39/18 Right to development - Report of the Secretary-General and the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Document Type: Final Report
Date: 2018 Jul
Session: 39th Regular Session (2018 Sep)
Agenda Item: Item2: Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General, Item3: Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development
GE.18-11384(E)
Human Rights Council Thirty-ninth session
10–28 September 2018
Agenda items 2 and 3
Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner
for Human Rights and reports of the Office of
the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General
Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil,
political, economic, social and cultural rights,
including the right to development
Right to development
Report of the Secretary-General and the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights
Summary
The present report contains an overview of the activities of the Office of the United
Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the promotion and realization of the
right to development from June 2017 to May 2018. The report also provides an analysis of
the implementation of the right to development, taking into account existing challenges and
making recommendations on how to overcome them. The report complements the report of
the Secretary-General and the High Commissioner on the right to development submitted to
the Human Rights Council at its thirty-sixth session (A/HRC/36/23).
United Nations A/HRC/39/18
I. Introduction
1. In its resolution 48/141, establishing the post of United Nations High Commissioner
for Human Rights, the General Assembly decided that the High Commissioner should
promote and protect the realization of the right to development and enhance support from
relevant bodies of the United Nations system for this purpose. The General Assembly also
decided that the High Commissioner should recognize the importance of promoting
balanced and sustainable development for all people and of ensuring the realization of the
right to development, as established in the Declaration on the Right to Development.
2. The Human Rights Council, in its resolution 36/9, requested the Office of the United
Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to continue to submit to the
Council an annual report on its activities, including on inter-agency coordination within the
United Nations system, that have direct relevance to the realization of the right to
development, and to provide an analysis of the implementation of the right to development,
taking into account existing challenges and making recommendations on how to overcome
them.
3. In its resolution 72/167, the General Assembly reaffirmed its request to the High
Commissioner, in mainstreaming the right to development, to effectively undertake
activities aimed at strengthening the global partnership for development among Member
States, development agencies and the international development, financial and trade
institutions and to reflect those activities in detail in his next report to the Human Rights
Council.
4. In the same resolution, the General Assembly requested the Secretary-General to
submit a report to the Assembly at its seventy-third session and an interim report to the
Human Rights Council on the implementation of the present resolution, including efforts
undertaken at the national, regional and international levels in the promotion and realization
of the right to development.
5. The present report is submitted in accordance with the above requests. It contains an
overview of the activities of the Office relating to the promotion and realization of the right
to development, covering the period from June 2017 to May 2018, and an analysis of the
implementation of the right to development, existing challenges and recommendations on
how to overcome them.
II. Activities of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
6. In implementing its mandate to promote and protect the realization of the right to
development, the Office is guided by the Declaration on the Right to Development, the
Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, relevant resolutions of the General
Assembly and the Human Rights Council and conclusions and recommendations of the
Working Group on the Right to Development.
7. The OHCHR operational framework for promoting and protecting the realization of
the right to development is contained in the strategic framework for the period 2018–2019
and OHCHR Management Plan for the period 2018–2021.1
1 See A/71/6 (Prog. 20), pp. 4–7; OHCHR, United Nations Human Rights Management Plan 2018–
2021 (HRC/NONE/2018/17). Available at
www2.ohchr.org/english/ohchrreport2018_2021/OHCHRManagementPlan2018-2021.pdf.
A. Support to the Working Group on the Right to Development
8. OHCHR provided support to the Working Group on the Right to Development for
the organization of its nineteenth session, held from 23 to 26 April 2018 (A/HRC/39/56). It
also supported the Chair-Rapporteur during the intersessional period in holding informal
consultations and presenting the report of the Working Group to the Human Rights Council
and the General Assembly.
9. At its nineteenth session, the Working Group held interactive dialogue with the
Special Rapporteur on the right to development and with experts on the implementation and
realization of the right to development. It also considered contributions made by States at
the national, regional and international levels to the implementation of the right to
development; drafted criteria and corresponding operational subcriteria on the right to
development; and drew up a comprehensive and coherent set of standards for the
implementation of the right to development.2
B. Support to the Special Rapporteur on the right to development
10. OHCHR also supported the new Special Rapporteur on the right to development,
who took up his role on 1 May 2017. During the period under review, he presented his
vision report (A/HRC/36/49), in which he outlined the background and context of the
mandate, challenges for its implementation and a strategy, as well as specific work streams.
The report also detailed the Special Rapporteur’s approach to engagement with
stakeholders and his methods of work.
11. In accordance with Council resolution 36/9, the Special Rapporteur is convening
regional consultations on the practical implementation of the right to development. The
objective of these consultations is to identify good practices in designing, implementing,
monitoring and assessing policies and programmes that contribute to the realization of the
right to development. The first consultation, for the African region, took place in Addis
Ababa from 27 to 29 March 2018. The consultations will feed into the development of
guidelines and recommendations for designing, monitoring and assessing the structures,
processes and outcomes of human rights-informed development policies. They will also
identify indicators and measurements.
12. In resolution 33/14, the Council also requested the Special Rapporteur to contribute
to the work of the Working Group on the Right to Development, with a view to supporting
the accomplishment of its overall mandate. Consequently, the Special Rapporteur
participated in informal consultations held by the Chair-Rapporteur of the Working Group
with representatives of Member States and civil society organizations in September 2017
and participated in the nineteenth session of the Working Group.
C. Support to the Advisory Committee
13. At the request of the Advisory Committee, OHCHR provided expert input and
shared information in relation to a study on the ways in which development contributes to
the enjoyment of all human rights that the Committee is preparing as requested by the
Council (Council resolution 35/21). The study draws on contributions received from States,
United Nations and other intergovernmental bodies and agencies, non-governmental
organizations, national human rights institutions and other stakeholders and will be
submitted to the Council at its forty-first session.
D. Activities for the promotion and realization of the right to development
14. During the period under review, OHCHR organized and supported numerous
activities that have direct relevance to the realization of the right to development, including
2 The report is contained in document A/HRC/39/56.
in the context of the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Some examples are provided below.3
15. In July 2017, OHCHR delivered a presentation on the right to development at the
Second Regional Conference on the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights “Human
rights-based approach to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development in the Arab Region”, organized by OHCHR and the League of Arab States
and held in Cairo.
16. In September 2017, OHCHR organized the biennial panel discussion on unilateral
coercive measures and human rights. The objective of the panel is to increase awareness
among all stakeholders, including United Nations human rights mechanisms, of the
negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights in
countries targeted by unilateral coercive measures and in third countries (see Council
resolution 37/21). The panel theme was “Resources and compensation necessary to
promote accountability and reparation”. Its objective was to identify principles, guidelines
and mechanisms for assessing, mitigating and redressing the adverse impact of unilateral
coercive measures.
17. In December 2017, OHCHR participated in the South-South Human Rights Forum
in China. The Office provided contributions on “Realization of inclusive development and
human rights under South-South cooperation” and “Building a community of shared future
for mankind and promoting global human rights governance”, integrating the right to
development, human rights, peace, sustainable development, international cooperation and
related issues.
18. OHCHR participated in a Human Rights Council side event entitled “Realizing the
right to development through connectivity – China-Pakistan economic corridor”, organized
by the Permanent Mission of Pakistan in Geneva. The event was premised on the idea that
“connectivity” of remote areas and regions with urban centres and trading hubs can help
bring about transformation, alleviate poverty and address inequalities. OHCHR underlined
the key role of the right to development in this context. Constructive development must
advance human, environmentally protective, well-being, with special attention given to the
vulnerable and marginalized, including women and girls living in remote, rural areas.
19. OHCHR organized and participated in a number of events focused on environmental
issues, including climate change and its impact on the right to development. It advocated
for the integration of the right to development in the implementation guidelines for the
Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
OHCHR organized a briefing on the Twenty-third Conference of the Parties to the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, a meeting on the Talanoa dialogue
platform, two side events on general recommendation No. 37 (2018) of the Committee on
the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on gender-related dimensions of disaster
risk reduction in the context of climate change, the Expert Meeting “Promoting rights-based
climate finance for people and planet”4 and the Human Rights Council panel discussion on
human rights, climate change and migration (see A/HRC/37/35). The Deputy High
Commissioner participated in the launch of the Environmental Rights Initiative. OHCHR
also participated in a meeting at the International Human Rights Conference of Pakistan,
which discussed the operationalization of the local communities and indigenous peoples’
platform at the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change, and participated in a number of events at the twenty-third session of the
Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
3 More information on these and other activities is available at
www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Development/Pages/DevelopmentIndex.aspx.
4 See “Promoting rights-based climate finance for people and planet”. Available from
www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Development/Pages/19thSession.aspx.
and the Third United Nations Environment Assembly. OHCHR submitted multiple reports
on climate change and migration to the Human Rights Council.5
20. In July 2017, OHCHR participated in the World Trade Organization’s Global
Review on Aid for Trade, which had as its theme “Promoting trade, inclusiveness and
connectivity for sustainable development”. In September 2017, OHCHR took part in the
panel “Africa’s continental free trade area: achieving human rights-consistent
development” of the World Trade Organization’s annual public forum, entitled “Trade:
behind the headlines”.
21. OHCHR made efforts to raise awareness on the right to development, including
through research and analysis, development of resources and tools and the dissemination of
publications both within and beyond the Office. The Office continued its outreach and
advocacy on the right to development and provided briefings to various partners and civil
society groups with a view to revitalizing the dialogue and building support for the right to
development.
22. OHCHR developed an e-learning module on “Operationalizing the right to
development in implementing the SDGs” jointly with the University for Peace and the
United Nations University International Institute for Global Health, in collaboration with
academics. The module explains how the right to development can be operationalized in the
implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals, especially its international
dimensions vis-à-vis Sustainable Development Goal 17 on “Revitalize the global
partnership for sustainable development”.
23. OHCHR undertook studies, which contributed to the work of the nineteenth session
of the Working Group on the Right to Development. The studies addressed issues such as
the international dimensions of the right to development; illicit financial flows;
international investment agreements and industrialization; and promoting rights-based
climate finance for people and planet.6
24. In order to promote the right to development in Guinea-Bissau, OHCHR, in
cooperation with the United Nations Integrated Peacebuilding Office in Guinea-Bissau,
undertook several initiatives involving relevant stakeholders. Among other things, OHCHR
provided technical assistance and advice for the mainstreaming of human rights, including
the right to development, in the National Development Plan of Guinea-Bissau.
25. In Madagascar, OHCHR organized a round-table discussion to draft a tripartite
charter for sustainable development and respect for human rights in the framework of
private investments. OHCHR also conducted training for national authorities to build their
capacity to apply a human rights-based approach in drawing up the national development
plan.
26. In Guatemala, OHCHR has worked to promote the rights of indigenous peoples and
to address inequality and extreme poverty. Measures for capacity-building and support to
strategic litigation have helped empower indigenous peoples to participate in the
formulation of policies in support of their right to development. The Office has also
coordinated with other United Nations agencies in advising those responsible for the
country’s statistics system to adopt a human-rights-based approach to data, including by
disaggregating data to guide development policies aiming at leaving no one behind.
27. In December 2017, OHCHR organized, jointly with the United Nations Population
Fund and the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women,
a seminar entitled, “Leaving no one behind on the road to sustainable development” in
Timor-Leste. The event aimed at raising awareness of the situation of specific vulnerable
groups and making recommendations for their integration in development.
5 A/HRC/37/35 and a study on the slow onset effects of climate change and human rights protection for
cross-border migrants, available from
www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session37/Pages/ListReports.aspx.
6 The studies are available from www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Development/Pages/19thSession.aspx.
III. Analysis of the implementation of the right to development, existing challenges and recommendations to overcome them
28. In its resolution 70/299, the General Assembly decided that the theme to be
reviewed by the high-level political forum in 2019 would be “Empowering people and
ensuring inclusiveness and equality”. More specifically, it decided to review in depth
Sustainable Development Goal 10 (Reduce inequality within and among countries), among
other Goals, as well as the means of implementation, including with respect to Goal 17
(Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the Global Partnership for
Sustainable Development).
29. As a contribution to this thematic review, the present report focuses on the inter-
State dimension of Goal 10, the need to reduce inequality among countries, analysed from
the perspective of the right to development and linked to the other Goals, in particular Goal
17. The present report does not intend to be exhaustive in the number of topics covered, nor
in the depth of each of them.
A. Equality and non-discrimination among countries
30. The principles of equality and non-discrimination are at the heart of international
human rights law. Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights stipulates that:
“All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights”. There are several aspects
to equality as a legal principle, or its antonyms inequality and discrimination, which are
relevant to the discussion of inequality between countries.
31. First, equality derives its substantive content from the rights, laws or facts to which
it is applied. It relies on comparison and is therefore relative, either in respect of certain
characteristics or without any specific disaggregation, to a comparator, with regard to
legally relevant facts.7 In law, the principle of equality can be applied to all subjects with
legal personality entitled to the rights to equality and non-discrimination, either as an
autonomous, free-standing right to equality or as an accessory right to non-discrimination.
Under international human rights law, these include only individuals, groups and peoples.
Under other areas of international law, these can include States or legal persons, for
example businesses.
32. Second, equality can be considered according to several factors. For example, on the
basis of the material scope of application, such as political, economic or social inequality,
or the territorial scope of application, such as inequality within countries or regions, among
countries, or in global settings, such as in international organizations or global inequality.
Inequality can also be divided into horizontal and vertical inequality. Horizontal inequality
is defined as inequality among culturally defined or constructed groups, in contrast to
vertical inequality, which is inequality among households or individuals, such as wealth
and income inequality (CEB/2016/6/Add.1, p. 21).
33. Third, equality has several dimensions. Equality can be formal, de jure, or
substantive, de facto. It can be equality of opportunity or equality of results; it can be
characterized as transformative or inclusive.8
34. Fourth, equality implies the prohibition of discrimination. 9 Discrimination is
understood to imply any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference that is based on a
prohibited ground and that has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the
recognition, enjoyment or exercise by all persons, on an equal footing, of all rights and
freedoms. Discrimination can be direct or indirect; it can occur in the public and private
7 Kristin Henrad, “Equality of Individuality”, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law,
2008, para. 88.
8 For the latter concept and more generally on equality and non-discrimination, see Committee on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities, general comment No. 6 (2018) on equality and non-
discrimination.
9 See, for example, Human Rights Committee, general comment No. 18 (1989) on non-discrimination.
spheres and it can be systemic or structural. International human rights instruments
typically contain a non-exhaustive list of prohibited grounds of discrimination, including
“property” — comprising wealth and income — as well as “other status”. The Committee
on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights subsumes a person’s social and economic
situation, such as the situation in which the poor and homeless find themselves, in the latter
category.10 Not every differentiation amounts to prohibited discrimination, however, if there
is a reasonable and objective justification for the differential treatment. Thus, if a
complainant can provide evidence for a prima facie case of discrimination, the burden of
proving that the differentiation was reasonable and objectively justified or the consequence
of an alternative explanation shifts to the respondent.
35. Finally, in order to eliminate substantive inequality, States may be under an
obligation to adopt special measures to remedy the conditions causing the discrimination in
question.11
36. International human rights law applies primarily in the relationship between States
and persons or sub-State groups subject to their jurisdiction and individuals within the
power or effective control of the respective State.
37. Sovereign equality of States is a fundamental principle of international law and of
the United Nations. 12 The Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning
Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the
United Nations specifies six elements of sovereign equality:
(a) States are judicially equal;
(b) Each State enjoys the rights inherent in full sovereignty;
(c) Each State has the duty to respect the personality of other States;
(d) The territorial integrity and political independence of the State are inviolable;
(e) Each State has the right freely to choose and develop its political, social,
economic and cultural systems; and
(f) Each State has the duty to comply fully and in good faith with its
international obligations and to live in peace with other States.
38. The right to development is a right of individuals and peoples — a right that requires
an enabling environment at the national, regional and global levels for development and an
order in which all human rights and fundamental freedoms can be fully realized. While the
Declaration on the Right to Development reaffirms the principles of international law
concerning friendly relations and cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter
of the United Nations, including the principle of sovereign equality of States, it is also
based on a more substantive understanding of equality between States, as an important
requirement for the realization of human rights globally (art. 3).
39. More generally, the right to development demands an enabling environment for
development. The responsibility for the creation of this enabling environment encompasses
three main levels: (a) States acting collectively in global and regional partnerships; (b)
States acting individually as they adopt and implement policies that affect persons not
strictly within their jurisdiction; and (c) States acting individually as they formulate
national development policies and programmes affecting persons within their jurisdiction.13
The first two levels overlap with States’ extraterritorial obligations to respect, protect and
fulfil certain human rights. According to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural
10 See Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, general comment No. 20 (2009) on non-
discrimination in economic, social and cultural rights, para. 35.
11 See Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, general recommendation No.
25 (2004) on temporary special measures.
12 Charter of the United Nations, art. 2 (1).
13 A/HRC/15/WG.2/TF/2/Add.2, annex. See paper prepared by Olivier De Schutter, “The international
dimensions of the right to development: a fresh start towards improving accountability”, available
from www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Development/Pages/19thSession.aspx, paras. 19–27.
Rights, States’ obligations under the International Covenant on Economic and Social Rights
apply both with respect to situations on the State’s national territory, and outside the
national territory in situations over which States parties may exercise control including in
the context of business activities.14 At the global level, the right to development implies
three levels of obligations: duties to seek to conclude new international agreements; duties
to cooperate in existing international forums; and duties to comply with obligations already
stipulated.15
40. The Declaration on the Right to Development codifies, in a human rights instrument,
principles that are essential for reducing inequalities among nations and ultimately global
inequality. These principles include the right of peoples to self-determination and the duty
to cooperate to ensure development and to eliminate obstacles to development. The
following section looks at these principles in the light of different international legal
instruments and of the Sustainable Development Goals.
B. Self-determination
41. The Declaration on the Right to Development affirms that this right “implies the full
realization of the right of peoples to self-determination, which includes, subject to the
relevant provisions of both International Covenants on Human Rights, the exercise of their
inalienable right to full sovereignty over all their natural wealth and resources” (art. 1 (2)).
The principle of self-determination is also codified in the Charter of the United Nations
(Art. 1 (2)) and the International Covenants on Human Rights. 16 It is considered a jus
cogens norm of international law. 17 The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
reaffirms that “every State has, and shall freely exercise, full permanent sovereignty over
all its wealth, natural resources and economic activity” (para. 18).18
42. The principle of self-determination implies norms that may contribute to addressing
inequality between States. Many developing and least developed countries are rich in
natural resources. Preserving the policy space of developing countries in the exercise of
their sovereignty over their natural resources is crucial to enable them to use those
resources to promote the right to development of their own peoples and inhabitants. 19
According to the Independent Expert on the promotion of a democratic and equitable
international order, sovereignty over natural resources implies that if “these natural
resources were ‘sold’ or ‘assigned’ pursuant to colonial, neocolonial or ‘unequal treaties’ or
contracts, these agreements must be revised to vindicate the sovereignty of peoples over
their own resources” (A/HRC/37/63, para. 14 (g)). Through the 2030 Agenda, States agreed
to respect the national policy space for sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic
growth, in particular for developing countries (in its para. 21).
43. The 2030 Agenda also acknowledged the importance of international financial
institutions’ respect for the policy space of developing countries (para. 44). This implies
that any structural adjustment, austerity measures or related policies should be designed in a
way to respect the policy space for complying with economic, social and cultural rights, as
14 General comment No. 24 (2017) on State obligations under the International Covenant on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights in the context of business activities, paras. 10, 25–37. See “The
international dimensions of the right to development: a fresh start towards improving accountability”,
paras. 28–62.
15 “The international dimensions of the right to development: a fresh start towards improving
accountability”, para. 33.
16 See also Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and
Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, principle (e), and
General Assembly resolution 1803 (XVII) of 14 December 1962 entitled, “Permanent sovereignty
over natural resources”.
17 See, e.g., A/HRC/37/63, para. 14 (b), and International Law Commission, conclusions of the work of
the Study Group on the fragmentation of international law, contained in A/61/10, para. 251,
conclusion 33.
18 The Goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda can be found in General Assembly resolution 70/1.
19 See, e.g., A/HRC/4/30/Add.2, para. 6, and A/HRC/4/25/Add.3, para. 7 (a) (iii).
well as the right to development, which in turn implies a duty to carry out due diligence of
conducting human rights impact assessment of such measures.20 One of the targets under
Sustainable Development Goal 17 is to “respect each country’s policy space and leadership
to establish and implement policies for poverty eradication and sustainable development”
(target 17.15).21 Hence, respecting the policy space of countries as an expression of their
right to self-determination is important to promote sustainable development and to address
inequalities among countries.22
44. Particularly in the field of international investment law, balancing the rights of
investors with self-determination and national sovereignty over natural resources is
important for protecting an enabling policy space for the realization of the right to
development of developing countries. The enforcement of bilateral investment agreements
should be compatible with States’ international human rights obligations and international
human rights instruments, including allowing for nationalization of resources for preserving
the rights of indigenous peoples. 23 International investment policies, agreements and
dispute settlement provisions should be revised to safeguard the policy space necessary for
the realization of human rights.24
45. The Declaration on the Right to Development also affirms States’ obligation to take
resolute steps to eliminate massive and flagrant violations of human rights “affected by
situations such as … colonialism, foreign domination and occupation, aggression, foreign
interference and threats against national sovereignty, national unity and territorial integrity,
threats of war and refusal to recognize the fundamental right of peoples to self-
determination” (art. 5). These relate to the subjugation of one nation or people to another, a
process which is enabled by and exacerbates inequality among countries, and denies the
right to development of the peoples whose self-determination is violated. 25 The 2030
Agenda calls “for further effective measures and actions to be taken, in conformity with
international law, to remove the obstacles to the full realization of the right of self-
determination of peoples living under colonial and foreign occupation, which continue to
adversely affect their economic and social development as well as their environment” (para.
35).
C. Duty to cooperate to ensure development and to remove obstacles from
development
46. According to the Declaration on the Right to Development “States have the duty to
cooperate with each other in ensuring development and eliminating obstacles to
development” and the full realization of human rights (art. 3 (3)). The duty of international
cooperation, in this context, includes the duty to seek, in good faith, to conclude and
implement international agreements that contribute to the realization of the right to
development. 26 Several specific provisions of the Declaration detail how the duty to
cooperate should be carried out. States “should realize their rights and fulfil their duties in
such a manner as to promote a new international economic order based on sovereign
20 See, e.g., A/HRC/37/54.
21 The indicators related to the Sustainable Development Goals can be found in General Assembly
resolution 71/313, annex IV.
22 For an analysis of how international investment agreements have affected the right to development,
see paper by Bhumika Muchhala, “International investment agreements and industrialization:
realizing the right to development and the Sustainable Development Goals”, available from
www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Development/Pages/19thSession.aspx.
23 See, for example, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Case of Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous
Community v. Paraguay, Judgment of 29 March 2006, para. 140.
24 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), “Investment Policy Framework
for Sustainable Development” (2015), UNCTAD/DIAE/PCB/2015/5, pp. 19, 31, 33, 78–79, 82, 85,
117 and 119.
25 See A/71/554, paras. 38–59 and 61; see also UNCTAD/GDS/APP/2017/2, pp. 38–40.
26 See “The international dimensions of the right to development: a fresh start towards improving
accountability”.
equality, interdependence, mutual interest and cooperation among all States, as well as to
encourage the observance and realization of human rights” (art. 3 (3)). In particular, they
“have the duty to take steps, individually and collectively, to formulate international
development policies with a view to facilitating the full realization of the right to
development” (art. 4 (1)). More importantly, to address inequalities among countries, States
should take sustained action and cooperate to promote more rapid development of
developing countries, and to provide the latter with appropriate means and facilities to
foster their development (art. 4 (2)). Cooperation to eliminate obstacles to development
includes the duty to “take resolute steps to eliminate the massive and flagrant violations of
the human rights of peoples and human beings” (art. 5). Finally, the implementation of the
right to development includes the formulation, adoption and implementation of policy,
legislative and other measures at the national and international levels (art. 10).
47. One of the purposes of the United Nations is to achieve international cooperation in
solving international problems. This includes cooperation to achieve “higher standards of
living, full employment, and conditions of economic and social progress and development”,
as well as “universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental
freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion”.27 The Universal
Declaration of Human Rights affirms international cooperation as a means of realization of
everyone’s economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for human dignity and free
development of personality (art. 28). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights also
recognizes that “everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights
and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized” (art. 28).
48. A social and international order that enables the full realization of human rights
requires an international economic order based on equity, sovereign equality,
interdependence, common interest and cooperation among all States and international
solidarity, 28 which shall “make it possible to eliminate the widening gap between the
developed and the developing countries”.29 Equitable global governance is necessary to
achieve this goal. The 2017 consolidated report of the Secretary-General and the High
Commissioner for Human Rights on the right to development pointed out that long-
standing asymmetries in global governance are an important challenge to the realization of
the right to development. “The under- or non-representation of developing countries in key
forums on global governance undermines the effectiveness of such forums … Without
more inclusive, democratic and participatory decision-making processes …, those absent or
whose voices are less well heard will remain on the margins of the benefits of
development” (see A/HRC/36/23, para. 41). The 2030 Agenda includes a target to “ensure
enhanced representation and voice for developing countries in decision-making in global
international economic and financial institutions in order to deliver more effective, credible,
accountable and legitimate institutions” (target 10.6) and “broaden and strengthen the
participation of developing countries in institutions of global governance” (target 16.8).
These targets are to be assessed on the basis of the “proportion of members and voting
rights of developing countries in international organizations” (indicators 10.6.1 and
16.8.1).30 To these ends, States have created bodies such as the Board of the Green Climate
Fund, which has an equal number of members from developing and developed country
Parties, including representatives of relevant United Nations regional groupings and
representatives from small island developing States and least developed countries.31
27 Charter of the United Nations, Arts. 1 (3), 55 (a) and (c) and 56.
28 See, e.g., draft declaration on the right to international solidarity, preamble, contained in
A/HRC/35/35, annex.
29 Declaration on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order, preambular para. 3.
30 The indicators related to the Sustainable Development Goals can be found in General Assembly
resolution 71/313, annex.
31 See FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1, decision 3/CP.17, annex, para. 10.
49. The duty to cooperate for development in a manner that addresses inequality among
countries is reinforced by international human rights treaties, which are to be interpreted in
a “development-informed and interdependence-based reading”.32
50. The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights monitors the
implementation of all the rights protected by the International Covenant on Economic and
Social Rights, contributing simultaneously to the full realization of the relevant elements of
the right to development. In doing so, the Committee addresses, in its examination of the
reports of States parties and in its dialogue with them, the eradication of poverty and
underdevelopment and the creation of conditions for achieving economic and social
progress and development for all, including for disadvantaged and marginalized individuals
and groups (see E/C.12/2011/2, para. 7).
51. Under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, States
parties undertook to take steps, individually and through international assistance and
cooperation, especially economic and technical, with a view to achieving progressively full
realization of the rights therein enshrined (art. 2 (1)). As the Committee has observed, the
phrase “maximum of its available resources” refers to both the resources existing within a
State and those available from the international community.33 The Covenant also underlines
the importance of international cooperation for the realization of the right to an adequate
standard of living (art. 11 (1)), the realization of the right to food (art. 11 (2))34 and in the
scientific and cultural fields (art. 15 (4)).
52. The Covenant describes specific modalities for international cooperation and
assistance to be carried out by States and by the United Nations (arts. 22–23). The
Committee has affirmed that “international cooperation for development … is an obligation
of all States”, and it “is particularly incumbent upon those States which are in a position to
assist others in this regard”.35 The Committee also expressed the view that virtually all
United Nations organs and agencies involved in any aspect of international development
cooperation should take into account recommendations made by the Committee in
deciding, each within its field of competence, on the advisability of international measures
likely to contribute to the effective progressive implementation of the Covenant.36
53. The Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights has acknowledged that
international cooperation may need to include major debt relief initiatives for developing
countries.37 In a 2016 statement, the Committee concluded that “all States should ensure
that they do not impose obligations on borrowing States that would lead them to adopt
retrogressive measures in violation of their obligations under the Covenant”
(E/C.12/2016/1, para. 10). Cooperation for addressing sovereign debt was also reflected in
a target to Sustainable Development Goal 17 (target 17.4) and in the Addis Ababa Action
Agenda of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development (paras. 93–
102). To be successful, such cooperation should effectively take measures to counter the
actions of the “non-cooperative minority bondholders” that disrupt the will of the large
majority of bondholders who accept a restructuring of a debt-crisis country’s obligations
(ibid., para. 100), the so-called “vulture funds”. 38 Sovereign debt restructuring should
follow the Basic Principles on Sovereign Debt Restructuring Processes. In addition, as
mentioned by the Independent Expert on foreign debt, not only will “curbing illicit
financial flows … be essential for realizing human rights and achieving sustainable
32 Joint statement of Chairs of the human rights treaty bodies on the occasion of the twenty-fifth
anniversary of the Declaration on the Right to Development, available at
www2.ohchr.org/SPdocs/Issues/Development/JointStatChairUNTB_25AnniversaryRtD.doc.
33 General comment No. 3 (1990) on the nature of States parties’ obligations, para. 13.
34 See also general comment No. 12 (1999) on the right to adequate food, paras. 36–41.
35 General comment No. 3 (1990) on the nature of States parties’ obligations, para. 14.
36 General comment No. 2 (1990) on international technical assistance measures, para. 2.
37 Ibid., para. 9.
38 See Human Rights Council resolution 27/30. See also, e.g., A/HRC/20/23, A/HRC/33/54,
A/HRC/14/21 and A/72/153, and “The international dimensions of the right to development: a fresh
start towards improving accountability”, paras. 65–72.
development” but reducing such flows “should be seen as an important element in the fight
against unsustainable debt” (see A/HRC/31/61, paras. 4 and 35).
54. The Convention on the Rights of the Child (art. 4) and the Convention on the Rights
of Persons with Disabilities (art. 32) also acknowledge the importance of international
cooperation for realizing economic, social and cultural rights. Interpreting the duty to
undertake international cooperation, the Committee on the Rights of the Child has urged
States to meet the United Nations target for development assistance of 0.7 per cent39 of
gross domestic product, and stated that assistance should be rights-based.40
55. The 0.7 target has been reiterated in Sustainable Development Goals target 17.2,
which further encourages providing at least 0.2 official development assistance to least
developed countries.41 Other Sustainable Development Goals targets also call for official
development assistance and financial flows to developing countries, 42 especially to
countries most in need, in particular, least developed countries, African countries, small
island developing States and landlocked developing States (target 10.b). Official
development assistance should not be accompanied by constraints that affect the ownership
of policy space by the recipient State to establish development priorities and address
poverty (target 17.15 and indicator 17.15.1),43 and should be predictable, effective and
transparent.44
56. Remittances by migrant workers are another source of financial flow that transfers
wealth from more developed countries to less developed ones, promoting the right to
development in the latter and contributing to address inequality among countries. The right
to make such transfers is recognized by the International Convention on the Protection of
the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (arts. 32 and 47). The
Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their
Families has recommended that States “take measures to reduce the cost of sending and
receiving funds, taking into account the principle of gender equality, in line with
Sustainable Development Goals target 10.c, and facilitate access to safe and affordable
remittance transfer systems, the productive use of remittances and their low cost
transmission to rural regions”.45 States should hence cooperate to address obstacles to these
remittances.
57. States’ duty to cooperate for ensuring development and for removing obstacles from
development is closely related to principles and obligations in other fields of international
law. International trade law and international investment law include the principle of
special and differentiated treatment,46 which aims at granting more favourable treatment
and conditions to developing and least developed countries so that they may benefit from
and develop through trade and investment.47 Sustainable Development Goal 10 has as one
39 General comment No. 5 (2003) on general measures of implementation of the Convention, para. 61,
with reference to A/CONF.198/11.
40 Ibid.
41 In line with the Addis Ababa Action Agenda, para. 51. See also indicator 17.2.1.
42 Targets 1.a., 2.a, 3.b, 4.b, 6.a., 7.b, 8.a, 9.a, 10.b, 12.a, 13.b, 15.a and b, 17.3 and 17.7. See also
indicators 1.a.3, 2.a.2, 3.b.2, 4.b.1, 6.a.1, 7.b.1, 8.a.1, 9.a.1, 10.b.1, 12.a.1, 13.b.1, 15.a.1 and b.1,
17.3.1 and 17.7.1.
43 See also A/70/274, para. 19.
44 Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation, outcome document of the Fourth High-
level Forum on Aid Effectiveness held in Busan, Republic of Korea, from 29 November to 1
December 2011. See also “The international dimensions of the right to development: a fresh start
towards improving accountability”, paras. 79–93.
45 CMW/C/IDN/CO/1, para. 45; CMW/C/BGD/CO/1, para. 46. See also CMW/C/LKA/CO/2, para. 47.
See also indicators 10.c.1 and 17.3.2.
46 See decision of the Contracting Parties of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, decision on
differential and more favourable treatment, reciprocity and fuller participation of developing
countries, 28 November 1979, L/4903. The principle is closely related to the principle of preferential
and non-reciprocal treatment, see Declaration on the Establishment of a New International Economic
Order, art. 4 (n).
47 See World Trade Organization, “Special and differential treatment provisions in WTO agreements
and decisions”, WT/COMTD/W/196.
of its targets to “implement the principle of special and differential treatment for developing
countries, in particular least developed countries, in accordance with World Trade
Organization agreements”. The corresponding indicator is “proportion of tariff lines applied
to imports from least developed countries and developing countries with zero-tariff”
(indicator 10.a.1). Special and differentiated treatment can go beyond tariff cuts. One of the
indicators to Sustainable Development Goal 14 recognizes that “appropriate and effective
special and differential treatment for developing and least developed countries should be an
integral part of the World Trade Organization fisheries subsidies negotiations”.48 Informed
by the principle of special and differentiated treatment, the World Trade Organization has
adopted an amendment to intellectual property rules to ease poor countries’ access to
affordable medicines.49 This decision, in line with Sustainable Development Goals target
3.b, has the potential to reduce inequality among countries with regard to access to public
health.50
58. The international environmental law principle of common but differentiated
responsibilities establishes that the “developed countries acknowledge the responsibility
that they bear in the international pursuit of sustainable development in view of the
pressures their societies place on the global environment and of the technologies and
financial resources they command”.51 The principle is also enshrined in the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (art. 3 (1)) and the Paris Agreement (art. 2 (2)).
The principle of common but differentiated responsibilities informs climate finance
initiatives52 that may provide important tools to help implement the right to development in
developing countries.53 The principle is also referred to in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development. Sustainable Development Goal 13 includes as a relevant target to
“Implement the commitment undertaken by developed-country parties to the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to a goal of mobilizing jointly USD100
billion annually by 2020 from all sources to address the needs of developing countries in
the context of meaningful mitigation actions and transparency on implementation and fully
operationalize the Green Climate Fund through its capitalization as soon as possible”.54 It
also includes, in an indicator to target 13.b the “number of least developed countries and
small island developing States that are receiving specialized support, and amount of
support, including finance, technology and capacity-building, for mechanisms for raising
capacities for effective climate change-related planning and management” (indicator
13.b.1). By placing a more substantial burden on developed countries on the basis of their
differentiated responsibilities and respective capacities, the principle helps to address
inequalities among countries.
59. The Declaration on the Right to Development affirms that States “should do their
utmost to achieve general and complete disarmament” and “to ensure that the resources
released by effective disarmament measures are used for comprehensive development, in
particular that of the developing countries” (art. 7). Inequalities among countries, including
asymmetries of power, are aggravated by the military might of States. Though there has
been a decline of military expenditure since the 1960s, it still surpasses 2 per cent the world
48 Target 14.6.
49 World Trade Organization, “Implementation of paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS
Agreement and public health”, WT/L/540 and Corr.1.
50 For other considerations in putting trade in the service of the right to development, see “The international dimensions of the right to development: a fresh start towards improving accountability”,
paras. 94–113.
51 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, principle 7.
52 For example, the clean development mechanism (Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change, art. 12), the Adaptation Fund (FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.1, decision
10/CP.7) and the Green Climate Fund (FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1, decision 1/CP.16, para. 102).
53 See “Promoting rights-based climate finance for people and planet”. See also Adaptation Fund Board,
“Environmental and social policy”, available at www.adaptation-fund.org/wp-
content/uploads/2013/11/Amended-March-2016_-OPG-ANNEX-3-Environmental-social-policy-
March-2016.pdf, paras. 14–19.
54 Target 13.a.
GDP, 55 many times higher than the average percentage of development assistance by
developed countries, which barely reaches 0.3 per cent of their GDP. 56 The duty to
cooperate for effective disarmament has been reinforced by treaties relating to means of
warfare, including the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain
Conventional Weapons Which May be Deemed to be Excessively Injurious or to Have
Indiscriminate Effects and the Protocols thereto,57 the Convention on Cluster Munitions and
the recent Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. To realize the right to
development, the resources released from the banning of these weapons and from the
maintenance of their stockpiles should be reoriented towards social services, the creation of
employment in peaceful industries, and greater support to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development (see A/HRC/27/51, para. 71). Through Sustainable Development Goals target
16.4, States committed to reducing significantly the illicit arms flow. The Arms Trade
Treaty helps tackle illicit arms flows, which contribute to international humanitarian law
and human rights violations 58 and, consequently, affect the exercise of the right to
development,59 especially in developing countries.
60. The duty to cooperate to remove obstacles to development has been understood to
corroborate the duty to ensure respect for international humanitarian law instruments, 60
including in the context of belligerent occupation. Hence, all States and the international
community as a whole should cooperate to end violations of international humanitarian law
that affect the right to development of the people occupied and to end procrastinated
occupation itself.
61. Finally, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea enshrines the
principle of “common heritage of mankind” (art. 136). 61 The Convention contains
provisions that can contribute to addressing inequalities among States, including the
provision of equitable sharing of financial and other economic benefits derived from
activities in the deep seabed, or the Area (art. 140),62 and transfer of technology and
scientific knowledge relating to activities in the Area to developing countries and to the
International Seabed Authority and to an Enterprise to be established by it (art. 144).
Similar provisions on the equitable sharing of benefits of common resources can also be
found in the Convention on Biological Diversity (arts. 1 and 15 (7)).
IV. Conclusions and recommendations
62. International law, including human rights treaties and the Declaration on the
Right to Development, provides a normative framework to address inequalities among
countries, as envisioned in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Applicable
principles of international law include self-determination and the principle of
international cooperation. A joint reading of these principles with provisions of the
Declaration on the Right to Development, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
and relevant international treaties, as well as the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development provides guidance for assessing and addressing inequality among
countries.
55 https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS.
56 https://data.oecd.org/oda/net-oda.htm.
57 Protocol on Non-Detectable Fragments (Protocol I); Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the
Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices (Protocol II); Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions
on the Use of Incendiary Weapons (Protocol III); Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons (Protocol IV);
Protocol on Explosive Remnants of War (Protocol V).
58 A/CONF.217/2013/L.3, annex, arts. 6 (3) and 7 (3), as adopted by the General Assembly in its
resolution 67/234 B of 2 April 2013.
59 Declaration on the Right to Development, para. 7.
60 Article 1 common to the 1949 Geneva Conventions.
61 See also arts. 137–149. The concept was coined as a proposal to address inequalities among countries.
See A/C.1/PV.1515, para. 91, and A/C.1/PV.1516.
62 See also art. 150 (i).
63. In implementing the 2030 Development Agenda and Sustainable Development
Goals, States should:
(a) Take into account the normative framework contained in the
Declaration on the Right to Development, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
and other international human rights instruments;
(b) Interpret international treaties in the light of these standards, in
particular the right to development;
(c) Promote and maintain the policy space of developing countries to ensure
that the management of their natural resources contributes to the realization of the
right to development and sustainable development;
(d) Undertake human rights impact assessments in relation to structural
adjustments, austerity measures and other prescriptions for economic reform;
(e) Work to achieve equitable representation of developing countries in
international decision-making that affects them in institutions of global governance,
address international inequality and the right to development, and set up transparent
and participatory processes open to other stakeholders, including civil society, at all
levels;
(f) Encourage sovereign debt relief initiatives that benefit developing
countries and cooperation to counter vulture funds that disrupt the capacity of States
to negotiate debt restructuring;
(g) Uphold the commitments made in the Addis Ababa Action Agenda and
Sustainable Development Goals target 17.1 with respect to capacity-building for tax
administration, including through targeted use of official development assistance and
provision of technical assistance and other forms of support;
(h) Increase official development assistance, especially to least developed
countries and countries in most need, while respecting the right and duty of the
developing countries to determine their own development priorities and ensure that
assistance is predictable, effective and transparent;
(i) Promote measures for reducing costs and facilitating the transfer of
remittances by migrant workers, including undocumented migrants, to their families;
(j) Promote the adoption of trade and investment policies that foster the
development of developing and least developed countries in accordance with the
principle of special and differentiated treatment;
(k) Promote the adoption of environmental policies that contribute to
sustainable development and the mitigation of environmental disasters in developing
and least developed countries, in particular those most vulnerable to climate change,
taking into account the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities;
(l) Promote negotiations in good faith towards disarmament and the
investment of the resources released in the development of developing and least
developed countries;
(m) Promote international cooperation to ensure respect of international
humanitarian law and human rights law, in particular with the view to ending foreign
occupation and respecting the right to development of the peoples under occupation;
(n) Promote fair and equitable distribution of the benefits resulting from
development, globalization and global commons, including the common heritage of
humankind.