work warrants consideration of the gender-specific dimensions of
every aspect of that right.
III. Women’s right to decent work
14. The right to decent work entails the right to productive and freely chosen and
accepted work that ensures a dignified life without discrimination. For women, this
involves the freedom to choose work and to practise a profession, and equal access to work
opportunities and decent jobs.
15. Notwithstanding women’s growing involvement in paid work worldwide, significant
gender disparities persist in regard to labour force participation and employment. A 2016
ILO report on women’s employment estimates women’s labour force participation in 2015
at 49.6 per cent globally, compared to 76.1 per cent for men.3 While the rate in developed
countries stood at 71.0 per cent, figures ranged between 61.9 per cent and 18.8 per cent in
other regions in 2015.4 Securing decent work and staying in it also remains a challenge for
many women. Indeed, with the exception of a few subregions, unemployment rates among
women in the workforce are higher than among men worldwide. 5 Moreover, women
workers are disproportionately numerous in non-standard forms of employment such as
part-time and temporary contracts or self-employment, which tend to be more precarious.
Women are also overrepresented in the informal economy, which is characterized by poor
working conditions as well as a lack of job security and of social protection. The gender
3 ILO, Women at Work: Trends 2016 (Geneva, 2016).
4 ILO, World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2016 (Geneva, 2016).
5 ILO, Women at Work: Trends 2016.
gap in employment in the informal economy reaches a peak of 13 percentage points in sub-
Saharan Africa.6 These statistical data signal de facto discrimination as regards access by
women to decent work opportunities, which States have an immediate duty to eliminate.
A. Freedom to choose a profession and an occupation
16. Women’s right to freedom to choose a profession is frequently compromised by
discriminatory legal provisions.
17. Laws in some countries prohibit women from performing certain tasks, exercising
certain professions or entering particular industries, on the basis of gendered perceptions of
unsuitable work for women. Such prohibitions often concern night work, jobs in sectors
such as mining, or participation in the armed forces. Treaty bodies have called upon States
to remove these prohibitions.7
18. Subjecting women’s engagement in work to authorization from their spouse or a
male guardian, as is found in some family laws, is another form of formal discrimination.8
In some countries, where the laws do not provide for such prior authorization, it may
nevertheless be practised. In other situations, women’s right to freely chosen work is
impeded by restrictions on the exercise of other rights, such as their freedom of movement
or their right to legal autonomy. The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination
against Women has on several occasions challenged States that have maintained such
systems.9
19. Freedom to choose work also means freedom from forced labour. Many women are
trapped in slavery-like situations or engaged in forced labour, including as a result of
trafficking. As part of its duty to protect, States must take specific measures to prevent
actions by third parties that would put women in situations of forced labour. States should
also tackle the root causes of women’s vulnerability to forced labour and trafficking, such
as poverty or a lack of employment in the home country, that compel women to seek
migration opportunities.
20. Domestic work notably exposes girls and women, especially migrant domestic
workers, to risks of forced labour. Combating this situation necessitates raising awareness
around women’s dignity and equal rights, both in countries of origin and countries of
destination. Awareness of legal protections for women’s rights in receiving countries,
including with regard to the conditions of work, is also essential, in order to enable
domestic workers to assert their rights.
21. Treaty bodies have recommended that States discontinue arrangements such as the
sponsorship system and the live-in setting, which render domestic workers particularly
vulnerable to severe labour exploitation.10 States should also take measures to ensure the
release of women in situations of forced labour. This involves setting up accessible systems
that allow victims to seek effective assistance, and subjecting to labour inspection those
sectors where women are likely to be held in forced labour, such as domestic work and
agriculture.
6 Ibid.
7 See, for example, CEDAW/C/KAZ/CO/3-4, para. 28; CEDAW/C/GIN/CO/7-8, para. 47; and
CEDAW/C/TKM/CO/3-4, para. 32.
8 See, for example, CEDAW/C/CMR/CO/4-5, para. 28; CEDAW/C/TCD/CO/1-4, para. 32; and
CEDAW/C/QAT/CO/1, para. 35.
9 See, for example, CEDAW/C/ARE/CO/1, para. 45; and CEDAW/C/IDN/CO/6-7, para. 17.
10 See, for example, CEDAW/C/OMN/CO/1, para. 42; and CERD/C/LBN/CO/18-22, para. 42.
B. Equal access to work opportunities
22. Equality in the exercise of the right to work involves non-discrimination in
accessing work opportunities. Women’s higher unemployment rates, as well as
occupational segregation, are symptomatic of discrimination in access to work
opportunities. To achieve substantive equality, States should adopt supportive policies,
combat discriminatory practices, and change cultural or religious expectations about
women’s roles at home and in the family that hinder their transition from school to work.
1. Unemployment
23. While the right to work is not construed as an absolute right to obtain employment,
States have an obligation to ensure equal access to work opportunities. A State in which a
significantly higher number of women are unemployed is failing to discharge its obligations
to fulfil the right to work and to ensure non-discrimination in the exercise of the right to
work. The principle of progressive realization also entails the gradual reduction of women’s
unemployment. To that end, States have an obligation to implement effective and targeted
measures, to the maximum of their available resources.
24. Research converges on the importance of adequate economic policies to effect
change in women’s employment opportunities. Economic policies that do not lead to the
creation of jobs have a detrimental effect on women’s equal access to employment. In fact,
policies targeting women’s employment in the context of jobless growth will have only a
limited redistributive effect, reallocating some jobs from men to women.11 Consequently, in
a 2016 report, UN-Women stresses the importance of creating additional decent jobs for
women, as well as improving their access to them. Specifically, it is recommended in the
report that macroeconomic policies depart from traditional goals of deflation, and instead
stimulate economic activity and increase demand for labour. In the report, UN-Women also
calls for increased social spending so as to create decent jobs in sectors such as health,
education, and care.12
25. Employment policies should provide for employment services that cater to the
specific challenges faced by women, to ensure that they do not leave the workforce or
resort to precarious jobs after childbirth and to facilitate their re-employment after career
interruptions. This could include specialized placement assistance, as well as training
programmes linked with prospective employment opportunities. Some States have put in
place incentives for companies to recruit women who return to the workforce after career
breaks.
26. Because of the criterion of sex intersecting with other factors such as race, ethnicity,
colour, religion, national or social origin and disability, many women experience multiple
forms of discrimination and face serious hurdles in exercising their right to work. For
example, women with disabilities face greater difficulty in securing employment. In this
regard, laws should require employers to ensure an accessible work environment and the
provision of reasonable accommodation.
27. Discriminatory legal provisions and policies such as those on access to certain
positions on the basis of ways of dressing,13 different mandatory retirement ages for men
and women, and provisions for revoking the work permit of migrant women upon
11 José Antonio Ocampo and Jomo Kwame Sundaram, Towards Full and Decent Employment (2008), p.
70.
12 UN-Women, Transforming Economies, Realizing Rights (New York, 2015), p. 9.
13 See, for example, CEDAW/C/NOR/CO/8, para. 29.
childbirth or marriage14 should also be amended, so that women enjoy the right to work on
an equal basis with men.
2. Discrimination in recruitment
28. Women are often refused job offers on account of their sex, in spite of labour laws
against discrimination. Structural biases have led to practices of appointing men to perform
certain jobs and not hiring women, including due to social assumptions that motherhood is
irreconcilable with the demands of employment. In some cases, the prospect of pregnancy
and motherhood discourages employers from recruiting women at all. In this regard, some
employers have imposed pregnancy tests as a condition of recruitment or for maintaining
employment, which is discriminatory and should be prohibited. 15 In fact, women’s
situations in the labour market often belie their educational attainment, due to
discrimination in recruitment.
29. States have an obligation to remove conditions that are likely to lead to women’s
disadvantage in recruitment, through sound labour laws and monitoring institutions,
especially as women rarely have the opportunity to challenge hiring decisions. For
example, it is important to transfer the coverage of paid maternity leave to the social
security system or public funds, in order to combat the preferential recruitment of men on
the basis of the perceived cost of recruiting women of childbearing age.
3. Occupational segregation
30. Stereotypes about women’s roles in the family and society have resulted in
horizontal segregation, whereby women are overrepresented in sectors such as
manufacturing and in professions related to familial and service functions in the public and
private sectors. Moreover, women occupy primarily clerical and support positions, which
creates a horizontal segregation in the labour market.16 More concerning is the practice of
employing women with disabilities in sheltered workshops, without adequate support for
their transitioning to the open labour market.17 States have an obligation to take effective
measures to remove these discriminatory situations, with a view to fulfilling women’s equal
right to work opportunities.
31. While girls’ and women’s right to education is beyond the scope of the present
report, it is important to stress that it is a critical determinant of equality in employment.
Therefore, States should take measures to diversify girls’ and women’s educational choices.
States should also introduce quotas, where necessary, in areas of study in technical,
vocational and tertiary education in which women are underrepresented. Some countries
have implemented specific projects to encourage girls to pursue education in fields
traditionally associated with the other sex. Sexual harassment and bullying that are
obstacles to girls’ and women’s educational achievement, especially when they are in the
minority, should also be addressed.
32. As stereotypes are often reproduced in school textbooks and conveyed by the media,
sustained communication campaigns about equality of opportunities and outcomes are
necessary. In particular, article 8 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities calls on States to combat stereotypes and prejudices relating to persons with
disabilities.
14 See, for example, CEDAW/C/ISR/CO/5, para. 42.
15 See, for example, CEDAW/C/MEX/CO/7-8, para. 28.
16 UN-Women, Transforming Economies, Realizing Rights, p. 10.
17 See, for example, CRPD/C/AUT/CO/1, para. 44; E/C.12/JPN/CO/3, para. 12; and
CRPD/C/KOR/CO/1, para. 49.
33. Temporary special measures are the most effective means to address occupational
segregation, both horizontal and vertical, and to achieve substantive equality. They should
be codified in laws specifying the circumstances under which employers are required to
implement them. Special measures should be designed to support the principle of equality,
so as to comply with convention-based and constitutional stipulations thereon. 18 The
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women regularly highlights the
importance of defining numerical goals to be achieved within a certain period of time.
Special measures should be discontinued when the objectives of equality of opportunity and
treatment have been achieved.
34. Temporary special measures can be implemented in recruitment, for example by
giving preference to a woman when candidates are equally qualified, or by providing
training to women candidates so that they can meet the qualifying criteria for the positions
that are subject to temporary special measures. Some countries have introduced mandatory
quotas for the representation of women on the boards of companies.
35. Governments have a greater responsibility to eliminate occupational segregation in
public organizations, where they have more direct control of human resources policies.
Targets in the public sector could include appointments to decision-making positions or in
professional groups where women are traditionally underrepresented.
C. Access to decent work
36. When there are no legal restrictions on one’s choice of work, women are not always
fully free to engage in the work of their preference. Indeed, unpaid domestic and care
responsibilities often restrict their employment options. On the one hand, many countries
face a shortfall in affordable infrastructure and services and related social security schemes
that would free women from care responsibilities. On the other hand, inflexible hours in the
workplace are often incompatible with household and care roles that women continue to
carry out. As a result, women take on part-time or temporary employment involuntarily;
accordingly, in some regions, they face a 25 to 35 per cent higher risk of being in
precarious employment than men.19
37. The discriminatory ramifications of women’s overrepresentation in non-standard
forms of employment are numerous. In addition to the repercussions on earnings, women’s
right to work is also at risk, as non-standard jobs generally lack security. Moreover, while
work should enable individuals’ personal fulfilment, women frequently experience
discrimination in part-time and temporary jobs that tend to be low-skilled, have few career
prospects and often do not correspond to their educational and professional qualifications or
aspirations.
38. The lack of possibilities to work part-time or with other flexible working options is
equally discriminatory. When flexibility is not afforded, female workers with care
responsibilities may be forced to forego employment. This holds particularly true when
economic considerations favour withdrawal from work by women who earn less than male
household members.
39. The ILO Workers with Family Responsibilities Recommendation, 1981 (No. 165)
provides detailed guidance on national policies to enable persons with family
responsibilities to exercise their right to work. In particular, States should develop systems
18 Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women general recommendation No. 23
(1997) on political and public life, para. 15.
19 ILO, World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2016, summary.
of care that are affordable and accessible and change society’s perception of women’s roles.
Some countries have made it compulsory for companies of a certain size to provide
childcare services.20 Moreover, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
states that the development of flexibility in the workplace should be part of these national
policies. To this end, it is important to ensure that the arrangements put in place are
premised on the equitable sharing of care responsibilities between men and women.
40. The right to decent work also implies work opportunities in the formal economy. In
many regions, women are primarily employed in the informal economy. 21 The ILO
Transition from the Informal to the Formal Economy Recommendation, 2015 (No. 204)
outlines 12 guiding principles informed by country experiences. In addition to measures
taken to progressively bring employment and businesses into the formal economy, States
should implement macroeconomic policies aimed at creating decent jobs. Indeed, women
work in the informal economy owing to a lack of opportunities in the formal economy.22
D. Entrepreneurship
41. Entrepreneurship is another way of exercising one’s right to work, where the right of
women to equal opportunities also applies. Data showing that women are less likely to be
involved in entrepreneurial activity than men reveals patterns of inequality.23 Closing this
gap requires tackling the root causes of women’s disadvantages in entrepreneurial
participation and business ownership, as well as implementing targeted measures.
42. Firstly, formal discrimination should be eliminated where it exists. States should
guarantee women’s legal autonomy, thus eliminating any legal barriers to their ability to
conclude contracts, own and administer properties, or hold bank accounts without needing
the prior authorization of another person. Discriminatory practices, such as those related to
inheritance and the registration of households’ lands in men’s names, should also be
abolished.
43. Financial inclusion is critical for promoting women’s access to means of production,
as either women lack the necessary collateral for accessing loans or the informality of their
businesses is incompatible with procedures in traditional financial institutions. Several
countries have attempted to overcome this barrier through initiatives establishing special
credit lines at banks or by setting up specific funds or more accessible banking and payment
services. Other countries have coupled these measures with initiatives aimed at improving
women’s literacy, and their business, economic, financial and legal skills, and at narrowing
the gender gap in access to information and communication technology. Temporary special
measures can also be implemented to support women’s entrepreneurship, for example by
prioritizing women in land redistribution programmes or granting women-led businesses
preferential treatment in public procurement processes.
44. Several States have implemented projects and programmes promoting the
development of income-generating activities for women. These initiatives should be
accompanied by measures to facilitate access to markets, including through investment in
transport infrastructure and in marketing facilities. A human rights-based approach to such
efforts should seek to develop activities in the formal economy, in businesses that would lift
20 See, for example, CEDAW/C/PRY/CO/6, para. 28.
21 ILO, Women at Work: Trends 2016, p. 11.
22 Ocampo and Jomo K.S., Towards Full and Decent Employment, p. 77. See also the ILO Transition
from the Informal to the Formal Economy Recommendation, 2015 (No. 204).
23 United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Human Development Report 2015 (New York,
2015), p. 111.
women and their families out of poverty, and to support their inclusion in sectors
traditionally associated with men.
IV. Non-discrimination in the enjoyment of the right to just and favourable working conditions
45. Beyond equal access to opportunities, women’s equal right to work encompasses
equality of opportunity and treatment in the workplace. The right to just and favourable
conditions is the necessary corollary of the right to work that is freely chosen and
accepted.24 In its general comment No. 23 (2016) on the right to just and favourable
conditions of work, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights recalls that
States have an obligation to guarantee that women enjoy conditions of work not inferior to
those of men and receive equal pay for work of equal value.25
A. Non-discrimination in working conditions
46. For women, non-discrimination encompasses the right to equal working conditions
as well as the right to differential treatment due to biological differences.
1. Right to equal working conditions
47. The right to equal working conditions is undermined for certain categories of female
workers, including due to the sectors they belong to. Domestic workers, the majority of
whom are girls or women, are among those most at risk of abuse, harassment and violence.
Their living and working conditions may be akin to slavery when they live with their
employers. Domestic work also falls outside the scope of the labour law in several
countries. Therefore there are no standards, at the country level, that spell out their working
conditions.
48. The ILO Domestic Workers Convention, 2011 (No. 189) and Domestic Workers
Recommendation, 2011 (No. 201) provide guidance to States on measures to be taken to
protect the rights of domestic workers. On the basis of these instruments, several States
have started regulating domestic work and the operations of recruitment agencies. However
violations continue to be observed, as victims are often isolated and unable to seek
assistance. Treaty-monitoring bodies have expressed the view that domestic workers should
enjoy the same labour rights as other workers, in terms of health and safety at work, rest
and remuneration. 26 Any separate legislation should solely address their increased
vulnerability to abuses and not set specific conditions of work.
49. Women working in manufacturing and other sectors in export-processing zones are
also vulnerable to violations of their labour rights. Often, in order to attract investors, States
adopt specific regimes for export-processing zones whereby labour law does not apply,
either partially or fully. Reports of low wages, long working hours, unpaid overtime, sexual
harassment and other forms of violence in export-processing zones are rife. States enforcing
such regimes fail in their obligation to protect the right to just and favourable conditions of
work and the right to non-discrimination.
24 See Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights general comment No. 23 (2016) on the right
to just and favourable conditions of work, para. 1.
25 Ibid., para. 54.
26 See, for example, CEDAW/C/BRA/CO/7, para. 12; and CEDAW/C/AND/CO/2-3, para. 30.
50. Women migrant workers, especially undocumented and irregular migrant workers,
are likely to face violations of labour rights.27 Often, they lack employment contracts and
are thus vulnerable to exploitation. 28 Also, legal protections may not reach the large
majority of women engaged in the informal economy.
51. In order to meet their obligation to protect the right to equal working conditions,
States should expand the mandate of compliance institutions so that it covers the informal
economy and domestic work, including in private residences. Moreover, they should
monitor the working conditions of both regular and irregular migrant workers. Regulations
and policies should take into account the difficulties encountered by these women workers
in seeking assistance or remedies when their rights are violated. States should also ensure
that these categories of workers are able to exercise their right to organize so that they can
advocate for their labour rights.
2. Differential treatment due to biological differences
52. Due to biological differences, female workers require differential treatment at work,
including in relation to pregnancy, childbirth and breastfeeding. These should be specified
and protected by domestic laws and should not be considered as discriminatory. The lack
thereof would have adverse consequences not only on the right of women to just and
favourable conditions of work and on their right to health but also on their ability to
exercise the right to work altogether.
53. Article 11 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
against Women and the ILO Maternity Protection Convention, 2000 (No. 183) and
Maternity Protection Recommendation, 2000 (No. 191) provide the main direction for a
maternity protection framework in the workplace, with minimum standards in respect of
access to health care, health protection, and maternity leave entitlements.
54. According to the ILO Maternity Protection Convention, 2000 (No. 183), working
women should have access to prenatal, childbirth and postnatal medical care. When such
services are not provided free of charge, the costs should be covered by health insurance
schemes. Conditions in the workplace for safeguarding the health of pregnant or nursing
women and that of their child include prohibition of the performance of certain tasks that
may pose risks to the health of expectant women, protection against their exposure to
harmful environmental conditions, and the granting of rest periods during working hours.
To the extent possible, appropriate accommodation should be provided so that women can
perform their work responsibilities during pregnancy. If necessary, they may be reassigned
to different tasks. Such a decision should be made in consultation with the person
concerned, with the guarantee that she can return to her previous position when conditions
allow it. Pregnant workers should be protected against exposure to harmful chemicals that
can result in illnesses, pregnancy complications or fetal disorders. Article 11 (3) of the
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women advises
periodic reviews of legislation relating to maternity protection in the light of scientific and
technological advances.
55. In the context of its examination of State party reports, the Committee on the
Elimination of Discrimination against Women has recommended that States accord the
minimum of 14 weeks of paid maternity leave to women, with at least two thirds of
previous or insured earnings, in accordance with the ILO Maternity Protection Convention,
2000 (No. 183) which also prescribes one daily break with pay for breastfeeding. The
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women has also called upon
27 See, for example, CMW/C/URY/CO/1, para. 23; and CMW/C/BFA/CO/1, para. 20.
28 See, for example, CMW/C/KGZ/CO/1, para. 38.
States to remove undue restrictions on the right to paid maternity leave. 29 Pay during
maternity leave — guaranteeing continued income — is central to ensuring that maternity
does not affect women’s economic situation and that women have the means to meet the
additional expenses engendered by childbirth. With regard to migrant women, it is essential
to ensure that they retain their legal status during maternity leave.30
56. Maternity benefits should be made available to all women, including female migrant
workers, unwed mothers,31 domestic workers, self-employed women and part-time workers,
as well as women employed in sectors where such protection is not traditionally afforded,
such as in agriculture. In this regard, setting up non-contributory cash benefits for women
who do not meet the qualifying conditions is a good practice.
57. Notwithstanding the recommendation in article 4 of the ILO Maternity Protection
Convention, 2000 (No. 183) of a minimum of six weeks of postnatal maternity leave,
several States have allowed women to decide when they start maternity leave.
Overprotective regulations imposing long maternity leave may not be desirable, when they
reinforce gender-stereotyped roles. 32 Instead, provisions for non-transferable paternity
leave, parental leave and leave for family reasons are recommended.33 Some States have
extended parental leave to parents adopting children.
58. Workplaces should have water and sanitation facilities that meet women’s specific
hygiene needs. A lack of adequate facilities is discriminatory, as it often compels women to
avoid work during menstruation. Leave policies should also accommodate menstruation-
related needs, as required. States should combat stigma and taboos around menstruation,
where they exist, so that they do not hamper women’s right to work. Some industries may
also need to establish specific standards for the protection of women’s health. For instance,
attention should be paid to women’s exposure to chemicals that may have adverse effects
on their reproductive health.
B. Equal opportunities in the workplace
59. The right to equal opportunities at work concerns women’s equal right to be
promoted, freedom from harassment — especially sexual harassment, and protection
against unfair dismissal. Several countries have made it illegal for employers to
discriminate against a person on the grounds of sex and have adopted equal employment
opportunity laws. And yet, women are routinely discriminated against in the workplace, as
evidenced by women’s underrepresentation in managerial and decision-making
occupations 34 and by the numerous cases of sexual harassment and of gender-based
discrimination when such data are collected.35
60. According to article 7 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights, all workers have the right to equal opportunity to be promoted to an
appropriate higher level, subject to no considerations other than those of seniority and
competence. Under their obligation to protect, States should adopt laws requiring
employers to apply merit-based and transparent promotion processes and to outline in their
29 See, for example, CEDAW/C/GRD/CO/1-5, para. 31; CEDAW/C/MUS/CO/6-7, para. 31; and
CEDAW/C/BHS/CO/1-5, para. 34.
30 See, for example, CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/5, para. 33.
31 See, for example, CEDAW/C/SGP/CO/4/Rev.1, para. 29.
32 See, for example, CEDAW/C/MDA/CO/4-5, para. 27.
33 See Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights general comment No. 23 (2016), para. 44.
34 UN-Women, Transforming Economies, Realizing Rights, p. 10.
35 See, for example, CEDAW/C/BEL/CO/7, para. 32; and CEDAW/C/MEX/CO/7-8, para. 28.
internal human resources policies and procedures the safeguards against discrimination in
promotion.
61. Non-discrimination against women at work also entails pregnancy and maternity —
and the prospect thereof — not leading to disadvantages in the workplace nor affecting job
security. Maternity should not impede women’s opportunity for promotion. In some
countries maternity leave is counted in time accrued, for the purposes of seniority and
promotion. Adjustments made to accommodate expectant and nursing workers should not
lead to the downgrading of their position, or to the risk thereof. The practice of demoting
women upon their return from maternity leave should be proscribed.36
62. Violence, including sexual harassment, is an impediment to women’s equal
opportunities in the workplace. Furthermore, sexual harassment is discriminatory, as
rejection of advances often results in victims being denied recruitment and promotion and
in some cases has led them to resign from their positions. As such, States should enact
legislation outlawing sexual harassment, with the broadest definition possible. Legislation
should also prescribe specific duties on employers to prevent sexual harassment, and
procedures, based on confidentiality, for the notification and reporting of claims of sexual
harassment and for their resolution.37
63. Women workers should enjoy protection against unfair dismissal. Due to their
overrepresentation in pink-collar jobs and among those who are on short-term and
precarious contracts, women are more likely to be made redundant. It follows that, in
addition to promoting women’s access to higher-level positions, States should take
measures to prevent the abuse of short-term and other precarious contracts by employers,
which often occurs in order to circumvent the right of women to maternity leave and to
avoid paying social contributions.38
64. Lastly, dismissal due to pregnancy or maternity should also be prohibited. Standards
on this matter ban the termination of women’s employment contracts for a certain period of
time before and after childbirth. Yet, the practice of terminating women’s contracts during
or after the protection period is widely reported. The penalties for such unfair practices are
often not enough of a deterrent, with employers opting to pay the fines.
65. As part of their duty to protect, States should monitor the effectiveness of regulatory
provisions aimed at protecting women against unfair treatment on account of sex,
pregnancy or childbirth, ensuring that they have a dissuasive effect and that aggrieved
workers have access to effective remedies. Trade unions also play a key role in promoting
women’s equal rights at work, by guaranteeing, among other things, that collective
agreements do not lead to discrimination. As such, States should maintain a legal and
political environment that enables workers to exercise freely their trade union rights. It is
equally important that women are adequately represented in the decision-making bodies of
trade unions.39
C. Equal pay for work of equal value
66. The right to equal pay for work of equal value is enshrined in article 7 of the
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and in the ILO Equal
36 See, for example, CEDAW/C/GRC/CO/7, para. 28.
37 See Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights general comment No. 23 (2016), para. 48.
38 See, for example, CEDAW/C/MNE/CO/1, para. 28.
39 See, for example, CEDAW/C/SRB/CO/2-3, para. 26; CEDAW/C/TUN/CO/6, para. 36; and
CEDAW/C/ZAF/CO/4, para. 29.
Remuneration Convention, 1951 (No. 100). This entails equal remuneration for the
performance of similar jobs and of jobs that are “completely different but nonetheless of
equal value when assessed by objective criteria”.40 In this regard, treaty-monitoring bodies
have often drawn the attention of States parties to the fact that provisions on equal pay for
equal work fall short of the requirement of the principle of equal pay for work of equal
value.41
67. Studies show that discrimination in remuneration accounts for a large part of the
gender pay gap. Women are overwhelmingly paid less for the same work, but also, the
wages in sectors that predominantly employ women are lower than in other sectors. Indeed,
wages tend to diminish when more women enter a particular occupation, which
demonstrates the devaluation of work that is performed by women. 42 This systemic
discrimination in remuneration is one of the reasons why women’s educational
achievements have not generated commensurate economic returns.
68. The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights recommends that States set
time-bound targets for achieving gender equality in remuneration.43 Measures to be taken in
this regard include adopting legislation that guarantees the right to equal remuneration for
work of equal value, and mandating labour inspectorates to investigate claims of unequal
remuneration. Moreover, States should promote objective appraisals of jobs on the basis of
the work to be performed and require employers to progressively decrease the differentials
between rates of remuneration for men and rates of remuneration for women for work of
equal value.44 The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights clarifies that “the
extent to which equality is being achieved requires an ongoing objective evaluation of
whether the work is of equal value and whether the remuneration received is equal.”45
Discriminatory practices, such as the payment of larger wage bonuses to men, based on
social norms of men as breadwinners, should also be abandoned. 46 Some States have
enacted laws providing for mandatory gender equality plans and mandatory reporting by
employers, for example on the transparency of salary policies and mechanisms for reporting
instances of discrimination.
69. Evaluation of jobs across industries and professions should be conducted by States,
with a view to narrowing gender pay gaps. In its general recommendation No. 13 (1989) on
equal remuneration for work of equal value, the Committee on the Elimination of
Discrimination against Women recommends that States consider adopting “job evaluation
systems based on gender-neutral criteria” to assess the value of jobs across organizations,
professions and industries. The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has
further developed this concept, stating that such criteria should include “skills,
responsibilities and effort required by the worker, as well as working conditions”.47 In
practice, States should provide support to social partners so that collective bargaining in
sectors where women are predominant could lead to re-evaluation of wages in those
40 See Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights general comment No. 23 (2016) on the right
to just and favourable conditions of work, para. 11.
41 See, for example, E/C.12/JAM/CO/3-4, para. 14; E/C.12/NZL/CO/3, para. 14; and
CEDAW/C/CPV/CO/7-8, para. 26.
42 Asaf Levanon and others, “Occupational feminization and pay: assessing causal dynamics using
1950-2000 U.S. census data”, Social Forces, vol. 88, No. 2 (December 2009), pp. 865-892.
43 See Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights general comment No. 23 (2016), para. 15.
44 ILO, Equal Remuneration Recommendation, 1951 (No. 90), arts. 4 and 5.
45 See Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights general comment No. 23 (2016), para. 12.
46 See, for example, CEDAW/C/BLR/CO/7, para. 32.
47 See Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights general comment No. 23 (2016), para. 12.
sectors. 48 Some States have also undertaken nationwide equal pay campaigns, raising
awareness of the illegality of discrimination in remuneration.
V. Women’s unpaid work
70. Women carry out the bulk of unpaid caregiving and household work in society,
which keeps them out of the workforce and public life. In addition to social norms, the lack
of affordable care services and the gender remuneration gap perpetuate women’s
disproportionate engagement in unpaid care work.
71. The gender disparities in the allocation of unpaid work impedes girls’ and women’s
equal enjoyment of their rights to education, work and an adequate standard of living, and
of other rights, and impedes their social and economic empowerment. While men engage in
remunerative and productive activities, women, who are often burdened by unpaid work,
have limited options to participate in public life and to seek decent employment. Often,
they are compelled to resort to precarious part-time and temporary employment. The
cumulative impact of unpaid work on the situation of the rights of older women is also
considerable. With little to no pension and retirement savings, some older women who have
spent a significant part of their life in unremunerated work may be denied a large range of
their rights, including the right to an adequate standard of living, the right to health, and the
right to be protected against abuse. Moreover, the rights of persons receiving support may
also be affected, in that caregivers may not always be able or qualified to provide adequate
care.
72. The social and economic contributions of unpaid work have remained largely
invisible and undervalued. Yet, in essence, women’s unpaid work “subsidizes” the
provision of care, by filling unmet demands for public or affordable services. It is estimated
that women’s unremunerated work could amount to between 10 and 39 per cent of a given
country’s gross domestic product.49 Most national economic and social policies have failed
to accord due consideration to this barrier to women’s equal participation in the labour
market and public life.
73. States’ policies affect the extent of women’s engagement in unpaid care. In her 2013
report, the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights underlines that State
policies determine who has access to care services and also who does not50 and is thus
obliged to fill the gaps through unpaid care work — this is usually girls and women.
Moreover, the availability of social, household and public infrastructure influences the
amount of time that women spend on household work. Consequently, in addition to
mending the gender-based division of work, the core of public policies that are aimed at
addressing women’s unpaid work should be anchored in social protection, recognition of
the value of unpaid work, and the availability of time-saving domestic technologies and
public infrastructure. Part of this approach has been framed by Diane Elson as the “triple
R”: recognize, reduce and redistribute.51
74. Any effort to effect change on women’s burden of unpaid work should start with
recognition of the social and economic value of the work. This entails acknowledging that
48 See, for example, CEDAW/C/NOR/CO/8, para. 30.
49 Debbie Budlender, The Statistical Evidence of Care and Non-Care Work Across Six Countries,
(Geneva, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, 2008), p. 38.
50 See A/68/293, para. 8.
51 Diane Elson, “The three R’s of unpaid work: recognition, reduction and redistribution”, paper
presented at the Expert Group Meeting on Unpaid Work, Economic Development and Human
Well-being (UNDP, 2008).
care, hitherto performed primarily by women, enables other members of society to enjoy
their human rights at the expense of those women’s enjoyment of their own human rights.
Such recognition should inform States’ social, economic and fiscal policies. In order to
measure the economic worth of the unpaid work done by women, States could collect
statistical data, embark on a valuation process, and incorporate unpaid work in the gross
national product. This exercise could also lead to a better valuation of wages in care-related
industries.
75. Posited on the principle that care is a collective responsibility, the social protection
system is a critical tool for redistributing the burden of unpaid care on women and for
mitigating its impact on older women. In its general comment No. 19 (2007) on the right to
social security, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights recommends that
States develop schemes for covering, among other things, family and child support, and
sickness and disability, to meet the needs for assistance and other related expenses and to
enable carers to fulfil their responsibilities. These benefits, which could be in the form of
cash entitlements and social services, should be available and accessible, especially for
disadvantaged and marginalized individuals and households, including those working in the
informal economy. Taking into account the resources and circumstances of the
beneficiaries, they should also be adequate in amount, form and duration, so that care can
be outsourced, for example. In this regard, the inclusion of care in social protection floors is
of critical importance. Other good practices include allowing for care expenses to be
deductible from income tax.52
76. States should alleviate the effect of career interruptions for unpaid care on older
women’s income, through social protection. States could, for instance, design non-
contributory pensions to ensure older women’s right to social security and to offset losses
of earnings due to periods of unpaid care work. Another good practice is factoring women’s
involvement in unpaid care into the determination of benefits under contributory schemes,
by considering periods of child-rearing or care of dependents in the calculation of pension
entitlements.
77. States should be mindful of the impact of economic policies on women’s unpaid
work. Reductions in public social services, prompted by funding cuts in the context of
austerity measures, could result in additional demands for unpaid care work on families,
compelling some women to give up remunerated work.53 At the same time, those who
remain in employment end up carrying a heavier burden. Although the Committee on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and many other human rights mechanisms
recommend that austerity measures should not disproportionately affect the rights of
disadvantaged and marginalized individuals and groups, the gendered effect of budgetary
cuts on unpaid care work is often overlooked by impact assessments.54
VI. Conclusions
78. The commitments made with the recent adoption of the Sustainable
Development Goals — especially goal 8 (target 8.5, under goal 8, “Promote sustained,
inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and
decent work for all”) and goal 5 (“Achieve gender equality and empower all women
and girls”), together with the requirement contained in the 2030 Agenda that the goals
52 See, for example, CEDAW/C/MLT/CO/4, para. 20.
53 Francesca Bettio and others. The Impact of the Economic Crisis on the Situation of Women and Men
and on Gender Equality Policies (Luxembourg, European Commission, 2013).
54 See, for example, A/HRC/26/39.
be implemented in a manner consistent with the obligations of States under
international law — should give a political impetus to advancing women’s equal right
to work worldwide.
79. Equality and non-discrimination are fundamental human rights guarantees
which apply to the right to work. They also give rise to an immediate obligation for
States to eliminate discrimination against women in the exercise of the right to work,
in terms of equal opportunities and equality of outcomes. In this vein, addressing the
gender-related dimensions of the right to work is crucial, as the labour market reflects
the social prejudices and disadvantages that undermine equality and dignity.
80. The close nexuses between the right to work and other human rights warrant a
life cycle and rights-based approach as well as multisectoral interventions. To achieve
substantive equality, macroeconomic policies should promote the creation of decent
jobs for women, and targeted measures should be integrated into employment policies
to strengthen women’s employability and reduce their engagement in precarious jobs.
81. Labour regulations and policies should provide for specific tools for combating
discrimination in the workplace such as wage disparities and sexual harassment. Such
regulations and policies should pay particular attention to domestic workers, migrant
workers and women with disabilities, whose labour rights are often violated. They
should also provide for conditions and treatment that take into account biological
differences between men and women. At the same time, laws and regulations would be
of limited utility without access to effective remedies by victims and without
monitoring and enforcement mechanisms that are sensitive to violations of women’s
labour rights in the workplace.
82. Sustained efforts are needed to correct the deeply entrenched gender
stereotypes that obstruct women’s equal access to opportunities. Adjustments in social
protection systems and investment in infrastructure are also necessary in order to
alleviate women’s burden of unpaid care. More generally, greater involvement by
women in policymaking and law-making processes and in trade union leadership is
called for so that their experiences and views are taken into account.
83. The impact of all measures taken should be monitored against time-bound
goals, on the basis of process and outcome indicators, 55 in the light of States’
obligation to progressively realize the right to work. States are also bound by their
obligation to use their maximum available resources in this process.
55 OHCHR, Human Rights Indicators: A Guide to Measurement and Implementation (Geneva, 2012).