39/7 Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - -Uzbekistan
Document Type: Final Report
Date: 2018 Jul
Session: 39th Regular Session (2018 Sep)
Agenda Item: Item6: Universal Periodic Review
GE.18-11277(E)
Human Rights Council Thirty-ninth session
10–28 September 2018
Agenda item 6
Universal periodic review
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review*
Uzbekistan
* The annex is being circulated without formal editing, in the language of submission only.
United Nations A/HRC/39/7
Introduction
1. The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, established in accordance
with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1, held its thirtieth session from 7 to 18 May 2018.
The review of Uzbekistan was held at the 5th meeting, on 9 May 2018. The delegation of
Uzbekistan was headed by the Chairman of the Committee of the Legislative Chamber of
the Oliy Majlis (Parliament) on Democratic Institutions, NGOs and citizens’ self-
government bodies, Akmal Saidov. At its 10th meeting, held on 11 May 2018, the Working
Group adopted the report on Uzbekistan.
2. On 10 January 2018, the Human Rights Council selected the following group of
rapporteurs (troika) to facilitate the review of Uzbekistan: Côte d’Ivoire, Saudi Arabia and
Slovakia.
3. In accordance with paragraph 15 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution
5/1 and paragraph 5 of the annex to Council resolution 16/21, the following documents
were issued for the review of Uzbekistan:
(a) A national report submitted/written presentation made in accordance with
paragraph 15 (a) (A/HRC/WG.6/30/UZB/1);
(b) A compilation prepared by the Office of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in accordance with paragraph 15 (b)
(A/HRC/WG.6/30/UZB/2);
(c) A summary prepared by OHCHR in accordance with paragraph 15 (c)
(A/HRC/WG.6/30/UZB/3).
4. A list of questions prepared in advance by Belgium, Brazil, Germany, Liechtenstein,
Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern
Ireland was transmitted to Uzbekistan through the troika. These questions are available on
the website of the universal periodic review.
I. Summary of the proceedings of the review process
A. Presentation by the State under review
5. The delegation of Uzbekistan stated that the first ever parliamentary report on the
situation of human rights in the country had been published, a broad administrative reform
was being implemented, the Office of the Business Ombudsman had been set up, and that,
in 2017, Uzbekistan had observed the Year of Dialogue with the People and of Human
Interests.
6. Other key steps taken included legislation on overseeing the actions of members of
the Government, adopted by Parliament in 2017. Uzbek civil society was developing
actively. For the Government, the opinion of every citizen mattered, and citizens had
various tools for direct communication. All those measures were in line with the action
strategy on five priority areas of development in Uzbekistan for 2017–2021.
7. Uzbekistan had been one of the first Central Asian countries to establish a national
human rights institution. Human rights education efforts were continuous, with courses
taught in all school classes and at university.
8. Efforts to ensure a genuinely independent judiciary required constitutional reform.
The commission for the election of judges under the President’s authority had been
dissolved and a supreme judicial council had been established as the highest judicial body,
and granted constitutional status. The new body was tasked with selecting judges and
overseeing the constitutional principle of the independence of the judiciary. Judges
henceforth served for life; judges retired at the age of 65, while Supreme Court justices
retired at 70. Material and technical support for courts had been transferred from the
Ministry of Justice to the Supreme Court itself. An example of progress was the fact that, in
2017, a total of 262 people had been acquitted, up from only 4 people in 2016. Moreover,
acquittals or non-custodial sentences had been handed down in high-profile trials of
independent journalists and human rights defenders accused of undermining the
constitutional order.
9. Civil society reforms concerning non-governmental organizations (NGOs) included
the elimination of unjustifiably restrictive registration procedures for them, exemption from
10 types of taxes, removal of the restriction on opening bank accounts and the introduction
of electronic registration. More than 9,200 NGOs were active in Uzbekistan, and rent-free
“NGO houses” had been established for their use.
10. With regard to corruption, a new law on State procurement had been designed to
enhance transparency in public procurement and eradicate corruption.
11. Established in 2017, the Office of the Business Ombudsperson was a non-judicial
body created to protect the rights of entrepreneurs. It was independent of government
bodies and officials and answerable only to the Constitution and laws. Its activities and
tasks, regulated by a law adopted in August 2017, were to shape State policy to help to
defend and develop entrepreneurship, to ensure that State bodies respected entrepreneurs’
rights, to provide legal support to entrepreneurs, and to guarantee freedom of
entrepreneurship. It had already examined more than 1,500 complaints, and a helpline and a
website had also been created to communicate with entrepreneurs. With regard to proposals
to restore entrepreneurs’ rights, out of 20 cases, there had been 8 warnings and 2 lawsuits
for S500,000.
B. Interactive dialogue and responses by the State under review
12. During the interactive dialogue, 77 delegations made statements. Recommendations
made during the dialogue are contained in section II of the present report.
13. Belgium welcomed the release of several political prisoners and the easing of some
restrictions on freedom of expression. It noted, however, the significant gap between the
international obligations of Uzbekistan and their implementation on the ground.
14. Argentina commended Uzbekistan for having adopted its action strategy on five
priority areas of development.
15. Bulgaria encouraged Uzbekistan to take steps to implement the new legislation and
public policies, and to enhance the independence and effectiveness of the Human Rights
Commissioner (Ombudsman) in conformity with the principles relating to the status of
national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights (the Paris Principles).
16. While commending Uzbekistan for addressing human rights challenges, including
child labour in the cotton sector, Canada expressed hope that Uzbekistan would continue its
progress in addressing harassment of persons, including of civil society actors and
journalists.
17. Chile appreciated the State’s cooperation with the United Nations and the various
constitutional amendments made to broaden rights and the protection of freedoms. It
regretted the suspension of registration of international human rights organizations. Chile
noted the absence of women in the delegation of the State under review.
18. China welcomed the efforts made by Uzbekistan to promote and protect human
rights, including the progress witnessed in economic and social development, poverty
reduction, the raising of living standards, gender equality and promotion of the rights of
women, children, persons with disabilities and other vulnerable sectors of society.
19. Côte d’Ivoire welcomed the State’s strengthened cooperation with OHCHR and
human rights mechanisms. It encouraged Uzbekistan to strengthen its legislative framework
for human rights, in particular for the rights of women, children, persons with disabilities
and migrants.
20. Cuba welcomed the measures taken to strengthen women’s rights and the judiciary,
and highlighted the improved quality of education witnessed at all levels.
21. Czechia noted with interest the State’s adoption of its action strategy on five priority
areas of development in Uzbekistan for 2017–2021.
22. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea welcomed the ratification of several
international instruments, the national plan of action for 2014–2016, the strengthened
dialogue and cooperation with United Nations mechanisms and the consolidation of the
legislative framework for human rights.
23. Denmark emphasized that dialogue with the Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture
and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment was highly valuable to
all States working to prevent torture and ill-treatment. The Convention against Torture
Initiative stood ready to explore avenues to assist Uzbekistan.
24. Egypt welcomed the efforts made by Uzbekistan to counter corruption and human
trafficking, and to establish mechanisms to promote and protect civil and political rights in
the country.
25. Estonia expressed its concern regarding the situation of freedoms of expression,
assembly, association and movement, and at reports of harassment, surveillance, arbitrary
arrest and detention, torture and ill-treatment of journalists and human rights defenders.
26. Finland remained concerned about continued reports of torture and ill-treatment in
detention and of forced labour, especially in the cotton harvesting sector. It urged
Uzbekistan to ensure respect for the freedoms of expression, association and assembly, in
accordance with international human rights standards.
27. France welcomed the improvements made to the legislative framework of the rule of
law and the reforms in the justice sector. It also noted the reduction in the incidence of
forced labour and the greater space accorded to civil society.
28. Georgia welcomed the national plan of action for the implementation of
recommendations made by international human rights mechanisms and the State’s
cooperation with OHCHR. It encouraged Uzbekistan to take steps to ensure that relevant
policies and legislation were in full compliance with international standards.
29. Germany welcomed the reforms made by Uzbekistan and its commitment to
abolishing child and forced labour, to releasing political detainees and to preventing torture.
It remained concerned about restrictions on civil society and NGOs, and ongoing reports of
torture in prisons.
30. Ghana welcomed the progress made in protecting the rights of persons with
disabilities. It expressed concern, however, about alleged cases of unlawful arrest,
detention, torture, ill-treatment and conviction of members of religious minorities.
31. Greece welcomed the national plan of action (2014–2016) to implement the
recommendations made by international human rights mechanisms. It also welcomed the
recent visit by the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief to Uzbekistan.
32. Paraguay applauded the national plan of action for the implementation of
recommendations made by the treaty bodies, particularly the State’s plan to develop
cooperation with OHCHR. The coordination of efforts was crucial to the ratification of
human rights instruments.
33. Hungary commended the release of political prisoners and the lowering of
restrictions on freedom of expression. It welcomed the visits conducted in 2017 by the
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Special Rapporteur on
freedom of religion or belief, and also welcomed the road map on cooperation with
OHCHR.
34. While welcoming the adoption of a plan of action to combat trafficking in persons,
Iceland expressed its concern at the lack of investigations into prosecution of and
convictions on trafficking in women and girls.
35. India appreciated the consolidation of the legal status of the Office of the Human
Rights Commissioner and the greater effectiveness of the National Centre for Human
Rights. It praised some of the public welfare measures taken for the poor, children with
disabilities and the elderly.
36. Indonesia praised the steps taken to ratify the Convention on the Rights of Persons
with Disabilities, and the action strategy on five priority areas of development for 2017–
2021.
37. The Islamic Republic of Iran commended the State for its cooperation with
international human rights mechanisms, the steps taken to ratify the Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the 2017 presidential decree on supporting persons
with disabilities.
38. Iraq welcomed the constitutional and legislative reforms to promote human rights,
and the national programmes to fight corruption and human trafficking.
39. Poland welcomed the efforts made by Uzbekistan to ratify the Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
40. Italy praised the State’s enhanced cooperation with international organizations, its
constructive dialogue with the special procedures of the Human Rights Council, and the
ongoing human rights reforms.
41. Japan welcomed the State’s emphasis on judicial and socioeconomic reform and the
strengthening of civil society in the action strategy on five priority areas of development for
2017–2021, the Administrative Procedures Act and the Administrative Litigation Act.
42. Kazakhstan welcomed the increased cooperation of Uzbekistan with the treaty
bodies and the special procedures of the Human Rights Council, and the efforts it had made
to strengthen the independence of the judiciary, to reform the public management system
and to preserve interethnic and interfaith harmony, while addressing the cultural and
linguistic needs of minorities.
43. Kuwait noted the progress made in the fields of human rights, counter-terrorism,
non-discrimination, political and civil participation, and cooperation with human rights
mechanisms.
44. Kyrgyzstan welcomed the significant progress made since the previous review cycle,
pointing out that the new legislative changes and practical steps would have a significant
impact on the promotion of human rights in Uzbekistan.
45. The Lao People’s Democratic Republic welcomed the action strategy on five
priority areas of development. It also welcomed the bill on guarantees of equal rights and
opportunities for women and men.
46. Lithuania welcomed the State’s enhanced cooperation with OHCHR and the
progress made in eliminating child labour, and the release of political activists, human
rights defenders and journalists who had been detained.
47. Malaysia welcomed the progress made in gender equality and the promotion and
protection of the rights of women, children and persons with disabilities. It also welcomed
the progress made in human rights education, social welfare, health, and poverty reduction
and eradication.
48. Maldives welcomed the efforts made to strengthen the Office of the Human Rights
Commissioner in accordance with the Paris Principles. It also welcomed the national plan
of action to implement the recommendations made by international human rights
mechanisms and the action strategy on five priority areas of development for 2017–2021.
49. Mexico acknowledged the policy of openness of the Government and the measures
taken on the issue of disability.
50. Montenegro welcomed the agreement with OHCHR and called upon the
Government to issue a standing invitation to all special procedures. It invited the State to
repeal article 120 of the Criminal Code, which criminalized consensual sexual activities
between adult males.
51. Morocco commended the action strategy on five priority areas of development for
2017–2021 and the steps that the State had taken to ratify the Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities. It welcomed the measures taken in the areas of corruption,
domestic violence, education, health and women’s empowerment.
52. The delegation of Uzbekistan stated that, with regard to cotton harvesting, measures
had been taken to eradicate forced labour. The President had addressed the issue, and a
parliamentary commission had been set up to ensure respect for labour rights. The
Government was working together with representatives of Cotton Campaign, an
international NGO that monitored the cotton sector worldwide. Various measures had been
taken to improve the situation: harvest wages had been increased by 250 per cent in 2017; a
sector-wide review, from planting to harvesting, had been conducted; and cotton growing
was being phased out on low-yielding land. Annual production of cotton thread was around
one ton; 72.5 per cent of the cotton harvest was processed, representing some 750,000 tons.
Two major cotton-producing projects with a budget of $464 million had led to the creation
of more than 6,500 jobs.
53. The delegation stated that targeted social protection measures had been taken for
persons with disabilities. Efforts were continuing to ensure the compliance of infrastructure
with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and to secure its ratification.
Some 20 NGOs worked directly to help persons with disabilities, while more than 600
NGOs offered additional assistance, including free courses in sign language and Braille.
Steps were being taken to guarantee better quality of prosthetics and other rehabilitation
devices required by persons with disabilities. The Government had launched a programme
for the period 2017–2020 in support of persons with disabilities.
54. Efforts to prevent violence in places of detention and protect citizens against torture
emphasized prevention. In 2017, additional measures had been taken to strengthen
guarantees for defendants’ rights and freedoms. Article 1 of the Convention against Torture
and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment had been fully
implemented by article 235 of the Criminal Code, which contained a ban on torture. A
procedure had been introduced for complaints concerning unlawful conduct by law
enforcement officials. Henceforth, prosecutors would regularly verify the conditions of
those in pretrial detention facilities or holding centres with the help of audio and video
surveillance. In addition, the Parliamentary Ombudsman and the Business Ombudsman
provided independent monitoring. New restrictions had been introduced regarding the
admissibility of evidence. Evidence was inadmissible if it had been obtained unlawfully or
in violation of the Criminal Code; if a defendant’s rights had been infringed in the process;
if information came from an unknown source; or if testimony did not meet the required
standards.
55. The delegation reported on efforts made to prevent torture in places of detention.
Some 2,500 video surveillance cameras had been installed in pretrial detention facilities and
holding centres; 123 had been installed in cells, and plans had been made for the
installation of an additional 285 cameras. To ensure a timely response to reports by citizens
on cases of torture, in 2017, the Ministry of Internal Affairs had opened special premises
for receiving citizens and taking their complaints. Some 40 complaints concerning people
in custody had been lodged, as a result of which 10 officials would be relieved of their
duties.
56. A law had been adopted on 17 April 2018 to fight human trafficking. There was a
need to align the Criminal Code with relevant international instruments, such as the United
Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime. One noteworthy step taken at
the national level had been the establishment of an interagency commission to fight human
trafficking. In 2017, a total of 204 criminal cases had been brought on grounds of sexual
exploitation, and 32 criminal cases for labour exploitation (down from 81 in 2016).
57. Additional measures had been taken to ensure gender equality. The Committee for
Women was very active in that respect, and a law on combating domestic violence had
been adopted. At the national level there were over more than 30 laws on the protection of
gender equality. Efforts were being made to ensure equal pay for work of equal value. Plans
had been made to create the position of ombudsman for children and youth.
58. Nepal welcomed the emphasis given to countering corruption, fighting human
trafficking and promoting health and quality education. It also welcomed the State’s
engagement with the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and other
United Nations human rights mechanisms. Nepal called upon Uzbekistan to continue its
measures to strengthen the independence of the judiciary, to fight domestic and gender
violence and to ensure gender equality.
59. The Netherlands welcomed the visits made to Uzbekistan by the High
Commissioner and the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief in 2017. It also
welcomed the efforts made to eliminate child labour and to ratify all relevant conventions
of the International Labour Organization (ILO). It regretted the situation of lesbian, gay,
bisexual, transgender and intersex persons in Uzbekistan.
60. Nigeria commended the State for its cooperation with human rights mechanisms. It
welcomed the State’s human rights plans and programmes, and the efforts it had made to
uphold the principles of equality and non-discrimination, and in countering terrorism.
61. Norway noted the greater openness and international engagement of Uzbekistan, the
release of political prisoners, the removal of persons from black lists, the increasing
freedom of the press and the progress made in abolishing forced labour. Restrictions on
civil society and freedom of expression, association and belief, however, remained.
62. Oman appreciated the amendments made to the Constitution in 2017, and laws and
regulations supporting social services for the elderly, persons with disabilities and other
vulnerable groups.
63. Pakistan welcomed the measures taken on human rights and freedoms, and the
action programme against human trafficking for 2017–2018.
64. Honduras praised Uzbekistan for its implementation of the recommendations that it
had accepted.
65. The Philippines commended Uzbekistan for its efforts to institutionalize the
protection of victims of trafficking by including a provision of medical support, and also to
improve the normative framework to strengthen the protection of human rights and
fundamental freedoms.
66. Ireland welcomed the State’s increased cooperation with international human rights
mechanisms, as shown by the visits of the High Commissioner and the Special Rapporteur
on freedom of religion or belief. Reports were still being received on the use of torture and
ill-treatment against detainees and prisoners, and on the harassment, arbitrary arrest and
detention, torture and ill-treatment of human rights defenders, journalists and government
critics.
67. Portugal acknowledged ongoing reforms effected by Uzbekistan to ensure its
socioeconomic development.
68. Qatar praised the State for the constitutional amendments made to bolster human
rights, the adoption of the action strategy on five priority areas and the plan to support
persons with disabilities. It welcomed also the efforts made to improve equality of
opportunity for persons with disabilities.
69. The Republic of Korea welcomed the measures taken to strengthen the
independence of the judiciary, the institutionalization of a constitutional court, the
amendments made to the Citizenship Act and the regulations introduced to increase
freedom of movement inside and across borders.
70. The Russian Federation welcomed the efforts made by Uzbekistan to approve
national plans of action to implement the recommendations made by the treaty bodies and
to amend the Constitution, particularly the provisions on the public control of activities
conducted by the authorities.
71. Saudi Arabia acknowledged the increased level of cooperation of Uzbekistan with
the treaty bodies and the special procedures, and its adoption of the memorandum of
understanding between the National Centre for Human Rights and OHCHR.
72. Senegal praised Uzbekistan for its ratification of the ILO Freedom of Association
and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) and its plans to ratify
the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
73. Serbia commended the State for the measures taken to bring national human rights
institutions into line with the Paris Principles and to adopt plans of action to implement
international human rights standards. It encouraged Uzbekistan to take measures to
eliminate maternal and newborn mortality.
74. Slovakia praised the efforts made to strengthen media freedom and active
cooperation with ILO in tackling child labour. It expressed concern at the fact that many
journalists remained in custody.
75. Slovenia welcomed the improvement of the situation of human rights, pointing to
active cooperation of Uzbekistan with civil society to strengthen the judicial system and
raise awareness on human rights. It pointed to reports of forced labour and hazardous
working conditions.
76. Spain urged Uzbekistan to address discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual,
transgender and intersex persons and to take steps to investigate and punish acts of violence
and hate crimes.
77. The State of Palestine noted with appreciation the steps taken by Uzbekistan to
introduce reforms to protect human rights and to sign the memorandum of understanding
between the National Centre for Human Rights and OHCHR.
78. According to Sweden, Uzbekistan had taken positive steps to improve the situation
of human rights, such as the release of human rights defenders and its review of many
prison sentences. Nonetheless, an unknown number of individuals were still in prison on
politically motivated charges.
79. Switzerland commended Uzbekistan for its wide-ranging reforms and encouraged it
to fully implement its development strategy for 2017–2021. It welcomed the release of
prisoners of conscience, but noted with concern that many people were still detained for
having expressed their political views.
80. Tajikistan acknowledged the measures taken by Uzbekistan to adopt the plan of
action for developing cooperation with OHCHR, to fight human trafficking and to provide
legal protection and medical care for the victims of trafficking, and also the steps it had
taken to eliminate child and forced labour.
81. Togo praised Uzbekistan for the improvements made to the constitutional and
legislative framework and the adoption of international norms to strengthen cooperation
with the treaty bodies and other human rights mechanisms.
82. Turkmenistan noted the increased level of cooperation between Uzbekistan,
OHCHR, the treaty bodies, the special procedures and international NGOs on questions of
human rights and freedoms.
83. The United Arab Emirates welcomed the adoption of a number of national plans of
action, and enquired about any preliminary conclusions reached since Uzbekistan had
adopted its national plan of action on human trafficking the previous year.
84. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland noted the positive
developments in the situation of human rights in Uzbekistan, but also the concerns
remaining with regard to freedom of expression and association.
85. The United States of America commended Uzbekistan for the steps taken to expand
space for civil society and reduce structural challenges for NGOs. It urged Uzbekistan to
continue its efforts to address torture, and to invite the Special Rapporteur on torture and
other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment to visit the country. It noted
with concern the wide-ranging restrictions on peaceful religious activity and the fact that
reports were still being received of cases of adult forced labour.
86. Uruguay hailed the implementation by Uzbekistan of its plans of action, including
its development strategy. It hoped that the State would consider ratifying the Rome Statute
and the Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members
of Their Families.
87. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela applauded the State’s social protection plans
for older people and persons with disability, the medical care policies for rural dwellers,
mothers and children, and the national system for development goals focused on
employment and social protection.
88. Yemen welcomed the efforts made by Uzbekistan to strengthen human rights,
particularly its adoption of the action strategy on five priority areas of development and the
strengthening of the constitutional guarantee with regard to submitting complaints with the
authorities.
89. Afghanistan commended the Government of Uzbekistan for its efforts to empower
the Office of the Human Rights Commissioner, and encouraged the State to take further
action to promote and protect human rights.
90. Algeria commended the State for its implementation of the programme of action to
combat human trafficking and the inclusion of all the categories of human rights in its
action strategy on five priority areas of development, and encouraged Uzbekistan to
monitor the outcome of steps taken.
91. Brazil commended Uzbekistan for its continued efforts to reduce poverty, to provide
access to education and health and to combat infant mortality and malnutrition. It
encouraged the State to extend a standing invitation to the special procedures.
92. Armenia encouraged Uzbekistan to expand human rights training and education. It
noted the State’s use of modern information and communications technology in its
dialogues with the public, and encouraged Uzbekistan to strengthen public and civil society
dialogue in the implementation of human rights programmes.
93. Australia commended Uzbekistan for its decree against forced labour and for its
progress in the protection of freedom of expression. It welcomed the measures taken by the
State to improve the situation of human rights of detainees and to strengthen protection
against ill-treatment and torture.
94. Azerbaijan praised the achievements of Uzbekistan in its incorporation of
international human rights standards into the national education system. It commended
Uzbekistan for the progress made in delivering public services in a transparent and efficient
manner.
95. Belarus praised the comprehensive and systemic approach taken by Uzbekistan to
implement human rights policy through its action strategy on five priority areas of
development and the measures taken to promote employment, improve the quality of public
services and increase cooperation with OHCHR and its regional office.
96. The delegation of Uzbekistan stated that the country was endeavouring to guarantee
the rights and freedoms of journalists and to strengthen the freedom of the media to operate.
The persecution of journalists was not an issue, as reflected in the comment by Lithuania to
the effect that no journalists were currently detained in the country.
97. With regard to issues relating to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex
persons, Uzbekistan, like the other States members of the Organization of Islamic
Cooperation, wished to preserve family values and was therefore not planning to amend
article 120 of the Criminal Code.
98. With regard to the urban-rural divide mentioned, Uzbekistan gave priority to various
recommendations on decent housing. A nationwide programme launched in 2016 had led to
the construction of 18,000 well-equipped buildings and the renovation of 130,000 buildings
in rural areas. Furthermore, a one-off “rental amnesty” had been designed to facilitate the
establishment of property title. Other steps were being taken to implement economic and
cultural changes that would benefit all rural dwellers, relating, inter alia, to the rights to
decent work, education and affordable health care.
99. Determined efforts were being made to reduce statelessness. Over the past five
years, 1,500 stateless persons had been granted Uzbek citizenship. Moreover, efforts were
being made to ensure comprehensive registration of all births. In a recent report, the United
Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) had pointed out that Uzbekistan had a birth registration
rate of 100 per cent. Furthermore, a campaign had been launched to register children
directly in remote areas. The Aral Sea area was a development priority for the Government.
In 2017 alone, some 150,000 people had gained access to drinking water thanks to the
renovation of water pipes and water supply plants. The Government had earmarked $2.5
billion for the development of the region.
100. The delegation informed the Human Rights Council that, for the first time in 15
years, Uzbekistan had extended an invitation to the Special Rapporteur on freedom of
religion or belief. The State intended to work closely also with the Special Rapporteur on
the independence of judges and lawyers. One priority of the current judicial reform was the
ratification of international conventions and United Nations instruments. For example,
Uzbekistan would soon ratify the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
II. Conclusions and/or recommendations
101. The recommendations formulated during the interactive dialogue/listed below
have been examined by Uzbekistan and enjoy the support of Uzbekistan:
101.1 Ratify the human rights instruments to which it is not yet a party, in
particular the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All
Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, the Convention on
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Optional Protocol thereto, the
Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the Protocol thereto, the
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Optional Protocol to
the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment (Honduras);
101.2 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and
Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, the Rome
Statute of the International Criminal Court, the Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the
Rights of the Child on a communications procedure (Spain);
101.3 Ratify the international instruments to which the State is not yet a
party (Togo);
101.4 Ratify the main human rights instruments to which the State is not
yet a party (Côte d’Ivoire);
101.5 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of
All Forms of Discrimination against Women (Denmark);
101.6 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and
Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Denmark);
101.7 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and
Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Estonia);
101.8 Consider ratifying the Optional Protocol to the Convention against
Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
(Ghana);
101.9 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and
Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Greece);
101.10 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and
Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Lithuania);
101.11 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and
Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Chile);
101.12 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and
Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Senegal);
101.13 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the
Child on a communications procedure (Slovakia);
101.14 Ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of
All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families and step up its efforts to
ratify the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Indonesia);
101.15 Ratify the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons
from Enforced Disappearance (Iraq);
101.16 Ratify the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons
from Enforced Disappearance, as the issue of enforced disappearance is an
urgent global problem that we all have to tackle (Japan);
101.17 Ratify the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons
from Enforced Disappearance (Senegal);
101.18 Consider accession to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities and the Optional Protocol thereto, and the Optional Protocols to the
Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure, to the
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment and to the Convention on the Elimination of All
Forms of Discrimination against Women (Georgia);
101.19 Ratify the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
(Paraguay);
101.20 Ratify the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
(Iraq);
101.21 Accelerate the process of ratification of the Convention on the Rights
of Persons with Disabilities (Kazakhstan);
101.22 Expedite the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons
with Disabilities (Oman);
101.23 Ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of
All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families and the ILO Domestic
Workers Convention, 2011 (No. 189) (Philippines);
101.24 Ratify the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
(Qatar);
101.25 Expedite efforts to ratify the Convention on the Rights of Persons
with Disabilities (Saudi Arabia);
101.26 Ratify the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
(Armenia);
101.27 Ratify the Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory
Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity (Armenia);
101.28 Continue dialogue with relevant countries, international agencies and
civil society in order to improve the human rights situation, including that of
women, children and persons with disabilities (Japan);
101.29 Ratify the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the
Agreement on the Privileges and Immunities of the International Criminal
Court (Estonia);
101.30 Ratify the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
(Iceland);
101.31 Issue an official invitation to all United Nations mandate holders who
have outstanding requests to visit Uzbekistan (Hungary);
101.32 Issue a standing invitation to the special procedures of the Human
Rights Council (Poland);
101.33 Invite the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment or punishment and the Special Rapporteur on the
situation of human rights defenders (Norway);
101.34 Extend an open invitation to special procedure mandate holders and
human rights mechanisms (Honduras);
101.35 Extend a standing invitation to the special procedures (Portugal);
101.36 Ratify both the 1954 Convention relating to the Status of Stateless
Persons and the 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness (Slovakia);
101.37 Ratify the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the
Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons (Brazil);
101.38 Continue its cooperation efforts with United Nations mechanisms and
treaty bodies (Morocco);
101.39 Continue its engagement and cooperation with United Nations
human rights mechanisms (Pakistan);
101.40 Continue constructive cooperation with United Nations human rights
mechanisms (Tajikistan);
101.41 Strengthen cooperation with the United Nations system in the area of
human rights (Algeria);
101.42 Continue its active engagement with special procedure mandate
holders of the Human Rights Council, the treaty bodies and OHCHR
(Azerbaijan);
101.43 Continue its consolidation of the rule of law by concretely
implementing new legislation (France);
101.44 Ensure respect for transparency and equity in the granting of land
and real-estate facilities to investors (France);
101.45 Continue efforts to strengthen the national legal framework for
human rights (Georgia);
101.46 Establish an overarching national human rights plan that takes into
account its international obligations and guides coordination efforts between
the various national action plans and State programmes (Paraguay);
101.47 Continue efforts on human rights education and training for the
benefit of civil servants and authorities (Morocco);
101.48 Consider adopting further necessary measures to ensure the
promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in line
with its international obligations (Nigeria);
101.49 Continue its work to bring national legislation into line with
Uzbekistan’s international obligations (Russian Federation);
101.50 Pursue measures to fight corruption, in particular through the
adoption of an anti-corruption law in line with international standards in this
area (Algeria);
101.51 Maintain and further develop the application of innovative
approaches and technological innovations in the efficient delivery of public
services (Azerbaijan);
101.52 Bring domestic legislation on counter-terrorism into line with the
relevant international framework (Mexico);
101.53 Take actions necessary to preserve human rights while countering
terrorism (Afghanistan);
101.54 Widen the scope of its human rights national action plan through an
inclusive approach for the advancement of the promotion and protection of
human rights (Indonesia);
101.55 Continue the practice of adopting national plans for actions in
various fields with the purpose of improving the human rights situation in the
country (Tajikistan);
101.56 Pursue its efforts to strengthen the national human rights institution
and bring it into conformity with the Paris Principles (Egypt);
101.57 Further strengthen the National Centre for Human Rights and the
Office of the Human Rights Commissioner (India);
101.58 Redouble efforts to strengthen its national human rights institutions
to comply with the Paris Principles (Indonesia);
101.59 Step up efforts to align its national human rights institutions with the
Paris Principles (Philippines);
101.60 Pursue efforts to set up a national human rights institution in line
with the Paris Principles (Qatar);
101.61 Establish a national human rights institution fully in line with the
Paris Principles (Senegal);
101.62 Ensure that the national human rights institution is fully in line with
the Paris Principles (Togo);
101.63 Advance in the adjustment of existing institutions with a view to
establishing a national human rights institution in accordance with the Paris
Principles (Uruguay);
101.64 Continue efforts to expedite the adoption of the law on public
oversight and the establishment of public councils in all government bodies
(Yemen);
101.65 Ensure fully the alignment of the Office of the Human Rights
Commissioner (Ombudsman) with the Paris Principles (Afghanistan);
101.66 Request technical cooperation with OHCHR to establish a permanent
national mechanism to follow up on the implementation of international human
rights recommendations (Paraguay);
101.67 Consider the establishment or the strengthening of the existing
national mechanism for coordination, implementation, reporting and follow-up,
in line with elements identified in the 2016 OHCHR guide on national
mechanisms for reporting and follow-up (Portugal);
101.68 Define racial discrimination and incorporate all the elements of
article 1 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Racial Discrimination into its legislation (Côte d’Ivoire);
101.69 Take all appropriate measures to improve the living conditions of all
detainees, as well as to prevent any phenomena of mistreatment or torture in
prisons (Greece);
101.70 Ensure the rights of detainees and prisoners to contact their families
and medical doctors and to consult with a lawyer of their choice in privacy and
confidence (Poland);
101.71 Grant access to places of detention to independent monitors
(Lithuania);
101.72 Continue the process of releasing all political prisoners together with
a transparent process to bring legislation into line with the international
framework on civil and political rights (Mexico);
101.73 Revise practices in detention facilities to eliminate the use of torture
or other cruel treatment or punishment, employ independent monitoring, and
thoroughly investigate and prosecute allegations of such practices (Canada);
101.74 Carry out judicial and penitentiary reforms in accordance with
international law (Norway);
101.75 Release all persons imprisoned on politically motivated charges
(Sweden);
101.76 Close the Jaslyk prison colony, facilitate full and unhindered access
for monitoring by the International Committee of the Red Cross, and ratify the
Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman
or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Australia);
101.77 Publicly condemn the use of torture and establish a system of
independent inspection and control of places of detention in order to prevent
the possible use of torture in those places of detention (Belgium);
101.78 Strengthen the national mechanism for the prevention of torture and
ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture (France);
101.79 Amend article 235 of the Criminal Code to ensure that the definition
of torture is in full compliance with international human rights law, and invite
the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment to visit Uzbekistan (Germany);
101.80 Release all wrongfully imprisoned persons and take further
meaningful measures to end torture and ill-treatment in detention facilities
(Hungary);
101.81 Carry out prompt, impartial and effective investigations into all
allegations of torture and ill-treatment, and prosecute and punish all those
responsible, including law enforcement and prison officials (Ireland);
101.82 Take measures to put an end to torture, and implement the
recommendations of United Nations mechanisms in this regard (Chile);
101.83 Continue its efforts to combat torture and cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment or punishment through the improvement of law
enforcement legislation and actions (Russian Federation);
101.84 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture,
establish a national preventive mechanism accordingly, and strengthen the
investigation and prosecution of allegations of torture (Czechia);
101.85 Continue to provide appropriate training to lawyers, prosecutors and
judges in order to carry out judicial reforms (Japan);
101.86 Establish recognition mechanisms for truth and compensation for the
victims of the Andijan events (Mexico);
101.87 Adopt legislation that ensures the full independence of the judiciary
and the exercise of the legal profession in conformity with international
standards (Mexico);
101.88 Further strengthen ongoing efforts to increase transparency of its
judiciary (Republic of Korea);
101.89 Take all necessary measures to ensure the independence and
impartiality of the judicial system (Switzerland);
101.90 Continue taking steps for the strengthening of the judicial system
(Tajikistan);
101.91 Implement national priorities in the field of rights and freedoms of
the person (Cuba);
101.92 Fully implement government decrees banning the forced mobilization
of public sector workers and students, and provide access for independent non-
governmental organizations to conduct monitoring of labour rights (Australia);
101.93 Continue and expand efforts with regard to freedom of expression
and the media (France);
101.94 More vigorously take further steps towards increased press freedom
(Georgia);
101.95 Allow the media to operate without government interference, and
ensure access to all sources of information, including foreign sources and the
Internet (Germany);
101.96 Cease all restrictions on the right to freedom of opinion and
expression, and ensure that the right to manifest one’s religion in private or in
public is fully protected and realized (Ghana);
101.97 Take the necessary measures to guarantee that all persons can
peacefully exercise their right to freedom of expression in accordance with
international standards, in particular when it comes to human rights defenders
(Argentina);
101.98 Adopt concrete measures to ensure the legitimate exercise of the
rights to freedom of expression, association and belief (Norway);
101.99 Release all journalists detained on politically motivated charges
(Slovakia);
101.100 Refrain from oppression of the free press by instances of police
violence, detention and censorship (Slovakia);
101.101 Bring legal provisions that restrict the right to freedom of expression
and freedom of the media into line with Uzbekistan’s international human
rights obligations, including by allowing effective access to information, also
online (Sweden);
101.102 Ensure that all individuals, including human rights defenders and
journalists, may exercise their right to freedom of expression and access to
information (Switzerland);
101.103 Guarantee freedom of expression, assembly and association, and end
the harassment of journalists, human rights defenders and those exercising
their constitutional right to peaceful protest (United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Northern Ireland);
101.104 Release all persons imprisoned on the basis of their political
affiliation, and cease the use of article 221 of the Criminal Code to extend
prison sentences without justification (Australia);
101.105 Continue implementing measures to extend public access to legal
information and to extend targeted educational work in this area (Belarus);
101.106 Ensure that all trials, including those of persons charged with
terrorism or in connection with membership in banned religious organizations,
observe international fair trial standards (Finland);
101.107 Consider removing burdensome and oppressive registration
requirements, and rescind intrusive government practices, including
monitoring and raiding, which infringe on the right to freedom of religion or
belief (Ghana);
101.108 Release all prisoners of conscience incarcerated or arbitrarily
detained on account of their faith (Ghana);
101.109 Adopt effective measures to promote and protect freedom of religion
or belief and to prevent related restrictions and discrimination (Italy);
101.110 Revise provisions in the country’s criminal and administrative codes
relating to freedom of religion or belief, so as to conform with article 18 of the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Canada);
101.111 Revise so-called religious “extremism” laws to decriminalize peaceful
religious activities, simplify registration requirements for religious groups, and
remove penalties on religious literature communications (United States of
America);
101.112 Publicly support the work of men and women human rights
defenders and independent journalists, particularly by systematically
investigating cases of violence or harassment against them, prosecuting
perpetrators and compensating and rehabilitating victims (Belgium);
101.113 Ensure prompt, independent and thorough investigation into all
reports of assaults on and harassment of human rights defenders, journalists
and civil society activists, and bring those responsible to justice (Estonia);
101.114 Decriminalize defamation and include it in the Civil Code in
accordance with international standards (Estonia);
101.115 Involve Uzbek civil society and international actors more widely in
the implementation of decisions, in particular for the prevention of torture,
freedom of the media and working conditions during cotton harvests (France);
101.116 Ensure that all civil society and human rights organizations can work
without hindrance by lifting prohibitive registration requirements, burdensome
programme approval regulations and censorship of printed materials
(Germany);
101.117 Provide greater support to facilitate the work of civil society (Iraq);
101.118 Create a safe environment for the work of human rights defenders,
including women human rights defenders, and investigate all reports of
harassment of human rights defenders (Poland);
101.119 Enhance efforts to create an environment in which journalists,
human rights defenders and NGOs can freely operate in accordance with
international standards (Italy);
101.120 Continue to provide support to human right organizations (Kuwait);
101.121 Review the June 2015 law on NGOs and the laws on defamation to
bring them into line with international standards, including Uzbekistan’s
obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
(Lithuania);
101.122 Ensure that NGOs, human rights defenders, journalists and other
members of civil society can freely exercise their rights to freedom of
expression, association and peaceful assembly (Lithuania);
101.123 Agree on a precise and early date for the visit by the Special
Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, as previously
recommended (Ireland);
101.124 Grant unrestricted permission to national and international civil
society organizations to freely conduct independent monitoring of the alleged
forced mobilization of citizens for cotton picking (Slovenia);
101.125 Make the registration process and requirements for independent
NGOs working in the human rights sector more flexible (Spain);
101.126 Fully implement the President’s decree of 4 May 2018 (United States
of America);
101.127 Further promote the enjoyment of the right to freedom of association
and the right to participate in public affairs and facilitate the registration and
unhindered work of NGOs, including those focusing on human rights, as well as
the registration and functioning of opposition political parties (Czechia);
101.128 Increase its efforts in the prohibition of slavery and human
trafficking (Islamic Republic of Iran);
101.129 Continue efforts to comprehensively and effectively combat human
trafficking (Kazakhstan);
101.130 Introduce amendments to the Criminal Code to establish criminal
liability for trafficking in children, child prostitution and child pornography
(Kyrgyzstan);
101.131 Redouble efforts in its fight against trafficking in persons and other
related crimes (Nigeria);
101.132 Redouble its efforts to combat trafficking in women and children,
and ensure appropriate protection for victims through the assignment of
human and financial resources to the institutions responsible (Honduras);
101.133 Effectively implement the decision made on 8 August 2017 by the
Cabinet of Ministers and take further time-bound measures to combat all
forms of slavery and forced labour, namely in the cotton and silk sectors
(Portugal);
101.134 Punish all forms of trafficking in women and children (State of
Palestine);
101.135 Adopt a holistic approach in combating prostitution (State of
Palestine);
101.136 Continue its efforts to enable tangible progress in combating
trafficking in persons (Turkmenistan);
101.137 Enhance the laws on the protection of victims of human trafficking
and ensure that sanctions against those responsible for trafficking are tightened
(United Arab Emirates);
101.138 Continue to strengthen safeguards against the use of forced labour in
the cotton sector (Estonia);
101.139 End all forced labour, including by abolishing the quota system in the
cotton sector, and allow independent monitoring in this regard (Finland);
101.140 Continue cooperation with ILO on the fight against forced labour
(France);
101.141 Collaborate with ILO to end the systematic use of forced labour of
adults in the cotton sector, and develop a comprehensive plan to eliminate its
use (Canada);
101.142 Eradicate forced labour entirely, including in the cotton harvest
sector, through the effective enforcement of the legal framework prohibiting
forced labour and by holding those responsible for violations to account
(Netherlands);
101.143 Step up its efforts to improve working conditions in the cotton
production sector and strengthen safeguards against the use of forced labour,
particularly child labour (Slovenia);
101.144 Continue to work closely with international organizations to
eradicate the drivers of forced labour and ensure compliance with ILO
recommendations across all sectors (United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland);
101.145 End forced labour by ensuring the consistent implementation of new
labour protections, including by local governments (United States of America);
101.146 Take further steps to eradicate forced labour, in particular in the
cotton industry (Czechia);
101.147 Pursue efforts to provide support and protection to the family, the
natural and fundamental unit of society (Egypt);
101.148 Continue its efforts to further implement international labour
standards in the country through its established cooperation with ILO
(Maldives);
101.149 Continue its efforts to further reduce the gap between rural and
urban areas in the fields of education and health care (Democratic People’s
Republic of Korea);
101.150 Continue to promote economic and social sustainable development,
raise people’s standard of living and lay a solid foundation for the enjoyment of
all human rights by its people (China);
101.151 Continue to reinforce its successful social policies on access to
education and health, in particular for women and children, as well as its
successful programmes aimed at fostering employment, nutrition and
assistance for the most vulnerable in the fight against poverty and social
inequality (Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela);
101.152 Implement the action strategy on five priority areas of development
of the Republic of Uzbekistan by 2021 (Belarus);
101.153 Apply the action strategy on five priority areas of development for
2017–2021 (Cuba);
101.154 Adopt legal and political measures to improve access to
comprehensive sexual education inside and outside schools in order to increase
health-seeking behaviour with respect to sexuality, reproductive health and
HIV prevention, with particular emphasis on groups at risk, such as women
migrant workers, the rural population, drug users and sex workers
(Honduras);
101.155 Promote the right to health and to a clean environment of the people
in the Aral Sea area (Republic of Korea);
101.156 Continue strengthening the national human rights institution in full
conformity with the Paris Principles (Nepal);
101.157 Enhance its efforts to further expand the educational system for
various categories of the public, particularly for women and girls (Islamic
Republic of Iran);
101.158 Continue efforts to provide inclusive education to all children,
including those with special needs (Bulgaria);
101.159 Address corruption in the education system to ensure that all hidden
and/or informal costs are eliminated (Malaysia);
101.160 Endeavour to reduce the disparity between urban and rural areas in
the distribution of teachers in primary education (Portugal);
101.161 Strengthen efforts aimed at guaranteeing women’s rights, and protect
women more efficiently (Egypt);
101.162 Develop policies in order to eradicate forced sterilization and
improve contraception policies and policies on access to decent work for women
(Paraguay);
101.163 Promote the entry of women into the formal economy, and apply
legislation guaranteeing equal pay for work of equal value (Iceland);
101.164 Continue implementation of various policies on gender equality and
the protection of the rights of women, children and persons with disabilities
(India);
101.165 Continue to promote gender equality and to protect the rights of
women, children, persons with disabilities and other vulnerable groups
(China);
101.166 Take further legislative measures and continue public policies
designed to promote and protect the rights of women, and to facilitate their
empowerment (Bulgaria);
101.167 Adopt a law on equal rights and opportunities for men and women,
as well as a national plan of action on this topic (Kyrgyzstan);
101.168 Continue to assist and promote the advancement of women in society
(Lao People’s Democratic Republic);
101.169 Take necessary steps to attain gender parity in the higher education
system, and address barriers to non-traditional education and career paths for
girls and women in the country (Malaysia);
101.170 Adopt a comprehensive national action plan to promote gender
equality (Montenegro);
101.171 Continue efforts to promoting women’s empowerment and gender
equality (Nepal);
101.172 Redouble its efforts for the promotion and protection of women’s
rights, including measures to enhance their representation in leadership and
decision-making positions (Pakistan);
101.173 Take additional steps to achieve gender parity in higher education,
and overcome barriers to non-traditional education and career paths for girls
and women (Portugal);
101.174 Adopt a legal and regulatory framework that guarantees equal rights
for men and women, bringing the new laws into line with the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (Chile);
101.175 Invest in additional efforts to lower unemployment, in particular
among women, in the agricultural sector and for people of nomad groups
(Serbia);
101.176 Adopt new legislation on gender equality in line with the Convention
on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, and prepare
a comprehensive national action plan to promote gender equality and improve
the role of women in political, economic, public and other spheres of life
(Slovenia);
101.177 Take further steps to ensure gender equality in higher education
(State of Palestine);
101.178 Revise national legislation and adopt new laws in conformity with the
provisions of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
against Women, and develop a comprehensive national action plan for gender
promotion (Togo);
101.179 Harmonize gender equality to guarantee equal rights
(Turkmenistan);
101.180 Fully implement the recommendations of 2015 made by the
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, and pass laws
on gender equality and domestic violence that comply with the Convention on
the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland);
101.181 Take concrete measures to effectively combat gender-based violence,
particularly early marriage and domestic violence, throughout the country,
including in rural areas (Belgium);
101.182 Specifically define and prohibit sexual harassment in the workplace
(Iceland);
101.183 Take further steps to fight violence against women (Italy);
101.184 Adopt comprehensive measures to prevent and eliminate all forms of
violence against women and girls, including through relevant legislation
(Kyrgyzstan);
101.185 Accelerate the legislative reform envisaged to promote gender
equality and punish gender-based violence, and ratify the Council of Europe
Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and
Domestic Violence and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (Spain);
101.186 Adopt legislation on violence against women in line with international
norms and standards (Sweden);
101.187 Harmonize domestic legislation to incorporate the provisions of the
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
(Uruguay);
101.188 Legally define and include in the Criminal Code the crimes of
domestic violence and gender-based violence, taking into account sexual
orientation and gender identity (Uruguay);
101.189 Consider adopting specific legislation on prevention of and protection
against gender-based violence and domestic violence in compliance with
international human rights standards (Brazil);
101.190 Develop measures for the protection and recovery of and assistance
for children living and working in street situations, and prevent them from
becoming victims of trafficking and economic and sexual exploitation (Iceland);
101.191 Continue its efforts to promote and protect family values and the
rights of children, youth, women and older persons (Islamic Republic of Iran);
101.192 Consider developing a coherent national strategy for the protection of
vulnerable children, with an emphasis on the gradual transition from their
current placement in institutions to receiving family support services
(Bulgaria);
101.193 Encourage the effective implementation of the comprehensive
national mechanism for the protection of vulnerable children (Maldives);
101.194 Enact legislation explicitly prohibiting corporal punishment of
children in all settings, including at home (Montenegro);
101.195 Enhance efforts to protect the rights of children (Republic of Korea);
101.196 Introduce into domestic legislation a definition of the sale of children
(State of Palestine);
101.197 Strengthen policies on the protection of children, and take measures
to criminalize the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography
(Togo);
101.198 Continue measures to strengthen the mechanisms of protection of the
rights of persons with disabilities (Islamic Republic of Iran);
101.199 Continue to improve the support system for persons with disabilities
and to strengthen their rights and freedoms (Lao People’s Democratic
Republic);
101.200 Finalize the elaboration of and adopt a bill on the rights of persons
with disabilities that takes into account the provisions of the Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Russian Federation);
101.201 Pursue the efforts made to elaborate a law on persons with
disabilities (Saudi Arabia).
102. The recommendations formulated during the interactive dialogue/listed below
have been examined by Uzbekistan and have been noted by Uzbekistan:
102.1 Adopt legislation against discrimination based on gender, disability,
migration status, and sexual orientation and gender identity (Mexico);
102.2 Take the necessary measures to repeal from the Criminal Code the
criminalization of consensual sexual relations between persons of the same sex
(Argentina);
102.3 Combat any form of discrimination or violence against persons based
on their sexual orientation or gender identity, and repeal article 120 of the
Criminal Code, which criminalizes consensual sexual activities between adult
males (Iceland);
102.4 Consider repealing provisions that criminalize homosexuality (Italy);
102.5 Repeal legislation that criminalizes consensual same-sex conduct, and
adopt laws to prevent discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender
identity (Canada);
102.6 Combat violence and discrimination on all grounds, including on the
grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity, through the adoption of
comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation and by investigating and
prosecuting all acts of violence and discrimination (Netherlands);
102.7 Adopt legal measures to combat effectively all forms of
discrimination on all grounds, including sexual orientation and gender identity
(Honduras);
102.8 Punish discrimination and violence based on sexual orientation and
gender identity prejudices (Chile);
102.9 Repeal article 120 of the Criminal Code that criminalizes consensual
relationships between men, and take measures to alleviate the discrimination
against the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex community and to
investigate and punish acts of violence and so-called “hate crimes” (Spain);
102.10 Decriminalize consensual sexual relations between people of the same
sex, and combat stigmatization on the grounds of sexual orientation or gender
identity (Uruguay);
102.11 Eliminate, in law and in practice, all forms of discrimination,
including that based on sexual orientation or gender identity (Czechia).
103. All conclusions and/or recommendations contained in the present report reflect
the position of the submitting State(s) and/or the State under review. They should not
be construed as endorsed by the Working Group as a whole.
Annex
Composition of the delegation
The delegation of Uzbekistan was headed by H.E. Prof Akmal Saidov, Chairman of
the Committee of the Legislative Chamber of the Oliy Majlis (Parliament) on Democratic
Institutions, NGOs and Citizens’ self-government bodies, and composed of the following
members:
• Mr. Ulugbek Lapasov, Counsellor, Chargé d’affaires a.i., Permanent Mission of
Uzbekistan to the United Nations Office and other international organizations in
Geneva;
• Mr. Makhmud Istamov, Deputy Minister of Justice;
• Mr. Bakhrombek Adilov, Deputy Minister of Internal Affairs;
• Mr. Erkin Yuldashev, Deputy Prosecutor General;
• Mr. Dilmurod Kasimov, Authorized Person of the President to Protect the Rights
and Interests of Entrepeneurs, Business-Ombudsman;
• Mr. Gulyamjon Pirimkulov, Head of division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.