Original HRC document

PDF

Document Type: Final Report

Date: 2017 Jul

Session: 36th Regular Session (2017 Sep)

Agenda Item: Item2: Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General

GE.17-11032(E)



Human Rights Council Thirty-sixth session

11-29 September 2017

Agenda item 2

Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner

for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the

High Commissioner and the Secretary-General

Composition of the staff of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights*

* The annexes to the present report are reproduced as received, in the language of submission only.

United Nations A/HRC/36/18

I. Introduction

1. The Human Rights Council, in its resolution 31/1, requested the High Commissioner

for Human Rights to submit a comprehensive and updated report to the Council at its thirty-

sixth session, with a special focus on further measures taken to correct the imbalance in the

geographical composition of the staff of the Office of the High Commissioner (OHCHR).

In resolution 28/1, the Council had requested the High Commissioner to submit such a

report at its thirty-third session. That report on the composition of the staff of OHCHR

presented data for 2015 (A/HRC/33/18), but the High Commissioner also explained that

with most staff now falling under the new staff selection and managed mobility system (see

ST/AI/20016/1), there would be no separate measures taken by or for OHCHR on which to

report. As the resolution asking for the current report was passed before the previous report

was issued, the High Commissioner, while still presenting the current report, is unable to

expand on measures related to the geographical composition of his Office.

2. Chapter II of the present report includes data on staff members on regular budget

posts subject to geographical distribution and data on staff in temporary posts funded from

general temporary assistance and extrabudgetary resources, or on technical cooperation

project posts, neither of which are included in the definition of posts subject to geographical

distribution.

3. Chapter III contains a description of the measures for improvement taken by the

High Commissioner, bearing in mind the issues identified by the Human Rights Council in

resolution 31/1, while fully observing United Nations Secretariat human resources policies,

in particular, its recruitment and contractual policies.

II. Composition of the staff of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

4. The recruitment of staff members to posts subject to geographical distribution is

governed by the system of desirable ranges at the Secretariat level. For that purpose,

Member States are grouped into four categories: unrepresented, underrepresented, within

range and overrepresented. A Member State is considered unrepresented when none of its

nationals, throughout the entire Secretariat, is serving in a post subject to geographical

distribution and filled in accordance with the established selection process. It is

underrepresented when the number of its nationals appointed to such posts throughout the

entire Secretariat is below the lower limit of the desirable range. It is within range when the

number of its nationals appointed to such posts is between the upper and lower limits of the

desirable range and it is overrepresented when the number of its nationals appointed to such

posts within the entire Secretariat exceeds the upper limit of the desirable range. The

representation status of Member States is affected by many factors, in particular the

turnover of staff and changes in the scale of assessments.

5. The official report on the composition of the Secretariat is submitted annually by the

Secretary-General to the General Assembly in accordance with a number of resolutions, the

most recent being Assembly resolutions 59/266, 60/238, 61/244, 63/250, 65/247, 66/234,

67/255, 68/252 and 71/263.

6. The most recent report of the Secretary-General on the composition of the

Secretariat (A/71/360) covers the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016. OHCHR is part

of the Secretariat and the breakdown of its geographical composition has to be seen against

the breakdown of the overall distribution within the Secretariat.

7. The Office of Human Resources Management launched an online reporting tool,

“HR Insight”, available to all permanent missions in August 2011. Since its launch, staff

demographic information has been available to all permanent missions. It is based on the

human resources data warehouse and enables the retrieval of information from other human

resources systems, including IMIS, Nucleus and Umoja.

8. The first release of the tool provided permanent missions with reports on desirable

ranges, a staff list and staff details for their respective nationals, such as composition by sex

and type of appointment. Those online reports are updated on a monthly basis (with an

approximately three-month time lag) and can be downloaded, enabling permanent missions

to gain convenient, instant access to often-requested reports from the Office of Human

Resources Management and reducing the need to print and distribute paper copies. As such,

the tool helps make the United Nations more environmentally friendly; for example, the list

of staff of the Secretariat is available only on this platform, which obviates the need to print

thousands of pages per year.

9. Since the first release of the tool, the Office of Human Resources Management has

made a number of enhancements, including adding reports that show Member States the

separations, appointments and forecast retirements of their nationals, plus a forecast of

retirements with respect to all P-5 to D-2 positions. As requested by the General Assembly

in paragraph 48 of resolution 67/255, a table showing data on the representation of

developing countries for geographical staff per month has been published online.

10. Going forward, the Office of Human Resources Management will work to make

more information available online, thereby giving Member States convenient and monthly

access to staff demographic information that was previously available only in its annual

report, thus reducing the number of pages printed and data duplicated across HR Insight

and the report on the composition of the Secretariat.

11. The table in annex I provides a breakdown of all OHCHR staff members in the

Professional category and above who have been selected through the established

recruitment process (“regular” staff) against both regular budget posts subject to

geographical distribution and extrabudgetary posts, by nationality, grade and sex as at 31

December 2016.

12. The table in annex II provides a breakdown of the following categories of additional

OHCHR staff in the Professional category and above not included in the table in annex I,

also by nationality, grade and sex as at 31 December 2016:

(a) Staff holding appointments of less than one year;

(b) Staff charged to general temporary assistance funds;

(c) Staff employed as technical cooperation project personnel.

13. It should be recalled that in paragraph 14, section IX, of its resolution 63/250, the

General Assembly re-emphasized that the system of geographical ranges was designed to

apply to countries rather than to regions or groups. This principle was recently reiterated by

the Joint Inspection Unit in a comparative analysis and benchmarking framework on staff

recruitment in United Nations system organizations, focusing on gender balance and

geographical distribution (JIU/NOTE/2012/3). The data in the present report are therefore

provided by country and listed in alphabetical order.

14. As at 31 December 2016, OHCHR had a total of 678 staff members in the

Professional category and above, of whom 558 are considered regular staff.

15. Nationals from 114 countries are represented in the Professional and above

workforce, in both geographical and non-geographical posts. The latter comprise

extrabudgetary posts that are not included in the system of desirable ranges (see paragraph

4 above). Of those 114 nationalities, 15 are underrepresented,1 71 are considered within

1 Underrepresented at 31 December 2016: Afghanistan, Australia, Belarus, Brazil, Central African

Republic, China, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Japan, Lesotho, Norway, Russian

Federation, United States of America and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of).

range,2 while 28 nationalities are overrepresented 3 in the Secretariat. OHCHR also has

nationals from the State of Palestine on its staff and one stateless staff member.

16. Despite the confirmation by the General Assembly that the system of geographical

ranges to be applied to the Secretariat is based on individual countries rather than regions,

the Human Rights Council has repeatedly requested that statistics on a regional basis be

provided. The table below complies with that request, showing the distribution of OHCHR

staff by regional group. It shows clearly a significant improvement in the geographical

balance between the regions since 2006. This can be explained by the mobile and dynamic

nature of OHCHR staff members and the effect of the various policies of the High

Commissioner in improving geographic diversity.

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights by region

(Percentages at 31 December 2016)

Region 2006 2009 2012 2015 2016 4

Africa 11.1 13.8 16.7 15.5 13.6

Asia 11.9 13.6 15.7 13.7 15.4

Latin America and Caribbean 9.6 13.2 13.3 11.6 12.0

Eastern Europe 3.3 5.7 7.0 7.8 8.1

Western Europe and others 64.1 53.7 47.3 51.4 50.9

Total 100 100 100 100 100

III. Efforts made to achieve equitable geographical representation and gender balance, and the new Secretariat staff selection and managed mobility system

17. Enhancing the geographical diversity of OHCHR staff remains one of the High

Commissioner’s priorities. However, since 1 January 2016, he no longer has the authority

to select the candidate he considers best suited for most OHCHR regular positions, as these

positons are part of the Political, Peace and Humanitarian Network. Selections for such

positions are coordinated centrally through Office of Human Resources Management.

18. As mentioned in the previous report (A/HRC/33/18), on 28 December 2015, the

Under-Secretary-General for Management, taking into consideration the provisions of

Article 101 of the Charter of the United Nations and pursuant to section 4.2 of the

Secretary-General’s bulletin on procedures for the promulgation of administrative issuances

(ST/SGB/2009/4), for the purpose of implementing General Assembly resolution 68/265 of

9 April 2014, staff regulation 1.2 (c) and the Secretary-General’s bulletin on the

introduction of a new staff selection and managed mobility system (ST/SGB/2016/2),

promulgated an administrative instruction on staff selection and managed mobility system

(ST/AI/2016/1 and Amend. 1).

2 Within range at 31 December 2016: Albania, Algeria, Armenia, Bangladesh, Benin, Bolivia

(Plurinational State of), Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Burundi, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica,

Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ecuador, El Salvador,

Eritrea, Estonia, Gambia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Hungary, India, Israel,

Jamaica, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Lithuania, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta,

Mauritania, Mauritius, Mongolia, Nepal, New Zealand, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru,

Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Senegal, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Singapore,

Slovenia, South Africa, Sudan, Sweden, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslav

Republic of Macedonia, Togo, Tonga, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, Uzbekistan and Yemen. 3 Overrepresented at 31 December 2016: Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Canada,

Chile, Denmark, Egypt, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Ghana, Ireland, Italy, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon,

Mexico, Netherlands, Philippines, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, Trinidad and Tobago, Uganda,

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Uruguay. 4 Source: Umoja.

19. The new staff selection system and the managed mobility system is implemented

through semi-annual staffing exercises composed of two parts:

(a) The filing of job openings: the selection and appointment of staff members in

the Professional and higher categories up to and including the D-2 level and in the Field

Service category to vacant positions available for one year or longer;

(b) A managed mobility exercise: the placement against encumbered rotational

positions under managed mobility of eligible and suitable staff members in the Professional

and higher categories up to and including the D-2 level and in the Field Service category,

who have been recruited following a competitive process, including review by a senior or

central review body under staff rule 4.15, or through a competitive examination under staff

rule 4.16 and who hold a fixed-term, continuing or permanent appointment.

20. In the new system, all placement and recruitment decisions are made in the interests

of the Organization as a whole by the Assistant Secretary-General for Human Resources

Management and the Secretary-General, in accordance with the goals and obligations

placed upon them under the system of desirable ranges mandated by the General Assembly.

For OHCHR, this is reflected in the departmental target relating to the recruitment of

nationals from unrepresented and underrepresented Member States established in the High

Commissioner’s compact. The High Commissioner may still indicate to the Assistant

Secretary-General the human resource priorities for OHCHR, but he has no final say in the

selection process. OHCHR will work closely with the Office of Human Resources

Management in the implementation of the new system, and will continue to inform the

Assistant Secretary-General that geographic diversity remains a priority.

21. In addition to the temporary job openings due to normal workforce fluctuations, the

implementation of the new system has resulted in an increased number of temporary job

openings as an interim solution to ensure that work, central to the mandate of OHCHR,

continues. Notwithstanding instructions from the Under-Secretary-General for Management

to reduce costs by selecting candidates residing within the duty station, the High

Commissioner will continue to endeavour to use the selection of temporary staff members

to increase the diversity of his Office.

22. OHCHR will continue to pay special attention to the issue of balance between

female and male staff members at all levels, an area in which determination and concerted

efforts have already brought success. As at 31 December 2016, women accounted for 61

per cent of Professional staff at the P-1 to P-4 level and 34 per cent at the senior level (P-5

to D-2). OHCHR will fully commit to the Secretary-General’s system-wide strategy on

gender parity.

IV. Conclusion

23. The High Commissioner will remain attentive to the need to maintain emphasis

on the broadest possible geographical diversity of his staff and will continue his efforts

in this regard, working closely with the Office of Human Resources Management

within the new system of recruitment for the Secretariat. Under the new system of

recruitment, however, there will be no separate measures by or for OHCHR on which

to report to the Human Rights Council in respect of the composition of its staff. The

attention of the Council is therefore drawn to the official report of the Secretary-

General on staff demographics, which deals with the composition of the Secretariat,

and the comprehensive information it contains about the staff of OHCHR, inter alia.

Annex I

Regular staff of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in the Professional and higher categories, by nationality, grade and sex

(As at 31 December 2016)

Total staff USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 P-1

Country of nationality All F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F

Afghanistan 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

Albania 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

Algeria 4 3 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - 2 - 1 - -

Argentina 12 5 - - - - - - - - - 2 4 - 3 3 - - - -

Armenia 5 3 - - - - - - - - - - - 2 2 1 - - - -

Australia 11 3 - - - 1 - - - - 3 - - 1 5 1 - - - -

Austria 6 4 - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 1 2 - - - -

Bangladesh 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - -

Belgium 8 4 - - - - - - - - - - 1 3 2 - 1 1 - -

Benin 5 - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - 3 - - - - -

Bolivia (Plurinational

State of) 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - -

Bosnia and

Herzegovina 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Botswana 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

Brazil 7 4 - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 2 3 - - - -

Bulgaria 6 3 - - - - - - - - 2 - 1 - - 3 - - - -

Burundi 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 - - - -

Cameroon 7 2 - - - - - - - - - - 2 - 3 2 - - - -

Canada 17 10 - - - - - - - - 4 1 1 5 2 4 - - - -

Central African

Republic 1 - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - -

Chile 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - 1 - - - -

China 4 4 - - - - - - - - - - - 3 - - - 1 - -

Colombia 7 5 - - - - - - - - - 1 1 2 1 2 - - - -

Congo 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 - - - - - -

Costa Rica 2 - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - - - - - -

Côte d’Ivoire 3 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - 1 - - - -

Croatia 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 - - - - -

Cyprus 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

Czechia 5 3 - - - - - - - - 1 - - 1 1 2 - - - -

Democratic Republic

of the Congo 5 3 - - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 2 - 1 - -

Denmark 6 3 - - - - - - - - 1 1 2 1 - 1 - - - -

Ecuador 5 4 - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 - 1 - 1 - -

Egypt 2 - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - 1 - - - - -

El Salvador 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 - - - -

Total staff USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 P-1

Country of nationality All F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F

Eritrea 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

Estonia 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

Ethiopia 3 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 1 - - - -

Finland 4 2 - - - - - - - - 2 1 - - - - - 1 - -

France 37 24 - - - - - - 2 - 1 3 5 7 5 14 - - - -

Germany 20 14 - - - - - - - - 1 3 2 4 3 7 - - - -

Ghana 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

Guatemala 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - 1 - -

Guyana 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 - - - - -

Haiti 3 2 - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - 1 - - -

India 9 6 - - - - - - - - 1 1 1 3 1 2 - - - -

Indonesia 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

Iran (Islamic

Republic of) 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - - - -

Iraq 4 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 2 - - - -

Ireland 5 3 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 2 - - - -

Israel 3 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 - - - -

Italy 33 17 - - - - - - 1 - 5 4 5 8 5 4 - 1 - -

Jamaica 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Japan 12 8 - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 1 1 6 1 1 - -

Jordan 9 5 1 - - - - - - 1 - - 2 2 1 1 - 1 - -

Kazakhstan 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - -

Kenya 4 3 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - 3 - - - -

Kyrgyzstan 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Lebanon 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

Lesotho 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Lithuania 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - 1 - -

Madagascar 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - -

Malawi 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

Malaysia 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - - -

Maldives 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - -

Mali 3 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - 1 1 - - - - - -

Malta 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

Mauritania 2 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - - - -

Mauritius 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - 1 - - - -

Mexico 9 7 - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 1 6 - - - -

Mongolia 3 1 - - - - - - - - 1 1 - - 1 - - - - -

Nepal 6 1 - - - - - - - - - - 2 - 3 1 - - - -

Netherlands 6 3 - - - - - - - - 1 1 - 1 2 1 - - - -

New Zealand 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Nigeria 6 4 - - - - - - - - 2 1 - 2 - 1 - - - -

Norway 6 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 1 1 - -

Pakistan 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Panama 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

Paraguay 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - - -

Total staff USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 P-1

Country of nationality All F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F

Peru 4 1 - - - - - - - - 2 - - 1 1 - - - - -

Philippines 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Portugal 7 5 - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 1 3 - - - -

Republic of Korea 8 7 - - - - - - - - - 1 1 - - 3 - 3 - -

Republic of Moldova 3 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 1 - -

Romania 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

Russian Federation 7 3 - - - - - - - - 1 - 2 - 1 2 - 1 - -

Senegal 3 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - 1 - - - -

Serbia 5 3 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 2 1 - - -

Singapore 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 - - - -

Slovenia 4 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 3 - -

South Africa 3 1 - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - 1 - - - -

Spain 34 21 - - - - - - - 1 1 2 4 3 7 12 1 3 - -

Sudan 1 - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sweden 9 7 - - - - - - - - - - 1 4 1 3 - - - -

Switzerland 19 15 - - - - - - - - - - 2 1 2 14 - - - -

The former Yugoslav

Republic of

Macedonia 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Togo 4 - - - - - - - - - 1 - 2 - 1 - - - - -

Tonga 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

Trinidad and Tobago 2 1 - - - - - - - 1 1 - - - - - - - - -

Tunisia 5 2 - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 1 1 1 - - - -

Turkey 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

Uganda 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - -

Ukraine 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

United Kingdom of

Great Britain and

Northern Ireland 26 12 - - 1 - - - - - 5 1 3 7 4 2 1 2 - -

United States of

America 25 11 - - - - - 1 3 1 3 1 5 2 2 3 1 3 - -

Uruguay 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - 1 - - - -

Uzbekistan 6 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 2 - - - -

Venezuela

(Bolivarian

Republic of) 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

Yemen 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - - -

Subtotal 554 314 1 0 1 1 1 1 8 4 48 26 72 92 99 160 10 30 0 0

State of Palestine 3 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - 1 - - - -

Stateless 1 0 - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - -

Total 558 315 1 0 1 1 1 1 8 4 49 26 74 92 99 161 10 30 0 0

Annex II

Non-regular staff of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in the Professional and higher categories, by nationality, grade and sex

(As at 31 December 2016)

Total staff USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 P-1

Country of nationality All F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F

Albania 1 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - -

Argentina 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - -

Armenia 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Australia 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - 1 - -

Austria 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - 1 - - -

Belarus 1 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

Belgium 3 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 1 - - -

Cameroon 3 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - 1 - -

Canada 5 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 - 2 - -

China 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

Colombia 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - -

Côte d’Ivoire 1 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

Czechia 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Democratic

Republic of the

Congo 3 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - 1 - - -

Denmark 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

France 15 10 - - - - - - - - - - 2 1 2 6 1 2 - 1

Gambia 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - -

Germany 3 3 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - 1 - -

Greece 1 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - -

Hungary 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Ireland 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - - -

Italy 6 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 1 1 2 - -

Japan 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - - -

Jordan 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Kyrgyzstan 1 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

Lithuania 1 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

Mauritania 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

Mauritius 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

Mexico 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 - - - -

Netherlands 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

Norway 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Philippines 2 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - - -

Republic of Korea 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Romania 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - -

Total staff USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 P-1

Country of nationality All F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F

Russian Federation 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Senegal 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Sierra Leone 1 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

South Africa 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Spain 6 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 3 1 - - 1

Sudan 1 0 - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - -

Sweden 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - -

Switzerland 6 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 2 - 1 - -

Syrian Arab

Republic 1 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

Tajikistan 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Togo 3 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - 1 - - -

Tunisia 1 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -

United Kingdom of

Great Britain and

Northern Ireland 10 4 - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 1 3 2 1 1 - -

United States of

America 10 6 - - - - - - - - - - 2 1 1 3 1 2 - -

Subtotal 119 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 9 27 43 11 20 0 2

State of Palestine 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - -

Total 120 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 9 27 44 11 20 0 2