RES/19/3 Composition of staff of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

GE.12-12678

Human Rights Council Nineteenth session

Agenda item 2

Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner

for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the

High Commissioner and the Secretary-General

Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council*

19/3

Composition of staff of the Office of the United Nations High

Commissioner for Human Rights

The Human Rights Council,

Recalling paragraph 5 (g) of General Assembly resolution 60/251 of 15 March 2006,

in which the Assembly decided that the Human Rights Council should assume the role and

responsibilities of the Commission on Human Rights relating to the work of the Office of

the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, as decided by the Assembly in

its resolution 48/141 of 20 December 1993,

Taking note of all relevant resolutions on this issue adopted by the General

Assembly, the Commission on Human Rights and the Human Rights Council,

Taking note also of the report of the High Commissioner on the composition of the

staff of the Office of the High Commissioner,1

Recalling the reports of the Joint Inspection Unit on the follow-up to the

management review of the Office of the High Commissioner2 and on the funding and

staffing of the Office,JIU/REP/2007/8.

Bearing in mind that an imbalance in the composition of the staff could diminish the

effectiveness of the work of the Office of the High Commissioner if it is perceived to be

culturally biased and unrepresentative of the United Nations as a whole,

* The resolutions and decisions adopted by the Human Rights Council will be contained in the report of the Council on its nineteenth session (A/HRC/19/2), chap. I.

1 A/HRC/19/24.

2 A/59/65-E/2004/48 and Add.1

Reiterating its concern that, despite the repeated requests to correct the unbalanced

geographical distribution of the staff, the situation remains that one region accounts for

almost half of the posts of the Office of the High Commissioner,

Reaffirming the importance of continuing ongoing efforts to address the imbalance

regarding the regional representation of the staff of the Office of the High Commissioner,

including in the senior management positions,

Underlining that the paramount consideration for employing staff at every level is

the need for the highest standards of efficiency, competence and integrity, and taking into

account Article 101, paragraph 3, of the Charter of the United Nations, expressing its

conviction that this objective is compatible with the principle of equitable geographical

distribution,

Reaffirming that the Fifth Committee is the appropriate Main Committee of the

General Assembly entrusted with responsibilities for administrative and budgetary matters,

1. Expresses its serious concern at the fact that, despite the measures taken by

the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, the imbalance in

the geographical representation of its composition continues to be prominent, and that a

single region occupies almost half of the posts of the Office of the High Commissioner;

2. Welcomes the statement made by the High Commissioner in her report that

achieving geographical balance in the staff of her Office will remain one of her priorities,

and requests the High Commissioner to continue to take all measures needed to redress the

current imbalance in geographical distribution of the staff of the Office;

3. Notes the increase in the past four years in the percentage of staff from

regions identified as requiring better representation and the various measures proposed and

already taken to address the imbalance in geographical distribution of the staff, while

noting with concern the small increase in 2011 and no change in the status of the prominent

region, and stresses the need to implement additional measures to redress the prominent

imbalance in a more expeditious way;

4. Takes note of the progress achieved in improving the geographic diversity of

the staff of the Office, and takes note also of the commitment of the High Commissioner to

remain attentive to the need to maintain the emphasis on the broadest possible geographic

diversity of her Office, as stated in the conclusion of her report;

5. Requests the High Commissioner to work on the broadest geographical

diversity of her staff by enhancing the implementation of measures to achieve a better

representation of countries and regions that are unrepresented or underrepresented,

particularly from the developing world, while considering applying a zero-growth cap on

the representation of countries and regions already overrepresented in the Office of the

High Commissioner;

6. Welcomes the efforts made towards the achievement of a gender balance in

the composition of the staff and the decision to continue to pay special attention to this

issue;

7. Requests future High Commissioners to continue to enhance the ongoing

efforts made in the fulfilment of the goal of a geographical balance in the composition of

the staff of the Office;

8. Underlines the importance of continuing to promote geographical diversity in

recruitment and promotion to high-level and Professional posts, including senior managers,

as a principle of the staffing policies of the Office of the High Commissioner;

9. Affirms the vital importance of geographical balance in the composition of

the staff of the Office of the High Commissioner, taking into account the significance of

national and regional specificities and various historic, cultural and religious backgrounds,

as well as of different political, economic and legal systems, to the promotion and

protection of the universality of human rights;

10. Recalls the provisions contained in section X, paragraph 3, of General

Assembly resolution 55/258 of 14 June 2001, on human resources management, in which

the Assembly reiterated its request to the Secretary-General to increase further his efforts to

improve the composition of the Secretariat by ensuring a wide and equitable geographical

distribution of staff in all departments, and also recalls the request that he submit to the

General Assembly proposals for a comprehensive review of the system of desirable ranges,

with a view to establishing a more effective tool to ensure equitable geographical

distribution in relation to the total number of staff of the Secretariat;

11. Encourages the General Assembly to consider further measures to promote

desirable ranges of geographical balance in the staff of the Office of the High

Commissioner representing national and regional specificities and various historic, cultural

and religious backgrounds, as well as the diversity of political, economic and legal systems;

12. Welcomes the increase in the human and financial resources allocated to the

activities of the Office of the High Commissioner and the impact it should have on the

geographic composition of the Office;

13. Recognizes the importance of the follow-up to and implementation of

General Assembly resolution 61/159 of 19 December 2006, and underlines the priority

importance that the Assembly continue to provide support and guidance to the High

Commissioner in the ongoing process of improvement of the geographical balance in the

composition of the staff of the Office of the High Commissioner;

14. Requests the High Commissioner to submit a comprehensive and updated

report to the Human Rights Council at its twenty-second session, in accordance with its

annual programme of work, following the structure and scope of her report and with a

special focus on further measures taken to correct the imbalance in the geographical

composition of the staff of the Office.

52nd session

22 March 2012

[Adopted by a recorded vote of 33 to 12, with 2 abstentions. The voting was as follows:

In favour:

Angola, Bangladesh, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, China,

Costa Rica, Cuba, Djibouti, Ecuador, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Jordan,

Kuweit, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritania, Mauritius,

Mexico, Nigeria, Peru, Philippines, Qatar, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia,

Senegal, Thailand, Uganda, Uruguay

Against:

Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Hungary, Italy, Norway, Poland,

Republic of Moldova, Romania, Spain, Switzerland, United States of

America

Abstaining:

Chile, Congo]