RES/19/32 Human rights and unilateral coercive measures
Document Type: Final Resolution
Date: 2012 Apr
Session: 19th Regular Session (2012 Feb)
Agenda Item: Item3: Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development
Topic: International Human Rights System
-
- In Favour
- Angola
- Bangladesh
- Benin
- Botswana
- Burkina Faso
- Cameroon
- Chile
- China
- Congo
- Costa Rica
- Cuba
- Djibouti
- Ecuador
- Guatemala
- India
- Indonesia
- Jordan
- Kuwait
- Kyrgyzstan
- Libya
- Malaysia
- Maldives
- Mauritania
- Mauritius
- Mexico
- Nigeria
- Peru
- Philippines
- Qatar
- Russian Federation
- Saudi Arabia
- Senegal
- Thailand
- Uganda
- Uruguay
GE.12- 13117
Human Rights Council Nineteenth session
Agenda item 3
Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil,
political, economic, social and cultural rights,
including the right to development
Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council*
19/32
Human rights and unilateral coercive measures
The Human Rights Council,
Recalling the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations,
Recalling also all previous resolutions on human rights and unilateral coercive
measures adopted by the Commission on Human Rights, the Human Rights Council and the
General Assembly,
Reaffirming Human Rights Council resolution 15/24 of 1 October 2010 and General
Assembly resolution 66/156 of 19 December 2011,
Stressing that unilateral coercive measures and legislation are contrary to
international law, international humanitarian law, the Charter and the norms and principles
governing peaceful relations among States,
Recognizing the universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated character of
all human rights and, in this regard, reaffirming the right to development as a universal and
inalienable right and an integral part of all human rights,
Expressing its concern at the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on
human rights, development, international relations, trade, investment and cooperation,
Recognizing that unilateral coercive measures in the form of economic sanctions can
have far-reaching implications for the human rights of the general population of targeted
States, disproportionately affecting the poor and the most vulnerable classes,
Recognizing also that long-term unilateral coercive measures may result in social
problems and raise humanitarian concerns in the States targeted,
* The resolutions and decisions adopted by the Human Rights Council will be contained in the report of
the Council on its nineteenth session (A/HRC/19/2), chap. I.
Recalling the final document of the fifteenth summit of the Heads of State and
Government of the Non-Aligned Movement, held in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, in July 2009,
in which the States members of the Movement decided to oppose unilateralism and
unilaterally-imposed measures by certain States, which can lead to the erosion and violation
of the Charter and international law, the use and threat of use of force and pressure and
coercive measures as a means to achieving their national policy objectives, and to support,
in accordance with international law, the claim of affected States, including targeted States,
to compensation for damage incurred as a consequence of the implementation of
extraterritorial or unilateral coercive measures or laws,
Recalling also that the World Conference on Human Rights, held in Vienna from 14
to 25 June 1993, called upon States to refrain from any unilateral measure not in
accordance with international law and the Charter and that created obstacles to trade
relations among States and impeded the full realization of all human rights, and that also
severely threatened the freedom of trade,
Deeply concerned that, despite the resolutions adopted on this issue by the General
Assembly, the Human Rights Council, the Commission on Human Rights and at United
Nations conferences held in the 1990s and at their five-year reviews, and contrary to norms
of international law and the Charter, unilateral coercive measures continue to be
promulgated, implemented and enforced by, inter alia, resorting to war and militarism, with
all their negative implications for the social-humanitarian activities and economic and
social development of developing countries, including their extraterritorial effects, thereby
creating additional obstacles to the full enjoyment of all human rights by peoples and
individuals under the jurisdiction of other States,
Reaffirming that unilateral coercive measures are a major obstacle to the
implementation of the Declaration on the Right to Development,
Recalling article 1, paragraph 2, common to the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,
which provides that, inter alia, in no case may a people be deprived of its own means of
subsistence,
1. Calls upon all States to stop adopting or implementing unilateral coercive
measures not in accordance with international law, international humanitarian law, the
Charter of the United Nations and the norms and principles governing peaceful relations
among States, in particular those of a coercive nature with extraterritorial effects, which
create obstacles to trade relations among States, thus impeding the full realization of the
rights set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human
rights instruments, in particular the right of individuals and peoples to development;
2. Strongly objects to the extraterritorial nature of those measures which, in
addition, threaten the sovereignty of States and, in this context, calls upon all Member
States neither to recognize these measures nor to apply them, and to take effective
administrative or legislative measures, as appropriate, to counteract the extraterritorial
application or effects of unilateral coercive measures;
3. Condemns the continued unilateral application and enforcement by certain
powers of such measures as tools of political or economic pressure against any country,
particularly against developing countries, with a view to preventing these countries from
exercising their right to decide, of their own free will, their own political, economic and
social systems;
4. Reiterates its call upon Member States that have initiated such measures to
abide by the principles of international law, the Charter, the declarations of the United
Nations and world conferences and relevant resolutions, and to commit themselves to their
obligations and responsibilities arising from the international human rights instruments to
which they are parties by putting an immediate end to such measures;
5. Reaffirms, in this context, the right of all peoples to self-determination, by
virtue of which they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their own
economic, social and cultural development;
6. Also reaffirms its opposition to any attempt aimed at the partial or total
disruption of the national unity and territorial integrity of a State, which is incompatible
with the Charter;
7. Recalls that, according to the Declaration on Principles of International Law
concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the
Charter of the United Nations, and to the relevant principles and provisions contained in the
Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, proclaimed by the General Assembly in
its resolution 3281 (XXIX) of 12 December 1974, in particular article 32 thereof, no State
may use or encourage the use of economic, political or any other type of measure to coerce
another State in order to obtain from it the subordination of the exercise of its sovereign
rights and to secure from it advantages of any kind;
8. Reaffirms that essential goods, such as food and medicines, should not be
used as tools for political coercion and that under no circumstances should people be
deprived of their own means of subsistence and development;
9. Underlines the fact that unilateral coercive measures are one of the main
obstacles to the implementation of the Declaration on the Right to Development and, in this
regard, calls upon all States to avoid the unilateral imposition of economic coercive
measures and the extraterritorial application of domestic laws that run counter to the
principles of free trade and hamper the development of developing countries;
10. Rejects all attempts to introduce unilateral coercive measures, as well as the
increasing trend in this direction, including through the enactment of laws with
extraterritorial application, which are not in conformity with international law;
11. Recognizes that the Declaration of Principles, adopted at the first phase of the
World Summit on the Information Society, held in Geneva in December 2003, strongly
urges States to avoid and refrain from any unilateral measure in building the information
society;
12. Invites all special rapporteurs and existing thematic mechanisms of the
Human Rights Council in the field of economic, social and cultural rights to pay due
attention, within the scope of their respective mandates, to the negative impact and
consequences of unilateral coercive measures;
13. Decides to give due consideration to the negative impact of unilateral
coercive measures in its task concerning the implementation of the right to development;
14. Requests the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, in
discharging her functions in relation to the promotion and protection of human rights, to
pay due attention and give urgent consideration to the present resolution;
15. Takes note of the thematic study prepared by the Office of the High
Commissioner on the impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human
rights* including recommendations on actions aimed at ending such measures;
16. Requests the Office of the High Commissioner:
* A/HRC/19/33.
(a) To organizes, prior to the twenty-third session of the Human Rights Council,
a workshop on the various aspects relating to the impact of the application of unilateral
coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights by the affected populations in the
States targeted, with the participation of States, academic experts and civil society
representatives;
(b) To prepare a report on the proceedings of the workshop and to submit it to
the Human Rights Council at its twenty-third session;
17. Decides to examine this question in accordance with its annual programme of
work under the same agenda item.
55th meeting
23 March 2012
[Adopted by a recorded vote of 35 to 12, with no abstentions. The voting was as follows:
In favour:
Angola, Bangladesh, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chile,
China, Congo, Costa Rica, Cuba, Djibouti, Ecuador, Guatemala, India,
Indonesia, Jordan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Malaysia, Maldives,
Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Nigeria, Peru, Philippines, Qatar, Russian
Federation, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Thailand, Uganda, Uruguay
Against:
Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Hungary, Italy, Norway, Poland,
Republic of Moldova, Romania, Spain, Switzerland, United States of
America]